Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11886988 times)

NickZ · « **Reply #4020 on:** January 25, 2014, 02:06:27 AM »

Verpiers and All:
Crackpots are welcome... Where would we be without them...
Even Tesla was a little off, at times.

I know the feeling of "seeing is believing", but also, "Believing is Seeing."

I'm still trying to wrap my head around how a solid state device, can do what spinning magnets and coils do. And how to replicate that effect, but without using the normal hot shocking electricity or normal grid currents.
I feel that the gravitational field(s) are where the mistery may lie, as that area has been mostly unexplored. Magnetic fields, are not the same as "gravitational fields".
Which are also much different from thermo-nuclear, or alfa/beta and other types of radiations. Even such as infra-red or heat/to energy generation, wind, solar, hydro, etz... that many of us already know well.
But, what about gravitational fields...
Well, I for one don't buy the term or idea of "gravity", in the first place. As the actual force in any vortex or planetary vortex field is from the outside towards the inside. And (towards the center), and out both the N and S poles. And not a pull from the center, as is still being taught in schools. This is not small matter, even though the apple still will fall on ones head, it is being pushed down, not pulled down.
Any way, think about it. Let me know what you think about these "gravitational fields", and their possible use with our devices.
There may be more there, than currently meets the eye.
Unfortunately, we may not be able to properly measure these waves yet, in all their diversity... Or can we?

NickZ

verpies · « **Reply #4021 on:** January 25, 2014, 02:55:44 AM »

Quote from: NickZ on January 25, 2014, 02:06:27 AM

Magnetic fields, are not the same as "gravitational fields".

Of course not.
"Gravitational fields" are spatial manifestations of 3D temporal motions.
"Magnetic fields" are spatial manifestations of 2D temporal motions.
"Electric fields" are spatial manifestations of 1D temporal motions.

NickZ · « **Reply #4022 on:** January 25, 2014, 04:23:25 AM »

Yes, well there may also be more to the old and current "gravitational field model", as is still being explained by such as Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_field

But, the main thing is how to tap these gravitational fields and extract some useful energy from them.
We may be barking up the wrong tree, as far as looking for free energy in the same old places, when it's all around us, all the time. If we only knew more about how to make use of them, and the possibilities of exploiting Dark Gravity, as well. Dark Gravity???

magpwr · « **Reply #4023 on:** January 25, 2014, 04:55:27 AM »

hi everyone,

I have uploaded a video into youtube on how i convert 1 watt of battery power using just(1xAA Li-ion 3.9volts x 0.26Amps to efficient hv circuit)which is converted to HV first then down convert into high current converter which i demonstrate the sparking via the big induction coil from the output of CW/CCW coil.Do hear the sound of sparking made on my screw driver.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxkZKfR9sSk

Please take note this is not "ou" device yet.There is still room for improvement.I had listed component used in video.

NickZ · « **Reply #4024 on:** January 25, 2014, 07:35:20 AM »

All:
I've been asked to upload this link to the thread, so here it is for your scrutiny.

http://s019.radikal.ru/i606/1401/de/4d01f890ea35.png

a.king21 · « **Reply #4025 on:** January 25, 2014, 09:57:20 AM »

Verpies: Can you check the maths in this patent:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=GB&NR=2432463A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=&date=20070523&DB=&locale=en_EP

This could be one of Kapanadze's secrets.

verpies · « **Reply #4026 on:** January 25, 2014, 01:08:05 PM »

Quote from: a.king21 on January 25, 2014, 09:57:20 AM

Verpies: Can you check the maths in this patent:

If you mean this:

Quote

...if the three-electrode capacitor has two sections of equal capacitance C and a the d.c. voltage across the inner and outer electrodes is 2V, a change v in voltage of the central electrode will increment the total electrical energy of the capacitor from 2(CV2/2) to C(V+v)212 plus C(V-v)2/2, which is greater than 2(CV212) by the amount Cv2

Then this quote seems to have severe OCR errors. I can guess that the author meant:
"from 2(CV²/2) to [ C(V+v)²/2 ] + [ C(V-v)²/2 ], which is greater than 2(CV²/2) by the amount Cv²"
...where the factor "2" in blue, appears because there are two capacitor sections in the device.

As such this math is correct, however note that mathematical correctness does not guarantee conceptual correctness.

d3x0r · « **Reply #4027 on:** January 25, 2014, 01:10:40 PM »

Quote from: verpies on January 25, 2014, 01:08:05 PM

If you mean this:Then this quote seems to have severe OCR errors. I can guess that the author meant:
"from 2(CV²/2) to C(V+v)²/2 plus C(V-v)²/2, which is greater than 2(CV²/2) by the amount Cv²"
...where the factor "2" in red appears because there are two capacitor sections in the device.

This is GB2390941; which is referenced as 'the prior device'

http://exvacuo.free.fr/Sciences/Brevets/GB2390941%20-%20H%20Aspden%20-%20Electricity%20generating%20apparatus.pdf

a.king21 · « **Reply #4028 on:** January 25, 2014, 01:19:47 PM »

Aspden: I wondered if his patent made sense.
I've just had a long conversation with DL who knew him well.
He tells me that Aspden was a skilled Patent lawyer as well as a brilliant
electrical engineer. There's unfortunately no guarantee that the device was
ever built by Aspden.
Pity.

d3x0r · « **Reply #4029 on:** January 25, 2014, 02:31:19 PM »

Regarding the building of this device mentioned in the last 2 patents.

2 cylindrical electrodes without a solid dielectric;
from playing with electrostatics, 2000 volts will jump a short gap between metal through air... and if the cylinders are not smooth, (mine are roughed because I took the paint coat off) the ridges will be extra (cathodic?) and short the gap ... well the inner rod can be prickly (positive potential) but then I have this lip on the other side of what I was going to have...
then comes the ridge at the end of the capacitor; without a bead of solid dielectric , it will short out the edges there....

I've seen this idea so many times in various iterations; the concetric capacitor plates I was going to use were the iron core and rod casing from leedskalnin client magnets... but that gap is wide... its something like 50-300pf... and the gap is like 2.5mm maybe more... which is only good for like 250V?

Again no specific dimensions... how far should the outside be gapped? I do have some aluminum sheet rolls that can be concentric-ized..
in the second patent he mentions the inner shoould be elongated ( stick out of the ends of the inner)

should be able to have a 3 plate capacitor, charge the middle (and remove the charge source.... if it's not tooo leaky itself, it's like a vaccuum chamber, removing the feed line...) and short the outer plates with an inductor, and see if stimulating it with an occasional short pulse would make it resonante/pulse.....

d3x0r · « **Reply #4030 on:** January 25, 2014, 03:25:29 PM »

Could just as easily be made from a dry cell (HHO) dry, with end plate grounded,other end on high voltage, and the middle connected through and inductor to another cell wired the same way.. and to the center again (for the patent verpies was akeda bout... GB2432463

or smiilarly with the original invention... but it's the geometry of the capacitance too; bleh nevermind

Farmhand · « **Reply #4031 on:** January 25, 2014, 04:10:50 PM »

Quote from: T-1000 on January 24, 2014, 10:08:20 PM

@verpies
I was curious why conventional mind got involved into unconventional approaches and you just answer to my question

@Farmhand
Nice to see you posting on forum again and I followed your videos in youtube. Just curious what brought you back on track as you was heading away from OU research direction..

P.S. I am away from experimenting at the moment as there are other life stuff to manage but soil be back to experimenting soon as I can.

Thanks T1000, I have been quite unwell with spine damage problems which did preclude me from experimenting for some time. I have been working hard to recover and have made some progress through sheer will power and tenacity, with the medical system broken to get some help is almost impossible.

Anyway I see potential in the Coler, Kunel and the Gary devices ect. I think there could be an avenue to exploit there. So I am trying to make something happen, maybe a revelation will strike me as I work. In saying that I think the same avenue exists in some other devices as well. What seems likely in theory, is sometimes almost impossible to realize in practice though. That won't stop me trying.

I'm making some errors as I get back into it, but I can take a mistake without flaying myself so it's ok I guess.

Cheers

Presently I am a bit stalled on an information intake overload problem. Short on head Watts. hehehe

..

ctbenergy · « **Reply #4032 on:** January 26, 2014, 12:54:59 AM »

Quote from: a.king21 on January 25, 2014, 01:19:47 PM

Aspden: I wondered if his patent made sense.
I've just had a long conversation with DL who knew him well.
He tells me that Aspden was a skilled Patent lawyer as well as a brilliant
electrical engineer. There's unfortunately no guarantee that the device was
ever built by Aspden.
Pity.

TheOldScientist "The Liquid Crystal Aether by Harold Aspden"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mR4u9iu2Cvs

Ed morbus · « **Reply #4033 on:** January 26, 2014, 10:44:43 PM »

Free Energy ?

Khwartz · « **Reply #4034 on:** January 26, 2014, 11:32:36 PM »

@All

Hi! I just come back for a short time just to inform you all that you have all you need on Overubity.com now, to test for yourself the already proven Richard Vialle's overunity device: his "Autogenerator" (Autogénérateur" in French).

http://www.overunity.com/12639/richard-vialles-new-theory-about-negative-mass-and-overunity/90/#.UuWJj8tKHqA

You may have a look too on this thread of Conspirovniscience.com where you can access in English and communicate in English too with great experienced experimenters and Pascuser to discuss the physics and know more about Richard's theory:

http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1504&st=30&#entry43360

Note: Skills in professional electronics are very in demand for the more advanced experiments to produce at will the 6 kW the 1 m long "bar" should produce according to the theory.

Good experiments!

Best regards, Khwartz.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11886988 times)

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

magpwr

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

a.king21

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

d3x0r

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

a.king21

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

d3x0r

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

d3x0r

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Farmhand

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

ctbenergy

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Ed morbus

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Khwartz

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY