1-The drop in current flow through the primary coil(the drop in P/in),means the impedance value of the primary coil went up or down?
>>> Irrational question.  There is no mention of the voltage.  Get help to learn how to compose a coherent sentence from Posters Anonymous.











Brad...
I've got something to say...
I really loved the skillful way...
You posed those questions like peddles, touché!

NOW, Brad, dammit, answer the question in posting #2073 about "magnetic field's."

Oh,i see lol.
Regardless of the fact that you know the questions are based on my transformer under test--you pull the old !!not enough information !card out . Well that shows a bit of a fail MH,as the 1st question clearly states(in brackets) that the P/in went up-the extra value to make a correct determination of the answer required.

2-The increase in current flow through the secondary coil,resulting in a higher power value dissipated across the 5 ohm resistor, means the impedance in the secondary coil went up or down?
>>>  Irrational question.  The impedance of the secondary coil is not discussed in this context.  There was no Brad secret decoder ring used in the answering of this question.

The secondary coil has current flowing through it,and power being dissipated across a 5 ohm resistor. The secondary coil is wound over the primary coil,and so the question is valid.

3- The combined results of the transformer as a whole,means the impedance went up or down?.
>>> Irrational question.  No answer provided, see recommendation in answer #1.

Enough information for those in the know,to provide an accurate answer.

4-The phase relationship between the primary and secondary coils current is bought into phase with each other how?
>>> Use a resistive load.

See question 2-quote: across the 5 ohm resistor

5-Show another transformer test carried out that shows the EMF and current phase relationship between the primary and secondary coil of a transformer to be in phase.
>>> Irrational question or use a resistive load and rose peddles.

See question 2-quote: across the 5 ohm resistor

6--provide a link or information on a transformer where the secondaries current leads that of the primaries current.
>>> Irrational question or see Brad's "magnet on a Popsicle stick that wobbles transformer" experiment extraordinaire.

The extraordinaire will get back to you on this one.

I will add in the spoon feeding information to the questions for you MH.
BRB.


Brad

Here you go MH
I have added the requested information in regards to the below questions.
Please read carefully this time,and note that the load !is! resistive.
 

Brad

Even if you don't follow the news, this one was really really hard to miss.  That's a deficiency.  The other deficiency is not denouncing what motorcycle dude did.

You were the aggressor and I shut you up and shut you down.  Then you had a moment of soul searching about your character and about over unity itself.  You realized that it was consuming you and you had nothing to show for it for years of work.  For all practical intents and purposes you disappeared.

And here you are defending Brad when I am arguing things with Brad like, "No, you do not measure the top speed of a car on a hill."  And you are a car guy for Christ's sake!

Turn off the bad boy Magluvin and just go back to being civil again.  But I will never forget that one full year of insane vicious harassment from you and the fact that you never apologized for it.

"Even if you don't follow the news, this one was really really hard to miss.  That's a deficiency.  The other deficiency is not denouncing what motorcycle dude did."

A deficiency?  Are you saying that I am deficient in knowledge because I find more important news more worthy of my time? Im not interested in the guy in the pic and Im not going to waste my time on that, you can if you like . So Im not in a position to make any comments on the guy based on what you say about him. It was up to you to prove your statement and it seems you wish to talk about it more than just proving what you said. So your story is deficient on proof so far.

'You were the aggressor and I shut you up and shut you down.  Then you had a moment of soul searching about your character and about over unity itself.  You realized that it was consuming you and you had nothing to show for it for years of work.  For all practical intents and purposes you disappeared."

Anyone can click on your name Milehigh, then click on 'Show posts' and do the same for me and compare.  I win, you loose. Simple   Maybe you can remember that we were both on moderation at the same time. So your no sweetheart my friend.  I suppose only I deserved the punishment and you were framed. What ever.

"Turn off the bad boy Magluvin and just go back to being civil again.  But I will never forget that one full year of insane vicious harassment from you and the fact that you never apologized for it."

Bad boy?  And you are a good boy? ?  Just always sooo nicy nice. Barf bag please.  You just dont want anyone calling you out on your hypocrisy. You cant function without it.  Playing the victim card



Mags

Magluvin:

You damn well know it's true.  People can sense that's it's true.  Many people were witness to it.  It was a shameful episode in your life and when you make light of it here you are just bluffing and you are just shaming yourself some more.  We both know the truth.

I have talked tough to Brad.  I don't know why Brad can't seem to understand basic things that we should all take for granted.  Take the example of determining the resonant frequency of a wine glass.  First, he insisted that he had to have specifics, and there was no other possible way to answer the question.  So are we supposed to believe that Brad can't understand what a conceptual question is or how to answer it?  So then I told him to create his own specific parameters and answer the question.  He clammed up and said nothing.  Then I answered the questions and he went on a tirade saying repeatedly that the answers were wrong.  Then I rebutted that and then he clammed up and said nothing.  That can be taxing, believe me, and the arguments can get heated.

Why don't you take up the issue of determining a car's top speed and argue with him that it has to be done on a flat surface and not a sloped surface?  Go ahead, what is stopping you?

Believe me, if you are going to stand your ground and argue common sense against nonsense, it's going to get heated.  And just the fact that you sit there with your own mouth clammed shut says a lot.  You are fully aware that for every one of the "main battles" if the arguments were set on a mainstream science forum Brad would be sliced to pieces.  And I am pretty sure for most of them you agree with me.

And ultimately I am trying to help Brad.  Why should he just do his thing in an artificial world that is fake, only to arrive at a rude awakening in the real world one day?  Why can't we argue things out with some kind of normal frame of reference, a commonly understood general understanding?

And that artificial world extends beyond Brad.  Look at the ridiculous nit-picking over the way the wine glass resonated.  Has it really stopped or are there still micro-movements in the glass?  If you stood up in your grade 11 Physics class and tried to challenge the teacher that the glass did not _really_ stop moving, how do you think that would come across?  The other students would look at you like you were nuts or just being a pain in the ass and disrupting the class.

Let me put it this way to you:  If the group scrutinized and nit-picked Brad the way I have been scrutinized and nit-picked, then Brad would be totally out of it, he would be a basket case.

A ridiculously permissive environment for Brad only ends up hurting Brad.  You know, the knowledge base around here that advances like a slow moving glacier, and half or perhaps more than half the time the glacier is melting.

I am really here for the next Wayne Travis or John Rohner or Naima Faegin.  Note that two out of three of them are under investigation by the FBI.  In the mean time, I came here in this thread to say, "What the hell do you mean by a 'resonant Joule Thief,' the Joule Thief is a pulse circuit and it does not resonate."

And it would appear after the initial buzz the "resonant Joule Thief" is going nowhere, there is nothing.  Smoky2's big talk was all smoke and mirrors.  A "resonant Joule Thief" doesn't even make sense and it would garner laughs and snickers on a real electronics forum.

The "resonant Joule Thief" evolved into a discussion about resonance and then a wine glass.  Brad puffed out his chest and we all know where that one went.  I don't even know why I am debating a little transformer with a wobbling magnet with him, it's not even supposed to be on this thread.

For all the grief and crap that has taken place, a wise person will realize that I got into heated debates with Brad to bring common sense and truth to the table.  The wine glass example did that.  I am sorry that Brad went haywire, but if you forget about this forum and the crazy bias towards Brad and against me, and look at what really was taking place in the discussions, I was trying to help Brad by standing my ground.  If you are just an enabler and just basking in the alternative reality around here and think that I am a bad guy then you are just hurting Brad.

And if you really want to split hairs, the first person to use nasty words like "stupid" or whatever was Brad.  I make it a policy to never to be the first to start anything like that.  And I am human and I can only tolerate so much nonsense from Brad, and from others.  I figure that the majority of you know that this is an "alternate reality" and if the same debate took place between myself and Brad on a "normal" forum, the results would be totally different.  Most of you would probably take off right away and disappear from a "normal" electronics forum.

So I said something to Brad that was "bad" and Grumage objected to it and it has been milked several times.  But what did Brad do to elicit that response from me?  I can't remember offhand, but it must have been something pretty outrageous, or something really bad that he said for the thirtieth time.  Don't pretend that Brad is an innocent angel.  His behavoiur has been outrageous, all stemming from me deciding to give him the straight goods and stand my ground.

I am really waiting for the next Wayne Travis deal to show up.  You know, people that steal millions of dollars from gullible people?  That's what I am interested in.  I tried, but ultimately I couldn't care less if I haven't changed Brad by one iota.

MileHigh

Here Magluvin, it's wake-up time for you.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/13/jimmy-savile-clunk-click-safety-ads-ejected-national-archives

Note it's from just four days ago.

<<<
The “clunk click for every trip” public information films presented by Jimmy Savile have been removed from the National Archives as official bodies seek to erase from history records of Britain’s most notorious child abuser.

Savile made 20 clips in the 1970s warning of the dangers of driving without seatbelts. The “clunk click” films, which were repeatedly broadcast in the 1970s, were seen as playing a key role in reducing road deaths before seatbelts were made compulsory in 1983.

One of the adverts featured in a collection of public information films issued by the National Archive in 2006. But a spokeswoman has admitted that the film was quietly removed from the National Archive’s website in 2014 after the extent of Savile’s child abuse became clear.

She said: “It was on our website as part of a selection of public information films that we curated there to mark the 60th anniversary of the Central Office of Information. We took it down in July 2014. We just felt with the current climate it wasn’t the best choice and it was perhaps ethically wrong to highlight it. So we removed it from the selection.

“We didn’t say anything about it at the time.”

Savile’s once ubiquitous public information films, which also include a series of adverts promoting train travel for British Rail, are available online. But they are absent from the British Film Institute’s online archive.
>>>

How would you like it if Johen_1955 compared you to Charles Manson, or to Marilyn Manson?

Johan_1955 did a sick twisted thing and he should come here and make a public apology to everyone on this forum.

MileHigh

Well there ya go. Ya proved it.  Im satisfied with that.

So maybe we can just all chill.  I mean you say you have helped a lot of people. But helping generally isnt just making people figure things out on their own and calling it help.

Like in school, if they ran the classes like this, very little learning of a lot of things wont get accomplished. Gees. If ya have the answer, spit it and test at the end of the week to see if it sank in.

If someone asks for my help, I help. I dont put them through the figure it out yourself game with some hints or guide them on an easter egg hunt.  We are getting no where fast.

Im goin home. Tired.

Mags

And ultimately I am trying to help Brad.  Why should he just do his thing in an artificial world that is fake, only to arrive at a rude awakening in the real world one day?  Why can't we argue things out with some kind of normal frame of reference, a commonly understood general understanding?

post 1232-The Night of the Living Joule Thief Zombies" - featuring the infallible Dr. Brainfry.  Coming to a theater near you.  Just remember it's all fantasy.
post 1240-No, you are wrong.  The standard Joule Thief circuit is more efficient than the second circuit.
It turns out that the second circuit(one with the LED across the L1 coil) is more efficient,as it removes the batteries internal resistive losses from the circuit during the off time of the circuit.
post 1253-garbage-in-garbage-out and clearly your statements are garbage without any substance behind them.
post 1253-Most of your experiments, after six years of working on the bench, are amateurish.Your presentation skills are almost non-existent.
Keep pushing that propaganda Big Brother.
post 1255-Ha ha ha... The drama queen is making yet another hasty exit.The infallible Dr. Brainfry
post 1259-Kiss my butt Smoky2-->smokey receives a kiss

MH hits the next gear.
Post 1285-There you go you pathetic sleazy little weasel.  Why should anybody trust you at all?
The revenge of Dr. Brainfry, his head is turning bright purple
post 1287-Here you weasel
post 1290-I think it could be an indication that you have some serious psychological problems.
post 1293-Dr. Brainfry is having a brain seizure.
post 1294-And lo and behold it turns out that Dr. Brainfry can't answer two simple questions
post 1305-I am getting exhausted with the stream-of-consciousness/churning spaghetti/brain-ricochet talk from you.  It's like you need a bloody Google translator just for you.  Throw in the ridiculous immature trash talk that is embarrassing and you are left with Dr. Brainfry on overload.
This was due to MHs screw up about the spike traveling through the collector to base junction. Latter on he realized his mistake,and worked out that it should have been through the !emitter! base junction-and not through the collector/base junction.
post 1317-Did you see Brad repeatedly attacking me with a bunch of unwarranted nonsense?.Don't you give me your crap without looking at the other side
Maybe it was lost in all your abuse MH>?
post 1318-Yes, I was part of the mass confusion here and I looked back in the thread.  In post #1191 I speculated that there was a collector-base breakdown.  Then in post #1199 PW confirms an emitter-base breakdown.  Only much more recently did I start thinking about a possible emitter-base junction breakdown
Well at least on a couple of occasions you have admitted you were wrong.
post 1340- But the actual engine itself, the pistons, the valves, the camshaft, the crankcase, the ignition, etc, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with resonance.
Opps-MH having another go at resonant systems of an ICE. We all know what the outcome was there
post 1349-That's just silly nit-picky BS because I am using common vernacular to describe the combustion in the cylinder.  It's gratuitous nonsense.  Why are you ignoring what is actually being stated, that resonance inside the cylinder is no good?
But i thought it did not exist?.
post 1370-The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is
 
Post 1389-Both EMJunkie and Wattsup could not answer the very same simple question that I posed to them about a coil.
OH yea-thanks for reminding me about those questions MH

The J/FET saga.
Post 1339-Me-->Yes,and my idea using a J/FET never came from any book.
Common sense say's that if there is not enough voltage to switch on a transistor or mosfet,then you use one that is already in an on state,and boost the voltage via a step up transformer to switch the fet off.
Post 1450-by our resident guru-->Yeah well I would have to say that that doesn't make any sense at all.  But don't let that stop you since this whole thread is filled with nonsensical statements by you and just about nobody says anything about it.
Post 1456-Thanks, and I made a mistake an assumed that a JFET required some Gate-Source voltage to be ON, when that is not the case.  So I retract my statement to Brad in post #1450 about it "not making any sense at all" because clearly I was wrong.
Cheers MH
post 1484-You have been treated normally by me
Hell MH,i'd hate to see your !treating people badly! then.

Post 1484- And there is no fucking apostrophe in "questions."  Demonstrate that you can learn something.
Now the bad language has kicked in.

same post-And there is no fucking apostrophe in "yours.
You can kiss my ass with your bullshit statement
Yuk
The main operation on an ICE is a synchronous machine and has nothing whatsoever to do with resonance.Screw you with your Brad's Bizarro World of anti-logic
Kiss my ass Brad with your stupid-ass gratuitous nonsense
You have buried yourself into your own deep dark chasm, you are one creepy dude that can't handle things and you lose your composure and throw away all of your personal integrity.
I have lost composure? lol. Well much said in that post.
post 1507-Beyond that, your argument that you "proved there is resonance" in an ICE is so absolutely ridiculous that you have to wonder what planet you are on.You can go back to your deluded fake-ass dream world .

post 1507- You should hook up with EMJunkie and you two can stroke each other up
More profanities MH?.
post 1510-I don't know if the quote above is due to your complete and total lack of critical thinking skills and total blindness to any kind of context, or, if it is just more completely useless trash talk. Either way, it is a total fail.
post 1534-Good, so that patent shows a resonant cavity in the combustion chamber can be used to improve the performance of a two-stroke engine.
Oh-bet that one hurt MH.
post 1535-So you are the very definition of stupidity in this case.
 
post 1569-His brain started frying at the beginning of the thread because he was in shock when someone actually started telling him that he was wrong.  Now he has turned himself into The Infallible Doctor Brainfry like some character right out of a comic book. 
Post 1574-MHs attempt at a redirection--No way, it's a tie.  You were supposed to show how resonance improved the combustion process
No,i was showing you were wrong again when you stated-->But the actual engine itself, the pistons, the valves, the camshaft, the crankcase, the ignition, etc, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with resonance
So yes-proven wrong.
Post 1577-Bla bla my ass Dr. Brainfry.
Post 1581- At least on this thread you will get the truth from me
Yes, I was unaware that there are ways to take advantage of resonance in a cylinder during combustion, and also for getting better air flow into and out of the cylinders.  I never claimed to be an expert in engines.
post 1562-You're a whack job.-oh ,that was to another member of the forum.
post 1588-Have you turned into a borderline psycho person because of this thread?  The answer is yes.Keep on repeating I am wrong until you are blue in the face and your brain sizzles and smoke starts rising
post 1594-You are so crippled in your communications skills it's almost unbelievable
Post 1695-this thread has turned you into a borderline psycho person
post 1612-Look up "spaghetti brains" in the visual dictionary and you will find a picture of yourself. LOL You need to go back to school and take some courses in English
post 1616-Your credibility is destroyed, poor Brad on a brain fry from hell.
post 1617-Nope, I speak the truth but ever since your brain started to fry you have been shamelessly bullshitting like crazy.More shameless lying and you are off in dreamland with your incorrect belief that magnets can do useful work

Post 1618-At this point, it's time for this to stop.
This is good
Post 1652-Brad: I really don't give a rat's ass.
Oh bugga.

Post 1619 is interesting,as here are the two original questions about the wine glass
How does a wine glass resonate, what is the mechanism?
How is the resonant frequency of a wine glass determined?
!how! is the resonant frequency of a wine glass determined?.

Post 1739-Said from the Choir of One Hand W***ing.

And that is where it starts getting bad.

And ultimately I am trying to help Brad

Thanks-but no thanks MH.


Brad

 author=MileHigh link=topic=8341.msg481035#msg481035 date=1460881284]
 

That says it all right there.  I tried to impress upon Brad that the basic Joule Thief is supposed to have a fixed value for the base resistor and varying the value of the base resistor makes no sense on a fundamental level.

Well as we are on a thread that is devoted to improving the JT,why would we be sticking to the MH JT?. On a fundamental level,decreasing the base resistance as the battery voltage drop's makes perfect sense,as it insures that the base of the transistor receives the required amount of current to switch on properly as the battery voltage drops below the switch on voltage of the transistor. This also in turn allows the current in the :1 winding to keep to a higher level,and thus the LED will remain !to some what! the same brightness as the batteries voltage drop's.

We have been through this before MH,and i posted video's showing the very principle of being able to reduce the base resistance as the battery voltage drop's. So this makes your above statement non sensible.

Nor does it change the brightness of the LED for reasons that were explained multiple times, all in the context of the normal operation of the device.

And your reasons were !once again! proven wrong--my video's clearly showed that.
Bench work MH--thats what it's all about when we need the truth.

But Brad would have none of it.  From what I can remember he made no attempt to understand any of this.

Brad tested your !theory!,and found it to be wrong.
We seen it on the scope,and we seen it by way of the light meter.

This manic scanning through all of the postings shows how it is pretty much hopeless.

All of the post MH--this is a lie.
I only got half way through them--and what a great bit of research it was
I was looking for this !help! you said you were trying to give me,but as it turns out,through the half of the thread i reviewed,i was the one helping you out most of the time.
You now know resonant systems around ICEs,help increase both efficiency and power.
You now know that internal resonant systems exist in ICEs that also improve engine performance.
You now know that a J/FET requires no gate voltage to conduct.
You now know that current can flow from the emitter to the base,and not from the collector through to the base as you had thought--once again,my bench experiments showed this.
You now know that reducing the base resistance on your JT circuit,dose indeed make the LED brighter--once again,shown by way of my bench experiments.
You now know that your question !how is the resonant frequency of a wine glass determined!! has to very correct meanings--1 of which i answered correctly.

In fact MH,i have taught you many things on this thread,and we are starting to sort out your Theory from actual  fact by way of bench experiments. This is a great day for the forum --it's what it's all about--helping others to learn. Encouraging other to help those that ask for it,and not telling other members not to help a fellow experimenter--that would be against the good will of this forum-now wouldnt it
And your welcome--glad i could help.

Now,about those questions ?
Are you happy that the required information needed is there?


Brad