Rosemary,

I CAN"T WAIT FOR MY ATTORNEY TO CLIMB UP YOU SKINNY ASS WITH A HUGE LIBEL LAWSUIT AND GIVES YOU WHAT YOU DESERVE !!!! 

As TK puts it 'BRING IT ON'.  Unlike him I mean it.  It would suit my purposes ideally.  On so many levels.  There is nothing I'd enjoy more.  And I'll happily supply your attorney with an address to serve those papers.  No need to wait.  I'll expect those papers within the next few days.  And I'll PM you an address for serving them.

As TK puts it 'BRING IT ON'.  Unlike him I mean it.  It would suit my purposes ideally.  On so many levels.  There is nothing I'd enjoy more.  And I'll happily supply your attorney with an address to serve those papers.  No need to wait.  I'll expect those papers within the next few days.  And I'll PM you an address for serving them.

Rosemary,

Don't bother sending me anything I've have enough, including your address for year.

I must thank you Rosemary, for all the slanderous remarks from you that appear in one location, it made it much easier to compile everything with the evidence in the "PDF's" that were posted in my defense, for your continued bashing of myself and others. I cannot believe the downloads of these PDF documents of 100% verifiable facts and truth in MY defense. Your a joke to put it mildly.

This may be a "CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT" with many parties involved, filed in Cape Town, South Africa.

This will have to be done all with "VIDEO" depositions from those involved with the suit ( for court viewing only ) plus experts, in each a field of the libel dispute against you.

Like I said earlier you have sealed your own fate with your posts here that cannot be changed by you in a quick EDIT.

OH .... AND YOU "BROUGHT THIS ON" NOT ME !!!! 

BUT THIS IS ALL ABOUT "YOU" !!!!


 

Hello guys,

I've just seen this post by TK.  He seems to think that I lack either the resources or the motivations to address these questions in a Court of Law.  For the record.  I do not know that there is ever any value in resolving anything at all this way. In fact I'm not sure that either party is ever satisfied.  On the face of it one expects Justice to be done.  But the outcome from any Court ruling is always subject to vagaries - that it would take a really brave punter to put money on which side the rulings are likely to fall.  However.  It would be required - at some stage - that our experimental evidence is brought to the table.  I would then be obliged to demonstrate the claim - either COP>17, COP>4 or - God forbid - COP INFINITY.  I would certainly put money on it that any such public demonstration would likely rivet the attention of some very interested parties who may not be happy with this proof.  And by the same token it would more than likely come to the attention of the wider public that any such claim even exists.   That the potential exists where one could actually decouple from the stranglehold of our utility suppliers.  Frankly I would welcome that publicity.  I suspect it would achieve considerably more than I've managed on these forums.   

So.  When TK writes this - then INDEED...

Just remember this, Rosemary : You are going to have to PROVE your contentions -- all of them -- in a court of law, if you really decide to pursue this.
 
 25.6 million Joules, over 4200 continuous Watts, into 900 ml water in 100 minutes. Are you quite sure that's the truth? I think the mathematics skills of a college educated lawyer-judge will likely trump yours, especially when the expert witnesses are called in to testify.

People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Not only would I be happy to defend this action - I would welcome it.  Actually I'm not rich.  But I've set aside a little bit of money to see this kind of action through - either as a claimant or defendant.  And I suspect that this would certainly result in exactly the opportunity that is denied on these forums.  Here no-one is prepared to be fully accountable.  But in Court one one can only be fully accountable.  In the same way, here all can deny the evidence.  But in Court no-one will be able to.  Why then would I resist a court action?

And guys.  There's a lot riding on this issue.  Our trolls have gone to some considerable lengths to allege that our claim is fraudulent - that my character is indefensible.  Then.  Let me defend them both.  Because it is impossible to manage this on a forum where denial of the evidence together with unacceptable libelous indulgence seems to be encouraged.  And no demands for accountability are made other than on the victim.  Which is particularly sad because you must bear in mind that there is actually only one victim here.  That's experimental proof of a breach in our unity barriers that really needs to be salvaged.  And for that I'll invest.  Both time and money. Gladly.

As ever, regards,
Rosemary

So.  Yes indeed Glen Lettenmaier.  I will PM you the address where you can serve those papers of yours.  I should have an address by no later than 10.00 a.m. which is in about 5 hours from now.  And I will advise everyone here when those papers actually get served.  And I'll advise you all of the claims in those papers.  It should be fun.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie Posie

Rosemary cannot read ..... she is to busy banging on the key board ignoring any posts just going off the wall like a child kicking their feet on the floor.

I will do this on "MY" time frame "NOT" yours ..... read the statement ( Reply #1294 ) it cannot be clearer. I do not need anything from you, no telling what would be inside coming from you.

Things like this happen to people like you that type things in public for all to see, that if said to anyone face to face not hiding behind a computer screen some may get very mad at a minimum. So get over it darlin I'd be more concerned with the plagiarizing of Figure 12a in the International Rectifier IRFPG50 Data sheet ( irfpg50.pdf ) you stole and redrew it as your invented NERD RAT - 12 MARCH 2011 DEMONSTRATION of the COP>INFINITY DEVICE CIRCUIT.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316142/#msg316142   Reply #1294 on: Today at 01:55:31 PM


This may be a "CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT" with many parties involved, filed in Cape Town, South Africa.

This will have to be done all with "VIDEO" depositions from those involved with the suit ( for court viewing only ) plus experts, in each a field of the libel dispute against you.

Like I said earlier you have sealed your own fate with your posts here that cannot be changed by you in a quick EDIT.

OH .... AND YOU "BROUGHT THIS ON" NOT ME !!!! 

BUT THIS IS ALL ABOUT "YOU" !!

Glen Lettenmaier,

If you didn't understand me the first time round - hopefully this will do the trick.  I am MORE than happy to defend both my good name and this technology in any court of law.  I will assist to the extent of giving you an address where you may serve your papers.  And I would be delighted to have this matter finally resolved.  More so as it will likely need some experimental proof of our claims.  And frankly - I LONG to put that evidence forward.  It will be a triumph for over unity. And that will be wonderful.  Even if I'm obliged to pick up the 'tab'. 

Franky I'm enormously grateful for this.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie Pose. 

I'm just going to switch Rosemary's circuit over to a relatively straightforward physical model in case it gives some people insight.  This may help some people understand how Rosermary's claim is a nonsense claim.  It's amazing how Rosemary clings steadfast to the point of view that her measurements with the DSO are beyond reproach.  It's just as equally amazing that she refuses all other proposed measurements when a good scientist would welcome alternative measurement proposals.

If the battery draw-down test is ever done then it will prove Rosemary wrong.  So she is walking quite confidently into a big surprise for her, and not a surprise for just about everyone else.

Here is the physical model for Rosemary's latest setup:

We can equate voltage to water pressure.  This makes good intuitive sense, because many people already think of voltage putting 'pressure' on a resistor to force current through the resistor.

We can equate current flow to water flow, simple enough.

Lets' say one pound of water pressure per square inch is like one volt.  Let's say one liter per minute of water flow is like one amp.  I know that I am mixing English and Metric units but what the hey.  Let's assume that Rosemary's setup has six batteries for 72 volts.

So, imagine a long metal pipe, say about 30 feet long, and there is a valve at the end of the pipe.  The pipe then empties into a big bucket.  The valve is controlled by a solenoid that is controlled by a 555 timer.   The valve opens very briefly then closes, and this takes place at 60 cycles per second.   The pipe is being fed by a water pressure source at 72 PSI.

You can envision something like this:  You hear the solenoid making a 60 Hz buzzing sound, and you see that when the valve opens there is a brief spray of water that goes into the bucket.  It's almost like one of those pulsing shower heads.

Whenever the valve closes there is a brief spike of high pressure in the pipe due to the 'hydraulic shock' effect.  That spike of water pressure is due to the fact that when the valve is opened, the water starts to flow.  The water has mass and therefore it has some momentum.  It's the momentum of the moving water that causes the spike in water pressure when the valve closes.  This should be sounding familiar to some of you.  This is equivalent to the inductance in the wires in Rosie's circuit and the associated voltage spike.

So, with a long pipe of water fed by a water pressure source at 72 PSI, and a chattering solenoid-driven actuator valve letting the water flow into the bucket in pulses, most people with basic common sense know that the bucket will slowly fill with water.

That's a very good analogy to what is happening in Rosemary's circuit.  Little bursts of current flow through the MOSFET switch when the "valve opens."

So if you can transpose your common sense about water flowing through a pipe to your common sense that's telling you that current is flowing through Rosemary's circuit - then you have solved the puzzle.

Again, I must stress that this is not a "coincidence" or a "pie in the sky" idea that sounds similar to what Rosie is doing, it is literally a very good approximation of what Rosie is doing.

You know the bucket is going to fill up with water and you know that Rosemary's circuit is going to drain the batteries.  There is no 'COP infinity,' the REAL WORLD is what is real.

MileHigh

Hello MileHigh

I'm afraid I've not bothered to read your post as I suspect you're punting some physics that is now outdated by our experimental evidence.  But for the record - I intend having that protocol evaluated by some experts in power engineering.  And I will, most assuredly, rest on their advices.  Unless - of course - you yourself are an expert in power engineering.  In which case you too must disclose your full name and your accreditation.

Kindest regards MileHigh.  I'm always intrigued by your persistence.  It nearly matches my own.
Rosie Pose - eo ... as you put it.