Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze (Read 16532421 times)

verpies · « **Reply #14565 on:** October 25, 2012, 07:04:44 PM »

Quote from: TheBuzz on October 25, 2012, 05:59:46 PM

Have you built a hairpin before? Obviously not.

You answer your own questions.

You are correct - I have not built a hairpin since I always kept my hair short and I never needed it.
I have never built the circuit depicted here either, but I pulsed a shorted coaxial cable (a transmission line) and observed standing waves in it.

Quote from: TheBuzz on October 25, 2012, 05:59:46 PM

You are the one left with conjecture. Knowledge is experience.

I am somewhat dim because my parents fed me this fluoridated water in childhood. Nonetheless I still managed to learn how to read and write and I 'd like to capitalize on this achievement by asking the heavens (in writing):
What is unconventional about the circuit depicted here and what conclusions can be drawn from observing its behavior ?

Zeitmaschine · « **Reply #14566 on:** October 25, 2012, 07:10:49 PM »

Quote from: TheBuzz on October 25, 2012, 06:25:48 PM

Would you want someone completely devoid of logic and integrity to have the power of the universe in their hands?

Not me. My attitude is if you are not smart enough to figure it out, you are not smart enough to play with it.

So, and what makes you think that someone Â»completely devoid of logic and integrityÂ« is not smart enough to figure out how to get the power of the universe in his hands?

How long should this shit ... er ... game of secrecy continue?

Will tell you: At the utmost till I have figured it out. Then the game is over.

Quote from: TheBuzz on October 25, 2012, 06:25:48 PM

As stated before - You need to pull a void in the universe (arc) so it will slap back together with the same vacuum energy of gravity. THEN you create a usable amount of displacement current with will bounce the ball down the field (wire) without all that nasty friction of constant contact with the surface of the wire/field.

Any idea how many voids I have pulled in the universe (by means of a spark gap) in the last few months? To no avail. Maybe I'm in a wrong universe.

And maybe TK is in a wrong universe too, because at 20:20 of Kapanadze 28th April 2004 full version free energy device the spark gap fails but nevertheless the lamps are lit. Strange universe, isn't it?

wattsup · « **Reply #14567 on:** October 25, 2012, 08:32:14 PM »

@TheBuzz

Your little drawing means nothing to me because you take all those instances as fact without proof. And then you want to feed it to us as fact. More then fact. An absolute certitude. A Godly revelation. I don't care how you dress it up. If the load is not is series then it is ultimately to produce a coupling and if you don't know what that is, then to bad.

So let's humor you a little about your drawing.

1) Where it says Voltage Vacuum. How did you prove that there is a voltage vacuum?
2) Where you say Ground Current. How did you prove there is a ground current?
3) Where you show the two way arrows pointing to each other. How did you prove they are in two directions?
4) Where you show the + and -, so how is this applicable to TK AC driven load?
5) Where you show two way arrows on the top and bottom. How did you prove this is in two directions?

Seems to me the vacuum you talk about would pull from the wire so you are actually looking at it in reverse when you say "vacuum". You can only have a vacuum when there is nothing entering, otherwise it is simple throughput not vacuum. So the + cannot be a vacuum. If it was vacuum and it was pulling the -, then how does the + enter as well in the other direction? So maybe there is a vacuum on the negative side as well to make your story complete. It does not make sense and you have no proof.

The only thing that is right about that drawing is the Wattups pointing to the thumbs down side. Thanks for that.

There is one thing to respectfully provide a theory, since you have no proof. There is another thing to state your cold hard facts while yelping about like a cheap shoot'in chicken.

Yes I am stupid all right. So stupid that I don't buy your lingo rattling. So you can now admit this is a THEORY and then we can all sit down and discuss it like adults normally do and not like we are your damn punchbags. Then you can point to the device and show where this fits "exactly" and with what components that can physically fit inside a tin can. That's why we are here - specifics. The time for theories without specifics is over.

We have not come all this way to be screwed up each time we start moving in a good direction on the builds, asking the right questions to be only diverted again by your miraculous and sudden entrance. So if you say this applies to all devices, then why are you concentrating on this thread? Hmmmmmm. Why not open your own thread? Why not discuss this about another device?. WHY THIS THREAD?

? Of all the places in the universe, why this thread? Why not apply to MIT? I am sure they would be glad to open up a Pissing in Heaven Department. These are the questions to ask???

Your attitude to others is your own decline and probably has been long engrained so I guess nothing will change that. But I will not sit around and be screwed over by a big mouth. NOT ANYMORE. About your persona of TheBuzz pissing in heaven............. Simply sick and very revealing. You can't be yourself so you invent this grand illusion. I would equate it to The Buzzard of Oz. And we all know who stood behind that curtain.

wattsup

PS: Now where the hell were we before all this crap started blowing us to hell. Oh yeh, we were discussing about the TKc topology logic and the limited alternatives it displays. Funny once I mentioned using the two transistors to pulse the TKc from both ends, all hell broke loose. Dammit.

a.king21 · « **Reply #14568 on:** October 25, 2012, 08:44:25 PM »

wattsup: So radiant energy is difficult to contain.
So you need to insulate with:
epoxy resin,
polythene,
plexi glass,
polystyrene,
etc.
Oh and you also need a great earth, the wetter the better.

verpies · « **Reply #14569 on:** October 25, 2012, 08:51:03 PM »

Quote from: wattsup on October 25, 2012, 08:32:14 PM

1) Where it says Voltage Vacuum. How did you prove that there is a voltage vacuum?

What is a "Voltage Vacuum" in the first place?
Maybe this means an absence of voltage.

Then we need to consider what is "voltage" and how it's measured.

As far as I know "voltage" is always measured between two points in space.
Wise books state that "voltage" is a difference between two electric potentials occurring at two different points.

If that definition of "voltage" is correct then it is impossible to measure voltage at only one point in space.
In that context, an absence of voltage or "voltage vacuum" would mean a uniform electric field (without any gradients).

P.S.
Presto! This way this thread is deftly derailed from the engineering details of the Kapanadze devices into abstract theoretical divagations.

andrea76 · « **Reply #14570 on:** October 25, 2012, 10:51:56 PM »

Quote from: a.king21 on September 05, 2012, 03:42:38 AM

I know the answer to this and I have posted it before, but it does no harm to repeat it.
Tariel is paranoid that people are getting close to his secret. He is also worried about the Turkey debacle. So he wants to hide the device inside a pile of smoke and mirrors. I have spoken to Tariel's translator and he has contacted the person who designed the mechanical components. The mechanical stuff is 100% nothing to do with ou. It is simply there to hide the secret. Tariel could not have imagined that the 2004 video would end up on the internet. He has told me directly that the secret is so simple - you'll laugh. That's why he doesn't want to disclose. Once disclosed, it could be put on the internet and anyone could replicate.
How do you patent protect something that the average DIY person could construct in a weekend?
When negotiating the 2 kw device, Tariel wanted to make a hydro-mechanical contraption. I told him bluntly that I could see through his smoke and mirrors . I then specified the aquarium 2 device. Just me - no-one else. The participants to this conversation were Mike, the financial backer, myself the ou researcher, N the translator and Tariel Kapanadze the inventor. All heard me speaking bluntly to him.
I told him I did not want load switching in the device because in the aquarium 1 he forgot about spike activity in switching and blew his device during the demo. I knew that if the device ran for hours, and hours it would be virtually impossible to fake. I told him this directly. He agreed. He said that for the budget he could build a 2 kwatt device. He did what I asked, and the device worked for 4 and a half hours before the team left.
So in that regard there is no mystery. The device specs were put forward by me and built by TK according to my specifications.
We were absolutely delighted. The debacle happened during the second visit when everything went wrong. In part we were to blame, because the government idiots we were relying on did not know how to get him a visa into the UK. He obviously then got spooked and cheated us. Personally I am mad as hell at the stupidity of the bureaucrats. Of course I now know how to get a visa for him.
So plan B was organised. This was to get him into South Africa. In order to do this we had to have some specifications of the device. TK also asked for his team to go to South Africa. - ie Moustache and the Armenian twins. Mike said it would be better for only TK to come as he only asked for his team at the last minute. I strongly suspect that his Armenian team (Moustache and the twins) were upset at this and got him to rat on us. They effectively saw their meal ticket leaving Georgia.
So, remember, we're very close. Please concentrate on the stuff I'm posting. I know which videos are relevant and which videos are not.
TK told me that he first discovered this secret in 1996 and he managed then to run a load of 1 KW for three months continuously.

@ a.king21

the plan B was organized in South Africa??

Zeitmaschine · « **Reply #14571 on:** October 26, 2012, 12:45:10 AM »

Quote from: wattsup on October 25, 2012, 08:32:14 PM

Funny once I mentioned using the two transistors to pulse the TKc from both ends, all hell broke loose.

The hell broke loose after the Tesla patent No. 514,168 came up on page 970. Suddenly photographs of Morgan, Rothschild and Rockefeller appeared.

Perhaps there is something wrong with this patent?

Â»... an improvement applicable more especially to the method or system of generating and utilizing electrical energyÂ«

Quote from: wattsup on October 25, 2012, 08:32:14 PM

Dammit.

Maybe not.

Anyway one thing is clear: I can't find one video showing a steady shining incandescent lamp driven by a spark gap. These lamps always flicker. Hence it is impossible that the TK device generates electric current by means of a spark gap, because TK's lamps do not flicker. It has to be a solid state device.

BTW: On page 222 there is a video Earth Current that claims an ordinary incandescent light bulb is lit with one side to ground and one side to a Â»battery deviceÂ«. This lamp does not flicker but also it seems the spark gap does not show any spark. Don't know what this means.

pix · « **Reply #14572 on:** October 26, 2012, 01:15:29 AM »

Quote:
"It is so simple it hurts to watch. Granted, I figured out the rest of unified field and what gravity is. I figured out what a photon really is and how they are created so I have a good head start on most people. I assume there are smart people out there that know everything I know and 100 times more but it is kept a secret. There are probably valid reasons for keeping that a secret. Would you want someone completely devoid of logic and integrity to have the power of the universe in their hands?"

This statement is a typical credo for those,hiding secrets from the public.
We are simpy too stupid to know and deal with, huh?
That statement makes a big question mark about your intentions.
As I am not a "russian spy", nor english is my native language, forgive me if I didn't express my thoughts precisely or I did grammar mistakes.
And, I do know what is a spark gap.It is in fact electron accelerator and current multiplier ( I did read Loeb and Meck papers and know term "Townsend discharge").
Having localized currents and voltage pattern on the 'hairpin" bar is the same as antenna works.Amplitude simply depends of driving rate of change.1/4 wavelenght antenna for example has its potential maximum on the free end and current maximum on the driven end. What is interesting, is how "hairpin" is driven, and that load could be connected between two points on the bar.Rate of change...

This is my last post on this thread.

Regards,
Pix

27Bubba · « **Reply #14573 on:** October 26, 2012, 01:28:17 AM »

"This is my last post on this thread.

Regards,
Pix"

Even thou I said "I'm out" in my earlier post. I just can't do this. I will not allow for some LOOSER dumb a** shut this thread down!
I urge you all just ignore those who trying to steer this effort in the wrong direction! After all, majority rules!

"Presto! This way this thread is deftly derailed from the engineering details of the Kapanadze devices into abstract theoretical divagations."

Not at all. As long as people like you and many others willing to contribute and not pay any attention to the garbage some scumbags posting..

elementSix · « **Reply #14574 on:** October 26, 2012, 01:37:01 AM »

Hey guys, I watched a video on youtube about an Ambient energy transformer that was very large and created enough free energy to run this table saw. The reason I am writing about it, is that it is a 3 coil transformer that is just like the 3 coil green transformer in the Kapanadze 2012 Aquarium video. The links are below for both. It has to be part of it considering that the large 3 coil transformer in the Russian video, seems to be the same looking even though its not the best quality video. Just maul that around. peace
Large Russian Transformer >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFP8zu6TdvI&feature=related
KAPANADZE 2012 Video >>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NLBSBRsBM

elementSix · « **Reply #14575 on:** October 26, 2012, 01:54:37 AM »

Maybe he puts the negative thru the left side and the positive thru the right side and the ground in the middle?

Any thoughts

wattsup · « **Reply #14576 on:** October 26, 2012, 01:55:17 AM »

Quote from: a.king21 on October 25, 2012, 08:44:25 PM

wattsup: So radiant energy is difficult to contain.
So you need to insulate with:
epoxy resin,
polythene,
plexi glass,
polystyrene,
etc.
Oh and you also need a great earth, the wetter the better.

@a.king21

Today I ordered my 8' copper rod and will pick it up tomorrow. Copper is so expensive these days that the dealer was sending his stocks to the recycler and was getting more money for it then selling it as a finished rod product. Cost $100. I just went to get 60 feet of #6 grounding wire so this weekend I will install my isolated Earth ground.

@xenomorphlabs

Thanks for posting that circuit but I think that one will only pulse one side of a coil. I think we need to pulse both sides of the coil. If you see a circuit or if anyone has a simple enough circuit that can to this, please put it up.

@verpies

Before we were interrupted rather abruptly, we were speaking about how to use the two transistors that I am putting here again to back track.

Quote from: wattsup on October 24, 2012, 09:53:06 PM

@all

The only main reasons I could think of to use two transistors of that size would be too.....

a) pulse both the negative and positive sides of a primary coil, or,
b) discharge both sides of a capacitor into a load.

For A, the reason to pulse both sides of a coil would be to pulse a primary in a way that you will not have a permanent connection on one side of the coil that produces a constant bias to the negative or to the positive. If both sides are released at the same time, then the flyback will have nowhere to go but out of the coil and be released to the secondary with greater punch.

For B, if you had a way of using simple capacitors and diodes that take an AC signal, send the positive of the wave to one capacitor and send the negative of the wave to another capacitor, that's two caps filled to the voltage peak (not peak-to-peak), that can then be released by the two transistors where the caps are now in series to double the voltage or in parallel to double the amperage.

So if you or anyone knows about a circuit that can do either A or B, I would need that to make some more tests.

Also some were referring to Tesla tests of sparks creating stinging effect on the body. Do you realize what size or strength of spark you need to do that? The noise alone would render you near deaf. There is no such strength in the TK spark. It is a small furty spark that has no punch, let alone creating any coupling event as I have tried that for days and days under so many combinations and frequencies using the same 6 turns coil with a TKc inside topology. There is nothing there but a token coupling event that barley starts up the filament of a 7 watts 120vac bulb only at resonance of around 21.5kHz. Ground, no ground made no difference.

@andrea76

Thanks for putting up that recent post. We should not forget it, especially the part where TK was sad that the 2004 video was published. This means he was using much less decoys in that one and the only real decoy being the spark gap that sadly (or happily in our case) froze up during the demo. Also,I am sure he never counted on so much attention but it has been a long road from all the analysis of all the videos and all the damn commotions did not make it easy at all to keep the concentration steady. But I think we are close.

@Zeitmaschine

Yes it is around that time as well. All this just bounced so fast.

I think we really need to look at the A and B conditions above using two transistors and anything else required that could fit inside the tin can.

I remember way back when we would use a battery with a parallel primary coil that would be manually shorted across the battery, this would send great voltages out of the secondary. I could be possible that the two transistors are doing just that.

Take the 2004 device again. The open transformer secondary with greater amperage then the primary is rectified. Why do you rectify it when your output is AC to load? Well you use the DC side and that visible capacitor in parallel to the DC output of the rectifier and you now have a battery. Then you send each side of that DC through the transistors and use the TKc on each side plus the load to the short the DC.

The question then remains what is that AC5 line doing? I think I know. Shit. Because the AC5 lines are so thin, all he is doing is sending that AC low amperage to the primary of a small HV coil inside the tin can TO PRODUCE HIS SPARK DECOY. All the parts would fit perfectly in this scenario. Man oh man.

We are really not that far away.

wattsup

elementSix · « **Reply #14577 on:** October 26, 2012, 02:51:01 AM »

@a.king21

Today I ordered my 8' copper rod and will pick it up tomorrow. Copper is so expensive these days that the dealer was sending his stocks to the recycler and was getting more money for it then selling it as a finished rod product. Cost $100. I just went to get 60 feet of #6 grounding wire so this weekend I will install my isolated Earth ground.

If you have a Scrap recycling yard near you, I buy tons of nice wire, copper sheeting and anything else you would need at alot cheaper prices. They pay 2.50 a pound and you can buy it from them for like 50 more cents a pound. Its a lot better than paying retail.. I live in CINCINNATI so there are 4 of them I can go to and all the Junkies and crack heads sell what ever they can find or steal from their work. Makes for really good wire ect...

elementSix · « **Reply #14578 on:** October 26, 2012, 02:58:04 AM »

I hate to sound like a neewbie, but I have a MOT and I hook one of the output wires to a BIFILAR pancake coil and when I do this, I get more energy it seems from the unused wire than the one wire I have hooked up from the MOT.. Is that just displacement or transference??? Because it arcs to my finger with a stronger sting than just the one wire from MOT itself

elementSix · « **Reply #14579 on:** October 26, 2012, 03:11:32 AM »

KING Said that TK didn't mean for the 2004 video to go out. That should be what everyone concentrate on. When the guy who is filming pans over to the work desk and you see 4 or 5 black disks that look like iron powder. They look about the same diameter as the can at the end of the coil setup. Could he be using the disks with bifilar coils between them. That could be the reason for all the wires running into the back of that can from every part couldn't it??? Just trying to help... There are 5 or 6 pages of TROLL attacks on each other and the fact that anyone who honestly wants to fight the good fight, could waste their time arguing over trolling-is, is beyond me.. Focus Focus... 2012 is almost over and if we don't help each other out, we might not have another chance.. Troll are only hurting themselves, their families, the planet and the human race. What will be your punishment when God asks you why...

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze (Read 16532421 times)

verpies

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Zeitmaschine

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

wattsup

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

a.king21

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

verpies

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

andrea76

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Zeitmaschine

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

pix

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

27Bubba

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

elementSix

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

elementSix

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

wattsup

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

elementSix

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

elementSix

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

elementSix

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze