Is There A Free Or Cheapest Method To Trade In Stock, Forex, or Penny Stock ?,  as a source of income to fund your projects.

        I have never done any of this,  since I don't know of very cheap ways of doing it.

        ( Note :  It would be useful if another website  'identical'  to this one could be created for  Stock/Forex/Penny-Trading or other related income-generating matters.
          Note :  I did state above that this is so people can fund their projects on this site   )

       Not only do you have to deposit an initial amount to get started in  'Stock-Trading'  and  'Forex',    whatever brokerage-company you use will have fees for each time you buy or sell or do anything else .

       Stock-Trading
           From my point of view, even spending a minimum of $500 to establish a  Stock-Trading account is too much and risky,  so unless there's a method which costs no more than $10,  I'm not interested in Stock-Trading.

        Forex
           As far as I remember you can get started in Forex with a minimum of $100, or is it $500
           However,  you have to wait 2 or 1 days to receive your  traded-currency-? or is it profit-?
           This seems to be the very opposite of what I want to be doing.
           (  Note : An Unofficial Forex  -   I wonder if people who have bank-accounts in more than one country,  that if they send themselves say $100000 from one currency into another at strategic times,  that maybe they can make $1000 profit each time they do that,  so that they could make $1000 every 1 or 2 days,  although I assume banks have limits and things to limit that  )

        Penny-Stock
           Obviously I have read that everyone recommends to avoid Penny-Stock trading because it's all unregulated and scams( inflating stock prices ) and all that,  and obviously if you invested more than $1 or $10 the chances are you'd lose it all very fast.
           However, it seems perfect for what I want to do


           I want to get into  trading with $1 or $10 maximum,  and then spend a few hours now and then rapidly buying and selling in 1-session, buying and selling  500-1000 times in just a few hours ,  obviously trying to turn $1( or $10 maximum ) into  $100,   and once I reach   $100  it would be important that I rapidly transfer that to a external  bank-account  not related to the trading  .

    The  problem is,  that because I would plan to  be buying and selling  500-1000 times in just a few hours,  I would have to pay a high-fortune in fees  for each time I buy or sell  and transfer the  balance to an external bank-account.
     So obviously I'm searching for a site with no fees for each time I would buy or sell,  or unusually low fees like .001-cent,   and no fees for transferring the account-balance  to an external  bank-account.
     
    Due to various circumstances,  I would want to always never have more than $100 in one of these trading accounts

     I've researched as much as I can on the internet.
         

  I do not have any project( related to this site ) that I want to raise funds for,  but obviously many other members do.

  (  To be honest, I would only seek to raise funds to obtain the  use  of  accommodation  that would have a very   'special-type'   of quiet( but with all the other   'normal'  types of noise of all places ),     or rather,    accommodation  that would only have one  'special-type'  of  noise problem not present  )

   You already know most of the material below,  but I will type it anyway and also for anyone else reading this

   Capacitor Propulsion in a high-vacuum :
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGN65lse5yE

    And,  in a lower vacuum :
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw1N5wNzJk8

    They say it is very difficult/costly to replicate the same vacuum as space, on earth,  so why do they not just test this Capacitor-Propulsion  and others up in space,  maybe because it might work

     The tests above may indicate indicate it is not( or not the same as )  ion drift or ion wind being generated in air

    It may work because of one of the examples in the  Faraday-Paradox( there is a wikipedia page for the  Faraday-Paradox ).
      If  you  spin a   Disc-Shaped-Magnet( near  'nothing' else ),  an  electrical-current  will be generated onto the magnet,  and can be collected from the magnet.
     It works because  the  magnetic-field of the   Disc-Shaped-Magnet  does not spin with the magnet,    in other words the magnetic-field  stays stationary and causes friction( induction ) with the  Disc-shaped-Magnet  which generates an electrical-current onto the magnet.
   So the magnetic-field  is ?  made up of  Aether or stationary-? particles sitting in a grid/lattice pattern in space.

   Therefore it is possible  Capacitor-Propulsion could be pushing against Aether or stationary-? particles sitting in a grid/lattice pattern in space.

   The webpages below do not mention any tests carried out in space
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld%E2%80%93Brown_effect
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Townsend_Brown

   The following quoted text is from my post :
   http://overunity.com/17203/magnetic-and-gravity-motor-update-and-notes/msg506161/#msg506161

     Tesla had stated somewhere  that the  source of the energy from his overunity? invention( was it one of his inventions related to this ) was  not  'electromagnetic' ,   that makes me wonder if the source of the energy from his overunity? invention  was  'gravity',   that his  Solid-State-?  invention converted gravity to electricity,   
        -  Is it possible he visually confirmed this by observing an  anti-gravity-effect

    And, if a  radio-receiver-device was to be  funneling energy from a  radio-transmitter-device as described on  http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html  ,    would there be a physical pulling force between them,    for-example,     if the  receiver-device   and  transmitter  were on free-floating boats,  would  they move toward each other,   either like an artificial version of gravity,    or,   as a possible alternate explanation of how gravity works,   if so,   then could this be an idea for producing  anti-gravity

    That could be another method of anti-gravity,  emitting a field that is in resonance with gravity but somehow out of phase with it,  or should it be completely synchronised/in-phase with gravity

   The following quoted text is from the same post :
   http://overunity.com/17203/magnetic-and-gravity-motor-update-and-notes/msg506161/#msg506161

   However,  keep in mind, that there seems to be 2 different  concepts in this topic :
     ( 1 ) - You emit a radio-signal( same amplitude and frequency, but offset phase,   as the target  radio-signal), to funnel the  radio-signal from the  target-transmitter into your device to  gain  the energy
     ( 2 ) - Your equipment funnels in the  radio-signal from the  target-transmitter by a method other than 'emitting a radio-signal'  ,   so your device can gain the energy,  I assume this would be the most difficult method 

    So number ( 2 ) method may-? be a method of anti-gravity without needing to emit a field,  and may be be different to  gravity-shielding,  I think it is mentioned on :
    http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
   
     That  webpage above is where I became aware of number ( 2 ) method, and it makes no reference to gravity,   except for a link  your can find by searching for the  text  "gravitation"

    So I just made some assumptions/theories from that page

     

        Penny-Stock
           Obviously I have read that everyone recommends to avoid Penny-Stock trading because it's all unregulated and scams( inflating stock prices ) and all that,  and obviously if you invested more than $1 or $10 the chances are you'd lose it all very fast.
           However, it seems perfect for what I want to do

There used to be a monthly London based publication called "The Penny Share Guide" which was quite intriguing. It was printed on a duplicator and ran to about four sides of A4 paper. But it has gone.

What was fascinating was that very occasionally, one could spot why a company was going to the wall. and of course, if one could buy up half the stock for a tenner, move in and fix it, then there would be a fortune to be made.

But the cost of a share is no measure of its value. It depends how many have been issued.