... Joel's claim that I have ADD is somehow not talking about ADD at all. 
...

During the course of discussion remarks are
quite often made which are 'tongue in cheek.'
Not intended to be taken literally.  But those
whose mission is to 'make mountains out of
molehills' will certainly try.  Pathetically.

Vaccine risks we're not told about.

Lol Out Of Topic here.

I've seen a lot of movies where an actor pretends to be drunk. What are you saying bro? Even jackie chang (the martial artist) has a movie called "drunken master." It's a good movie as entertainment material.

So your logic fails you man.

How can you tell when a person is really drunk?

Well you fail to see the real facts = you don't have evidence it is fake!

I think you don't understand the difference between fiction VS reality TV shows!

lol. The overall ULTIMATE GOAL speaks the truth, since it is a TV show they will through some fictional stuff in there fo the laughs = “Have you not seen the fat kid on that show tip up and drink an entire quart canning jar of "shine"....but then again have you seen the TV show “Stan Lee's Superhumans”? Go watch all episodes and tell me which is fake and which is real?

Oh bill you and your stories. lol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonshiners_%28TV_series%29

"Moonshiners is an American docudrama television series on the Discovery Channel that dramatizes the life of people who produce (illegal) moonshine in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina, Virginia, and South Carolina. The series dramatizes their liquor production efforts, law-evading techniques and life.^[1] There have been claims by local officials that the show is not what it portrays to be. Virginia authorities have stated that no illegal liquor is actually being produced by the people depicted in the show. The Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) said in March 2012 that, "If illegal activity was actually taking place, the Virginia ABC Bureau of Law Enforcement would have taken action."^[2] They also said that they had requested for the producers to add a disclaimer to clarify that the show was only a dramatization, "but the request was overlooked."^[2]"


Docudrama, as in...NOT REAL.

See?

Bill

Do you want a point-by-point refutation?

No...but dollars to donuts, we're going to be subjected to one nonetheless.

Regards...

Then one must ask why you do it;  why do you joke about serious disease?

I don't. But your squirms and deflections are interesting.

Again, I ask is it ok to make light of someone elses suffering.  Tongue in cheek or otherwise.
If yes, then man up and say it.  You've already boasted about getting military troll training right?  Why shy away from this?
If no, then you either believe that people with ADD are not suffering or that joel is wrong and you have trouble choking out those words.

I have time.  Let me know which one it is.  Until then I'll just keep on asking.

It is truly sad that you are suffering so and of course any
who have compassion and empathy wish you well and
hope that you will in time overcome.

Is your suffering in any way related to your dismal performance
in this present discussion?  Are you distraught on account of
your seeming inability to garner support for your AGENDA?

He may be frustrated and down to clinging to a repetitive off topic non issue...but he get paid nonetheless.

Whatever you do, don't start pressuring him to produce the unbiased data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of injecting chemicals into the bloodstream of organic electric creatures, or he will put you on ignore like he and his arse kisser, the butt pirate did when I exposed them as the shill and his trusty dim witted lap dog.

He much prefers trying and convince you that the onus is on you to prove that chemical cocktails are not good for you.

Regards...

I guess Joel will never admit he was wrong about the show Moonshiners.

He claimed it was 100% real, I proved that it is a docudrama and not real.  It is indeed off-topic but He brought it up in one of his nonsensical rants.  Maybe one day he will be right about something?

Bill

All through out the world businesses loose millions of dollars from lack of communication!

You're changing the subject again (#24).  What I was saying is that given that most of my family are not native English speakers and many of the people in my workplace aren't native speakers and that I've traveled a fair bit and that I've studied linguistics.  Your particular problems with English seem to be affectations.

This is 100% facts!

Yawn.

.the only blame I give you is that you are not able to see from all angles!

Wrong. You clearly said that I was changing the subject and because of that you deluded yourself into thinking I have ADD (which I'm going to use the more modern name ADHD from now on). 

And you are just trying to seek truth for yourself!

I'm sure humanity will benefit.  For example you are very amusing to talk to.  That benefits humanity - it makes them happy.  With a success rate much higher than you have had at curing ADHD.  So apparently I'm winning at benefiting humanity through this conversation.

I don't even know who told you that ADD is a disease?

It fits with the clinical definiton and at least one colloquial definition.  It is generally called a disease by doctors and it is classified by the DSMIV.   Sorry your permission is not necessary.

I'm very certain

A good sign that you are stupid.

80% of the people have it DUE TO TV.

Again the evidence says: "No".  If what you assume is correct the expectation you would see a correlation between TVs per capita and ADHD diagnosis.  No such correlation exists.  So the correct thing to do is to treat your hypothesis as if it is stupid.

And i'm certain

Good sign that you're stupid.

that most will get a pill prescription from having it = more confusion!

The first line treatment for ADHD is psychosocial counselling   When that fails or in extreme cases pharmacological measures are attempted.  There are two major classes of drugs and the most common one is stimulants.  Which helps in ~70% of cases.

I don't feel the need to APOLOZIGE to anyone when i'm telling them how they get ADD in the first place, in FACT, I should be thanked!

So here is where you should just stand up and say: "Ok I give, I'm just trolling" because it's exceptionally hard to believe a person would be as thick as you are being.  In the off chance you're serious it's worth mentioning that the reason you should apologize is because you are making light of people who suffer from a real disease.

But I see where ADD comes from, as bright as a sunny day!

Another good reason to think you're stupid.

The problem is that I was born genetically to see these things.

And another...

I never wished to be this way when I was born!

Trust me, very few wish you to be the way you are.

ADD is MADE!

The evidence says "no".

The cure is there but how can you stop smoking when they sell cigarettes all over the place?

I have no trouble not watching commercial tv or listening to commercial radio.  If you're still on that this is caused by TV/radio commercials.  Perhaps you're just not very smart?

Now you are trying to tell me that you know are an expert about the mind or psychology?

No, just in hypothesis testing and math.  Two things it's very difficult to do science without.

Well there you go, you are an azz kisser.

Either you didn't understand what I wrote or you don't understand what that idiom means.  Let me know which one it is.

Your mentality is not nikola, tesla

Yes.  In particular I don't believe a number of the incredibly stupid things he believed (or appeared to believe).

you can't wait to tell your “buddies” how stupid I am?

Think for once in your virtually useless life.   You can't stay on one topic, you have no idea how to phrase and support an argument, you use terribly ambiguous phrasing and you absolutely refuse to change how you say things or do the tiniest amount of work to phrase things better.  What's left but to make fun of you?

there are greater mind then yours.

Absolutely however you're simply not one of those greater minds.

You think ME joel321 is Seamonkey?

I didn't say that but now that you bring it up it's not entirely unplausible.

I'm joel321 a latino living in the USA.

... with ridiculous English affectations.

NOT COUGHING TOWARDS THE OTHER PERSON 80% WILL NOT GET INFECTED!

Yawn change of subject #25.  Now all of a sudden we are talking ONLY AND EVER about coughing directly on someone? LOL

ok, how would I know that I don't speak math language

Your change of subject aside (#26) what I was saying is entirely different.  You are responsible to research your position to the point that you can participate in a discussion.  So far you are not only not there but you also actively resist using terms properly.

Tell me what is a science language?

Change of subject #27.

hmmm...do you understand 100% what the contracts mean?

Logical fallacy.  I've already beaten that argument if you understood what I wrote.

I want to believe that I'm stupid!

Not enough to actually realize that you are.

I get tired of being called INTELLIGENT when I don't even fell INTELLIGENT.

Then you should pay attention to the people who are calling you stupid as they apparently know you better than the people who think you are smart.

So my ONLY conclusion is that the people that call me intelligent are more stupid than I am. I don't feel intelligent at all I just see them as lower than average. And then I ask myself why am I being called INTELLIGENT or STUPID! Then I see how socialism works! Where their social CIRCLE the ALPHA male tells them that they are intelligent!

Blah blah blah, just because a stupid person tells me that i'm intelligent ONLY means that his stupidity is showing. Since to understand that you also have to understand how ALPHA males work.

Change of subject #28.

I am 80% sure that I can beat you regarding brain intelligence!

Any intellectual contest?  Sure, I'll pick some so we can all watch you make excuses as to why you won't do it.

I'm very confident regarding this!

Another reason why you're probably stupid.

How do you know i'm not using every day language?

The same way people who write dictionaries know usage frequency.  By statistical analysis.

Maybe because everyday language you are only judging from your LITTLE BUBBLE?

Nope.  Think again Hammurabi. 

Here we go again. REPRODUCING is not the same as BORN.

Sure but every time someone is born someone has reproduced.  Which means your term "born" is ambiguous and you should probably pick another one.

REPLICATE is not the same as BORN!

Exactly viruses replicated but few would say they are "born".  You make a good argument that "born" is ambiguous and you should pick another term.

BORN! Comes first since reproducing is the mere fact of having ! The urge to REPLICATE!

LOL So wait before you said being born meant coming out of my mothers vagina.  Now you say I was born before then.  That I was born before I was born.  Again this is you making an excellent argument that your use of "born" is ambiguous and you should choose another term.

A female and a male REPRODUCE!

which means their child was born.  Hence, again a great argument that "born" should be swapped for another word.

DO you understand what is a root?

The root of what?

Reproduce! Or Replicate! Is not the root!!!!! get it?

How about you read a book or a web page about virology and look up some of those words.  Then perhaps you will know what you mean.

Ok, I learned a lot from you this day.

It was statistically inevitable that at some point in your life you would learn something from someone else.  Just not likely on an individual case.

and I thought I was talking to an “expert”.

I've already implied that I'm not an expert in Troll English Affectations.

That explains why we have cure the flu virus!

Are you trying to say that we don't have a method of prevention or treatment which works on all variations on the influenza genome?

The way I see it is that i'm looking at things from 23 different angles

In which case you shouldn't blame me for the 23 changes in subject and therefore there is no reason to claim that I have ADHD.

you are only looking at it from ONE angle.

Clearly if I'm responding to all 28 of your changes to the subject then I'm looking at as many aspects as you are.  However I just happen to know that most of what you're talking about is bullshit.

Who cares what colloquial or clinical definition

You do.  You said it wasn't a disease however it fits both the colloquial and clinical definitions.

I only care what CAUSS IT!!!!

No you only appear to care about validating your exceptionally stupid ideas about what causes it.  There's a big difference there.

Tell me what causes ADD and tell me why there is a pill for it? TODAY!

ADHD is a large collection of symptoms which may not even have a common cause.  However again twin studies have shown something like 70% correspondence.  As I said earlier psychosocial therapy is the first line in most north american countries.  Stimulants are one of the most common pharmacological treatments.   The reason why?  It improves outcomes in something like 70% of cases.

Well I cannot never proof my point because I cant never get rid of commercials.

You probably don't know enough math to understand how that means you're more wrong than right...

But i'm 100% that is the cause!

So you have never cured anyone but you are still 100% convinced.  Another reason you're stupid.

you always give half ass answers. This does not mean anything since advertising is true 100% to all people. What you imply is merely that you are somewhat educated to avoid ads. But the fact is that ads are all over the place – movies, magazines, tools, tv, cars, shoes, computers, etc etc etc.

I rarely watch movies with commercials and I don't read magazines and I use an ad blocker on my computer.  So while I do see commercials from time to time my exposure is so much lower than the vast majority of society that you have proved yourself wrong.  The only way for me to have ADHD as a result of exposure to commercials their effect would have to be immensely strong.  Which would mean everyone would have ADHD - however they don't.

You killed your own argument because you like your own ideas too much.

Who's “we”?

Medical opinion as seen through the lens of my reading of medical journals.

lol this is so bland and sorry pathetic explanation of = I don't know!

Nope.  What I'm saying is that many twin studies not only show a strong correlation between identical twins and autism diagnosis but there is also a strong proportionality between fraternal twins.  Both of those make a good case for autism to have a strong genetic component. 

In all honesty, you get confused easy. You drift from the MAIN POINT so far that you seem like you have the mentality of a girl.

You just have no mental power to even think outside your EGO.

Taking about what I mean by “born”.

ADD is a decease!

Coughing to a persons face while having the flu helps better than coughing to the ground!

If I get the flu virus I will never get the flu virus in my whole life!

I'm not an expert in medicine yet I speak like I am!

I get distracted easy because of ADD and forget easy what the main point is!

Maybe you need a reality check or maybe you need to change your mentality and help others with your stubbornness!

I'm not sure if these are all changes of subject or you just not reading what I wrote. You figure out what you are actually saying and let me know.