Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84248
  • *Latest: khniki

  • *Total Posts: 898018
  • *Total Topics: 15837
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 22
  • *Total: 25

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 271449 times)

Offline nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
@all

With the fight you have on this topic, you are not helping the OU community absolutely.

Nobody wants to see you fighting. Everybody want a solution to the energy crisis.

I am out of here!!!

Jesus

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
I would accept COP < 1 if I could power a machine with stupidity.
rgds.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Right now Rosemary your fate on the free energy forums is in question, Energetic forum adim , 5 individuals who have never seen your COP 17 replicated
Just that.  This is the first open acknowledgement that Glen, Harvey, Ashtweth, Jibguy and possibly Aaron - do NOT consider that they have a replication of my COP>17.  This is the actual issue at hand.  This means that they are satisfied that Glen's replication was actually the result of accidental and fortuitious and chance assembly of some electrical apparatus that resulted in their own result of COP>4? as Harvey erroneously assessed it?  Strange things afoot guys.  Now you see why I need to confront this sad effort to flame these threads and to insist that this is NOT their work?

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Hi all.  I'm not sure that it will serve any purpose but I'm going back to this post with specific reference to the following.

>One more LIE or post like that Jib, energetic forum Admin , Arron ,Glen Harvey and my self  Ashtweth will make a case yo remove you from the forums.

And this with specific reference to my right to defend myself in the face of an attack.
.......................................................
Rosemary

Hi all,

I am saddened that there is venom here !  I view this topic and the work already done as very significant.  I compare it to CF, Cold Fusion, CANR or whatever name you give it ... not the same mechanism I admit, but the same 'flavor' of initial observation(s).

....an anomalous amount of heat (energy over time = power) evolving from a physical set up of components ... the observed and measured cumulative power output unquestionably exceeding the input power. 

The important term here is "POWER".  In TOO many experiments, people get all excited over a spike in energy, or temperature.  For a brief moment, something displays OU chacteristics ... for example, a pulse ... which is where most errors or misinterpretation occurs ... beautiful ignorance and arrogance blind experimenters much too often.

In the case of this COP>17 Circuit, there is none of this "misinterpretation" the same as there is NONE with CF.

It seems Aaron from Energetic has been the only one to post a replication ... it appeared inconclusive because of some technical roadblocks, but still something was demonstrated.

If there have been other replications I have not seen, sorry, and please steer me toward them.   This is too important to just argue and criticize over.

Greg

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
----- Original Message -----
From: <info@esmhome.org>
To: <ainslie@xxxx.co.za>; <hwgramm@xxxxx.com>; <fuzzytomcat@xxxxxxx.net>
Cc: <ashtweth@xxxxx.com>; <totl@xxxx.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:11 AM
Subject: Forum


Greetings,

Unfortunately, there are still numerous posts occurring on the forum 
that contain unnecessary disagreements between certain members.

It is obvious that there are conflicts that are not going to be 
resolved any time in the near future.

The forum is a place to share and learn.  Questioning is fine if it is 
done with respect, but we have seen that this is not what is happening 
here.

It is possible to share your work without speaking of each other?s.

We ask from now forward that you do not reference or question the work 
of each other (Rosemary, Harvey, FuzzyTomCat) in any posts on 
Energetic Forum or via Energetic Forums Private Messaging.

To be quite clear, you are welcome to share your work, your ideas, 
your results.  Just do NOT reference each others work, ideas, results.

Each one of you is valued on the Forum, however, the Peace and good 
nature of the Forum have been interrupted and this cannot continue.

There are four admins to the forum, Aaron is one of them, however he 
has wisely recused himself on this matter.  The three others admins 
have made this decision.

To repeat, it is our place to make sure the good nature of the Forum 
is maintained.  We believe that is possible by simply posting about 
your own work and in no way referencing (directly or indirectly) 
anyone else with which you have a conflict.

If you do (reference anyone that you have a conflict with), you will 
be banned.

Admin
hi glen, you omitted this part, which was at the bottom of the pm you sent to me, and to the rest i assume...

Quote
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

also ..... a question .......

How can anyone or a inventor design a electronic circuit if they can not read a schematic or circuit diagram ?

http://www.energeticforum.com/59369-post262.html
TinselKoala - THE ONLY APPROPRIATE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM that I can assure you is correct is the diagram in the paper. And the flyback diode is a critical part of the system.

The circuit diagram in the Quantum article was prepared by Brian Buckley. I cannot comment on whether it is right or not as I simply cannot read it. I am hoping that Donovan will be able to comment in due course. I don't think he has even seen that article - as published.

But it is definitely required as without it we cannot 're-route' the collapsing fields back to the battery to recharge it.

so why are you attempting character assassination of rosemary and then having your little minion ashtweth run around accusing rose of what you are doing?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Hmm...
Since when the language spoken has anything in common with the possibility of "OU" claims?
You're one of the "innebriated" guy bots?
Jeeeez....
it's inebriated... jeeeez ::)

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
AGAIN !

Hi all,

I am saddened that there is venom here !  I view this topic and the work already done as very significant.  I compare it to CF, Cold Fusion, CANR or whatever name you give it ... not the same mechanism I admit, but the same 'flavor' of initial observation(s).

....an anomalous amount of heat (energy over time = power) evolving from a physical set up of components ... the observed and measured cumulative power output unquestionably exceeding the input power.

The important term here is "POWER".  In TOO many experiments, people get all excited over a spike in energy, or temperature.  For a brief moment, something displays OU chacteristics ... for example, a pulse ... which is where most errors or misinterpretation occurs ... beautiful ignorance and arrogance blind experimenters much too often.

In the case of this COP>17 Circuit, there is none of this "misinterpretation" the same as there is NONE with CF.

It seems Aaron from Energetic has been the only one to post a replication ... it appeared inconclusive because of some technical roadblocks, but still something was demonstrated.

If there have been other replications I have not seen, sorry, and please steer me toward them.   This is too important to just argue and criticize over.

Greg

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
AGAIN !

Hi all,

I am saddened that there is venom here !  I view this topic and the work already done as very significant.  I compare it to CF, Cold Fusion, CANR or whatever name you give it ... not the same mechanism I admit, but the same 'flavor' of initial observation(s).

....an anomalous amount of heat (energy over time = power) evolving from a physical set up of components ... the observed and measured cumulative power output unquestionably exceeding the input power.

The important term here is "POWER".  In TOO many experiments, people get all excited over a spike in energy, or temperature.  For a brief moment, something displays OU chacteristics ... for example, a pulse ... which is where most errors or misinterpretation occurs ... beautiful ignorance and arrogance blind experimenters much too often.

In the case of this COP>17 Circuit, there is none of this "misinterpretation" the same as there is NONE with CF.

It seems Aaron from Energetic has been the only one to post a replication ... it appeared inconclusive because of some technical roadblocks, but still something was demonstrated.

If there have been other replications I have not seen, sorry, and please steer me toward them.   This is too important to just argue and criticize over.

Greg
Greg - indeed it's important.  Which is precisely why I am fighting this corner.  But for now - here's the paper.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
You have put a lot of time into this theory and your earnest is evidence of your intent Rosemary.   Thank you for your efforts.   Is this theory able to model an "electric cavity" created by your switching circuit?  It will be much easier to work with radiant wavelengths once we can convert them into something we can sense.
Hope - welcome to the discussion.  I'm afraid the circuit was only ever designed to prove that COP>1 is possible.  But that, in itself, is important.  I know nothing about 'electric cavity' but will look it up.  Unless you can provide a link which would be much appreciated.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

BTW I'm afraid you've joined here where I'm in a kind of insurgency warfare with 5 Free Energy players who are trying to appropriate this technology or - to divorce it from my input.  Not serious in itself but it will rather put paid to our attempts to keep this technology open source.

Again.  Kindest as ever,
R

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Guys, not sure if I've done the right thing.  But effectively Ash and Glen can post to their heart's content on the new thread. 

I agree that there needs to be complete halt to this flaming.  It is ruining this thread which is the actual intention.  I should have followed my off forum advices and simply not tolerated their posts at all.  I apologise.  I do not intend allowing any further posts from either of them and they are free to spam, or do what they want there - or elsewhere.

Out of respect to our members here I've not deleted anything other than a post by shruggedatlas - in error.  Apologies.

Kindest regards, and abject apologies that I let this go on as I did.

Rosemary

Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Hi Rosie
Now your running two threads,what a busy bee you are
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rpBAZEVHmI
Good luck with the rocket surgery  ;)
cat

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi Rosie
Now your running two threads,what a busy bee you are
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rpBAZEVHmI
Good luck with the rocket surgery  ;)
cat

 ;D Hello cat.  Where have you been for goodness sake?  Much in need of some distractions. You see the blood bath I had to clean.   LOL.  Yes I've been busy.

Take good care of yourself there cat.  And thanks for the link - as ever.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie
btw - I'm not running that thread.  It's given - gratis to Glen and Ash.  At least they can't accuse me of censorship.  And they can enjoy their freedoms of expression there.   

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi all,

I am saddened that there is venom here !  I view this topic and the work already done as very significant.  I compare it to CF, Cold Fusion, CANR or whatever name you give it ... not the same mechanism I admit, but the same 'flavor' of initial observation(s).

....an anomalous amount of heat (energy over time = power) evolving from a physical set up of components ... the observed and measured cumulative power output unquestionably exceeding the input power. 

The important term here is "POWER".  In TOO many experiments, people get all excited over a spike in energy, or temperature.  For a brief moment, something displays OU chacteristics ... for example, a pulse ... which is where most errors or misinterpretation occurs ... beautiful ignorance and arrogance blind experimenters much too often.

In the case of this COP>17 Circuit, there is none of this "misinterpretation" the same as there is NONE with CF.

It seems Aaron from Energetic has been the only one to post a replication ... it appeared inconclusive because of some technical roadblocks, but still something was demonstrated.

If there have been other replications I have not seen, sorry, and please steer me toward them.   This is too important to just argue and criticize over.

Greg

I've now been able to give this post of yours more attention Greg. The thing is this.  There is clear evidence of 'over unity' in as much as the circuit shows that more energy is being dissipated at a load than is being delivered by the supply source - in this case using a battery.

But there are downsides.  The most energy we could get on the resistor in any reliable way was between 25 to 30 watts.  And even at this level we stress the MOSFET with voltage spikes that it can barely tolerate.  We're trying different variations of the transistor - by using and IGBT but have had difficulty sourcing this.  We've now been informed that it's delivered and hopefully it'll be to hand before Wednesday.

But we've got a long way to go to get this onto a usable scale.  If the IGBT works with a diode across it to replace the body diode of the FET then we may be able to get something more in the region of 100 watts.  It's still not much but it's in the right direction.  Still plenty of testing to do.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Ok Rosie
Music and comedy,the videos keep rolling,stay tuned
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfTy2gPZT_k&feature=PlayList&p=903757D3FEA6B5E6&index=0&playnext=1
enjoy
cat

Offline bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 929
The Commedy Channel
« Reply #479 on: August 23, 2010, 09:53:11 PM »
Always great entertainment posted here! Heheheheh! ;D

 

OneLink