Author Topic: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained) (Read 91641 times)

gravityblock · « **Reply #60 on:** January 30, 2011, 04:22:16 PM »

Tempest,

Your idea may work. I doubt Znidarsic hit the correct frequencies in his plasma experiments. We need to make sure we're not over-looking something. This is a good start IMO.

GB

gravityblock · « **Reply #61 on:** January 30, 2011, 08:04:48 PM »

Below is a quote on page 14 from a publication titled, "Anomalous Heat Generation during Hydrogenation of Carbon (Phenanthrene)," http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTanomaloushb.pdf

Quote from: MizunoTanomaloushb

With this technique, unlike electrochemical cold fusion, there is no electrolysis power or other
direct input power. The only input is to the heater, so once high-temperature triggers a reaction,
all of the anomalous heat is self-sustaining. The reaction could be sustained without electricity
by insulating the cell to maintain the temperature, but this would make it difficult to control the
temperature.

GB

gravityblock · « **Reply #62 on:** January 31, 2011, 11:13:30 AM »

LENR is not cold fusion, it uses the weak nucleur force, http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10230.msg272847#msg272847

This is the real deal. It's mainstream now. Lets get busy to replicate.

GB

gravityblock · « **Reply #63 on:** January 31, 2011, 12:51:59 PM »

Quote from: fznidarsic on January 28, 2011, 06:48:44 PM

I don't know, but I hope to play a small part in this unfolding story.
Time will tell, however, I want things to happen fast as I am getting old.

Frank Znidarsic

Znidarsic,

Here's your opportunity to play a small part in this unfolding story. Please extend your model from the quantum world to the molecular or macroscopic world in regards to the molecular orbitals, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital

A molecular orbital (MO) can specify the electron configuration of a molecule: the spatial distribution and energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). Most commonly an MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in qualitative or very approximate usage. They are invaluable in providing a simple model of bonding in molecules, understood through molecular orbital theory.

Some properties:

1.) The number of molecular orbitals is equal to the number of atomic orbitals included in the linear expansion, <----- I've already posted information about this linear expansion in regards to Phonon Resonance.

2.) If the molecule has some symmetry, the degenerate atomic orbitals (with the same atomic energy) are grouped in linear combinations (called symmetry adapted atomic orbitals (SO)) which belong to the representation of the symmetry group, so the wave functions that describe the group are known as symmetry-adapted linear combinations (SALC).

3.) The number of molecular orbitals belonging to one group representation is equal to the number of symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals belonging to this representation,

4.) Within a particular representation, the symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals mix more if their atomic energy levels are closer.

I believe the above is all related to Phonon Resonance, but your model needs to be extendend so we can understand the LENR's of the weak nuclear force. If my memory serves me correctly, I believe you have previously stated the weak nuclear force isn't understood very well. I think it's time for us to begin to learn more about this weak nuclear force. If you disagree, please express your opinions here. The only way progress is going to happen which is beneficial to all, is to have an open discussion in a constructive way. I think most of us here would highly value your opinion and would like to hear where you stand on all of this.

Thank You,

GB

broli · « **Reply #64 on:** January 31, 2011, 01:15:13 PM »

Quote from: gravityblock on January 31, 2011, 12:51:59 PM

Znidarsic,

Here's your opportunity to play a small part in this unfolding story. Please extend your model from the quantum world to the molecular or macroscopic world in regards to the molecular orbitals, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital

A molecular orbital (MO) can specify the electron configuration of a molecule: the spatial distribution and energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). Most commonly an MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in qualitative or very approximate usage. They are invaluable in providing a simple model of bonding in molecules, understood through molecular orbital theory.

Some properties:

1.) The number of molecular orbitals is equal to the number of atomic orbitals included in the linear expansion, <----- I've already posted information about this linear expansion in regards to Phonon Resonance.

2.) If the molecule has some symmetry, the degenerate atomic orbitals (with the same atomic energy) are grouped in linear combinations (called symmetry adapted atomic orbitals (SO)) which belong to the representation of the symmetry group, so the wave functions that describe the group are known as symmetry-adapted linear combinations (SALC).

3.) The number of molecular orbitals belonging to one group representation is equal to the number of symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals belonging to this representation,

4.) Within a particular representation, the symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals mix more if their atomic energy levels are closer.

I believe the above is all related to Phonon Resonance, but your model needs to be extendend so we can understand the LENR's of the weak nucleur force. If you disagree, please express your opinions here. The only way progress is going to happen which is beneficial to all, is to have an open discussion in a constructive way. I think most of us here would highly value your opinion and would like to here where you stand on all of this.

Thank You,

GB

Energy wise this can be useful in splitting water with low energy and collecting it as electricity with a fuel cell.

Phonon resonance could also explain how freddy can run a car on hydrogen. I believe his electrode tubes are tuned to a certain acoustic frequency.

I would rather much see someone else making gold first to at least prove that phonon resonance works.

Even though the math, process and science is open to this extraordinary achievement it's amazing to see how naive Joe Champion is.

http://www.drjoechampion.com/

Apparently he's about to mass produce gold. When you can mass produce almost any metal from another abundant metal dirt cheaply then you will cause a serious disrupt across the entire corrupt economy that is based on scarcity.

What's the point for precious metals if they are mass produced by the tons weekly. I always admire people who explore science on their own but I get baffled by the shear ignorance that comes with it about current world affairs.

Putting mass produced gold behind a vault won't magically solve all our problems. What will is applying this technology into practical solutions. Cheap gold conductors, cheap platinum fuel cells, cheap neo magnets...

gravityblock · « **Reply #65 on:** January 31, 2011, 04:39:01 PM »

Quote from: broli on January 31, 2011, 01:15:13 PM

I would rather much see someone else making gold first to at least prove that phonon resonance works.

Phonon Resonance Transmutation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRIsPq2C-5Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vprDxvQ_LuE

This result of metal formation (e.i.gold) was produced by two steps: 1- Using phonon resonance reactor for 10 days; 2- Heated the output til molten then poured it and let it cool.

GB

gravityblock · « **Reply #66 on:** January 31, 2011, 06:53:47 PM »

Don't forget about the "Infinite Energy" publication where LetsLab found 2 peaks of excess heat generation aligned with the phonon frequencies. The information at this time is overwhelming pointing to Phonon Resonance using the weak nuclear force in LENR.

GB

ResinRat2 · « **Reply #67 on:** January 31, 2011, 07:20:13 PM »

Quote from: broli on January 31, 2011, 01:15:13 PM

Even though the math, process and science is open to this extraordinary achievement it's amazing to see how naive Joe Champion is.

http://www.drjoechampion.com/

Apparently he's about to mass produce gold. When you can mass produce almost any metal from another abundant metal dirt cheaply then you will cause a serious disrupt across the entire corrupt economy that is based on scarcity.

What's the point for precious metals if they are mass produced by the tons weekly. I always admire people who explore science on their own but I get baffled by the shear ignorance that comes with it about current world affairs.

Putting mass produced gold behind a vault won't magically solve all our problems. What will is applying this technology into practical solutions. Cheap gold conductors, cheap platinum fuel cells, cheap neo magnets...

Well --- There goes my IRA .CCCRRRRAAAAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!

gravityblock · « **Reply #68 on:** January 31, 2011, 07:48:03 PM »

Quote from: ResinRat2 on January 31, 2011, 07:20:13 PM

Well --- There goes my IRA .CCCRRRRAAAAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!

Gold, Platinum, Paladium, and Silver prices live, http://www.monex.com/liveprices

GB

broli · « **Reply #69 on:** January 31, 2011, 08:43:33 PM »

I hope he makes it, but I won't bet on it. 150 years of suppression and deceit, you have to be a complete fool to ignore that. USA this USA that, I hope he can keep his head on his neck as I hear USA made guillotines are the sharpest.

wings · « **Reply #70 on:** January 31, 2011, 10:40:11 PM »

Fig. 14. Analysis executed with an SEM on an area of the cathode surface after 4000 sec. of plasma
â€“
January 2004.

www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pdf

gravityblock · « **Reply #71 on:** February 01, 2011, 12:38:38 AM »

Quote from: wings on January 31, 2011, 10:40:11 PM

Fig. 14. Analysis executed with an SEM on an area of the cathode surface after 4000 sec. of plasma
â€“
January 2004.

www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pd

The "f" was truncated in the above link, http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pdf

Thanks Wings,

GB

BobTEW · « **Reply #72 on:** February 01, 2011, 04:52:35 PM »

The "d" orbital dz2y center torus ring is the "clutch" or energy transfer for the two outer lobes. The electron flows like river in a figure 8 patten in 3D. The repelling field of the magnetic force; dynamic flow-magnetic current. This separate field is reason for the spin and lift seen in superconductors.

lanenal · « **Reply #73 on:** February 03, 2011, 01:05:43 AM »

Hi,

I have read the three papers, and the third paper is the easiest to understand in my opinion (written with great patience and detailed explanation -- a ground breaking work really need that to get anywhere). However, there are still something important appears just very confusing. The most obvious one is the definition of the constant K_{-e} called the elastic constant, which is supposed to be a constant, but in its definition, there is a variable r_x: K_{-e} = { F_{max} \over r_x } (see equation 4 in the third paper here: http://www.wbabin.net/science/znidarsic3.pdf ). In the end of this paper, even a numerical value is given to K_{-e}, but it is also said in the text:

"The variable, classical elastic constant of the electron K_{-e} emerged from this redistribution. It is expressed in equation (4). The elastic constant of the electric field resembles that of a gum band in that it decreases with displacement. "

I really hope Dr. Znidarsic can see this and explain it. Is K_{-e} a variable constant? It already reads like a paradox, so frankly I am quite confused -- I am shamed and humbled, as this is supposed to be understood with only elementary education as people here are saying.

lanenal

fznidarsic · « **Reply #74 on:** February 03, 2011, 03:11:40 AM »

The elastic constant is constant at a certain displacement. It varies inversley with displacement. Rubber bands do this also, they get softer as they are stretched, thus their "elastic constant" is dependent upon their position. Take a balloon. It is hard to blow when it is deflated. Its elastic constant is stiff. As the balloon is inflated it is easier to put air into it. Its elastic constant decreases with its inflation. The same sort of thing happens with electron. I hope this helps.

Frank Z

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained) (Read 91641 times)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

broli

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

ResinRat2

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

broli

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

wings

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

gravityblock

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

BobTEW

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

lanenal

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)

fznidarsic

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)