Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Modified GoToLuc Design  (Read 4705 times)

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2021, 03:06:23 PM »
For Lota as well

https://overunity.com/17070/all-magnet-motor-td-based/msg519616/#msg519616

Also please see LankaIV post on previous page.

regards
    floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2021, 02:48:52 PM »
Here is what I found in all of the variations I tried of the "Luc's force"
designs.

All of my attempts to increase the output magnet travel distance beyond a length of
3 track magnets, resulted in no improvement of input to out put ratio.

Work done as insertion of, or  removal of  or both insertion and removal
of the output magnet from above the track magnets, was always adversely
affected by those increases in the track length.

While using a 3 magnet track length, and with the addition of 3 magnets offset
below ONE END of the track magnets, I was able to extract the output magnet
from above the track (with near zero work) when it was at either of two distinct
points along the track.  However, output magnet travel was very limited in its
distance ( steep force fall off and shortness of travel).

While using a 6 magnet track length, and with the addition of 3 magnets offset
below BOTH ENDS of the track magnets, I was able to extract the output magnet
from above the track (with near zero work) when it was at the center point along
the track only.  This caused less than 1/2 of the track length to be usable usable.
Free insertion and / or removal of the output magnet from above the track while
near to either track end, became no longer  possible.  No bueno.

Approaching or exiting the track at an angle allows output magnet travel over
nearly the entire length of the track.  But no free insertion and or removal
of the output magnet, except for at one point,  (the center of the track).
No bueno.

And so on.

But no worries.  I just needed to get this off of my plate.
Next presentation is / will be so, so cool.

        floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2021, 08:48:45 PM »
This one
         @
    https://overunity.com/18875/o-u-magnet-force-shielding-1/msg558059/#msg558059
 is 30 X O.U.

           floor

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #18 on: May 28, 2021, 09:04:03 PM »
Hello Floor,


You present this magnetic stack with shielding relatively "static/motionless" so I will analog motive  present :


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19660419&CC=US&NR=3247407A&KC=A


the wheel to see as the shield


Keep it well !


Sincere


OCWL

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #19 on: May 28, 2021, 09:33:50 PM »
Thanks Lanka
Tu tambien

@ All readers
This one
         @
    https://overunity.com/18875/o-u-magnet-force-shielding-1/msg558059/#msg558059
 is 30 X O.U.

           floor

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2021, 09:56:48 PM »
Tu tambien  :o  Merci beaucoup !


Mais in  luso-galaico , North-America lusitanic denominations :


 Canada (= wood stick) /Lavrador-Labrador (worker incl. Wuff-Wuff)/ "Sargasso" (algae) Sea,


                                                                   você também






But I am only resident,not Portuguese !




Happy weekend wishing


OCWL
 

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #21 on: June 22, 2021, 12:39:29 PM »
Hello Floor,


You present this magnetic stack with shielding relatively "static/motionless" so I will analog motive  present :


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19660419&CC=US&NR=3247407A&KC=A


the wheel to see as the shield


Keep it well !


Sincere


OCWL

Similar idea here @

https://overunity.com/17736/permanent-magnets-and-coils-electricity-generation-design/msg521722/#msg521722


Offline norman6538

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2021, 02:43:35 AM »
Where is Floor? He has not been around since May. Is he sick?

I did some recent testing and I cannot get the magnets to balance without a sticky spot.

I have one more setup I will test before I give up.
This is what I will test.
https://overunity.com/18866/modified-gotoluc-design/msg557652/#msg557652
Norman

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2021, 08:50:13 AM »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2021, 09:50:11 PM »
But this one
         @
    https://overunity.com/18875/o-u-magnet-f"orce-shielding-1/msg558059/#msg558059
 is more mechanical work out than in or "O.U.".

           floor

Offline norman6538

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #25 on: August 29, 2021, 12:17:18 AM »
Floor I can't find the work in/out - only the grams.
did I miss that?

Norman

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #26 on: August 29, 2021, 09:23:41 AM »
re posting / modified a little


Here is what I found in all of the variations I tried of the

                          Luc's force" design variations.

All of my attempts to increase the output magnet travel distance beyond a length of
3 track magnets, resulted in no improvement of input to out put ratio.

Work done as insertion of, or  removal of  or both insertion and removal
of the output magnet from above the track magnets, was always adversely
affected by those increases in the track length.

While using a 3 magnet track length, and with the addition of 3 magnets offset
below ONE END of the track magnets, I was able to extract the output magnet
from above the track (with near zero work) when it was at either of two distinct
points along the track.  However, output magnet travel was very limited in its
distance ( steep force fall off and shortness of travel).

While using a 6 magnet track length, and with the addition of 3 magnets offset
below BOTH ENDS of the track magnets, I was able to extract the output magnet
from above the track (with near zero work) when it was at the center point along
the track only.  This caused less than 1/2 of the track length to be usable usable.
Free insertion and / or removal of the output magnet from above the track while
near to either track end, became no longer  possible.  No bueno.

Approaching or exiting the track at an angle allows output magnet travel over
nearly the entire length of the track.  But no free insertion and or removal
of the output magnet, except for at one point,  (the center of the track).
No bueno.

And so on.

But no worries.  I just needed to get this off of my plate.
Next presentation is / will be so, so cool.

        floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Modified GoToLuc Design
« Reply #27 on: August 29, 2021, 09:42:11 AM »