Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 285096 times)

Offline twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #525 on: September 02, 2010, 06:13:13 PM »
Golly Twinbeard.  Seems there's not much you can't do here.  I need to give all this more thought.  But I really like the option and would be very glad to explore its implications more closely.  Perhaps an early documentary type movie with a supporting explanatory text - and then - onwards and upwards. 

You are too kind, Rosemary... I am but a humble hacker who has been in the business for a while and made some friends.  Video does seem to do very well as a medium to attract people to a project.  The linux.com video article on the SolarNetOne drew more emails than I could reasonably handle.

I do have the thesis written but have learned - to my cost - that it's as clear as mud.  I need to make it simple.  It IS simple.  It's just difficult to put concept into words.  But, as I've seen now, a picture really is worth a thousand words.

But the thesis needs refinement.  If one can get the actual mapping of fields on a bipolar sphere then one would have some kind of an early start of those algorithms.

Here you go:

http://www.kjmagnetics.com/magfieldsphere.asp?pName=SY0

At this stage the fields are speculated - or evaluated from empirical evidence.  Not ideal - if we're to break new ground.  But I'm reasonably certain all this is doable.  Certainly it will need much more talent than I can bring to the table. 

What was the line from the film 'Field of Dreams'... "Build it and they will come."  :)

But I can certainly justify the composite state of particles - in terms of their interaction with a 'field'.  In other words, there appears to be a consistency with what is known when I simply 'grow' the stable particles from those dipoles.  And while we don't yet know the constituent of the particles themselves - if it conforms then there's a least some supporting logic. 

It might be less a case of growing them and more of polarizing in space the free particles that already exist everywhere, even in the "void" between recognized sub atomic particles, then harvesting them as they depolarize and seek equilibrium again. 

Delighted to have you on board Twinbeard.  I'll be in touch.  I just need to get these videos behind me.  And I'm delighted to learn that all this is doable.  I see it as essential to tap in those with the talent and the interest in this field.  And it's potentially SO vast.  There's no one contributor can do it justice - is my humble opinion. 
 ;D


It took the efforts of tens of thousands of people in concert to put a man on the moon;)



Kindest regards,
Rosemary

ADDED Just as a reminder to all.  If the aether IS magnetic in its fundamentals - then this will be time very well spent. 

Agreed.  And if they are magnetic, they are also electric.  I found the filamentary structures I was referring to in the other thread as appearing similar to Leedskalnins representation of north and south "individual magnets."  I had forgotten they were named after Birkeland.

There are short videos (10-15 seconds) showing Leedskalnins ideas on "individual magnets" here:
http://www.leedskalnin.com/

And a few images and background info on Birkeland currents:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cygnus-loop.gif
http://www.lucistrust.org/en/arcane_school/the_electric_bridge/sundry/the_electric_gods
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/birkeland.gif

'In 2007, NASA's THEMIS (Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms) project "found evidence of magnetic ropes connecting Earth's upper atmosphere directly to the sun," noting "that solar wind particles flow in along these ropes, providing energy for geomagnetic storms and auroras," thus reconfirming Birkeland's model of solar-terrestrial electrical interaction. NASA also likened the interaction to a "30 kiloVolt battery in space," noting the "flux rope pumps 650,000 Amp current into the Arctic!"'

Cheers,
Twinbeard
« Last Edit: September 02, 2010, 06:39:11 PM by twinbeard »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #526 on: September 03, 2010, 07:54:19 AM »

It might be less a case of growing them and more of polarizing in space the free particles that already exist everywhere, even in the "void" between recognized sub atomic particles, then harvesting them as they depolarize and seek equilibrium again.
I can't comment on this.  All I've proposed is that the structure of all particles can be resolved in terms of a proposed composite of that fundamental magnetic dipole.  You must remember that Bell's theorems conclude the ABSOLUTE requirement for consistency on a very fundamental level.  And I wonder if particles can simply be 'depolorised' at all.  I think what we need to find is that underlying 'pattern' if that describes anything.  It's a really big subject Twinbeard.  I'm sure you appreciate this. 

Agreed.  And if they are magnetic, they are also electric.
Again.  I acknowledge that there's an electromagnetic interaction.  Who could argue this?  But I don't know that a magnetic field requires an electric field.  I'm actually proposing that the magnetic field may be the fundamental source of all matter and all energy in matter.  I absolutely DO NOT argue the function of electrons within an atomic structure.  How could I?  It's well researched and evidence is empirical.   But I certainly argue that the magnetic force is dependent on an electric force.

... There are short videos (10-15 seconds) showing Leedskalnins ideas on "individual magnets" here:
http://www.leedskalnin.com/
I'm a great fan of Leedskalnin.  I buy into his 'little magnets' entirely.  But I CANNOT see the possibility of magnetic monopoles holding a 'field structure'.  It is my opinion that 'like charges' will always repel.  But the thing is that the resolution of the AC force does NOT need monopoles.  It only needs a 'field effect' with orbiting 'dipolar strings'.  If the AC was as depicted in those opposing coils - then the net force from them would be zero.  But that's just my opinion.   :D

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #527 on: September 03, 2010, 07:57:09 AM »
Sorry Twinbeard - I'm losing posts all over the place.  I meant to have this one precede the previous and it seems I can't do this.

In any event - I'll just write this again.  Regarding that 'shared' development of the thesis - it's going to be tricky but certainly preferred.  And any assistance you can give here would be much appreciated.  But I'll get back to you on this.  I first need to get some draft where the concepts can be better understood.  I keep stating that the concepts are simple.  They are.  But they're not easy to explain in language. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #528 on: September 03, 2010, 09:52:37 AM »
I can't comment on this.  All I've proposed is that the structure of all particles can be resolved in terms of a proposed composite of that fundamental magnetic dipole.  You must remember that Bell's theorems conclude the ABSOLUTE requirement for consistency on a very fundamental level.  And I wonder if particles can simply be 'depolorised' at all.  I think what we need to find is that underlying 'pattern' if that describes anything at all.  It's a really big subject Twinbeard.  I'm sure you appreciate this. 

Perhaps my choice of words was not as discriminatory as required... but please, let me know if my logic or operational assumptions are incorrect, in your opinion.  I further understand that perhaps you truly cannot comment, although likely not through unwillingness or lack of ability to do so.  I, however, am not in a position whereby I could potentially encounter any problems by making such statements, so here goes:

When we energize a coil, we create a magnetic dipole.  This much, I'm sure you will agree, is fundamental.  Any charged particle, or particle capable of developing such a charge inductively, which has mobility within the b field of that magnetic dipole will be repelled by one pole and attracted by the other, depending on charge state.  Also relatively fundamental, and what I was referring to with the term polarization.  Without the coil (or other influencing force) present, these particles naturally exist together in a state of equilibrium... a net zero charge when considering a decent sized sample.  That equilibrium is disrupted by the creation of the magnetic dipole.  When the disruption ceases; in this case when the coil is de-energized, nature seeks to restore its equilibrium.  When the disruption/cessation of disruption cycle happens above a critical frequency, and particularly with sharp gradients (absolute value of slope close to 1 in the graph described as voltage level on the y axis and time on x axis), __equilibrium__ thermodynamics is violated, and we can extract more energy from our open loop system than it takes to create the condition that is resonating our particles.  I making an assumption that you are well aware of this property of hard on and off switching... hence the IGBT's instead of MOSFETS;)  Nice choice on the wirewound resistor, also.  I have a few Ohmite variable models of similar construction that my father gave me.  What a great place to hide an aircore inductor.. in a heatsink!  At high frequency... wowie, look at that.  That resistor went negative on us!

An interesting panel on the 2nd law as applied above:
http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/520

An interesting article concerning your reference to Bell:
http://news.discovery.com/tech/teleportation-quantum-mechanics.html

I came across the latter (actually the original Chinese announcement) while conducting ongoing research concerning the possibility of using quantum entanglement as a Layer 1 for TCP/IP transmissions, and the possibility of this method having the quality of superluminal propogation for the purpose of latency free communication with devices orbiting nearby celestial bodies.  My hopes on that are to create a better backbone for our "Interplanetary Internet" than the present hertzian wave
store and forward method we are presently using.

Per the "underlying pattern,"  you may find this interesting:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/superconductor-fractals/


Yes, I am borderline autistic, and yes, I am pulling the majority of this out of my memory., and yes, I do tend to be very verbose!

Again.  I acknowledge that there's an electromagnetic interaction.  Who could argue this?  But I don't know that a magnetic field requires an electric field.  I'm actually proposing that the magnetic field may be the fundamental source of all matter and all energy in matter.  I absolutely DO NOT argue the function of electrons within an atomic structure.  How could I?  It's well researched and evidence is empirical.   
 

I am not sure that I am arguing its function either... just its structure.


But I certainly argue that the magnetic force is dependent on an electric force.

You will get no argument from me there!

I'm a great fan of Leedskalnin.  I buy into his 'little magnets' entirely. 

Me too, actually.  So much so that I am arranging a "field trip" for my girls to his home.
You are aware of the ruins off Yonaguni? 

http://www.google.com/images?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=yonaguni&oe=utf-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=-qOATNnuIIKKlwemqrCcDg&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=4&ved=0CD8QsAQwAw&biw=1440&bih=627

Particularly:
http://www.city.ishigaki.okinawa.jp/en/engnews/ishigakitimes/yonaguni.jpg
Notice the star shaped raised dias on the right. 

Does it look familiar:
http://here4now.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341d171f53ef010536451be7970b-450wi

I just look for patterns...  ;)

But I CANNOT see the possibility of magnetic monopoles holding a 'field structure'.  It is my opinion that 'like charges' will always repel.  But the thing is that the resolution of the AC force does NOT need monopoles.  It only needs a 'field effect' with orbiting 'dipolar strings'.  If the AC was as depicted in those opposing coils - then the net force from them would be zero.  But that's just my opinion.   :D

Regards,
Rosemary

:)

Cheers,
Twinbeard

Offline twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #529 on: September 03, 2010, 09:56:49 AM »
Sorry Twinbeard - I'm losing posts all over the place.  I meant to have this one precede the previous and it seems I can't do this.

In any event - I'll just write this again.  Regarding that 'shared' development of the thesis - it's going to be tricky but certainly preferred.  And any assistance you can give here would be much appreciated.  But I'll get back to you on this.  I first need to get some draft where the concepts can be better understood.  I keep stating that the concepts are simple.  They are.  But they're not easy to explain in language. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

No problem Rosemary.  Just let me know and I will turn on a mailing list for you, and we can sort out
the other pieces and parts, at your convenience and discretion, of course.

Cheers,
Twinbeard

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #530 on: September 03, 2010, 04:32:13 PM »
Sorry guys, I started to download diagrams and found that the pictures were WAY too big.  I'll try and get some more off photobucket. Bear with me.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #531 on: September 03, 2010, 04:43:19 PM »
Hopefully this one will work.  here goes. ???

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #532 on: September 03, 2010, 04:47:53 PM »
I still need to download the electron but have not got the required size.  The proton and neutron both resolved from composites of the electron.  I'll do a brief summary of the thinking when I finally upload the electron.

Regards,
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #533 on: September 03, 2010, 06:12:24 PM »
Hi again Twinbeard.  I saw that interminable discussion on Thermodynamic Laws and wondered if it wouldn't be as well to just email them this link - from our own forum.  LOL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbaub2kkkpA

From what I see it's a variation of the Nathan Stubblefield Earth Battery arrangement.  It really should be on the front page of every forum.  It's ground breaking results.  Perpetual Motion - and it's unarguable.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #534 on: September 03, 2010, 06:21:58 PM »
Guys, the following is the justification of the size of the proton vs the electron - which is a consequence of this construct - for those who follow the thesis. 

If the photon comprises two zipons then the zipon would be half the size of the photon.  Velocity and mass have an inverse proportionate relationship.  So, if the photon moves at the speed of light (C) then the velocity of the zipon would be 2C.  Velocity and mass are inversely proportionate so, if the mass of the photon were given as 1, then the zipon would be 0.5.  If the electron comprises 3 truants then its mass would be 0.5 x 3 = 1.5.  And, if the proton comprises three electrons then, each electron would comprise 0.5 for the quark.  3 quarks having no volume is 0.5 x 3 = 1.5.  Four times bigger for the orbital zenith of the second truant is 1.5 x 4 = 6.  And four times bigger for the orbital zenith of the third truant is 6 x 4 = 24.   The second and third truant only have two dimensions of volume as they manifest within a prescribed space, that merry-go-round referred to in the field description.  Therefore, 3 second truants, having length and breadth is 6 x 6 x 3 = 108.  3 third truants having length and breadth is 24 x 24 x 3 = 1728.  This gives a mass of 1837.5, minus 1.5 for the quarks that have neither volume or mass, giving a total of 1836.  Some variation of this number is, no doubt, required to accommodate the spherical shape of the truants, but it’s complex – a 2 dimensional sphere.

Copied from the thesis.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35909676/REVISION-OF-DARK-MATTER-MFM

Added  - And the neutron/proton arrangement - the neutron would then be precisely 1836 + 1.5 for the externalised 'quark' or electron arrangement.  It sort of conforms to actual known values so may be a fair construct.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #535 on: September 04, 2010, 09:02:33 AM »
Guys, a couple of isolated bits of information that I'm proud to add to this thread.  The one is the most elegant variation of a Nathan Stubblefield battery - done by lasersaber that has blown certain thermodynamic constraints to blazes.  I'm just AMAZED that it's not drawing more attention.  I'll append the link.

The other thing is this.  Take your first given circle - any arbitrary size.  Six circles fit around that first circle.  Add 6 - same size - and 12 fit around the second circle.  Add 6 - and 18 fit around the 3rd circle.  Add 6 - and 24 fit around the 4th circle.  Add 6 - and 30 fit around the 5th circle.  FOREVER.  I've got an illustration of this but it's too big to upload here.  I'll try and get a smaller version.

This relationship was found by Riaan Theron.   ;D

And here's the link to lasersaber's video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbaub2kkkpA
« Last Edit: September 04, 2010, 09:22:59 AM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #536 on: September 05, 2010, 12:57:21 PM »
Guys - just for the record.

Aaron has now officially locked all my threads and buried them on a subforum.  Meanwhile he displays the mosfet heating circuit thread on the front page of every forum.  That thread denies that I was the author of the circuit and it further denies benefit in the circuit.  Effectively the propagandising related to this technology is still rife. 

I seriously doubt that EF.com can be accused of 'advancing' ou technologies while these evident propagandising tools are required.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33937867/IF-I-WAS-A-TROLL

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #537 on: September 07, 2010, 07:57:52 PM »
I'm only posting here so that I don't lose this thread again.  I found it FINALLY in the 'whose on the forum link.  Someone patient - please help me learn my way around these forum topics.  There's still another thread I'm looking for.  The minute it drops off the first page it seems forever lost. 

Anyway - hopefully this one will survive until tomorrow when I have to do an update on our campus tests.

Sorry about this post's irrelevance.  Just scared of losing it again.

Rosemary

Offline mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #538 on: September 07, 2010, 08:41:38 PM »
I'm only posting here so that I don't lose this thread again.  I found it FINALLY in the 'whose on the forum link.  Someone patient - please help me learn my way around these forum topics.  There's still another thread I'm looking for.  The minute it drops off the first page it seems forever lost. 

Anyway - hopefully this one will survive until tomorrow when I have to do an update on our campus tests.

Sorry about this post's irrelevance.  Just scared of losing it again.

Rosemary

Dear Rosemary;

On the left side of the screen there is something called
the User Menu. If you click on *Show my posts* you'll get
your posts listed latest first and they have their link chain
headers available for clicking. Going into the "Forum" *is*
rather daunting.

:S:MarkSCoffman

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #539 on: September 07, 2010, 08:57:42 PM »
THANK YOU Mark,

Much appreciated.  I've just done this and I see it now.  Wilby tried to explain this earlier and - to my shame - I forgot what he said and lost the link to where he said it.  I'm aging - AT SPEED.  LOL

The very best to you Mark and many thanks indeed.
Kindest regards,
Rosemary