Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Converting mass responsible for Dark Matter into Energy  (Read 7384 times)

MGsid

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Converting mass responsible for Dark Matter into Energy
« Reply #45 on: October 06, 2023, 02:06:38 PM »
@Cloxxki

Quote
I'd like to learn more about the harmonics in place with this consistent concetric scaling factor, and why with 6/5 the number of needed steps is 8.

This harmonic is simply most optimal for this build. Other harmonics can be applied to this concept, but for this particular build 6/5 harmonic with 8 steps or 7/6 with 13 steps is the most optimal option.

I believe that the same concept was utilized also in pyramids. As the vibration wave traveled from the base of pyramid to the top, the wavelength got shorted and energy was increasing.

But that is just my personal view an it does not have to be correct.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Converting mass responsible for Dark Matter into Energy
« Reply #46 on: October 06, 2023, 03:44:22 PM »
@Cloxxki

Thanks for Your support.

@Kator01

I understand that you would like to have everything laid down ready on the table, but this ain't gonna always be the case.

And it is easier to write discouraging comments and accuse others of lying than to actually get your hands dirty and try to make a change. But I guess this is the only thing you can do.

I don't think so.
Sir
I (ME!!) would beg to have Kator assist me in research
He has great experience and has helped me in the past ,


He is NOT a naysayer ( quite the opposite)


Yes your claims grab attention.. 200 watts in KW’s out ?
unfortunately many have arrived over the years looking for
Others to solve something which is not working as they hoped..


And many have been bitten by this ..


Maybe cloxxi could get help building this ?( don’t think he has been bitten yet?)
Or if you have any verifiable gain at all to show ?(mw?
We could approach builders ( with incredible experience)


Respectfully
Chet


MGsid

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Converting mass responsible for Dark Matter into Energy
« Reply #47 on: October 06, 2023, 03:49:06 PM »
@ramset

Thank you for clarification.

I am doing my best and as soon I will have satisfying results I will post it here and share.

Regards