Author Topic: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity) (Read 303328 times)

pese · « **Reply #270 on:** February 07, 2010, 04:10:52 PM »

I have seen this too and wondered.
But if this gas (such as xenon "in a Photoflasher")
or NA-vapor lamp has ignited, it will be very low impedance.
and resistive.)
Perhaps Teslas meaning was this if it was ignited anf lightning

Pese

forest · « **Reply #271 on:** February 07, 2010, 05:22:15 PM »

Maybe once gases are ionized electrons are trapped by positive ions so they do not catch energy flow which is then undisturbed.

wings · « **Reply #272 on:** February 07, 2010, 06:40:26 PM »

Quote from: sparks on February 07, 2010, 12:45:09 PM

It is interesting that Tesla reports that a rarified gas acts as a conductor for hv hf power. Elevated terminals and all. I dare say that vacuum has infinite conducting abilites to charge information while denser media has a diffusion problem. Perhaps Tesla was going to transmit gravity waves which can flow between stratified layers of different density stuff.

Below is a picture of a gravity wave. The tittle of which is wave crashing distant storm.
The second picture even includes some wave geometry. Nice form of a geometry equation.

nice pictures !

see this one

from:
http://www.n01a.org/noya-book/metaphysics_revelations.htm

forest · « **Reply #273 on:** February 08, 2010, 07:35:01 PM »

Tesla coil = heat pump for ambient electricity

Tito L. Oracion · « **Reply #274 on:** February 08, 2010, 11:55:49 PM »

Hi everyone good day

Tesla discover and recorded an electrical impulse of unknown origin and so that was the time a magnifying transmitter become obsolete to him ok.

Then he tried to make his electric car and study the technique of not using the earth ground as ground ok.

The universe and our earth works perfectly. therefore we should always conclude that there is always a better way to make thing works perfectly ok.

There is always atleast one sure way!.
Sometimes we are concentrating to the deepest knowledge of the device but we are leaving some basic foundation which is the important one to study and gives some other door for a very much high technology better and deeper than the first impression.

otits L. noicaro

best regards

Magluvin · « **Reply #275 on:** February 09, 2010, 12:00:44 AM »

Sometimes I feel like I am searching for something that isnt there. I build these lil machines and circuits and change parameters and values, and at times I see something that makes me feel like Im getting close. But in my excitement I continue and find that in just about every case, I am using more energy than Im trying to produce. I read a lot of material, and everything seems to be a blur at the moment. None of it has gotten me any further than just draining my batteries and time.
Im tired. Im going to take a break for a while.

Mags

baroutologos · « **Reply #276 on:** February 09, 2010, 12:43:36 AM »

Regarding, ground...

I have made some time ago a kacher, per russian wording, a solid state Tesla coil like apparatus that produced sparks over a wire 2-3 long.
I have used lighbulbs to measure effectiveness (40 % max) and repeatedly discovered and its a solid data to me that ground provides at the Hf currents a suitable reservoir for maximum performance. Without ground usage my lamps were lit dimly, no matter what the topology of the circuit. period.

I have seen it vividly displayed by the kapanadze and his famous improvised resonator at the backyard demonstartion. he stressed that using a good ground is a must.

Its just that simple. I have read also, that instead of a grounding, you can have an antenna, spiked one best for the same purposes. By the way, a real solid ground can handle vast amperage while an aerial will not.

pese · « **Reply #277 on:** February 09, 2010, 03:26:10 AM »

yes , an antenna insted of ground do (capacativly the same as an gorund, specially fine, IF they is tuned to the frequency, (if you see an dipole antenna for fm/ vhf / uhf frequencies , you will see and understand. that an "neon (even an bulb) with 2 wires on in
- are nothing others that your neon with one wire and open side
capacitivly coupled to the (RF-)transmitter. Because your "SOURCE"
is nothing others...

G Pese

baroutologos · « **Reply #278 on:** February 09, 2010, 09:51:32 AM »

Quote from: sparks on January 29, 2010, 01:55:23 AM

I understand what I am saying. It is just reiteration of electromagnetic wave theory. I see a very close resemblance between a resonant electrical circuit and a non radiating electromagnetic wave. A current flows between nodes and antinodes of an electromagnetic wave. It is not charged mass moving since there isnt any charged mass in a vacuum yet there is current flow....

Hello Sparks,

I am not trying to be heretic here, but reading from Colorado Springs notes (Tesla is a great teacher) i believe what is Tesla saying as it is very logical. In a standard Tesla coil, you naturally formulate stationary waves.. OK.
BUt, the formation of stationary waves that is nodes and anti-nodes, it seems to apply only for voltage and not current...

. Sounds lol. let me explain if i may..

Consider the top toroid of a tesla coil as an one-terminal capacitor (which it is). Imagine the Tesla coil is grounded via another capacitor (at its base)
When the coil operates, both caps are charged-discharged according to current alterations natuyrally...
The top cap (toroid) how is charged/discharged if not current is not moving since it should be a voltage node/current antinode? Clearly not the case.. The same applies for the bottom cap.

Anyway, those are not my sayings.. Tesla in his notes says them again and again.

sparks · « **Reply #279 on:** February 09, 2010, 01:40:55 PM »

I believe we have to get beyond the water A in a pipe analogy of an electrical current and pay more attention to what is flowing in an electrical field between two places that are in a relative charge state. Inside a charged capacitor there is something flowing between the two metals. This is the current I am referring to.
Voltage arises from resistance to electrical currents. Or resistance to the flow of virtual particles that create different charge states. A proton is said to be positve while and electron is said to be negative. An electrical current flows between the two. It is not the electron moving that creates these currents it is the electron and proton charge state that creates these currents.

ramset · « **Reply #280 on:** February 09, 2010, 02:14:03 PM »

Some Folks think 100+ years is over [keeping Tito's secret]
Teets, they would have me think Walmart will be sellin your stuff
by the summer!!

Two quick reads from two very bright members of our community.
Just observing
Prejudice without investigation = ignorant

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5365-very-interesting-developments.html

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5357-new-electric-breakthroughs-arriving.html

Chet

sparks · « **Reply #281 on:** February 09, 2010, 03:26:13 PM »

Retracted just surf on by.

ramset · « **Reply #282 on:** February 09, 2010, 05:55:11 PM »

sparks · « **Reply #283 on:** February 09, 2010, 09:44:43 PM »

@Ram

I got this God stuff from the first book I dont know it may have been number two book that scared the living sheeeeet out of me when I was 6years old. I didnt eat apples for along time after I heard the Adam and Eve fairy tale. If your going to scare people into compliance with your dogma then I believe your motives are more than altruistic. I will refrain in the future from any references to the supernatural in the interests of coherent and sensible threads. Thankyou for drawing attention to my mistakes. There is always room for improvement.

Hopefully I can retract the last post and this one ASAP.

amigo · « **Reply #284 on:** February 14, 2010, 05:08:58 AM »

Quote from: ramset on February 09, 2010, 02:14:03 PM

Two quick reads from two very bright members of our community.
Just observing
Prejudice without investigation = ignorant

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5365-very-interesting-developments.html

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5357-new-electric-breakthroughs-arriving.html

Chet

Erm, did I say something ignorant or prejudice in my post on EF seeing you linked to my thread there?

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity) (Read 303328 times)

pese

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

forest

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

wings

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

forest

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

Tito L. Oracion

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

Magluvin

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

baroutologos

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

pese

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

baroutologos

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

sparks

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

ramset

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

sparks

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

ramset

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

sparks

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

amigo

Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)