Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump  (Read 344508 times)

zerotensor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #555 on: January 14, 2010, 12:15:00 AM »
Quote from: hartiberlin link=topic=8586.msg222188#msg222188 =1263422536
Hmm, the positive hump wavehill is mysterious there.

I think the shape of the waveform is partially due to the load being a resistor and diode in parallel.  On the positive swings, the ohmic load is distributed across the resistor and the LED;  1/Rtotal = 1/Rresistor + 1/Rdiode, while on negative swings, the coil only sees the resistor.  One way to mitigate this without removing the LED entirely would be to wire two LEDs in parallel, but with opposite polarities so that one or the other diode will pass current regardless of the polarity of the applied pulse.  Even then, the overall resistance will still fluctuate because of the nature of the diodes' response curves, (esp. at high frequencies).

agentgates

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #556 on: January 14, 2010, 12:44:35 AM »
Hi Marek

Thank you for your post. :)

@ Tony
Is this the effect You are observing driving your TPU?

Similar, but I don't have those ugly "afterhumps". :) Only the big ones. You perhaps driving it in current mode. (that is not good) The pulse length should be around 500ns depending on your setup but it never changed proportionally with my setups.

I meant "not freq sensitive" that those spikes come at any frequencies at approximatelly the same length. You can make those powerful spikes even without generators. Also they will be far stronger when you'll fire the 2 other coils in sequence.

These spikes won't even change in my previous setup (3 primary with the same one turn secondary, 20-30V 100-200mA, 87Hz) when I put a 50W 240 halogene bulb on it. They just don't care about your load.

Some interesting things I noticed:
1. There are not only stronger but lot more spikes when you drive all the 3 coils.
2. By only increasing the input voltage they are coming closer and closer a bit, some kind of spin-up effect.
3. I also observed a "jump-together" effect. When I increased the input voltage I zoomed the scope to observe closer the growing of a spike. A single spike grows out gently from the ground line. By just keep on increasing the input voltage, after reaching a certain level other spikes RAPIDLY jump out. So there is some kind of critical level that when you reach with the input voltage the number of these pretty curvy spikes rapidly multiplies. (it happened somewhere between 15V-20V)
4. I kept on increasing the input voltage and found another thing that might be interesting. There is a next voltage limit that when you reach they stop growing immediately. (IMHO the secondary gets saturated magnetically)

experiment description: Tpu with one driving coil, ONE TURN of collector loaded with 2.2ohm/3W resistor and white LED parallel. Diode light is very bright, voltage measured on the 2.2ohm load You can see on the scope. Input power about 12W, output about 1W. Still far from from OU, but for me there is something goin on in this device (Im an electronic engineer). Btw, this setup IS frequency dependent. The highest power occurs when freq=33kHz

Yes you can not make OU with one primary without other parts like a good LC pair.

12W is HUGE in consumption Marek. You need a current limiter resistor in series with your primary as this is not a current device. It is strongly a voltage device - as I found in the meantime. I think this is one of the many of those things were the other lads failed over the years, they just instinctly tried to handle it as a transformer where you have to punch the current hard through the wires if you want result. (I also did it :D ) Set your primary resistance somewhere between 15-22ohms to find the optimum of your coil. My present setup likes 15 and 18ohms 3-5W resistor in series on the common ground.

I think the latter will eliminate those ugly "afterhumps".

I hope I could help. Good luck. :)

Kind Regards
Tony

PS: I am currently writing the code for the PG to tickle this thing from as many angles I can and opefully I can tell about the results tomorrow.

UPDATE

Set your primary resistance to an optimum level when you can drive it between 100-200mA up to ~25V. (there is no point to go above as I noticed)

Another thing I have forgotten, when you get that "jump-together" thingy your power consumption will fall back rapidly in the same time. About to the half.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 01:05:36 AM by agentgates »

agentgates

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #557 on: January 14, 2010, 12:58:45 AM »
@zerotensor

Yes you're right but he also drives it in current mode and that thing is tring to be a back EMF pulse due to the high current he puts in and perhaps the res+diode pair rectifies it. :)

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #558 on: January 14, 2010, 01:04:38 AM »
Ok the revised page is up, I hope all the parameters are correct now. The link is at:

http://ziosproject.com/NJ/AAcoilPres/index.htm

Perhaps this can be put in the first post so new comers can directly see the latest design?

agentgates

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #559 on: January 14, 2010, 01:16:45 AM »
@broli

Thank you for your ambitious work again. :) However I can not see change on the page.

I can not modify my first post. :( There are many things I would like to change there but somehow the "Modify" button disappeared.

UPDATE

Code is ready but I feel dizzy so I have a rest. Think this glue is a poison to smell.

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #560 on: January 14, 2010, 01:25:38 AM »
@broli

Thank you for your ambitious work again. :) However I can not see change on the page.

I can not modify my first post. :( There are many things I would like to change there but somehow the "Modify" button disappeared.


Try hitting Ctrl+F5. Ask Stefan for updating the first post. And don't burn yourself out, eat and sleep healthy. Free energy and health should be both important to the tinkerers here.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #561 on: January 14, 2010, 01:35:06 AM »
Tony
Hook up the vent
the glue will affect you!!

don't just open a window get the vent going PLEASE
Dryer vent hose, small computer fan stick the hose out the window put foam/pillows around to seal

Chet

Broli
you can PM Stefan to add that info to first page

plengo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 962
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #562 on: January 14, 2010, 02:27:05 AM »
Ok the revised page is up, I hope all the parameters are correct now. The link is at:

http://ziosproject.com/NJ/AAcoilPres/index.htm

Perhaps this can be put in the first post so new comers can directly see the latest design?

Beautiful great work Broli, thank you.

Just for completion, since your one site for ALL info has the best coil representation, would you be able to also show there the wire sizes?

I have ALL the materials to replicate this work, including a programmable 14 channel micro-controller that I used for similar projects where I pulse coils such as this one. So I am dying to start but still a little confused (cleared by your 3Ds concerning the geometry) about the wire sizes.

Fausto.

ps: pdf below might be usefull for those trying to coil in such large cylinders.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #563 on: January 14, 2010, 03:14:53 AM »
Hope ya feel better Gates.  Glue can get ya. Car fumes get me good. Migraine. Starts with fuzzy vision then about 20 min later its a pounder.  More the cars that produce more carbon monoxide, due to no catalytic, bad catalytic, runs rich.
Was looking at scopes on ebay and a fairly descent one can be had for a reasonable price. I had one years ago but wasnt using it for a while and a friend needed one. So I sold it.  Gunna buy one.

Thats interesting about the voltage increase affects the outcome. The what it does, sounds out there, but I gotta accept that there are things that are not known by many.

Hop Grasser

tanakat

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #564 on: January 14, 2010, 03:17:41 AM »
@plengo

The latest post I could find was this one :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8586.msg221148#msg221148

Tony talks about :

0.19mm primary coils. Altogether 3 primary wound on the acrylic tube in the same manner. 45 degrees angle to the centreline and 10 degrees between the same primary coil. Each primary coil has 3.33 degrees offset to the previous one.

You can assume from the top of the post that the secondary uses 0.74mm

Hope it helps you


altair

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #565 on: January 14, 2010, 03:51:57 AM »
Wire size:
for americans, 0.19mm is AWG 32  :)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #566 on: January 14, 2010, 04:04:04 AM »
Fausto
Thanks for the PDF,nice to see you here.
@Altair
Thanks for the wire size.
@Hop Grasser
you from NY?

G night Fellas

Chet


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #567 on: January 14, 2010, 04:07:34 AM »
Ramset
Na  Ft Laud.  orig  Penn.

Magsinthesun   But its cold out!


Super God

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #568 on: January 14, 2010, 04:25:16 AM »
Is there a video showing the jump together effect?

Thanks!

zerotensor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #569 on: January 14, 2010, 04:53:59 AM »
Quote from: agentgates link=topic=8586.msg222231#msg222231 =1263428205
I can not modify my first post. :( There are many things I would like to change there but somehow the "Modify" button disappeared.

It's a good thing you can't modify your first post.  Many people have responded to it, and if you were to change it, the essence of the conversation might be corrupted.  It makes all kinds of sense to lock-out edits after a certain amount of time has elapsed in a forum like this, as it precludes members' ability to "re-write history", so-to-speak.  I'm not suggesting that this is what you intend, but still, for the integrity of the thread, I suggest that you just compose a new post which incorporates whatever modifications / corrections you wish to convey.  It's more "transparent" that way.