Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2  (Read 314656 times)

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #285 on: June 15, 2006, 01:41:33 AM »


also Stefan hope you are around to see what's going on in here despite the Soccer world cup....what a party!!!

Sorry for the offtopic reply, but I jus?t found how to view the soccer WM2006
for free on an UMTS phone via Vodafone My PC streaming:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvl_Lw4I05U

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #286 on: June 15, 2006, 01:44:55 AM »
Yes, seems
kukulcangod
has also the wrong stator magnets.
You must turn them by 90 degrees towards the rotor axis with their
big surface...otherwise the forces are too weak !

kukulcangod

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #287 on: June 15, 2006, 05:14:40 AM »
Quote
Hey kukulcangod and all!

Nice pics.

couple of questions: what kind of magnets are you using. are your stator magnets not the usual ferrite magnets that are polarized through thickness? because if they are then check madmaxx's design at page 14. I believe he had the polarization wrong. (sorry madmaxx and kukulcangod if i'm wrong )

 
 

Thanks T , the thing is with this radio shack magnets ceramic and magnetized through thickness that if I put them in the suggested side, the will get stuck to the rotor ??? because funny enough I'm using two half moons stacked magnets and the top one rejects the other attracts......so you know I wasn't expecting that behaviour from it , none the less by rising my stators a few milimimeters I would get clean rejection with one rotor half moon. I will try different arrangements will see.Good luck.

2tiger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #288 on: June 15, 2006, 11:13:31 AM »
Hi all
Reading your posts I notice that you have all the same problem.
That the created torque is enough to lift up a statormagnet but is too weak to bring them down after passing them.

So just an idea based on this.
I think that the kinetic energy of the rotor created by the repulsion ist not high enough to do both.
What would happen if you build a unit with a bigger radius so that the rotor magnet has a longer "way" to run "free" and store more kinetic energy in the rotor?

And - if I remember well you all are trying to liftup the first stator just in front of the stator. Torbay uses a rotormagnet that covers three statormagnets at a time.
Have anyone try to lift the third statormagnet in front of the rotormagnet? I think that this would be the better timing. The donkey will run faster if he see the carot more far away as he has it hanging down right in front of his nose.

Please tell me if I?m complete wrong.

CU
2Tiger
 


« Last Edit: June 16, 2006, 11:33:38 AM by 2tiger »

kukulcangod

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #289 on: June 15, 2006, 08:44:38 PM »
Quote
And - if I remember well you all are trying to liftup the first stator just in front of the stator. Torbay uses a rotormagnet that covers three statormagnets at a time.

Good thinking tiger, out of frustration it would've take me longer to get to that detail , it means going back to study original plans etc, that's why I made it in rhino as accurate as possible but constructing -again-with what is available amounts to a lot of brainstorming when time permits, Those are the types of observations we need to correct our trayectory.
 I did experiment  with my setting and as I mentioned before, with only one stator my rotor is able to go 360 and lift 2 stators after that , still need to be considered flywheel weight and power of magnets for Torque.Keep up the good work.

2tiger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #290 on: June 16, 2006, 11:09:46 AM »
Hi
Here some information from Torbay?s patent script.

Page 6
...logramos obtener una fuerza de rechazo magnetico que llamamos X y que sera igual a Z1+F+F+F = X  despejando la ecuacion nos queda X=F+F+F+F+F+F=6F.
Por otro lado Fq=F concluimos en que X>>>F4 (F4 es la F generada por M4) (aclaramos que F4<F debido a su desplazamiento y que X>>>Q por lo que obligamos al brazo rotor a desplazarce hacia la posision 2 (P2), por sistema mecanico M4 baja y se eleva M5 repitiendo todo el proseso anterior, de esta manera el brazo rotor se desplaza infinitamente (Pn+1)
                         X=6F-F4-Q=4F+
....


translation:
... we obtain a repeling force we call X and the amount would be Z1+F+F+F = X = 6F.
(Z1 = magnetic force of the rotormagnet (covering 3 of the statormagnets), F  = mag. force of ONE statormagnet)
On the other side we have Fq=F and X>>>F4(where F4 is the force generated by M4) (also we explain that F4 < F because of its desplaced position (lifted up) and X>>>Q (where Q include al mecanical losses, so the rotor has only one way to go, to Pos2(P2).
By a mechanical system(push down system) M4 will be pushed down and M5 will be lifted up (regard the order - first he pushed down and then he lifted up!!!) so that the process starts again.
                         X=6F-F4-Q=4F+

Well, as I read my physics book well, a magnetic force can only exist by an interaction between a magnet and another magnet or ferromaterials in other words only when you create a mag. flux.
So I see a mistake an his first formula   Z1+F+F+F = X = 6F.
The repeling force X MUST be 3F, there is no other way.
F4 is smaller than F. But why???. When he says F4 is the force created by M4, he surely means the lower repeling force of the lifted up stator No. 4 (perhaps there is an atraccion force, I don?t know!) so it is a positive value non a neagativ.
Also he supose that all mecanical/friccion losses Q are equal F. So all of you who have a model of this motor report that there is enough torque for lift up a stator, but no enough to feed  a pushdown mechanism, i think that Q must be bigger than 1F, perhaps 2F.
And where in the formula is the forcevalue to push down or lift up a stator?

From my point of view his last formula on page No. 6 must be the following:

              F4=+1F       Q=-2F    ->     X=3F+F4-Q=2F+

The only way to get a continiusly movement is, that you push down a stator ONLY with 1F in order to get 3F repeling force for start the cycle again.
But then you only have a selfrunner   :-[-  NO OU, sorry!

Any kind of critical replies are welcome. Thanks.

Cu
2Tiger




 
« Last Edit: June 16, 2006, 11:37:35 AM by 2tiger »

eavogels

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
    • FDP
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #291 on: June 16, 2006, 12:34:14 PM »
Perhaps, since 3 stator magnets are in front of the stator, that is 3 times as big, he calculates the rotor force (Z1) equal to the 3 forces of the stator magnets. Z1 = F+F+F
/Eric.

2tiger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #292 on: June 16, 2006, 01:14:32 PM »
Perhaps, since 3 stator magnets are in front of the stator, that is 3 times as big, he calculates the rotor force (Z1) equal to the 3 forces of the stator magnets. Z1 = F+F+F
/Eric.

Z1=F+F+F but ONLY when you have these three stator magnets in front of the rotormagnet, otherwise you cannot talk about a magnetic force.

Mica Busch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • Developing ConXepts
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #293 on: June 16, 2006, 07:58:16 PM »
This goes in addition to Tiger's comment, of lifting the stator ahead of the three already lifted. I recall seeing a model where the rotor was a complete circle, North/South along its diameter. Right now we are working on repulsion ONLY and half a rotor, but if the other half was present, providing an attractive force, no rigging would be needed to pull the stators back down, the attractive side would do that for us. All we would need to be concerned with is lifting the magnet ahead of the repulsion zone, to let the magnetic "bubble" we are squeezing around move. Thats the ONLY force to contend with, LIFTING a stator out of attraction so the repulsion side can rotate to alignment...

Just a thought  ;D

gn0stik

  • Guest
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #294 on: June 16, 2006, 10:12:25 PM »
Hi
Here some information from Torbay?s patent script.

Page 6
...logramos obtener una fuerza de rechazo magnetico que llamamos X y que sera igual a Z1+F+F+F = X  despejando la ecuacion nos queda X=F+F+F+F+F+F=6F.
Por otro lado Fq=F concluimos en que X>>>F4 (F4 es la F generada por M4) (aclaramos que F4<F debido a su desplazamiento y que X>>>Q por lo que obligamos al brazo rotor a desplazarce hacia la posision 2 (P2), por sistema mecanico M4 baja y se eleva M5 repitiendo todo el proseso anterior, de esta manera el brazo rotor se desplaza infinitamente (Pn+1)
                         X=6F-F4-Q=4F+
....


translation:
... we obtain a repeling force we call X and the amount would be Z1+F+F+F = X = 6F.
(Z1 = magnetic force of the rotormagnet (covering 3 of the statormagnets), F  = mag. force of ONE statormagnet)
On the other side we have Fq=F and X>>>F4(where F4 is the force generated by M4) (also we explain that F4 < F because of its desplaced position (lifted up) and X>>>Q (where Q include al mecanical losses, so the rotor has only one way to go, to Pos2(P2).
By a mechanical system(push down system) M4 will be pushed down and M5 will be lifted up (regard the order - first he pushed down and then he lifted up!!!) so that the process starts again.
                         X=6F-F4-Q=4F+

Well, as I read my physics book well, a magnetic force can only exist by an interaction between a magnet and another magnet or ferromaterials in other words only when you create a mag. flux.
So I see a mistake an his first formula   Z1+F+F+F = X = 6F.
The repeling force X MUST be 3F, there is no other way.
F4 is smaller than F. But why???. When he says F4 is the force created by M4, he surely means the lower repeling force of the lifted up stator No. 4 (perhaps there is an atraccion force, I don?t know!) so it is a positive value non a neagativ.
Also he supose that all mecanical/friccion losses Q are equal F. So all of you who have a model of this motor report that there is enough torque for lift up a stator, but no enough to feed  a pushdown mechanism, i think that Q must be bigger than 1F, perhaps 2F.
And where in the formula is the forcevalue to push down or lift up a stator?

From my point of view his last formula on page No. 6 must be the following:

              F4=+1F       Q=-2F    ->     X=3F+F4-Q=2F+

The only way to get a continiusly movement is, that you push down a stator ONLY with 1F in order to get 3F repeling force for start the cycle again.
But then you only have a selfrunner   :-[-  NO OU, sorry!

Any kind of critical replies are welcome. Thanks.

Cu
2Tiger


Until someone builds the motor to his patent specs we cannot take our test results and apply them to his equations. Every single replication attempt has had something not quite right about it according to his patent, ie wrong magnet pole alignment, no shaped stator magnet, not enough stator magnets, etc.

To me, the fact that we have gotten any results whatsoever is amazing. We did have one person here who claimed to have a slow turner, and he said he built it shabbily, and it needed refinement. Once we build one to specs, THEN we should modify and experiment, until then, we cannot speculate about output power based on our own experimentation.

Just an observation.

I was however curious about the results of eric's design, since it appeared to have so much torque. (it shook the table it was on).

 

Maran

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #295 on: June 21, 2006, 11:08:53 PM »
what whappen, nobody post any comment during 5 days. where is every body???????

Jdo300

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 682
    • The Magnetic 90 degree rule Theory
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #296 on: June 22, 2006, 08:12:44 AM »
Hello Everybody,

Sorry I have not gotten the promised simulation files up online yet. I just spoke to Maran about this today and I will post the dxf's of the pieces I have currently setup. I was trying to wait until I could find the time to put the rest of the screws and bolts into the model but it appears that I am not finding that precious window I need to do it. So I'll at least post the pieces I have made so far and just update the files as I finish it up. The only thing I don't have modeled are the brackets to mount the rollers on top of the stator pieces but I'm assuming that most people would just make some makeshift ones out of sheet metal anyway so I won't stress about that too much. I am not at my normal computer right now so I will post the existing part files tomorrow afternoon.

God Bless,
Jason O

Jdo300

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 682
    • The Magnetic 90 degree rule Theory
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #297 on: June 23, 2006, 08:08:03 AM »
Hi Everyone,

As promised, here are the updated screenshots of my CAD drawing. I actually did find the time to put all the screws and nuts into it. I also converted all the parts to .sat files which can be ready by AutoCAD. if anyone has any specific preferences let me know and I'll convert them to another format.

God Bless,
Jason O

Jdo300

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 682
    • The Magnetic 90 degree rule Theory
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #298 on: June 23, 2006, 08:09:42 AM »
Here are some more screenshots:

Jdo300

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 682
    • The Magnetic 90 degree rule Theory
Re: Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2
« Reply #299 on: June 23, 2006, 08:35:04 AM »
Hello again,

I've attached a zip file with the CAD drawings of the relevant parts. Here are a few notes about the model.

- I designed the rotor cap for some custom arc magnets that Dan LaRochelle has on hand but because of the rotor hub's layered design, you can simply replace the Rotor Magnet disk with a different one that would fit your magnet assembly. Since I designed it to fit rotor magnets that are 0.5" tall, perhaps using a series of small neo arc magnets that have the same 4" radius as Dan's will be a sufficient. The original arc magnets that Dan has are 4" OD, 3.5" ID, and 0.25" square cross section so I needed to use two of them to equal the height of the stator magnets I chose.

- The Stators are made up of two neo magnets separated by a steel core to approximate the tapered shape of the original wooden Torbay model. The magnets pictured in the model can be purchased at www.kjmagnetics.com on the following pages:

http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=BX084 (Large front magnet)

http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=BC82 (Small back magnet)

As for the plastic parts, the largest piece is the base, which is 12" in diameter and made of a 1.25" thick piece of plastic. In order for this to fit onto most CNC mini mills, the base could be sectioned up into quarters to fit the size of the cutting table. The next largest part is the rotor cap, which is made out of 1" thick plastic, 8" in diameter. For this design, I changed the 360 degree spiral to a 150 degree spiral but I can easily change this if necessary. The rest of the rotor and stator pieces are made from 1" and 0.5" pieces of plastic. But you should be able to see how much you will need from the drawings. If not, let me know and I'll be glad to give you a more precise answer :-).

God Bless,
Jason O