Author Topic: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.) (Read 342092 times)

Grumpy · « **Reply #780 on:** August 04, 2008, 07:47:06 PM »

Quote from: Godmode on August 04, 2008, 07:33:43 PM

The Allende letters

and the translation?

Wonderful insights in that document. Topside perspective is quite refreshing.

Godmode · « **Reply #781 on:** August 04, 2008, 08:39:37 PM »

The Atruscans know Generosity overwhelms.

Grumpy · « **Reply #782 on:** August 04, 2008, 09:10:57 PM »

Quote from: Godmode on August 04, 2008, 08:39:37 PM

The Atruscans know Generosity overwhelms.

@Godmode - What are you working on these days?

We can learn from the simple statement above. I wonder what happened to them - the Atruscans.

Anyway, not trying to hijack this thread with history lessons.

EDIT: In case anyone is interested in this culture

http://www.mariamilani.com/ancient_civilisation_civilization/ancient_etruscans.htm

Grumpy · « **Reply #783 on:** August 04, 2008, 09:47:44 PM »

@Godmode

http://theresonanceproject.org/research.html

spinning things into being

Godmode · « **Reply #784 on:** August 04, 2008, 10:12:08 PM »

Grumpy · « **Reply #785 on:** August 04, 2008, 10:40:09 PM »

@ Godmode,

Godspeed.

modernsteam · « **Reply #786 on:** August 05, 2008, 12:19:10 AM »

Quote from: AhuraMazda on April 10, 2008, 10:58:36 PM

@aleks

An antenna to receive what?
We must identify the source of energy first. If switching magnets can some how manipulate gravity or the Earths own magnetic
field the we may get something.

As far as the waves shape goes, the lazy person in me say's use square waves but look around you. We live in an
analogue world and sine waves have a lot of properties. You can get a lot more interesting harmonics than you would
with square waves. Look at the works of Keeley or Russel and you see what I mean.

I think text book Electronic or Electrical engineering view is not enough to solve this riddle.

AM

This is my take from readings and oral discussions with others in the Over-Unity "Community":

The antenna could receive surplus/additional energy from the Earth's magnetic field, or perhaps the Quantum Vacuum, a.k.a., "Zero-Point" Energy, as some have said. The latter is not really a correct term for said massless energy from the Vacuum of Space, because it refers only to the very tiny part remaining after all matter, and hence sensible heat, especially radiant heat, is removed from a designated portion of Space, theorized by the Casimir Effect, and physically demonstrated by Steve Lamoreaux in the late '90s. There's much more high-density Space Energy, as pointed out by Heaviside, Plank, Dirac, Wheeler, and Puthoff, and Tesla himself. By sharply perturbing a local area of Space around the circuitry of a TPU, or any other EMF-based "Free Energy" generator/converter as has been discussed many times in the TPU thread by references to oscillations and pulses, the "kicks" mentioned are those very virtual photons, or virtual electrons from the Dirac "Sea" "sucked" into the output windings, potentializing them, and possibly other circuit components in the TPU or other such generators. I think those are the resultant voltage "spikes" which Steven Mark - and John Bedini - talk about. But In these OU generators or converters, a specific antenna is generally not necessary, the output coils acting sufficiently as antennae receiving potential from the Vacuum onto the charges/electrons of the OP coil current. My reference for all of this is the writings of Lt. Col. Tom Bearden.

modernsteam · « **Reply #787 on:** August 05, 2008, 03:17:12 AM »

Quote from: allcanadian on August 01, 2008, 05:55:31 PM

@paul
I would agree but this is a rather simplistic view---- which is a good thing ;D we should keep things simple. I always like to turn things around to understand the other perspective, If an increasing voltage potential leads to increased amperage flow then ----an increasing amperage flow will lead to a increasing voltage potential. ...

@AllCanadian:

It seems basic electrical physics lessons in high school and community college made it fairly clear that through Ohm's Law, I = E/R, amperage varies as voltage, but not the reverse. From my understanding of simple electrodynamics, though increasing voltage gives rise to increasing current, increasing current as a first-cause phenomenon/event prior to voltage has not to date, existed, and thus cannot cause increasing voltage - unless, of course, someone can show me that that has indeed happened. After all, confirming physical evidence is the only real substantiation in science, not theory, text, or whatever, and certainly not the preachments of our "celebrated" physicists, be they Park, Kaku, or anyone else. So, increasing current results from increasing voltage, but because we know the current, we can calculate the voltage which caused it using Ohm's Law.

- a fellow Canuck -

BEP · « **Reply #788 on:** August 05, 2008, 04:29:41 AM »

Quote from: modernsteam on August 05, 2008, 03:17:12 AM

@AllCanadian:

It seems basic electrical physics lessons in high school and community college made it fairly clear that through Ohm's Law, I = E/R, amperage varies as voltage, but not the reverse.

@modernsteam

And what of the action of a tunnel diode or a NRO (negative resistance oscillator) or the variation of velocity factor on a transmission line using external magnetic or electric fields? (I haven't confirmed the 'electric field' part of that statement, yet.)

If I understand them correctly the resistance/impedance is changed causing a change in voltage without a change in current or a change in current without a change in voltage. My point is, speed should be part of the equation.

sparks · « **Reply #789 on:** August 05, 2008, 07:38:26 AM »

I believe mass fields are round and are confined by triangulated vector electric fields as well as defined by spinning triangulated vector electric fields. Where they touch is where resonance is achieved.

See below. Tesla's 3 6 9 is in there somewhere along with the south pole of the Earth being different than the north pole. Least ways in my mind.

pauldude000 · « **Reply #790 on:** August 05, 2008, 10:15:12 AM »

I have to jump in real quick, as I dont have much time right now.

I have heard many many times statements to the effect of "high voltage with little current", as if it is insignificant.

P=IV

1Watt
=1v X 1a
=10v X .1a
=100v X .01a
=1,000v X .001a
=10,000v X .0001a
=100,000v X .00001a
=1,000,000v X .000001a

These are all ways to state one WATT of usable energy. Voltage is never insignificant of itself, neither is amperage. It is only insignificant if you mistakenly remove it from its relation with amperage. It is only unusable, in the sense that at certain levels of voltage it becomes difficult to convert to a lower voltage with higher amperage. I didn't say impossible, I said difficult.

Paul Andrulis

sparks · « **Reply #791 on:** August 05, 2008, 05:43:23 PM »

@erfinder

Sorry about the confustion. I was trying to represent a dipole on the "fabric". Below is a diagram which incorporates point radiated fields. Thankyou for your consideration.

Grumpy · « **Reply #792 on:** August 06, 2008, 06:07:01 PM »

is the sphere between the tetrahedrons?

zrad · « **Reply #793 on:** August 06, 2008, 07:32:44 PM »

The sphere surrounds them.

zrad · « **Reply #794 on:** August 06, 2008, 07:55:13 PM »

Sorry,
I came in off another area in response to a reply from grumpy on Dr. Ray Brown's Crystal Sphere.

Cancel

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.) (Read 342092 times)

Grumpy

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Godmode

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Grumpy

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Grumpy

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Godmode

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Grumpy

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

modernsteam

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

modernsteam

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

BEP

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

sparks

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

pauldude000

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

sparks

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Grumpy

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

zrad

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

zrad

Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)