Very conventional motor. No secret, not even that of making easy money with people's credulity.
...
In the first book, the price is reduced (https://sites.google.com/view/non-fuel-energy-generating/non-fuel-energy-generating-device)
Why to sell a book $55 if you know the secret of free energy?!
Are you probably joking about the secret? For such a sum, just hand out. Good lunch is more expensive. And more importantly, the “Big Secret” is still on the way: “there is little time for translation”!
I wouldn't even accept the sum if I was paid to read such huckster's spiel.
;D
There is such a slogan "Everyone judges others by applying their own face to the assessment," are you probably the one who labeled me? Or do you work for a financial clan? Or you have no idea in the technique.
Good luck if you can be ......
We see nothing here from you except an advertisement for your book at $55, with childish mentions as "top secret". ::)For reference, look at the section in which my offer is posted! ;)
Pathetic.
Ability to pay for Bitcoins and download the book immediately after the payment...No, thank you, my library is already well filled with science fiction books and children's stories.
The troll is the one who hijacks this discussion forum to make money with pseudo-scientific crap.
" .... Devices can achieve efficiences of more than 1000% and this is not a joke ! ... "
A nice example, relatively new entry ' static generator' related :
https://patents.google.com/patent/DE102014017612A1/de (https://patents.google.com/patent/DE102014017612A1/de)
MEG ,Bearden et al., referencing.
An hundred Volt-Ampere generating device, probably with C.O.P. 10x would be enough, is it not ? ;) For the process demonstration and later magnification to 3 KVA private household e- plant following theE.U. "Zero Energy Building" in-situ power generation program.
Sincerely
OCWL
p.s.: the inventor his profession : Dr. Dipl.- Ing.
Probably he, if alive, can help to develop the " < 1000 Euros/ 3 KVA movement" !
Or is your A-Generator cheaper to construct and to deliver, Mr. Rakarsky. ? Included technical certification approvement ( ~ UAL, TUEV,.... ) !?
Do not build illusions in power, size does matter. (https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2019/03/a-generator-simplest-device-overunity.html)
For example, we take "philistine" indicators of 10 kW, output power, installation. We make simple calculations: for 1 hour of operation, the device produces 10 kW * hours; 24 hours - 240 kWh; in 30 days (24 hours each) it will be already 7200 kW * hours [7.2 MW * hours]! We look at our receipt for the payment of electricity for the calendar month and see how many kW * hours it takes to pay for the meter. Suppose you have an electric stove and hot water. The figure is about 800 kW * hour [0.8 MW * hour]. The question is what to do with the rest of the energy? You cannot store it in a two-room apartment on ... the tenth floor, otherwise you will need a huge battery the size of your apartment. At the same time every month will only stay. You can never sell it, world famous people have determined that you are a buyer, and you only have to pay!
We think further, but how much is needed?
We define average values: 800 kW * hours / 30 days = [26.7] 27 kW * hours per day - this is your average. 27 kWh / 24 hours = 1.125 kWh hours in ONE hour. This is an average figure. Naturally, consumption is uneven, and peak starts for the refrigerator engine and other devices are calculated for a total of 10 kW, but this is a fraction of a second. Then the simultaneous inclusion of devices and other things. The most interesting is that the main points of consumption you have a water heater and refrigerator. I see their power. The average power of the refrigerator ranges from 100 to 200 W / h (at rest), the maximum is 300 W / h (with the compressor running), that is, an average of about 250 W. Do not forget that the refrigerator is connected, working 24 hours a day. You can look at other electric indicators LINK. Directly connect the consumer to the generator, for example, 220 V / 50 Hz, single phase, you need to have enough power for peak starts, while ensuring that the voltage does not fall below 220 V AC. Such a mechanism was developed using a network inverter and buffer storage in the form of a battery of appropriate capacity. For stable operation, it is enough for us to have an output power of an autonomous generating device with permanent magnets with an indicator of 1.3-1.4 kW. According to his estimates, the battery capacity will be several times, and again, several times less than for a solar-powered device. How the home network on the 15th floor or in your house can look like is shown in the pictures:
FIGURE (SCHEME) (https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WOrgaOa84QM/XIpkwt91ziI/AAAAAAAAN2U/xJm1j_m_8QEtXrIeh8En3nq_rHYrwA7pACLcBGAs/s1600/000%25D0%259F%25D1%2580%25D0%25B8%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580.jpg)
You can use your home network. It is enough to disconnect the circuit breaker from the network, and to turn on the socket circuit, the output of the convector is 220 V / 50 Hz DC / AC from the home network with free energy from the magnetic generator.
For the civilized europide family house a 3 KWh battery-set and "...?..." KW generator, battery and electric consumer charging, should be sufficient !
"...?...": 3,2,1 KW. ? 24 hours day program and (K)Wp and (K)Wa measure and regulation, peak/ average
Not an hundred Watt prototype, but a thousand Watt prototype will become the
" Zero Energy Building" program demonstrating object !
Probably a help:
The first point:Prof. Ehrenhaft and his magnetic current explaination.
The second:we ,the humans,can not remark free U/IR-Radiation,
a radiation without temperature !
But when this radiation has not temperature ergo this radiation has(would) not (have) movement!
(Maxwell/Boltzmann)
Which is the source ?
Dear Rakarsky,
Just curious, did You ever build a working "Electro Magnetic Selfpropelled Generator" ?
Or You are just selling circuits?
Let me know.
Alex
My book is devoted to the main secret of an autonomous hydrogenerator, which eliminates all the contradictions of the hydraulic circuit and makes it possible even to make it yourself.
A book in English with a calculator (in an Excel workbook) to calculate the system.
Everything you can buy. To be done: a tank (in the dimension of a barrel) and a simple hydraulic reducer.
My humble job, now the bad guys can't stop you from making a free power generator.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2020/11/autonomous-hydro-power-plant-for-home.html
https://plati.market/itm/3039038?lang=en-US
UNDERWATER ELECTRIC CONVERTER OF STATIONARY WATER GRAVITATIONAL ENERGYAs you can see, there is no technical information and description here, only a statement of the fact that the device has been patented.
Authors:
Marukhin Vyacheslav Valentinovich (RU)
Kutyenkov Valentin Alexandrovich (RU)
abstract
An underwater electric converter of the gravitational energy of stationary water, consisting of a hydro turbine and an electric generator, characterized in that to obtain a flow of water that rotates a hydro turbine and electricity from an electric generator while consuming only the gravitational energy of stationary water, a device called "Water lifting device" is used, in which the outlet of the discharge pipe connected to the inlet of the hydraulic turbine and the water is drained through the injection pipe and the turbine into the surrounding water.
Ability to pay for Bitcoins and download the book immediately after the payment. (https://sites.google.com/view/non-fuel-energy-generating/non-fuel-energy-generating-device)first is my statement.
Direct link to the operator.
(https://www.digiseller.market/asp2/pay_wm.asp?id_d=2608365&lang=ru-RU)
I do not have the ability to accept Paypal. The Paypal operator made it impossible to accept payments to the wallets of my country.
2. what is the energy conversion mechanism in device described in your are offering.https://www.quora.com/How-can-a-refrigerators-efficiency-be-greater-than-1 (https://www.quora.com/How-can-a-refrigerators-efficiency-be-greater-than-1)
Note: I'm not interested with all of the stories, calculations, history of the device and position of the people involved.
All I'm interested with is explanation of energy conversion starting from explanation of :
a. what is the form original energy used by the device.?
b. that original energy (from point a.) is converted to what type of energy till it is converted into electrical energy at the end of the process?
c. Efficiency of refrigerator is more than 100%
I have no goal at all, to adapt to the energy standards of the bad guys. The goal is a personal energy, excluding counters the bad guys. A device that will provide energy to the household. My dream is already there, a simple repeatable device.
Circuit as it should be, using the household's usual electrical circuit. (http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_si/0/19966480.jpg)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Personal Electric (https://sites.google.com/view/non-fuel-energy-generating/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F)
Wesley, So you can describe the whole book,
I'll try briefly:
The formula of the ketic energy: Ek = 1/2mv^2; where: m - mass in kg; v- speed in m / s.
We write for an example:
Ek = 10kg * 2 m / s = 40 Joules / s * 0.5 = 20 Joules / s
Ek = 10kg * 50 m / s = 25000 Joules / s * 0.5 = 12500 Joules / s
Rough losses, in a tube are equal to a loss of 1 kg / s (1 l / s)
Ek = 9kg * 50 m / s = 22500 Joules / sec * 0.5 = 11250 Joules / sec
And here is how and why, it is not forbidden for anyone to read the book.
I think all other discussions are optional. I do not discuss unread material with the interlocutor.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2020/11/autonomous-hydro-power-plant-for-home.html
First of all, let us pay attention to the fact that this force grows very rapidly with increasing fluid velocity. Using the obtained formula, F = pQv^2, it is easy to calculate, for example, that at a speed of 1 m / s the jet will press on every square meter of the obstacle surface with a force of 1000 N (or When the speed increases to 20 m / s, these forces increase to i.e. with an increase in speed only 20 times, the forces increased 400 times
This feature of the action of fast-flowing waters was the cause of many natural phenomena. Huge ravines, riverbeds and river valleys were formed due to the destructive action of such forces created by flood waters. The erosion of sea and lake shores is produced by the same forces arising during the surf. These same forces allow rivers to transport soil eroded by them over long distances.
Wesley, So you can describe the whole book,I was not asking you about any secrets nor your own secrets.I have ask you to answer simple questions in format listed below.
The secret is simple, in increasing the speed of the mass.
Westley, I didn't think you were so illiterate. A lot of money, does not give awareness, probably takes away. Read more academic literature.I didn't ask for your opinion about me.
Wesley :DAt first:
You cannot, by definition, order me! In general, you should be glad that I respond to trolling.
In closed systems, efficiency cannot be more than one by definition.
Considering my self-contained hydrogenerator.
All power generated by the generator cannot exceed 5 kW (for example), but the efficiency is taken as a unit. The pump electric motor consumes 1.5 kW (5-1.5 = 3.5 kW to the consumer).
The efficiency of the installation can be estimated as 3.5 / 5 = 0.7.
But at the same time, the generation process is closed and self-propelled.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2020/11/autonomous-hydro-power-plant-for-home.html (https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2020/11/autonomous-hydro-power-plant-for-home.html)
Again your answer is not the answer in listed by me format.
If you have problems to understand English I will translate it into Russian.
Wesley
Energy (other-Greek. ἐνέργεια-action, activity, force, power) is a scalar physical quantity that is a single measure of various forms of motion and interaction of matter, a measure of the transition of the movement of matter from one form to another. The introduction of the concept of energy is convenient because if a physical system is closed, its energy is stored in this system for the time during which the system will be closed. This statement is called the law of conservation of energy.
From a fundamental point of view, energy is one of three (along with momentum and angular momentum) additive integrals of motion (that is, time-conserved quantities), associated, according to Noether's theorem, with the homogeneity of time, that is, the independence of the laws describing motion from time.
The word "energy" was introduced by Aristotle in the treatise "Physics", but there it denoted human activity.
Wesley :D
You cannot, by definition, order me! In general, you should be glad that I respond to trolling.
In closed systems, efficiency cannot be more than one by definition.
Considering my self-contained hydrogenerator.
All power generated by the generator cannot exceed 5 kW (for example), but the efficiency is taken as a unit. The pump electric motor consumes 1.5 kW (5-1.5 = 3.5 kW to the consumer).
The efficiency of the installation can be estimated as 3.5 / 5 = 0.7.
But at the same time, the generation process is closed and self-propelled.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2020/11/autonomous-hydro-power-plant-for-home.html
The device shown in the video t this link, is a Lead acid battery powered system. The unit contains an off the shelf DC to AC converter. Why it uses any water, I don't know.
floor
Wesley, who did you vote for Biden or Trump! I hope Trump wins, I believe in the Alliance of America, which is on Trump's side.question:
As I understand to sensible Americans, your democratic values are like a bone in your throat.
@Rakarskiy"Democracy" is a concept that came from ancient Greece (as they are trying to whistle about it), but the conditional equality was meant only for free citizens, with the existence of the institution of slavery. Don't bother, I have a very good education in various disciplines.
Democracy and capitalism.
One is a system of self governing within a group of people.
The other is an economic system.
Is democracy real? Democracy as the rule of the people or, more fully, “rule of the people, elected by the people and for the people” (as defined by the American President A. Lincoln) is more a normative ideal, an attractive utopia than a characteristic of real democratic states. This concept contains an internal contradiction. Its essence lies in the fact that the power of the people in the full sense of the word means self-government of the people, which means the denial of political domination, a special apparatus of coercion and other attributes of the state, one of the forms of which is real democracy.
In other words, true democracy is incompatible with the existence of the state and democracy as its kind. In fact, democracy has never existed anywhere without a state. The withering away of the state, its replacement by public self-government seems utopian, at least in the foreseeable future, given the diversity of public life, human freedom and the inevitable divergence of interests and aspirations of various people, as well as the need for the social system to make certain decisions that are binding on everyone.
Thus, democracy as a democracy is in many ways a utopian ideal, which nevertheless has an important normative significance, since it acts as a guideline, the goal of the political development of society.
"Democracy" is a concept that came from ancient Greece (as they are trying to whistle about it), but the conditional equality was meant only for free citizens, with the existence of the institution of slavery. Don't bother, I have a very good education in various disciplines.
By the way, in Russia, before Christianity, there was an institute for the power of the townspeople, called "People's Veche". In those days, the PRINCE was an elective position, not a genealogy. The princes became pedigrees later, after the fall of the Great Horde in the European part of Russia (Tar-taria in the Western manner), Tar-taria existed until the middle of the 19th century, and Platov's Cossacks, as part of the Russian army, was just the Tartary expeditionary corps, in alliance, against Napoleon.
"Tar-taria" from the expression "children of Torah and Tara". The names of the ancient Russian gods.
How do you like this version.
@Rakarskiy
Now I see. This book of yours is a book of satire and humor.
This device you have posted in РЁС-ВЕДРО.png is it representative of the
kinds of designs in your joke book, yes?
floor
@ rakarskiy
By your definition of an "autonomous hydrogenerator"....
Would a device design in which 2 wires connecting the 2 poles of a functioning lead acid
battery to 2 electrodes which are submerged in sea water, qualify as an "autonimous
hydrogenerator"?
At the pressures and temperatures which can be generated by the pump, there will be no
compression or cavitation or expansion of the water in the pipe system.
Restricting the nozzle outlet decreases the water volume flowing through it.
This will also increase the pressure in the pipe system as compared to what the
pressure within the system would be if the nozzle opening were larger.
The pressure within the pipe can only go as high as the pump can deliver and
then only while the nozzle is completely closed.
The energy and / or power available from the water that is jettisoned from the
nozzle, is the product of both the speed of the water exiting the nozzle and the
volume of that water.
If we increase the speed by narrowing the nozzle we decrease the volume.
If we increase the volume by enlarging the nozzle opening we decrease the
speed of the water as it exits.
Increasing the cross section of the pipe reduces turbulence and friction within the
water flow / pipe.
Restricting the pipe diameter in any way will decrease the volume of
water flowing in the pipe.
One can increase the speed of the water flow, but one cannot in this way increase
the energy present as that flow.
In such cases we can trade speed for volume or volume for speed, but the total
energy remains essentially the same.
Also, any restricting of the pipe diameter will only decrease the energy available
at the nozzle. This is due to friction losses within the pipe / turbulence.
But then I am sure that you must already be aware of these things.
floor
@ all readers
The diffuse cascading or otherwise, has no applicable value to the.......
battery powered pump / nozzle / Pelton type water wheel / generator device
as presented in Mr. Rakarskiy's 02_ENG_HHP_SELF.pdf .
(This device runs on a battery).
The pump / nozzle / Pelton type water wheel / generator, arrangement, only,
and greatly decrease the amount of usable energy that would otherwise
have been available directly from the battery or from the battery and then
through a DC to AC converter.
The described diffuser system is only useful in gas systems.
floor
In the generator, the electromagnetic torque acts against rotation and is therefore braking in relation to the prime mover. The torque generated by the prime mover balances the electromagnetic torque of the generator and the torque corresponding to the mechanical and magnetic losses in the generator.
The second rotor is repelled from the first, already rotating rotor with, say, half the speed.
is repelled by electromagnetic forces. We transfer energy for it with conductive rings and brushes.
What increment in the kinetic energy of rotation will the system (second rotor) receive for a motionless, resting observer?
It is not difficult to calculate the conversion factor COP = P (generator) / P (engine) = 1 / 0.014 = 71.4 (7140%).
The result looks fantastic, this generator is very real. Using a 100 W drive motor, this would be 0.9 kW of free energy when the electromechanical converter is self-propelled. The main thing that we found out is that turning on is possible, in our case, according to the condition of the problem, we can turn on the engine in the generator circuit with a load, provided that the load power is reduced, for the power consumption of the engine and the frequency of the network and the engine is 563 Hz.
Either the generator or the motor, must be over unity in and
of its self, before this drawing could self run.
Best wishes
floor
We did it. Nothing works. :(
http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/13619-motor-generators?p=508069#post508069
It is fashionable to read the updated version of the article through Google translator at the link. (https://rakarskiy-narod-ru.translate.goog/publ/free_energy_systems/motor_generator_cop_gt_1/3-1-0-137?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=nui)
Hello Mr. Rakarskiy,
I'm curious, how many poles, or pole pairs, must a synchronous generator have to deliver 563 Hz at 650 RPM?
thanks,
bi
You have one drawback, you don't read the material you are referring to. Everything is clearly told there, calculated for the final conclusion.
Yep, I read that. I asked the question to point out how ridiculous you are. How realistic is a 104 pole 1 kw alternator? Can you give me an example where one might be purchased?
You're out in left field with all those numbers that you stick in any equations which you can find. It makes no sense.
bi
Have you seen enough Indian cinema?Exactly. And not only Indian ones. :)
Well, what do you think! But the electromagnetic moment is formed by induction and for the simplest generator in one turn (frame), no squares can be applied, everything is based on basic formulas.
To find a solution, it is necessary to start from the basic calculation. Yes, the generator machine will come out expensive, since to get the result, the cost of magnets will increase significantly (if something decreases, something arrives: E = B * L*V). I was interested in another question in this task - the fulfillment of the condition of the Law of Conservation of Energy in the simplest generator, the fulfillment of the constant that the mechanical power applied to the rotation of the generator will be conditionally equal to electric, ideally. It turned out that this is a myth, and even an absolute one. The braking torque of the generator depends on the conditions of its design. The constant of the law of conservation of energy in the generator does not work, and depends not on the physics of the process, but on the engineering solution. Just making a superunit generator is expensive, so the condition price /power =electromagnetic moment varies in the ratio of the equality of electrical power to mechanical power. This is not a constant , it is a commercial attraction for production.
You can only do it yourself, other models have been developed and calculated, not such a cosmic conversion factor, but sufficient to make yourself non-volatile. The cost of manufacturing such a machine is still very high.
Link to the article with the solution: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_COP_1_motot_gen.pdf (http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_COP_1_motot_gen.pdf)
Sticking random values into misapplied equations and using fuzzy math proves nothing except that you lack fundamental comprehension of the science. From previous encounter between us on E.F., Ampere's force formula yields a force between the two conductors, not a moment.
Also I see little if any value in your approach to disprove conservation of energy.
I suggest you visit nearby university and seek review of book by those skilled in the field.
bi
Dear opponent! If you found an error. inaccuracy I will listen to you with pleasure. I solved the problem for the simplest generator, according to the rules of physics, the section of electromechanics. If you can't decide and point out the inaccuracy with your opponent's decision, then the statement is nothing more than bravado, nothing more. If so, then go to the educational institution yourself.
The simplest generator (https://x-faq.ru/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3003.0;attach=88786;image)
Twice, now a third. Very specific error on your part. Incorrect to apply Ampere's force law to solve for moment in a dynamo. This does not imply it is the only error.
bi
Magnetic induction of an infinite conductor with a current, there is such a formula. If we apply magnetic induction from an external magnetic field, then, according to the Ampere force formula, the motor will be greater than one in accordance with the principle of reversibility. I've been testing various combinations. So think again about what you're saying.
The two forces (F) are different in your graphic. One F is Laplace force, extension of Lorentz with current carrying conductor in uniform magnetic field. Other F is Ampere force, different extension of Lorentz where current in infinite wire causes force against equal current in parallel wire due to the magnetic field associated with the current in the infinite wire. Ampere's force is directed perpendicular to and between the two wires, equal and opposite direction, therefore unable to produce a moment. Laplace force is orthogonal and able to act against lever as a moment.
In the examples, the magnetic flux used in Laplace force equation is the product of the permanent magnets. In an Ampere's force calculation, the magnetic field(s) arise from the current itself.
bi
Really?
I turned over a bunch of material, and never found the calculation of the electromagnetic moment of the simplest generator. All that is offered is to count with an iron core. And there it makes sense to take into account the cross-section of the poles. In the simplest generator, the conductor moves in a magnetic static field.
The second is the power of Laplace (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace_transform)? I wonder how an integral indirect calculation can negate a rectilinear arithmetic one?
The third in the problem is not considered at all, sliding force changes, but only the frontal maximum for simplicity.
Fourth, everything must always be compared with the reversibility of the motor-generator machines.
Fifth, if you want to convince me of something, I ask for your justification and calculations in examples.
Otherwise, a windbag.
I don't need to convince you of anything. I am simply alerting you and the readers that I find your derivation, or "book", based on a misapplication of Ampere's force law and confusing, to say the least. I feel it shows a lack of comprehension of fundamentals on your part. I've stated my view and you and the readers can research and come to their own conclusions. I feel no need to argue.
bi
Dear, you claim the incorrect application of Ampere's Law, without giving a single argument, in the form of a calculation that, in your opinion, is correct. Therefore, your warnings are nothing more than bravado. I invite everyone to point out the mistakes, giving proof according to the opinion of the one proving the correct calculation, but all by the bushes. Therefore, you are not convincing.
My solution of the problem by the link: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_COP_1_motot_gen.pdf (http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_COP_1_motot_gen.pdf)
It was Ampere's "Force Law" which I said was improperly used, not to be confused with that which is generally termed as Ampere's Law. I did supply reference explaining that and a brief statement.
I read your paper again and tell you it is terrible. You design a generator with an output of 1.0 kw and input of 14 watts. It has 104 poles and a rotor diameter of 350mm by 500mm long. 7140% efficiency, thereby claiming to prove conservation of energy wrong. You even say "Such a generator is possible".
I don't think so.
bi
Can't you calculate the electromagnetic moment yourself, the simplest generator? For load: P =1 kW/220V ? Provided that the angular velocity is -650 rpm, and the distance between the active faces of the frame or the diameter relative to the axis of rotation d is 0.35 meters! The condition must be one frame or one coil turn!
I have no words, consider the execution of such a calculation a test of aptitude. I hope your employer reads your nonsense (your posts are above).
"I hope your employer reads your nonsense" says the fellow who has made the calculation to be 0.163Nm. That is about 23 oz.in. Similar to the rated torque of the motor shown here: https://www.ricmotor.com/details/rs-997ph
bi
What's bothering you? make your calculation, the conditions are higher. ;)
My calculation is here: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_COP_1_motot_gen.pdf (http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_ld/0/40_COP_1_motot_gen.pdf)
Slide by link: http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_fr/0/8389356.jpg
bistander, if you can squeeze 1 kW out of this engine, then why all this cheese board. I thought you were an expert ;)
I only spoke up here because I see you selling BS.And how, in this case, can perpetum mobile be done?
The electromagnetic torque capability is the determining factor of the dynamo. If as your design exercise indicates, 0.163 Nm is the electromagnetic torque of your machine, it indicates poor material utilization, which you even mentioned..
I don't know cheese board, but have knowledge and experience with electric machinery and energy conversion. I only spoke up here because I see you selling BS. I'm not buying it and don't think others should either. Similar to my run-in with Turion. You make an extraordinary claim (1kw out / 14w in), prove it.
bi
Mr. Rakarskiy,
My suggestion. Obtain motor shown in my post. Test it. Analyze it. Measure components. Apply your formula using its parts. Compare your calculations to published performance. Then realize your mistake.
Yes, I have done this, many times over career. Published formulae always correlate when properly applied.
bi
You have not done as I suggested. Compare your calculations to tested performance. Also let us see your [1 kw out / 14 w in] dynamo in action. Prove these calculations and claims you make are true. My career is just fine. I prove my work to my boss. I am not selling to public using false claims and garbage calculations. You need to prove what you say or public will see that you cannot. I need to prove nothing. Millions of electric motors and generators operate according to principles of conventional established science and physics which I endorse.
bi
The output power of this generator is 240 VAC at approximately 30 A or 7.2 kW at 2000 rpm. The required power on the shaft (12) is approximately 600 watts.
I made a suggestion that would help you learn or realize that your calculation methods do not work, by using an existing dynamo economically available of about the same EM torque as the one you designed. You choose to play with a YouTube toy. Fine. Build it, test it and verify your calculations. That'd be interesting.
I silence no person. I simply challenge BS when I see it being sold using false claims and lies. Prove me wrong, please.
bi
@ Mr. Rakarskiy
First, I wish you success in your free energy explorations.
Second, it is up to you (the presenter) to prove or show experimentally
any O.U. results you might claim.
Third, It is not up to others (i.e. bistander) to disprove O.U. claims. It is reasonable
that the burden of proof rest upon any claimant of what is extra ordinary, to demonstrate
and CLEARLY AND PLAINLY describe their method or device,
and
to show measurements along with the methods of how those measurements were taken.
best wishes
floor
Good time!
Have you solved this problem yet? Are there any other unresolved issues?
You yourself have hastened to make sudden conclusions, my restless friend, and haste is a bad companion on a journey.
You have found the grain of how a wire interacts with a current in a magnetic field. You have very little left.
Your efforts with your friend are very commendable. You just need to be able to set yourself the right tasks to conduct practical tests.
Traditionally, thrust force measurements are carried out!
In fact, when testing a laboratory sample, this condition has just been met. The wire with the current stuck to the magnetic pole with a force corresponding to the gap between the wire and the magnetic pole, the magnetic induction of the magnet at this point and the current strength in the wire along the entire length of the attraction zone. The force of attraction was determined by the distance between the sources of the magnetic field. Have you really not heard anything about such an element of the magnetic field force as lines of force, which, as I will point out to you, are capable of contracting and stretching. In the drawings they are called isolines. Their densest manifestation will be at the pole. You should also make an imitation of a wire with a current with a gap, without shifting to the edges of the poles of the magnet. In my last post, I recommended that you use an incompressible non-magnetic material superimposed on the poles of a magnet. In the generator, this distance does not change to establish the truth, it cannot be changed in the experiment. In addition, it is necessary to eliminate the friction force of the movable element. I recommend making such an element with the possibility of changing the gap. The magnetic clamp must have a cross-section equal to the cross-section of the magnet, the magnetic resistance in the magnetic circuit has not been canceled.
I have given you a drawing, you have the opportunity to depict it in a more visual form using electronic means. The red color indicates only the condition of the gasket at a constant distance when measuring magnetic thrust. It is impossible to apply the ampere force constant without taking into account many factors. I hope that you will do everything right and make sure that the Law of Conservation of Energy does not need to be ignored.
Just a basic calculation. In the statement of the constant: 1 Tesla = 1 Newton / 1 Ampere * 1 meter, the dimensionality of the distance of the field boundary of the wire for equilibrium with the external field is equal to the minimum, in fact, the surface of the conductor. I calculated both conditions. In reality, based on the experiments conducted, there was not a single case that the distance was equivalent to the surface of the conductor.
Mr. Rakarskiy,
I mentioned previously you misapply Ampere's Force Law. Now you use a units definition as a method to calculate a variable. It is not an equation intended for such use.
bi
(edit) excuse me please. I have lost the URL where I copied the graphic used. Similar can be easily found by search for "physics units of tesla".
Tesla as a unit of measurement:
Tesla is a unit of measurement of magnetic flux density, magnetic field strength and induction in the International System of Units (SI), named after the inventor Nikola Tesla.
Tesla as a unit of measurement has the Russian designation - Tлl and the international designation - T.
1 tesla is equal to the induction of such a homogeneous magnetic field in which a force of 1 newton acts on 1 meter of the length of a straight conductor perpendicular to the magnetic induction vector with a current of 1 ampere. In other words, one Tesla is equal to the field strength acting on a conductor with a force of one newton per meter of conductor at a current strength for each ampere of current.
Similarly, one Tesla represents a magnetic flux density of one weber per square meter of area.
T = kg / (c2 · A) = N / (A · m) = Wb / m2.
1 T = 1 kg / (1 s2 · 1 A) = 1 N / (1 A · 1 m) = 1 Wb / 1 m2.
Tesla was introduced into the International System of Units by the decision of the XI General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1960, simultaneously with the adoption of the SI system as a whole. In accordance with the SI rules concerning derived units named after scientists, the name of the Tesla unit is written with a lowercase letter, and its designation is capitalized (Tl). This spelling of the designation is also preserved in the designations of derived units formed using Tesla.
@ rakarskiy
Build and test your principle in a simple experiment.
floor
What's the point of building it when I found a bug.
Hello
now you have calculated so much. Whether everything is right or not? But how should the generator for TOYIR Kamolov bike be? It is four poles. The diameter approx. 160mm the width approx. 80mm. With neodymium magnets. Wire approx. 0.5mm. Can you do the math?? I built the engine with flywheel but the generator is the problem.
Greeting
Lota
Hello
OK I'll try. But in the video he only has a power regulator and a BLCD driver. One interrupter and two relays and throttle. I don't know what the transformer is for yet.
Greeting
Lota
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_nj9m2UEBs&t=0s
@ rakarskiy
nice presentation
thanks
floor