Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos (Read 1602781 times)

minnie · « **Reply #2310 on:** January 30, 2015, 09:15:33 AM »

This is very exciting sort of stuff. I thought why not look at the huge experiment
nature shows us, namely the solar wind.
There's a thing called the "Heliospheric current sheet" that has a nice swirl to it.
My thoughts were that to prove the idea that Ken has is to observe a stream of
particles passing by a spherical magnet. Thus, large magnet, Earth, source of particle
stream , Sun.
Anyways if the Earth's magnetic field was a ball of string would this cause the
passing electrons and ions to experience some sort of torque.
I just feel I am understanding a tiny bit about the patterns on a Ferrocell, I
find them intriguing to say the least ,
John.

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2311 on:** January 30, 2015, 09:21:46 AM »

Quote from: minnie on January 30, 2015, 09:15:33 AM

I just feel I am understanding a tiny bit about the patterns on a Ferrocell, I
find them intriguing to say the least ,
John.

I knew 100% the nature of magnetic reciprocation long before I ever got ahold of Timms FERROCELL,

using it was just icing on the cake confirming the obvious necessity of the hypotrochoid field pressure mediations.

Seeing one hands on is far far better than the damn videos, which cannot show you the deep "holographic" depth.

make this pic viral:

profitis · « **Reply #2312 on:** January 30, 2015, 09:42:51 AM »

Mr apohasis tell me something straight brother: does this vortex oscillate or is it smooth allway.does it wobble.does it change shape like a tornado does.is there a kink in its dance or does it just stand there

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2313 on:** January 30, 2015, 09:55:21 AM »

Quote from: profitis on January 30, 2015, 09:42:51 AM

Mr apohasis tell me something straight brother: does this vortex oscillate or is it smooth allway.does it wobble.does it change shape like a tornado does.is there a kink in its dance or does it just stand there

that a field pressure equalizes doesnt mean or imply it "standing there"

a vortex oscillates by definition necessitatively so. Likewise there is a phase shift between the "N pole" and "S pole" , you can even see it in the ferrocell

likewise, all the many biological experiments prove that beyond ANY shadow of a doubt, Im working on same for the 4th and 5th edition.

the phase shift is not only there, it must exist, explaining same simply is a task still in progress. Its really very simple, and ironically "hard" to explain.

research "gyromagnetic precession" for some more in depth insights on same as a primer.

pinestone · « **Reply #2314 on:** January 30, 2015, 08:50:31 PM »

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on January 30, 2015, 09:55:21 AM

...Its really very simple, and ironically "hard" to explain...

Try this:
https://www.tcd.ie/Physics/Magnetism/Lectures/5006/5006-2.pdf

and this: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CDYQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieeemagnetics.org%2Fieee_static_content%2Fspin%2520torque%2520tutorial.ppt&ei=YePLVNPYD8W4ggT4woHYAQ&usg=AFQjCNHJZIdq3Yxrxcfux96Cg4OeFAPghw&bvm=bv.84607526,d.eXY

and maybe you could actually make a comment that wasn't rude, vulgar, intimidating, obscene or degrading.
Like a man, not a beast.

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2315 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:01:04 PM »

Quote from: pinestone on January 30, 2015, 08:50:31 PM

Try this:
https://www.tcd.ie/Physics/Magnetism/Lectures/5006/5006-2.pdf

Magnetostatics dont explain polar phase shifts, or Compression and Rarefaction differentials.

NOR does Maxwells equation have any bearing on explaining same.
NOR does Gauss's law do same either.

FROM THE ARTICLE:
Diamagnets produce weakly repulsive images

Diamagnetism is low magnetic permeability / high dielectric coherency.

There is no such thing as a "repulsive image" or "magnetic repulsion".
Likewise that articles talk about "superconductors" is also absurd, there is no thing "conductive" in a superconductor, it is simplex extremely high low-magnetic permeability

Acca · « **Reply #2316 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:13:48 PM »

MAGNETVORTEX is here !!!

Harnessing skyrmions for electronics and spintronics applications
Mar 20, 2014

Previously, electric currents have been used to manipulate skyrmions in metallic magnets. Heat could now be used to drive their motion in electrically insulating magnets,

"Wow imagine, a magnetvortex that is NOT effected RF or electricity.... Just HEAT !!!! "
Acca...

http://phys.org/news/2014-03-harnessing-skyrmions-electronics-spintronics-applications.html

http://phys.org/news/2014-02-electron-vortex-state-skyrmion-molecules.html#inlRlv[/font]

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2317 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:27:19 PM »

Quote from: minnie on January 30, 2015, 09:15:33 AM

John.

Thought youd like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7t5cKc1-MY

Something nobody has seen before on Youboob (sic).

incredibly stability and likewise the gyroscope can draw out the hypotrochoid pattern by using a magnet ATTACHED TO the gyroscope

Acca · « **Reply #2318 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:28:07 PM »

Ken here is one for you !!! Ha ! Sooo… that was the old black hole theory …

Now it’s Gone !!

Black holes do not exist where space and time do not exist, says new theory.
6 hours ago by Lisa Zyga
http://phys.org/news/2015-01-black-holes-space-theory.html#nRlv

Acca...

Acca · « **Reply #2319 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:31:16 PM »

Good video clip I will have to try that with a pen ....

Acca....

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2320 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:35:16 PM »

Quote from: Acca on January 30, 2015, 10:13:48 PM

MAGNETVORTEX is here !!!

Hey!!!

Alas its great stuff, but they merely REIFIED nonsense a "Skyrmion" which they say------- "Skyrmions are 'whirls' in the magnetization of certain magnetic materials"

All theyre really saying is "natural magnetic vortex"

So they devised a cute BS term -----"Skyrmion"

OR>>>>>>>
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In particle theory, the skyrmion (/ˈskɜrmi.ɒn/) is a hypothetical particle related originally[1] to baryons. It was described by Tony Skyrme and consists of a quantum superposition of baryons and resonance states

WHEW!!! THATS SOME STINKY SHIT!!!!

(not you, them).

Atomists (modern "science") can even be BALLSY enough to turn a magnetic force vortex into PARTICLES!!!!!!

Next thing they come up with, is that LOVE is comprised up of "Lovium particles"

(((All hail Acca and the magnetic vortex)))

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2321 on:** January 30, 2015, 10:42:22 PM »

Quote from: Acca on January 30, 2015, 10:28:07 PM

Black holes do not exist where space and time do not exist, says new theory.
Acca...

100% accurate, Stephen J. Crothers been giving talks on same.

see here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf1ihBNMEpw

Stephen J. Crothers trashes black hole nonsense and S. Hawking

My premise Im writing on (which Stephen J. Crothers doesnt ever mention or talk about, or know about). is that-------

A (presumed) 'black hole' is where counterspatial inertia EXCEEDS magnetic FORCE of the matter which formerly comprised same.

As such a black hole has NO MASS (utterly contrary to the notion that a black hole has mass = X number of solar masses etc)

Its utterly simplex and non-convoluted and is necessarily SO.

Likewise this explains Galactic Jets and backs up Stephen J. Crothers premise AGAINST the "black hole BS" of Einstein and that idiot Hawkins.

Current BS on black holes (presumed) can never explain galactic jets FROM which matter is ejected in a tight vortex pattern

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2322 on:** January 31, 2015, 01:31:57 AM »

Quote from: pinestone on January 30, 2015, 08:50:31 PM

pinestone

Pinestone, folks,.... is the inventor of the Ferrocell and other devices, including his now revolutionary new device! The Electromagnetic Deflection Unit

see his latest invention here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMssut5ik9A

Everyone here should pay him respect and get on bended knee as regarding him,.... ( I MEAN THAT SERIOUSLY, NOT JOKINGLY) for his devices, his inventions.

Ive MAYBE said that about 2 people alive, and hes one of them.

My hat off to you dear sir, all respect and love.

His Ferrocell invention is so simplex, so incredible, that I dare say without hesitation that I WOULD (no joke at all) personally kiss his ass with 100% due respect.

I may be a crude ass, but I respect who and what deserves respect.

pinestone · « **Reply #2323 on:** January 31, 2015, 01:43:44 AM »

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on January 31, 2015, 01:31:57 AM

Pinestone, folks is the inventor of the Ferrocell ...

Oh you can remain seated hahah.
Really, lets not be so dramatic. I'm just another experimenter and magnet enthusiast like the rest of you.
We're all trying to figure this stuff out to try and make a better world for us to live in.

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #2324 on:** January 31, 2015, 01:51:01 AM »

Quote from: pinestone on January 31, 2015, 01:43:44 AM

I'm just another experimenter

Ill have to strongly disagree on that one

News:

User Menu