Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Sparks' New TPU Design  (Read 12394 times)

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Sparks' New TPU Design
« on: December 10, 2007, 02:23:53 AM »
    Below is a link to my website where I will be publishing a new design for building a TPU.  Some posters on this forum don't believe in imagination and designing.  They find it necessary to encourage people to make machines without understanding the working theory.  It is like telling a worker in a Mexican slave factory he will understand how a DVD player works by soldering  the circuit boards together and installing them on a chassis.  Pure bullshit IMHO.  For those of you interested in designing before building
please feel free to comment and question in this thread and visit the website for updates.  Just getting started so bare with me.

http://mysite.verizon.net/vze76b18/energyfortheworld/index.html

Chad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2007, 03:27:15 AM »
Hi sparks, ive just started to read up on the TPU and it sounds fascinating so il be sure to check in on your progress.
Also is there any chance you could improve the picture quality of the TPU at the bottomnof this page as i cannot read the text
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze76b18/energyfortheworld/id5.html

sorry to be a pain in the backside buddy.

chad.

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2007, 08:15:16 PM »
    ...Some posters on this forum don't believe in imagination and designing.  They find it necessary to encourage people to make machines without understanding the working theory.  It is like telling a worker in a Mexican slave factory he will understand how a DVD player works by soldering  the circuit boards together and installing them on a chassis.  Pure bullshit IMHO...

Bullshit?  Like this - see attached:

I have found that there a handful of people capable of building devices that they see in their heads - with little or no design required.  These are the people that get results straight out of the gate.  They are not afraid to blow stuff up, of RF burns, of being blown through a wall, or across the room, or of being shot.  Most if not all of these individuals share their work freely.  No running off to the Patent office, no non-disclosures, no BS.  They build from their minds and hearts because that is what they love to do.  They do not play stupid guessing games, or regurgitate thrice-chewed thoeries.  They "git 'er dun" and their is not a single person spouting a theory that can hold a damn candle to them!

Chad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2007, 08:50:11 PM »
looks like ive stepped in to a ongoing heated debate?, i dont want to get involved i just want to learn.

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2007, 09:25:31 PM »
@sparks

I am making an exception to my posting rule here, be careful when you power that thing up! The scalar waves may fry your ass! Read the early postings in the Successful TPU-ECD replication thread to learn of the results... mostly burned out scopes etc... and the early postings in the Lord of the Rings thread may save you time in going over old things already tried.. but good luck in your experimenting...

Acerzw..

Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2007, 09:51:43 PM »
@Sparks

You have all images on your Web site in .JPG.  This is wrong.  Only photos should be saved in JPG.  Things like technical drawings should be saved in GIF or PNG.  If you don't need 256  GIF colors, then use less.  Many times 16 colors is more than sufficient and it keeps the bandwidth down, makes the page load faster.

Earl

Motorcoach1

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 307
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2007, 12:18:38 AM »
Damm Grumpy .I knock my beer over laughthing so hard .....belch ...now back to winding  har har har ....... ::)

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2007, 04:40:05 AM »
   I have been spending time engineering the next design phase of the tpu.  I have decided to place the driver ring and emitter plates between two pieces of 1"granite slabs.  The slabs will shield the driver ring from acquiring uncontrolled energy from the magnetic shell current.  I would never power up this driver ring in an open field,  it is just WAY TOO DANGEROUS.  The granite will also act as a heat sink and radiator for the driver current electrical losses.   The next layer in the tpu sandwich will be the collector plates.  These plates should develop potential to ground as the energy moving along the magnetic shell encounters them.  All cabling (hf initiator cable and collector plate cables)  will be routed from the center of the tpu and not through the magnetic shell area.  I am going to work on a diagram illustrating the above.  I will put it on my website in a gif format as suggested by Earl.  I'm a newbie to web design so bare with me.

IronHead

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 970
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2007, 05:00:02 AM »
I will drink to that Grumpy  well said

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2007, 05:10:30 AM »
   I have been spending time engineering the next design phase of the tpu.  I have decided to place the driver ring and emitter plates between two pieces of 1"granite slabs.  The slabs will shield the driver ring from acquiring uncontrolled energy from the magnetic shell current.  I would never power up this driver ring in an open field,  it is just WAY TOO DANGEROUS.  The granite will also act as a heat sink and radiator for the driver current electrical losses.   The next layer in the tpu sandwich will be the collector plates.  These plates should develop potential to ground as the energy moving along the magnetic shell encounters them.  All cabling (hf initiator cable and collector plate cables)  will be routed from the center of the tpu and not through the magnetic shell area.  I am going to work on a diagram illustrating the above.  I will put it on my website in a gif format as suggested by Earl.  I'm a newbie to web design so bare with me.

Now, this may be a perspective or whatever, but shouldn't you kinda prove that the SM TPU works and is dangerous before you design your own?  I mean, you can have all sort of arcs and sparks and lethal currents in conventional apparatus.

Granite and "heat sink" in the same sentence?  Is that even legal?  Isn't granite more of an insulator?  I have a granite mantle and granite hearth for my fireplace - the mantle never gets warm and the hearth takes hours to get warm and then it is only warm near the fireplace - not at the edges.  Well, anyway, granite shrapnel....what's that saying - FIRE IN THE HOLE !!!

Magnetic shell?  always thought it was a 3D field without a surface.

Dangerous?  If the SM TPU is so dangerous, why does he hold it in his hands?  and he even sparks the wire together - whoa! talk about living on the edge! - SM could have gotten sucked into a blackhole vortex -  :o

This whole gravitational view does't seem to jive with SM's comments in any way shape or form, but good luck with it.

I recommend a flack vest - the kind with the ceramic plates.  They will shatter, and dissipate the impact energy of the marble.


sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2007, 06:19:36 AM »
@ Grumpy

        The granite is a dense crystalline structure that is very difficult to melt and pull electrons out of or through it.  I have a granite hearth that is exposed to all sorts of radiant energy and it hasn't cracked yet.  I will be using heat sink grease and adhesives for stress reduction. By seperating the driver current from the load current you are able to control the heating of the copper ring.  You need only enough current in the copper to form a torroidal shaped magnetic shell.  Marks spoke several times about the gyroscopic phenomenom of his devices.  See if you can imagine shitloads of electrons going around and around a ring. This current will make it's  own gravity field at the same time it bends vectored energy into a magnetic field shaped to concentrate energy  at the inside diameter of the tpu ring.  I believe that SM had no idea of what he was into.  He  could hold onto the small ones because his collector windings don't generate much heat or radiation until the load is completed.  Thanks for the criticism though it helps alot.

turbo

  • Guest
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2007, 07:16:44 PM »

   I have been spending time engineering the next design phase of the tpu.   


Did you finish the first design phase then ?  :)

Steven did say that people would change the desing to what fit's them best.

M.

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2007, 09:26:44 PM »
@ Grumpy

        The granite is a dense crystalline structure that is very difficult to melt and pull electrons out of or through it.  I have a granite hearth that is exposed to all sorts of radiant energy and it hasn't cracked yet.  I will be using heat sink grease and adhesives for stress reduction. By seperating the driver current from the load current you are able to control the heating of the copper ring.  You need only enough current in the copper to form a torroidal shaped magnetic shell.  Marks spoke several times about the gyroscopic phenomenom of his devices.  See if you can imagine shitloads of electrons going around and around a ring. This current will make it's  own gravity field at the same time it bends vectored energy into a magnetic field shaped to concentrate energy  at the inside diameter of the tpu ring.  I believe that SM had no idea of what he was into.  He  could hold onto the small ones because his collector windings don't generate much heat or radiation until the load is completed.  Thanks for the criticism though it helps alot.

Doesn't granite have impurities that have ions?  Also, isnt granite a mixture of different crystals from several minerals?  I remeber it has quartz and feldspar - can't remember the others - 'bout half a dozen I think - maybe less.

Heatsink grease or not, granite is not very thermally conductive, with a thermal conductivity of 2.1compared to aluminum which is 210.  Better than better kniown insulating materials, but it ain't no heatsink.

Magnetism decreases with the square of the distance from the source.  If you want a shell - won't you have to set up some sort of standing pressure zone?

How does a current create a "gravity field"? I am familiar with several devices that thwart gravity via high voltage fields, but not with high current.

SM knew full well what he wanted to accomplish - he wanted to harness the extra power in an "impulse" - after all this is where the extra energy is and always has been.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2007, 05:38:20 AM »
@Grumpy

Thankyou for your reply.  I am hoping that the overheat problems SM had with his devices are not going to be an issue in the new design.  I believe that once the initiator plates or windings have accelerated the electrons in the ring they need to be shut off.  Circulation of electrons is what I'm after not any circulation of energy in  wave forms.  Mark's device was outputting some really hashed up dc.  I never saw an oscope pattern of his inventions output current but I guarantee it wasn't pretty.  I want to circulate flat line DC in the ring with as little eddy currents as possible.  The ring current only needs to be enough to create the magnetic shell I keep yakking about.  The load current will not be carried by the ring (unlike sm's devices) and will not vary with changes in load currents.
          About the gravitational field propogation.  We can study gyroscopic action.  The electrons in the rotor are still very disordered so not much of a gravitational field is created when spun but still the inertial effects from increased gravity are brougt to bare.  Astronomers that have studied black holes hypothesize that at the core of the black hole is a circulation of energy in an orbit whose energy concentration can only be expressed in millions of star power.  The gravitational field from this tiny vortex is capable of influencing stars thousands of light years away.  Quonta so ordered that a hydrogen molecule size of a black hole vortex has the energy of our sun contained within it's space boundaries.  Of course the concentration of energy in the tpu ring is a far far cry from a black hole energy concentration but it can still be concentrated enough to create a gravitational field in excess of earth's.  Earth's 22mile i.d vortex creates a magnetic shell extending 15 or 20 earth radi into space from each magnetic pole.  Just like SMS compass in the center of the ring, a compass gets quiet inside the magnetic shell of the Earth's at the poles. 
    Then there is vectored energy or "black energy".  I suspect that this energy gets displaced or bent by vortex energy passing through it's ever present field.  This is not static energy but is a flowing energy from a zero point emitter.  The magnetic shell itself is bent black energy flow.  Black energy meeting the  magnetic shell will flow along the shell's surface and hopefully hit my collector plates and charge em up.
   I chose granite because of it's crystalline matrix properties.  I am not a mineral guy at all so there is probably a better rock to use. I thought of mica and porcelain but mica is a bitch to work with and porcelain is brittle plus the voltages here don't warrant porcelain.  I believe that most of the attracted energy will create a charge on the collector plates and not be passed on to the granite face anyway.  The black energy will get caught up in the collector plate's tiny tpu's (electrons and neuclei) and get released as "magnetism" from the collector plate currents.  Some of it will pass through the collector plate and just keep on truckin right pass the tpu. 

@ Marco
 
    I have posted a picture of a  designed double collector tpu on my website.  (SM was only getting 1/2 of the collection potential on his big one.  You'll notice in his video, I have a link to from my site,  that his big one is resting on what appears to be, granite?  Could be he was roasting them or folding them up when he let both sides flow.)  My wife is bitching about some stupid shit so I got to go.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2007, 06:24:36 AM by sparks »

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Sparks' New TPU Design
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2007, 11:14:37 AM »
Hello all,

@Sparks

I thought that Im the craziest of all TPU builders but it seems thats not so. I burned 2 scopes, scope probes, a lot of coils, MOSFETs.....but what you want to build is.......

Just google - granite, radiation - and you will see what I mean.

Otto