This is another example why not to ask/answer this user name concerning the RV, and how suspicious and counter productive his posts have become. Plus off topic.

All available informations are provided in the published compilations and this has been pointed out to this user name already in many posts.

Also i have merely advised [as it states in my above post] how to address this user name  to Stefan based on my opinion concerning his experience with the RV and on this circuit. His understanding [and experience] of how the RV works and based upon his attitude and time wasting methodology. [this is for his benefit if any]

Its too easy for me to insult a suspicious and or oil man, an alleged disabled man looking for sympathy with no lab, and or to be aggressive to an old man who would have trouble lifting half the weights i could, and who has an attitude which is obvious to me and some others as useless.

But i will say this based on those who like to lol, follow his OU advice  that sim programs can show OU, and to not to build any thing and rely on skepticism with out finding out for your self.

No simulation program can show ZPE, radiant energy , or any of the principles which the engineers who have worked with the RV have tested and reported. The lab is the best education, especially when concerning the RV .

So how ever useful you find This user names design engineering (which cannot explain OU), don't expect it to show what the RV engineers have reported in the lab. Their instructions and how to are posted in the comps.

Lab tests are needed by those we trust, not skepticism- Ashtweth
.
PS Words that do not match deeds are unimportant. -  Ernesto Che Guevara
This was quiet fun to point out that concerning the RV, a man with out a lab is truly a disabled one.
Plus  to improve attitudes and not to rely on skepticism alone .

G'day all,

Quote:

 Words that do not match deeds are unimportant. -  Ernesto Che Guevara

End of Quote, Beginning of comment :-)

Anyone that believes this has never read Plato, Anaximander, Aristoteles, Socrates and a whole heap of other philosophers that did not exactly match their words with their deeds in everyday life.

According to that idiot terrorist Che Guevera they were unimportant.

For my money I know who made a better and more lasting impression on the world.

Hans von Lieven

G'day all...
If My mechanical drawings do not match the physical model, or the technical data on the drawings is wrong....then all I can see is a bird drinking the water...like Homer Simpson...
Maybe it's all an illusion.
I like neons....here is one of mine.....
Scotty.

@Stefan: Indeed, spend him a break!

As i have seen, some other sceptics like Humbugger came along here. But they do not write the same discouraging stuff all the time. Its enough to answer once or twice with same arguments.

@Humbugger, come back, when there is something ready AND proofed by a group. Then i would like to see you convinced.

@Astweth, please cool down! Its not nice or fair, to point on Hum's physically Disability. This has nothing to do with his extrem annoying sceptics and his desire for admiration.

@ Hans
   
   i have never heared Milkovic claim perpetual motion from any of his devices. He claims USABLE energy from the LEVERAGE. i have however seen  MANY OTHER PEOPLE who see his device, claim that it is OU, when it is not.
There is nothing OU about the Milkovic device.

.

Hi Smokey,
Have you ever built and tested a Milkovic machine?
While I will agree with your assessment regarding the distribution of energy, it only applies to a non resonant machine. A non resonant machine and a resonant machine are two completely different mechanisms.
A non resonant unit is a slug. It looks like it is operating correctly, but no particular power is apparent at the end of the lever. Most people stop here and call it a day.
Milkovic calls his machine an oscillator for a very good reason. Significant power is generated in the lever once the right combination of weights, springs and dimensions is found. It's not that hard, but it takes a while to get it tuned.
I built one to see if what he says is true, and I'm satisfied that he is right. I didn't perform any sophisticated measurements because it was obvious to me that what Milkovic claimed really worked.
BTW, I've built many prototypes of machines that failed miserably. This was one of the few exceptions.

Ted

G'day all,

@ Hans
   
   i have never heared Milkovic claim perpetual motion from any of his devices. He claims USABLE energy from the LEVERAGE. i have however seen  MANY OTHER PEOPLE who see his device, claim that it is OU, when it is not.
There is nothing OU about the Milkovic device..

Sorry Smokey, not quite right what you are saying. In 2001 Milcovic published a book called Perpetuum Mobile in which he shows ten such devices, nine of them invented by him and one by someone else. In that book he does claim to have invented perpetual motion with his devices based on secondary oscillations. Unfortunately the book is only available in Serbian.

If you want to order a copy, here is the URL of the order form

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/KnjigeEng.html#perpetum

Hans von Lieven

yes sorry, but what happened to freedom of speech?