Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1605372 times)

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #810 on: July 29, 2014, 03:38:49 AM »
of the Tattoed Genius's

Here is what is up, demon seed.    First you accuse me about lying about my dead wife, in which I pounced on your ass with a mountain of PROOF proving you're trash.

Heres the "tattoo"  scene you keep mentioning.

My close and dear friend,...... named Kiven (not Kevin) Warner became a famous tattoo artist........ he was diagnosed with lymph node cancer and melanoma.

He knew he had a death sentence, ..... lots of skin grafts etc etc. .........To remember him by, I had him do some nature scenes on me so I could remember him.


It was my request of a "farewell card" from my best friend for me to remember him by.


want PROOF??
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/kentucky/obituary.aspx?pid=15436958

Now, pedal your arse down the road

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #811 on: July 29, 2014, 04:08:15 AM »
TA, you left out the part where he basically accused you of being a criminal by implication.

Regards...



And copied below is where the douche bag Tinsh!t Koala troll accused me of being a liar...and my redponse.



 Re: A pair of Very Imoprtant Web Sites

Quote from: Tinsh!tKoala on July 28, 2014, 07:08:43 AM<blockquote>My full name and contact details are known to several members of this forum and they are welcome to conduct any background checks they like on me and to report the results as long as they respect my privacy by not posting my personal details on the forum. And the incident to which you refer was simply me posting the TOP RESULT from a Google search of the Tattoed Genius's publicly posted name. And you will notice that as soon as I reminded him that his expensive lawyers would see the _whole thread_, including the sum total of his abuse, libels and insulting behavior... he shut right up about lawyers, didn't he. So you can take your bogus strawman ad-hominem trolling lying abuse and stuff it where the "son" don't shine, SON.
</blockquote>

First, lets dispense with this lawyer paper dragon business that has been put up.

The cowardly troll never actually came right out said Theo A/Ken was a criminal...he simply implies he was.

BIG difference in the court of slanderous accusations...which all who employ these low ball tactics are very well aware of.

So, now we are in a situation where when this troglodyte troll is is simply held to the standard he himself set, he responds with an unproven and outlandish accusation that I am a liar.

Such an extreme reaction makes me even more suspicious of this trolls past.
 
And unless this creep can demonstrate (provide proof that I indeed AM a Liar, then the only conclusion left is the HE in fact is a LIAR...a has really left himself wide open for a slander lawsuit this time.

This POS closed by referring to me as SON.

Well, I would like to happily report there that there is absolutely no genetic connection whatsoever, or any other type for that matter, between myself and this vile troll.

Regards..."

93RDELEMENT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 154
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #812 on: July 29, 2014, 04:27:02 AM »
Where is the vortex ??? I have read all the data you put up but no vortex ???? There is no death !!! energy converts remember !!! Don't worry about being a criminal a bird stole my peanut sandwich I called the police hahaha Its not easy living in a world of selfish divided people no unity among humans no sharing and men just cant get along without killing each other .. So where is the vortex ??????????? Also memory magnetic memory its connection to evp and bacteria and a virus there a lot more to magnetism than a stupid magnet ... Your wife is alive now I know why you are so grumpy ! A spirit guide made contact with me a few years ago as the sun was rising she spoke to me in real time proper conservation It lasted a few days than nothing since . There are many kingdoms some are very dark make sure you lighten up see the butterfly in everything help who you can and become all that is good .... We earn our ticket into the next world !     

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #813 on: July 29, 2014, 04:30:31 AM »
TA, you left out the part where he basically you of being a criminal by implication.
Regards..."


Its no worries, some people are just warts on the ass of life.


Its their duty to define the contrast between nobility and agnosis.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #814 on: July 29, 2014, 04:52:26 AM »
Kenny:

To answer your questions:

>>> NOW, tell us HOW and WHY this "boundary"  "KNOWS" how to immediately SHIFT when two magnets are brought together.  (YOU CANNOT)

I am assuming that you are talking about two bar magnets in attraction.  There never was any boundary in the first place so there is no shifting.

>>> NOW, tell us WHY this "boundary" is ONLY created from induction?

For this question I will assume the setup is this, the one with the real Bloch wall:  [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N]

In that setup there are two very very weak magnetic fields in opposition at either end of the iron bar.  The closer you get to the center of the bar the weaker the fields get.  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation.  So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.

>>> NOW, tell us HOW this "boundary" equalizes due to pressure gradients?  (YOU CANNOT)

Forget about the fantastical term "pressure gradients."  The real variables are the flux density and the total amount of magnetic flux.  With the [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N] setup, the two fluxes essentially cancel each other out in the iron bar.  You actually would have to precisely match the flux contribution from either magnet to actually have a Bloch wall in the center of the iron bar.  A slight excess of flux from one magnet over the other would move the Bloch wall further away from the stronger flux source.

>>> NOW, tell us WHY there is ZERO MAGNETIC "ATTRACTION" AT THIS so-called "BOUNDARY"  (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/huh.gif)     (YOU CANNOT)

If you are referring to [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N] then there is almost zero attraction if you do an imaginary slice through the iron bar where the Bloch wall is located.

>>> Its all a "magnet" right?   Why is there NO "attraction" at the boundary?    ROFL       (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)  (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)

No net flux means there is no attraction.   On the other hand, if you do an imaginary slice through this [N---S] then there is "attraction" inside the magnet.

>>> Ok, so a "magnet" is "POLARIZED"  ehhhh??     So what the FUCK is creating the polarization?(http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/huh.gif)?   (Hint, is that dielectric inertial plane CONCENTRATED [[[[[[not IN.........CONCENTRATED]]]] at the middle).

The polarization comes from the fact that the outer electrons act as current loops and they are all moving in the same direction.  Therefore the current loops have magnetic moments that are all pointed in the same direction.  That is the polarization.  It all stems from the very first clip I linked to, "The magnetic field from a moving point charge."  In fact everything that you have been discussing stems from this.  A magnet is just a bunch of moving point charges that are generating magnetic moments, a.k.a. little tiny toroidal fields.  Or you can say it's bunch of current loops.  The main point being that all of your fantastic and crazy terms are all just flotsam and jetsam - everything you are discussing stems from understanding that a moving point charge creates a magnetic field, and a moving point charge that moves in a circle creates a tiny magnetic moment.  That is at the foundation of all of the blather.  In theory all that you need to understand is this, and then all of the macro effects that you see from playing with magnets can be deduced by starting from this basic fundamental point.

You can sum it all up like this:

Moving point charge -> magnetic field
Point charge moving in a circle (eg: electron) -> Magnetic moment
Magnetic fields -> Vector addition

That's really the foundation of it all.  It's all just trillions and trillions of little magnetic dipoles adding together.

There is no "dielectric inertial plane" for a single electron moving in a circle.  Therefore, there is no "dielectric inertial plane" for a magnet.

This is all that there really is:  a moving point charge creates a magnetic field.

We have the technology, we have the mathematical formula that actually tells us the magnitude and the direction for the magnetic field generated by a moving point charge for any location in 3D space.

That is ALL THERE IS.  You are on a wild goose chase.

MileHigh

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #815 on: July 29, 2014, 05:51:44 AM »
To answer your questions:
I am assuming that you are talking about two bar magnets in attraction.  There never was any boundary in the first place so there is no shifting.

SORRY, I SAID ANSWER.........not baseless statement. 


.  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation.  So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.

Sorry, no descriptions ALLOWED,  only EXPLANATIONS (you have none)


Forget about the fantastical term "pressure gradients."  The real variables are the flux density and the total amount of magnetic flux.  With the [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N] setup, the two fluxes essentially cancel each other out in the iron bar.  You actually would have to precisely match the flux contribution from either magnet to actually have a Bloch wall in the center of the iron bar.  A slight excess of flux from one magnet over the other would move the Bloch wall further away from the stronger flux source.


FLUX of what moron?    Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*


What bloch wall? (DIELECTRIC INERTIAL PLANE) ........1 PAGE AGO YOU SAID IT DIDN'T EXIST    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

You said one thing only 12 hours ago, NOW something wholly different!!!   

Asked you 20 pages ago to define FIELD, ......since they have NOTHING to do with particles, you are afraid of that word.


If you are referring to [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N] then there is almost zero attraction if you do an imaginary slice through the iron bar where the Bloch wall is located.

LOCATED?   I never said it was LOCATED THERE dummy,  I said it was CONCENTRATED THERE due to magneto-dielectric mutual repulsion in a conjugate binding system

CONCENTRATED AT   is not  =   LOCATED AT     .   pathetic.



No net flux means there is no attraction.   On the other hand, if you do an imaginary slice through this [N---S] then there is "attraction" inside the magnet.

You cannot do ANY kind of slice, and "find" either magnetism NOR the dielectric inertial plane moron, they are FIELDS,..........FIELDS ARE NOT found in particles NOR "slices"

ROFL!!! 

Here, have an imaginary slice of mud pie.



The polarization comes from the fact that the outer electrons

Electrons dont exist, and FIELDS are not particles............EVEN THE INSANE idiots in Quantum dont claim fields are particles   ROFL !!!!! My goodness, you're so gnorant. 


act as current loops and they are all moving in the same direction.  Therefore the current loops have magnetic moments

Current loops eh?  That would require you to DEFINE A FIELD, which contain no particles,   Pathetic .


Moving point charge -> magnetic field

Magnetism doesnt move in a circle, moron, it moves in a pair of reciprocating vortex , convergent and divergent.

You cannot define  the word FIELD, as such, you cannot employ it. 



That's really the foundation of it all.  It's all just trillions and trillions of little magnetic dipoles adding together.

Sorry, asshole, but magnetism is (as Maxwell, and Tesla, and Faraday state) the BYPRODUCT, the radiation, the "FIELD OF DIELECTRICITY"

But, I guess you think yourself wiser than then?   ROFL !!!


Magnetism is a DISCHARGE, you fucking idiot,       Ever heard of "electricity TERMINATING as/into MAGNETISM"  ??????????   
   Guess what is "dumping" / radiating MAGNETISM????  Thats right dummy, Dielectricity.



There is no "dielectric inertial plane" for a single electron moving in a circle.  Therefore, there is no "dielectric inertial plane" for a magnet.

Nice claim, try again.    Bullshit not accepted here.   

This is all that there really is:  a moving point charge creates a magnetic field.


Points dont exist moron, you have to make a line to make a point, and you have to make a point to draw a line. 

POINTS!!!!!!!   ;D  ;DI know that BS fallacy of Quantum VERY VERY WELL 


We have the technology, we have the mathematical formula that actually tells us the magnitude and the direction for the magnetic field generated by a moving point charge for any location in 3D space


What technology, you havent invented shit, you are NOT studied in Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell, Steinmentz, nor Heaviside   ;D  ;D

No son, you have jack shit statements, illogical bullshit, and no patents, no evidence, NO LOGIC, no proof, NOTHING,  Absolutely nothing.



Your pathetic sacred cow is made out of plaster and gold paint....., go wimper in the corner.



You dont even know that magnetism is the TERMINATION of either dielectricity OR electricity


Did you FUCKING THINK magnetism is causing magnetism?????????????   demented     :o  :o  :o

Honestly, I have to say "holy fucking shit"  , pardon to others.




I see how your system works, magnetism is causing magnetism  in a "magnet"      OMFG     ;D  ;D

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #816 on: July 29, 2014, 05:54:39 AM »
.  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation. So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.


Is that so?  Let me quote you from few hours ago , you INCONSISTENT ASSHOLE>>


Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 12:59:44 AM
    Repeat: There is no bloody Bloch wall in the center of a bar magnet, nor some "dielectric inertial plane."



 ;D  ;D  ;D


How, honestly, did you get so delusional??? 

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #817 on: July 29, 2014, 06:01:40 AM »
What technology

Magnetic force microscope, Kerr-effect laser microscopy, and spin polarized neutron tomography come to mind...

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #818 on: July 29, 2014, 06:02:07 AM »
Jeez, this feels like a "Great Turkey Shoot."

Quote
FLUX of what moron?    Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields

And you try to claim that you have studied magnetism for 20 years?  "The medium is the message."

You really stumbled there.

Quote
Is that so?  Let me quote you from few hours ago , you INCONSISTENT ASSHOLE>>

Lat time I looked an "iron bar" was not the same thing as a "bar magnet."

You are just too intense!  Have another coffee!

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #819 on: July 29, 2014, 06:04:18 AM »
Picowatt, we are not worthy!!!  lol

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #820 on: July 29, 2014, 06:04:27 AM »
Lat time I looked an "iron bar" was not the same thing as a "bar magnet."
You are just too intense!  Have another coffee!


Last time I looked, I can TURN an "iron bar" into a bar magnet


A: without touching it

B: without any damn particles.


You are just too stupid, go take your pills.   ;D


In magnetized iron created from mere magnetic induction, there is dielectric coherence only.

in a strong magnet created from discharge coils, there is enormous dielectric capacitance AND coherency.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #821 on: July 29, 2014, 06:06:59 AM »
No!  You are the bozo because you didn't see that I was talking about two different things!  And you can't admit it because you would have a system crash.

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #822 on: July 29, 2014, 06:11:08 AM »
No!  You are the bozo because you didn't see that I was talking about two different things! 


Lets see about that BS:

Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 04:52:26 AM
    .  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation. So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.


    Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 12:59:44 AM
        Repeat: There is no bloody Bloch wall in the center of a bar magnet, nor some "dielectric inertial plane."




Yup, you're a lying worm



Any, by the goddamn way,  it doesnt matter if its a SPHERE magnet,  BAR magnet,  CONE magnet,......CYLINDER magnet.............its the SAME,

the DIELECTRICITY which terminates INTO MAGNETISM  (hence the fucking "magnet), has (THEY ALL DO, EVERY MAGNET ON EARTH) a dielectric inertial plane,  or your so-called "Bloch wall"



You know WHY ITS CALLED A BLOCH WALL  asshole???????

Because it was DISCOVERED,  the phenomena,  they couldn't EXPLAIN IT.................so they NAMED THE PHENOMENA.

end of story.



Pictured below, the dielectric inertial plane and the vortex on a pole.........BUT, YOU WILL NEVER SEE THIS, .......(because you dont experiment, you dont do shit but flap your lips like a monkey)



last shot shows counter-voidance, or what you humans call "repulsion"

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #823 on: July 29, 2014, 06:20:18 AM »
Crash dump:

<<<
For this question I will assume the setup is this, the one with the real Bloch wall:  [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N]

In that setup there are two very very weak magnetic fields in opposition at either end of the iron bar.  The closer you get to the center of the bar the weaker the fields get.  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation.  So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.
>>>

It's all just too fantastical that there are people like this!

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #824 on: July 29, 2014, 06:20:54 AM »
Magnetic force microscope

dielectric imaging from magnetic induction.


Proving WHAT again?