Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: New accelerating gravity wheel ! Converted video from www.newenergymachine.com !  (Read 659182 times)

AB Hammer

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1253
Charlie

 Thinking about the break. The only way it might take that many turns for the break is if he is using a screw plunger for a hydraulic system. For a mechanical screw break even with fine threads would only take a turn or two.

noonespecial

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Hi AB,

That's true. But what I think Bob is doing is backing off the brake much farther than necessary just to start the machine. Then, quite clearly in the video, tightening it again to control the speed. In fact, this is what he states in the video.
If he is using the brake as a speed control you would want as fine a control as possible. If the caliper is a scissor-type of caliper this would provide the greatest braking leverage and control and yes, many more turns. So again, no discrepancy.

Maybe Bob will correct me if I'm wrong.

Regards,
Charlie

LarryC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
@Ralph,


Comment from Bob in reply #83:
 
The compressor in the movie is what I was the machine was driving to do some usefull work. The machine wasn't ballanced and the board that is moveing is used as a shelf or small table.
There are no hoses or airlines conected to it.

There has been a lot of speculation about the various items in his shop. I'm going to take Bob's word about this until I'm proven wrong.


What about those so called latches on the compression springs, I fail to see any! And are the bellows from here?

The latch mechanism on my Irwin clamp is a metal bar with a slit that has a slant on each edge and it jams the bar, but releases with a slight twist force. I suspect a similar simple setup is used and would not be very visible. It may be inside the metal support block.

The ridges of the bellow cover or bellow shock can be seen just to the top left of the center. I'm sure he needed to use something more compact than the springs in the center due to space restriction. Also, the air shocks would be of the type with no rebound and the air could be stored and released as needed for the 8"+.


My main concern and reasoning for delay is that a lot of this information is not compatible with the visualization we have in the videos and still shots.

His machine is almost twice as wide as mine, approx. 20", but my levers are very close to his specs. If my machine was the same width and was in the position of the photo you would not be able to see the levers sticking out, only close to full top or bottom would it show. I don't have his 6/36" leaver, trying to figure out how to fit it in back, but it would not show either since it is only used over 15 degrees.

I may end up with the pneumatic as it may be the only way to apply the needed force for the 8"+. But this would be very difficult for me to implement.

Regards, Larry
« Last Edit: November 18, 2008, 04:56:04 PM by LarryC »

noonespecial

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
@all

The only other comment I wish to make at this point is that we have Bob's statement that his latest machine is no less than the ninth variant of his original concept. Therefore, making assumptions based on a couple of stills and video is risky when we don't know exactly where these fall in the evolutionary pathway of his design.

Regards,
Charlie

rlortie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
    • 'Arrache'
@Larry,

you wrote: I may end up with the pneumatic as it may be the only way to apply the needed force for the 8"+. But this would be very difficult for me to implement

A fine example of why I stated in a previous post to Bob:  The number of people that would be capable of building the machine for individual use is infinitesimal. The financial % that would be lost in sales of his machine would be so insignificant that it would not even be noticeable. Once again I reiterate, Why if he has his Patent or Patent pending number is he not coming forward. with the announcement.

I have been informed allegedly that Bob once signed a contract and disclosure statement with a Hot House patent company, you know the type that advertise on TV "Inventors wanted"  Of course it ended up with them demanding start up fees from Bob. So consider that he has already been BURNED once!  So is he being cautious, you bet he is!  My attempt to reason with him is...  If you build a better mouse trap the people will beat a path to your door. A very old adage, but the only improvement it needs is advertising, leading to public knowledge.  Bob need not lay out one thin Canadian Dime if he can display a self-sustaining machine. Investors will cover all costs of patenting, start-up and production.

Having been involved in over-unity research as long as I have, one  phone call is all I need, stating that I have a self-runner,  investors will be knocking on my door in  less than 48 hours.  Why? because they know I will not call until I have a verified documented runner.   

On another related  note; Remember Bob wrote a post aimed at me stating; "would you just give it away, I  do not think so".  With that thought in mind, how much of the information released do you feel is viable?  If he is not going to give, then obviously he is either not telling all or he is leading the 'doers' down a dead end path!  Best wait and see!

That does not mean you should stop attempting to duplicate, simply apply your own innovative thoughts where you feel they are applicable. If Bob continues to drag his feet then you may be the one to beat him to the punch!  As per Larry's above quote, I recommend or suggest  that only those with knowledge and capability of fabricating a double acting hydraulic or pneumatic system with the required knowledge of transference (valve reciprocation) attempt to follow Bob's design.     

 This one arm bandit concept needs a turbocharger in the form of an outside energy source.  Once improved upon, one must hope that the gross output will be sufficient to provide the input leaving a net force for other usage. 

Regarding the brake release scenario; A 1/4 x 20 piece of all-thread will move one full inch in 20 turns. A caliper disk brake requires only a few thousands of travel.

Ralph Lortie   
 

« Last Edit: November 18, 2008, 08:30:34 PM by rlortie »

rlortie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
    • 'Arrache'
@all

The only other comment I wish to make at this point is that we have Bob's statement that his latest machine is no less than the ninth variant of his original concept. Therefore, making assumptions based on a couple of stills and video is risky when we don't know exactly where these fall in the evolutionary pathway of his design.

Regards,
Charlie

A very well placed thought provoking statement Charlie, one I am in total agreement with!  If Bob is adamant of not giving, then he is not going to give us a "show and tell" lecture from the nearest podium.


broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
If you look at the beginning of the thread from Bob's perspective he unveiled "everything" about the wheel (he even asked people to email him for the workings of it). At least that's how it would have looked like from his standpoint. You have to imagen explaining your invention. From your perspective it would seem like you gave everything away since you already know how it works. But from our standpoint it's a complete different matter. And I believe he also saw this the last period. People in here were struggling with the concept so he figured he'd leave it at that to not have successful replications yet. That's why his last short response was unlike the previous ones. The only mystery to me was his proposed cam system which till this day I still don't understand.

rlortie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
    • 'Arrache'
Re: New accelerating gravity wheel ! Converted video from www.newenergymachine.c
« Reply #622 on: November 18, 2008, 10:13:55 PM »
Here is the Canadian patent office website,
but I did not yet find any gravity related patent by the inventor name
Kostoff, so maybe someone else is lucky to find it ?

http://patents1.ic.gc.ca/srch_adv-e.html

Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

It has recently come to my understanding that the patent is allegedly, deliberately  not written up as a gravity related patent. The concept is hidden within a device that falls in another category. If possible one may have to do a "wide search by inventor name if  feasible on the patent search engine employed.

@ LarryC,

Could you please direct me to the post where you learned of the cam and levered followers? All I can find is  mention of a cam.  I am lacking input as to what kind of cam or its function, hydraulic valve cam, make and break contact cam, lifter cam, ETC.

Ralph Lortie   


broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: New accelerating gravity wheel ! Converted video from www.newenergymachine.c
« Reply #623 on: November 18, 2008, 10:39:07 PM »
If possible one may have to do a "wide search by inventor name if  feasible on the patent search engine employed.

Bob Kostoff Is his full name. I searched both the US and Canadian databases but found no matches.


noonespecial

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
As Ralph has stated, its possible that Bob was clever enough to hide the specific invention within a more nebulous title. And if Bob went to that length, its also probably not filed under his name.

According to Canadian (and I assume US) patent law, its possible to protect an inventory's anonimity by filing under an assignee's name.

Regards,
Charlie

LarryC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Could you please direct me to the post where you learned of the cam and levered followers? All I can find is  mention of a cam.  I am lacking input as to what kind of cam or its function, hydraulic valve cam, make and break contact cam, lifter cam, ETC.

Bob's post follows:

The way to lift the weight to the opposit end is at the 4:00 oclock position (later he states 3:30) an  arm from the centre, on a cam mecanisum to the end of the arm (2.5 ft) is forced around and lifts the linked weights 1" farther than 1/2 the total travel. Centricical force will lift it the rest of the way. It acts like a leaver 2.5" to centre and 10" past.The farther it pushes the weight from the bottom the easier it gets.The first 2" is the heaviest. The spring mecanisum helps at the first of the upward stroke.

This was hard to figure until we applied it as a third class lever. First a pivot point than a roller at 2.5" from the pivot and then at 10" past the 2.5" roller it connects to the 2.5 FT lift arm connected to the weight boxes. Once this lever mechanism was established than the cam requirement fall into place. If the cam lifts the 2.5" roller .8" over 45 degrees (3:30 to 5:00) with spring assist then the 10" past will lift the weight boxes at the end of the 2.5FT rods 4". If another 1.6" lift was added to the 2.5" roller at 5:00 to 6:00 (30 degrees) than the weight box lift will be another 8". The last 1.6" is done by the actuator arm (6/36") plus supercharger per Bob.

Regards, Larry

rlortie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
    • 'Arrache'
LarryC , Charlie and broli,

Thank you for your research and input.

Shaking the apple tree as we have been doing the last couple of days, has caused an apple or two to fall! They are not ripe yet and we know green apples are not good for us.

I suggest we all go back to our own research or what ever and proceed  our favored path, whether it be hands on research or armchair philosophy.  I have recieved confirmation that we have all we are going to get for now regarding Bob's machine. I feel that any more speculation here other than reference to personal progress of ones own endeavors will be in vain.  We are not going to hear from Bob until he is ready to pull back the curtain.

Those concerned about the possibility of Bob and his machine going the same way as Bessler need not fear, it is not going to happen!

If you are attempting to duplicate as Larry is doing, I suggest you proceed using your own innovation. I am going to shelve all my research on this and wait for an announcement which hopefully (as quoted) will come before the end of November. If we do not hear anything by then I for one will consider proceeding with my own version. I have been patient for fifty years, another couple of weeks is a drop in the bucket!

Tomorrow I return to the shop, I have a couple of concepts to work on. Luckily I have three test beds, when I tire or loose patience with one I jump to another, giving my mind a chance to clear and reflect. Its my way of avoiding 'tunnel vision' 

Regards,

Ralph Lortie

 

 

LarryC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
@Ralph,

If you are attempting to duplicate as Larry is doing, I suggest you proceed using your own innovation. I am going to shelve all my research on this and wait for an announcement which hopefully (as quoted) will come before the end of November. If we do not hear anything by then I for one will consider proceeding with my own version. I have been patient for fifty years, another couple of weeks is a drop in the bucket!  


Yes, Ralph, I tried to valiantly responsed to you earlier, that is gone now as I cannot sustain.

Do you really think you may have all the time in the world? My father in law, not much older than you, but earlier today (2:47 Ct AM), I was awaking by a phone call from the hospital with my father in laws unsuspected death and my wife's (his daughter) extreme sadness. So I may be out of touch for a while.

So please people, get er done while you're here, for your family and the world, before your ability to do so is going!

Regards, Larry 

rlortie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
    • 'Arrache'
Larry,

Do you really think you may have all the time in the world? My father in law, not much older than you, but earlier today (2:47 Ct AM), I was awaking by a phone call from the hospital with my father in laws unsuspected death and my wife's (his daughter) extreme sadness. So I may be out of touch for a while.


I am sorry to hear of your loss and offer my condolence. And no! we do not have all the time in the world, at least not as an individual. I am on borrowed time now.

So please people, get er done while you're here, for your family and the world, before your ability to do so is going!

I only exist for that reason, its a long story and I will not go into full detail but after my second heart attack I was diagnosed in August of 2002 and told I would be dead by February of 2003

In October 2002 I flat lined and was revived 27 times in a period of a 300 mile fixed wing jet airplane ride while being transported to a Cardiology Hospital. There after awakening  I was informed that I was a prime candidate for a new experimental heart surgery procedure.  I offered myself as a walk in cadaver to Oregon State University teaching hospital,

The operation procedure was explained to me and  that my chances of surviving  the operation were very low.  Both my wife and I had to sign a contractual agreement.  My heart was sliced and diced and sewn back together.  When I came out of the anesthesia Alan Alda and the crew from Scientific American Frontiers was there.  Two months later a defibrillator was implanted in my chest. Every three months I now go in and have my inboard computer downloaded and battery checked.   

Now I am not a Bible thumper but for some reason it just wasn't my time to go. Ever since I have had this insatiable urge to put full time into seeking a new energy source, I chose to pursue gravity after spending many years with magnets. For me it is the only reason I am alive. it is as though God said, No I am not ready for you yet, you have something more to do, and I cannot think of what it is other than turning gravity into a clean energy source. It is the direction he pointed me in! 

For those that follow the readings of the Bible, God said in so many words that there is everything here man will ever desire, seek and ye shall find. As our technology grows so does our seeking and finding. But IMO we are not going to find it until we are smart or evolved enough to utilize it, a walk through history will tend to confirm this.   

My life is built around gravity wheels and that damn guy named Bessler. Before I die it is imperative that I or some one stands on his shoulders while he is in a lake over his head!. In the meantime my house that is in need of maintainance is falling down around my ears. Research in the shop and on the computer are more important until the roof springs a leak!

Maybe this will help explain why I offer to build viable or questionable designs for people who lack the resources or empirical skills to build their own.    
   

noonespecial

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Odd...isn't it?

The problem with these forums is that we converse/spar with faceless nicknames. Its so easy to view them adversarially until you 'walk a mile in their shoes' so to speak.

Thank you Ralph...very inspirational.

And sincere condolences to LarryC.

Regards,
Charlie