Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16530721 times)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16725 on: April 05, 2013, 03:34:01 PM »
Stivep: Wesley, no headaches whatsoever, no ill effects at all from my Tbilisi team.
The team was exposed to 4 1/2 hours during the demonstration.
Remember, you and TK were not in good health during your stay.
I have also been informed that during TK's stay in Turkey they carried out extremely extensive and extremely expensive tests for all manner of possible danger to humans. ie x-ray tests, radiation tests, poison tests etc.
Everything came back all clear.

x_name41

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16726 on: April 05, 2013, 05:31:11 PM »
hello stivep and congratulations for your successful experiment, but would you explain is there a some connection between your conception and that of the Andrea Rossi and his reactor of cold nuclear fusion?, thanks in advance!


verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16728 on: April 05, 2013, 05:57:30 PM »
would you explain is there a some connection between your conception and that of the Andrea Rossi and his reactor of cold nuclear fusion?
I don't think they have much in common.
In Rossi's experiment the atomic nuclei merge together and in Wesley's experiment, they fall apart.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16729 on: April 05, 2013, 05:57:42 PM »
Not necessarily. You just proved that in certain environments (e.g. inside RF fields) even normally stable nuclei can decay.
There is another way to look at it: The EM environment affects the stability of the nuclei.

There is more evidence of this influence here.

P.S.
The Miles Mathis paper,  I recently quoted, explains a mechanism of the neutron decay as a collision with external electrons/positrons, suggesting that beta decay always has a cause that is external to the nucleus.

I believe the EM enviroment affects the stability of the entire atom.  When the wavelength of a photon is short enough it can cause ionization of the atom or it can cause radioactive decay of the neucleus.   The photon 1/4wavelength has to be in angstroms.  A longer wavelength and the intensity of the wave has to be increased to elicit the same effects.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16730 on: April 05, 2013, 06:01:05 PM »

Thank You  Sparks for material from your post.







hello stivep and congratulations for your successful experiment, but would you explain is there a some connection between your conception and that of the Andrea Rossi and his reactor of cold nuclear fusion?, thanks in advance!
The Magic of Mr. Rossi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtQJyHKVuio


Yes I see connection  between Andrea Rossi and my experiment.
Andrea Rossi stays about  secret ingredient additive  for his device to work
Andrea Rossi use aluminium foil around  his device- from the perspective of Calorimetry  in terms of  heat conservation, this foil is a joke so what would be another reason to  use aluminium foil well resaonable suspicion would be Beta  radiation.
By that token if say compound (substance) is non radioactive that Colman 1956 would be explanation for it .............
Why?
  because Rossi and   original patent of  Edison  in my video Revolution has begun Free Energy Exposed   part 3 shows nickel as part of   compound used by  Hendershot.
Colman does not use Nickel - different method of extraction  -that is only what you looking for   essence of it.
And I have seen it as early version of  Hendershot   later Colman  stating that 110V at 10A= 1.1kW for 30 milligrams only!!
is to be extracted from glass tube of 5mm inside diameter and 45mm long with assuming 14 layers of compound
If cobalt is one of initiators of this process along  with phosphates (phosphorus  based)
Than if it happened that we take Coleman heat eruption ( not utilized by Colman) as factor  of Rossi process but triggered by Beta radiation  than we have answer to Andrea Rossi secret.
Worse it  comes that if the secret additive  will be proven as not included in the patent than he is in trouble.


But maybe  he  hided  secret ingredient  being afraid that before he gets  big money his patent will be in denial by the reason to Colman priority rights.


By analyzing Rossi  and Colman we might see just different way of extracting energy
That explain different structure and different additives to the compound
For Rossi Temperature is dominating factor.


Wesley




PS: recent edition that might help to identify not only Rossi but TK as well :)
There you go - here is your Beta radiation supported by evidence of aluminium foil  used to stop it.
look at video link you will find it.
first picture is  ludlum from ebay
the two last are Rossi toys.
I hate to ruin anyone business but F... it.
It looks like Rossi will have problem with  money earning :)
by patent rights priority of Colman.

I will never support anyone who thinks money only f you.
give something and than make A LOT  OF  money  on IT ALONG WITH OTHERS  that IS FAIR AND ONLY FAIR
THE COMPETITION WILL EAT YOU UP - THAT IS GOOD......... YOU  WILL MAKE YOUR PROFIT ANYHOW BUT PRODUCT WILL BE AFFORDABLE
« Last Edit: April 05, 2013, 09:36:15 PM by stivep »

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16731 on: April 05, 2013, 06:06:39 PM »
I believe the EM enviroment affects the stability of the entire atom.  When the wavelength of a photon is short enough it can cause ionization of the atom or it can cause radioactive decay of the neucleus.   The photon 1/4wavelength has to be in angstroms.  A longer wavelength and the intensity of the wave has to be increased to elicit the same effects.
Notice that even 300 meter photons (MHz) can affect the nuclei, when the nucleus is immersed in weak DC magnetic field.  See here.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16732 on: April 05, 2013, 06:29:01 PM »
It only matters if there is gamma or neutron radiation released, right ? I have found difficult to test for any kind of radiation for a DYI  device kind like TK has made for example.  Once I proposed to use photographic paper in black envelope with a pieces of lead or other solid metal plates in various shapes. Put a device into a container and glue to  each wall such envelope then run device for a few days. In case of neutron radiation the results are not reliable even if you fill container with water.... :( 
What do you think about it , stiveip , verpies?

x_name41

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16733 on: April 05, 2013, 06:35:29 PM »
thank you Stevep and would have been well incidentally to contact (if there is a such a possibility of course) with the itself Andrea Rossi for discussion of some possibilities and etc.

verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16734 on: April 05, 2013, 06:44:13 PM »
Yes, neutron and gamma are the worst.
When beta particles are shielded with heavy elements (e.g. Pb) it is worse than shielding them with light elements (e.g. Al) because heavy elements convert beta particles to X-Ray radiation through Bremsstrahlung effect. However Pb is better for shielding gamma radiation.

Yes, you can differentiate between beta and gamma with a highISO photo film with and without aluminum foil.  See here.

Neutrons are much harder to detect.
The CdCl2 that Wesley uses, is good at catching slow neutrons and converting them to gamma.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16735 on: April 05, 2013, 06:58:30 PM »
Notice that even 300 meter photons (MHz) can affect the nuclei, when the nucleus is immersed in weak DC magnetic field.  See here.


300MHz=1 meter band
thank you for material  my friend
interesting to view it again
I have big respect to you
I hope together we can  at the end solve the puzzle.


Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16736 on: April 05, 2013, 07:01:25 PM »
thank you Stevep and would have been well incidentally to contact (if there is a such a possibility of course) with the itself Andrea Rossi for discussion of some possibilities and etc.
No I'm not.


 Rossi would like me to  contact him him as last person in the planet earth
He is money and money  oriented only.
I'm  free energy and money as equal opportunity for  all of us.
The good  about me is I'M NOT FOR SALE

Please look up( my post  before) for additionally  posted photographs for prove that Rossi  used Beta radiation!!!!!!!!!! :)


Wesley

NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16737 on: April 05, 2013, 08:25:12 PM »
Hello stivep Do You Know the names of 3 Elements from Harold Victor Colman Patent for RF Activation?
1 part Co(No3)2 6H2O
2 parts CdCl2
3 parts of 3Ca (Po3)2 + 10C
Thank You My Friend

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16738 on: April 05, 2013, 09:08:01 PM »
Hello stivep Do You Know the names of 3 Elements from Harold Victor Colman Patent for RF Activation?
1 part Co(No3)2 6H2O
2 parts CdCl2
3 parts of 3Ca (Po3)2 + 10C
Thank You My Friend
you just named them here.
 :)
this is the receptivity
 other than that I do not understand  what more can I say.
it is Chemistry Elementary
and you see it on my video!!! :)
I will support knowledge but I would not support those who do not want to develop o learn  by themselves
I believe in education and self education 
I'm not serving you a ready to eat  dinner.



I expect cooperation
NO GREED!!!
help in experiments
and Till now I did not ask you for any financial support as of yet
Help me to help you :)




Wesley







NETIKS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #16739 on: April 05, 2013, 09:13:14 PM »
Thank You Stevep but i need names of compounds for those 3
Can You tell me the exact names?
thanks