Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: An "elementary" point of view...  (Read 2970 times)

iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Stellarotor http://www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/stanga.html
An "elementary" point of view...
« on: February 02, 2010, 07:54:01 PM »

   ....related to a possible  PM,is to bring to light the "prime mover".
   
      If you take a short look at an overshot water mill,you can notice easy:

       -without the river flow,the energy collector (the "wheel"...),is not moving...is well balanced.A pair of scales,in the fulcrum "feels" no difference.

       -with the river flow,the wheel moves...a pair of scales,in the fulcrum, "feels" the difference.

       As an abstract,existing only in the mind,we can keep this word :the difference.

       It can be a concrete thing:the overshot river flow,acts as a prime mover,due to gravity.

       It can be any possible object(s) of thought("difference" ),also...if it can work as a prime mover,due to gravity too.

          All the best! / Alex
Logged

iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Stellarotor http://www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/stanga.html
Re: An "elementary" point of view...
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 08:06:50 PM »


.....can be also,a power collector(usually a certain shape of wheel),immersed in a flow:equal arms,concave-convex shape.
   
    For gravity,the  shape  is not important...CoG ,only.

    The shape of mass is "transparent" for gravity,not for nuclei.

    It's possible to lay the nuclear system of mass,in such a manner,alike concave-convex shape of a common wheel?

    A kind of nanotechnology marvelous accomplishment? Who knows?

    For the moment,thinking in a classical way,we have the possibility  to imagine a long arm-short arm(equal masses case) ,vis-a-vis fulcrum.

    A formal image is a feedback energy system,with input<<<output,due to an "inner" mass circulation/flow.

     All the best! / Alex

 
 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »