Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum  (Read 696247 times)

Offline r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3795 on: August 08, 2022, 06:41:15 PM »
Pewnie nie umiem czytac naukowcow ale umiem odroznic ciagle mowienie do slepego o gorach; lecz zamiast slepemu opowiadac mozna go tez tam zabrac.

W obecnym swiecie naukowiec jest nikim po za swoim labolatorium i kolegami. Kilka razy w roku sa nagrody Nobla ale i tak ludzi to nie obchodzi za to obchodzi Lewandowski grajacy obecnie w "Barcelonie" tak bardzo, ze nasze media zglupialy bo zachwycaja sie pilkarzem ktory nie gra dla swojego kraju no i to tylko kopacz plki, a nie nawet ktos z tytulem. Jesli jutro ktos pokaze generator 10kw free energy to jedyne pytanie bedzie ... kiedy go mozna kupic w sklepie i za ile. Nikt juz nie zwraca uwagi na postep i to ile potrzeba wysilku na to. Telsa byl kims w tamtych czasach teraz jest to Lewandowski ale on mu do piet nie dorasta. Co pozostanie po Lewym ? buty? i "kilka zdjec". Generator tez bedzie bezimienny co najwyzej z tabliczka koncernu lub chinskim logo 1 z 1000000 firm go robiacym choc watpie zeby obecnie nawet taki scenariusz byl mozliwy. Nadal mamy kupowac paliwa kopalne az zabraknie i wtedy moze cos...

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3796 on: August 08, 2022, 07:27:19 PM »
zgadzam sie z Toba
Prawda.
Bardziej kusi mnie dac bobu  kacapom w Ukrainie. 
- dobrze do wiwatu, nacieszyc sie  kacapskim  tancem na linie zanim spadna w przepasc.
   Jestem emocjonalny, jeden wiecej obraz moze nawet mnie soprowadzic do wscieklosci.

Wesley

Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3797 on: August 08, 2022, 07:47:21 PM »
Does anyone here have data on the circuits or devices Tesla was using for his magnetometers?

I assume he likely built his own like on page 25 C.S.N. however at first he was perhaps buying something off the shelf also.

Does anyone know what the tech off the shelf in 1899 was for a magnetometer?

I am looking for the tech before the fluxgate and after the Gauss swinging magnet.

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3798 on: August 08, 2022, 08:10:16 PM »
comment from one of responders:


Quote
I am sorry if the Russians hurt your friends or families property or persons.
Funny how lazy people are on this board. 
Even if you give them the secret your friend does not want to disclose they would still want a schematic with parts values then the Gerber files etc.   
It's interesting Tesla spoke of 3rds and the 1/3 wavelength of the Poynting vector. 
I don't know what the secret you are keeping is as you have advanced knowledge from
 calculating the Corum data so out of respect I have only alluded to certain things such
as circular Polarization. 
I have a feeling you just told that guy without telling him referring to the lake and the interface.
I have to laugh, have a drink on me.  Thank you for all the great work you have provided to us.



I'm not against Russian Nation.
Kacapy, Raszysty,  Moskale have nothing  in common with Russian father trying to support his family.

We need to avoid circular polarization, 
The position  of Tesla tower  must be Vertical.
(  because EM wave must be perpendicular to direction of propagation)
There is no secrets for  Dr James Corum A to B energy transfer. I explained it quite well.
There is one thing  - simple and mentioned but unexplained by me  about energy Extraction from Schumann Waveguide.
Not Brewster Angle but Complex  Brewster Angle look in Corum Patents is used by Dr. Corum and me.
No reflection no refraction
allows  for wave in the interface travel in curvature of earth/air interface.
basics  are here. https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU?t=307
 
Phenomena used  by Viziv and Dr Corum  are exactly and without any changes used in Energy Extraction from Schumann waveguide.
Training with  Dr James Corum A to B energy transfer. is absolutely  fundamental to start after that
try to   Extract energy  from Schumann Waveguide.


The good thing is that it costs you only some wire nothing.


Wesley

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3799 on: August 08, 2022, 09:19:15 PM »
  The bad thing is you want someone else to do your work, and prove the point.
 As it seams that it's too simple for you to act on.
   So, please show the harvesting of Aether from the surrounding ambient, as Tesla mentions is possible, or no one will believe you.  Don't confuse the above with transfer of the energy.
   We are not lazy as you, nor full of excuses, and are ready to replicate What is SHOWN to WORK.    Thank you for your contribution.

 NickZ

Offline r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3800 on: August 09, 2022, 09:10:03 AM »
You say Zenneck waves are Kapanadze's device.
However, the coils must be vertical so how do you explain this with the Kapanadze device?

Just don't say Kapanadze has discovered a method of arranging the coils on the knee :)


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-57554-1

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3801 on: August 09, 2022, 03:06:23 PM »
  The bad thing is you want someone else to do your work, and prove the point. //  no one will believe you. 

YES. TRUE. Replication - copying - is fundamental tool ruling  science and business.That is why they made patent law.
I don't care nor it is important to me now. Information was printed, spread, and questions addressed  indicated  involvement .
Reasoning:
It was a need to create educated ready to act group of experimenters eventually affecting Rashists economy.( this also affects all of the rest.)and information was send.
Audience  responded to it, including NickZ whose disappointment is expressed here.
____________________________________________

So, please show the harvesting of Aether from the surrounding ambient,
  I don't want trash about  non-existing Aether/ether posted here.
-such comments and/or all such contents, may be scheduled for removal
NickZ


_____________________________________________________________________[

Your:
We are not lazy as you, nor full of excuses, and are ready to replicate What is SHOWN to WORK. 
 

  and your :
no one will believe you.
 

contradicts each other by means of exclusion.
Pushing for proof of documented science while talking about nonsense  eather/ether/aether
is like cracking oddly rejected' true nonsense in science world into more nonsense by an individual having no idea what it is about.


Use your brain NickZ can you?
Flat-screen TV was invented in America in 1937.
https://eldredgrove.com/when-was-the-flat-screen-tv-invented/
"re-invented" by Plitzer in 1964
Seiko Epson,  first LCD TV, to the public in1982, 2.5" screen.
By the 2020s, most flat panel TVs began to offer 4K
Only because people like you waiting for others to work on it first.

Wesley

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3802 on: August 09, 2022, 04:01:24 PM »
         
 
    Tesla describes what you call junk, as the Aether, the source of all seen and unseen.
    NickZ
   
______________________________________________________________________
From moderator:
eddied for content.:

It is last time I allow "Aether" here unless you provide scientifically recognized proof of its existence knowing that such proof doesn't exist.

Tesla's later experience with E=mc2 made him to accept it once eather/Aether was rejected.
It is unfortunate that many dinosaurs got stack around Bohr Atom model.
Quote
It is important to remember that the Bohr atom is not an accurate representation
https://scienceprimer.com/bohr-atom
It is important to remember that Aether is rejected worldwide incorrect attempt originated in 18 century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element)


Nick - another attempt to  change moderated comment can cause  your account to be  reviewed by Administrator  .
   
   
« Last Edit: August 09, 2022, 05:23:20 PM by stivep »

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3803 on: August 09, 2022, 04:05:46 PM »
from moderator:
eddied for format not content.
content reminds original


Wesley
Perhaps harvesting from “Environment” is a more
Generic ( less controversial ) term For the community at this time !
  Your interface gain mechanism is said to necessitate the production or assembly of a transmitter and receiver first ? (which “can “manifest a gain after the proof of transmission Through interface is validated !
In some as yet undisclosed way !
And this would seem to be a big part of the Tesla claim of transmission through ground to any place on the planet !
IMO seeing this transmission of power at a distance would be a remarkable thing itself ( for experimenters equipped to do this )
And once having a running system …you state that Dr.Hann found a truly simple path towards a gain beyond the system
Input ( unlimited access to … planets Energy transfer “manifold” or interface …between above and below ?
Seems amazing
And as you say much simpler and at least a result is offered of some kind (long distance  power transmission)
We Need an open source lab or group to play with this !


Respectfully
Chet K
PS
I see here there is an open source builder working on
Transcontinental Telluric transmission?
of electric power !
https://overunity.com/19208/transatlantic-telluric-communications-experiments-us-to-uk/msg569693/#new
« Last Edit: August 09, 2022, 04:36:18 PM by stivep »

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3804 on: August 09, 2022, 07:22:37 PM »
stivep
Quote
From moderator:
eddied for content.:
It is last time I allow "Aether" here unless you provide scientifically recognized proof of its existence knowing that such proof doesn't exist.

Would you consider Dark Energy/Matter or ZPE as being scientifically recognized?.

The physicists at NASA seems to believe Dark Energy has merit...
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy

As well this is news to me...
https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-energy
Quote
dark energy, repulsive force that is the dominant component (69.4 percent) of the universe. The remaining portion of the universe consists of ordinary matter and dark matter. Dark energy, in contrast to both forms of matter, is relatively uniform in time and space and is gravitationally repulsive, not attractive, within the volume it occupies. The nature of dark energy is still not well understood.

Nobody mentioned a universal repulsive force before?...

AC

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3805 on: August 09, 2022, 10:38:23 PM »
stivep
Would you consider Dark Energy/Matter or ZPE as being scientifically recognized?.

The physicists at NASA seems to believe Dark Energy has merit...
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy

As well this is news to me...
https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-energy
Nobody mentioned a universal repulsive force before?...
AC
Quote
"Dark energy is thought to...
" it is not statement but presumption  November 30, 2010
.under condition that science about it is evolving
"Disclaimer:  material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated"
https://www.nasa.gov/missions/deepspace/f_dark-energy.html

Your link is from after
April 23, 2022
: https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy
  where history of Dark Energy, Dark Matter is explained here:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
 It reminds a presumption of unknown yet mechanism but is not denied.
Denial= rejection: is a moment in physics  where presumption or theory  or model is replaced by another more accurate model.
Accepted model in physics at its most is based on:
Standard Model that has become established as a well-tested physics theory.https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model

Physics although modern reminds in its basis pretty archaic as:
Acceptance in physics :
- is some measure of the fraction of events or the spacial or momentum distributions of events that will be registered in the detector.
another words we like to touch and test to believe and in that NickZ is right.

Often, science is presented as trafficking in absolute truths.
On the contrary, science is a framework for interpreting, systematizing, and predicting nature based on empirical observations.
That is to say, a well accepted ‘theory’ (framework for understanding/predicting nature)
can always be upended with sufficiently compelling contrary evidence.
And in that  NickZ is right.
But he doesn't know where he is right or wrong.
He doesn't manifest  skills  in this area and "intuition" - is not recognized by science.( the same as a religion)

________________________________________

Zero-point energy (ZPE) is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have.
you're free to put the zero of energy anywhere you like, it requires vacuum.
vacuum is a bit of space with nothing in it.

I have system in my lab that should go to 4k (Kelvin) but it goes much much lower than that.
So I can  easily achieve temperature of 3K - "space vacuum" temperature,  but not vacuum of space !!!!!!!!!!!
and here we are dealing also with 

dark matter
which doesn't interact with other stuff (except gravitationally, and possibly only through the feeble weak interaction)
Some scientist may protest when I say that: I can go to ~1.6K that is lower than deep space temperature.
https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=1046



Wesley
« Last Edit: August 10, 2022, 01:52:41 AM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3806 on: August 10, 2022, 01:06:54 AM »
Classified military testing often requires entire testing device to be destroyed.
It is Switzerland made jewel, and I  was lucky
It was approved to be saved. look at picture
Wesley

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3807 on: August 10, 2022, 01:09:08 AM »
Here you have explanation what is what
Wesley

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3808 on: August 10, 2022, 08:06:01 PM »
stivep
Quote
Often, science is presented as trafficking in absolute truths.
On the contrary, science is a framework for interpreting, systematizing, and predicting nature based on empirical observations.
That is to say, a well accepted ‘theory’ (framework for understanding/predicting nature)
can always be upended with sufficiently compelling contrary evidence.

I would agree and we still have a lot to learn...

For example, the property of inertia is usually missing in most models and generally lumped together with mass as if they were the same thing.
It's problematic because there are only two logical results...
1)the mass was acted on by an external influence and space cannot be empty as supposed.
2)the mass has acted on itself in some way violating multiple laws of science.

I came to this conclusion in a way similar to Richard Feynman's first principals...
https://blog.dtssydney.com/richard-feynmans-principles-of-scientific-thinking

As Feynman implies, not so much science but common sense and describing the evidence without regard to the way we feel it should be.
As such the logic involved in explaining inertia is littered with contradictions.
We cannot call "inertia" a property (a quality of something) and have no explanation of what it is or how it came to be.
The term "property" implies said quality must be due to some influence in which we have two choices, 1)internal or 2)external.

Which comes full circle back to the two initial options...
1)the mass was acted on by an external influence and space cannot be empty as supposed.
2)the mass has acted on itself in some way violating multiple laws in science.

Generally speaking whenever an argument becomes circular, ie. the supposed answer contradicts the actual question, were in trouble. That's the wonderful thing about science because there's never a shortage of questions to be asked...

Regards
AC



Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3809 on: August 10, 2022, 11:12:14 PM »
For example, the property of inertia is usually missing in most models and generally lumped together with mass as if they were the same thing.
As Feynman implies, not so much science but common sense and describing the evidence without regard to the way we feel it should be.
AC

Talking about inertia:
In  mostly classical physics  it is common opinion: (common sense )
"that there is no “problem of inertia”, on the grounds that either
-no explanation is needed for such phenomena or
- the explanation is already at hand."
just because e.g law of inertia, in one form or another, was already used before them by such people as Galileo , Descartes.
-but common opinion is just common in relation to elements making it, so it can't be taken as an axiomatic value.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Huygens and Leibniz, seen inertial motion as uniform and on a straight line, whatever direction we like it to be in the universe.
Quote
When something is at rest, it tends to stay that way.
In physics inertia is described as "a property of matter
by which it continues in its existing state of motion
in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force."

Barbour’s seen inertial motion as “cosmic drift,” but we do not know whence it comes and what determines its course and it was  year 2001.
-relativity of motion, which makes everything relative to something else.
Some others see a problem between Inertia and Relativity?

Einstein utilized  Gaussian coordinates and differential geometry,  for
"A A B B relativity of revolution relativity, generalized? A B B A
constructing his theory of gravity (usually called “general relativity,” but a caution is necessary for this word). "
https://1library.net/article/what-is-the-problem-with-inertia-and-relativity.y4erlxrq

But because we are interested with energy and inertia
we coming to all kind of rotational machines made by all kinds and all levels experimenters:
 Jeff St. John  August 07, 2020:
https://www.greentechmedia.com/squared/dispatches-from-the-grid-edge/solving-the-renewable-powered-grids-inertia-problem-with-advanced-inverters
postulating :
Quote
Setting up inverters to augment or mimic that inertial stability.
referring  to virtual inertia  inertia damping generation


Quote
South Australia. The 30-megawatt/8-megawatt-hour battery system sits at a substation
serving several towns on a peninsula that also hosts about 90 megawatts of wind farms,
with only a single connection to the mainland.
but it turns out that this is:
Quote
the megawatt-scale inverter operating the ESCRI system and the much smaller inverters
connecting rooftop solar systems to the distribution grid aren’t that different,
So large scale vs small scale at your home obeys the same rules including Inertial motion at individual or summary level.
Aren't we coming back by that to:  "common opinion" (common sense )  from very top of my comment?

That's the wonderful thing about science because there's never a shortage of questions to be asked...
Regards
AC

Wesley