Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Goal of overunity  (Read 6527 times)

anthonymag

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Goal of overunity
« on: February 15, 2012, 11:31:14 PM »
I'm a newbie here, but with the research I've done so far, I've found the goal of the projects here and elsewhere to achieve  power generating systems (or motors) that attempt to operate in overunity seem to get close, but lack the funding or physics to achieve the intended goals.  Granted I have many hours of reading to do here, yet this device http://www.rexresearch.com/kawai/1kawai.htm or perhaps this device http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDeXTXYFKAY driven by this device http://bourke-engine.com/ani.htm fueled by this device http://www.rexresearch.com/pantone/pantone.htm seems like it may work very efficiently at every subsystem and at overunity overall.  Any thoughts?
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Goal of overunity
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2012, 01:38:47 AM »
I have thoughts.
 :o

For the "thrust-drag" axis, you can substitute "overunity-underunity" if you like.
Logged

anthonymag

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Goal of overunity
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2012, 01:35:50 PM »
It looks like the graph is a pictoral representation of the argument negating the possiblity of OU.  Is that correct?
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Goal of overunity
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2012, 02:16:51 PM »
No, that's not correct. The graph is a comparison between what OU researchers would _like to happen_ and what _actually happens_.
You get some encouraging result, you improve your apparatus, and your result gets a little more encouraging... so you improve your apparatus by a factor of 10 and your result gets more encouraging.... by a factor of 5........ lather rinse repeat.
This happens many times because those researchers are "barking up the wrong tree", by spending their efforts on schemes that _cannot possibly work_. Usually this is because they have not grasped some fundamental fact of nature, or are making simple (or not so simple) errors in their math or logical reasoning.

It's a graph of what will happen to _you_ if you take your several non-working technologies and try to string them together into a working one.

But don't let me discourage you from wasting your time. Everyone knows I'm a pseudoskeptic and paid debunker. Just because my devices, like the TinselKoil or the various static machines that I make, are closer to being OU than just about any others you will see on this site..... don't let that fool you into taking me seriously.
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Goal of overunity
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2012, 02:23:12 PM »
Sorry... I must have woken up on the wrong side of the floor this morning. That's what I get for reading RA's posts before breakfast.

What I mean to say is that there is a tremendous waste of great talent and creativity that happens when people spend their time on things like "gravity motors" or "permanent magnet only" types of devices, or inductive kickback phenomena like Bedini motors or Ainslie circuits, or buoyancy drives or Pyramid Power, or many other things we see here on Stefan's site. We are surrounded by a sea -- several seas, actually -- of real, concentrated energy, but nobody is going to be able to "get their feet wet" in these seas until and unless they understand the basics of what we _do_ know about the world. There are edges and cracks in our understanding, but if you don't know what the solid ground looks like, you'll just wind up falling into the mud and getting stuck.
Logged

anthonymag

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Goal of overunity
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2012, 07:04:34 PM »
Incomplete understanding, or the belief thereof, is what leads to new findings either through persistence or luck or both, in any field of study.  Exploiting the Bloch Wall is an example.  It's nothing new of course, but this powergenerating device http://panacea-bocaf.org/energybymotion.htm which appears to have documented certification tests here http://www.gammamanager.com/certific.html sounds like it may be using electromagnetic phenomena associated with the Bloch Wall and/or the Neel Wall, although I need to do a little more investigation.  This video is certainely compelling, but with anything you read or see on the internet, proof is in the science.  That is my whole point in posting.  OU users are all wanting to get the same goal accomplished, overunity.  That generator is documented doing so.  Of course we cannot verify the science ourselves with that same unit, but we can build our own smaller scale version hence,  http://www.rexresearch.com/kawai/1kawai.htm.  There are cracks, let's find them.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »