If its "counterfeit", its not "money".

it's all fiat anyway...

If Einsteins "discovery" is counterfiet, its not his CRED to "spend"

Its not real, its trash, its a mish mash of stolen concepts.



Might I remind you that Einsteins teachers thought he was a RETARD.   



He is the goddamn SAINT and "god" of Relativity and Quantum bullshit.


Time to return to Steinmetz, Tesla, Heaviside, Maxwell.



The future is dielectrics and vortex technology.    Not quantum bullshit.

The future is dielectrics and vortex technology.    Not quantum bullshit.

So you say.  Time will tell...

So you say.  Time will tell...

τὰ πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει   - Heraclitus


Thats ancient Greek for  "everything is spinning bitch, nothing is sittin' still "      ...........  (well, translated into URBAN English thats what it says)   





What is coming out in a couple months makes the amazing stuff below look like childs play.

A bit repetitive, but yeah, wonderful stuff.

If you look into how that new encoding technology was developed, scientists used QED to develop it.

thats ass backwards, thats like saying Faraday used QED to bend light in the "Faraday Effect"



I can call wiping my ass  "QUANTUM FRICTION"..........it however means NOTHING.



Quantum is a brain fart, a mental clusterfuck of ERROR upon error.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it not true.  Read the article in Nature... 

QED has allowed for the development of a lot of technology.  Sure, many can claim to hate QED, and most realize it is an incomplete mathematical model at best, but in the end, it gets used because it is a better fit than all before it.

You just dont fucking get it.  Calling something makes is NOTHING.     I can call midgets "quantum sub-particle transitional humanform beings"      MEANINGLESS.


Son, Faraday, Steinmentz, Tesla, Heaviside, Maxwell, that gave you EVERYTHING that is running EVERY FUCKING THING IN YOUR FUCKING HOUSE,.............didnt have shit to do with quantum anything.



brain dead fool.


I can invent something new and claim its based upon "electron flow".......doesnt mean its  a "QUANTUM INVENTION" it just means Im ascribing bullshit lexicon to dielectric force charges.



I could invent a new Origami folding table and say its a  "Qauntum folding table modeled after Boson entropy"            But again, its JUST BULLSHIT   


Poor brainwashed child.

It's all about the math... and the predictions it can make.

And that math is way over both of our heads, so we rely on those that use it, and then test it thru experimentation, to tell us which fits best.

If the scientists that developed that new data encoding system say they used QED and quantum math to develop and predict the behavior of electrons and the subsequent modification of photons, then I will tend to believe what they say.

PW

CP Steinmentz math is WAY over your head too,    some of his formulas are 24 pages LONG, in small print.


doesnt mean SHIT.........and doesnt have SHIT to do with an arbitrary Pseudo-Science of Quantum.



MOTHER NATURE IS NOT AN INSANE CRACK WH0RE      

MOTHER NATURE NEVER CREATED:
1. virtual photons
2. electrons
3. photons
4. muons, gluons, bozons, negative momentum quasi-neutrinos.....etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.



All this is SHIT to clog Academia with MORE $$$ and MORE grants and MORE BULLSHIT.


You cannot , you MAY NOT, you NEVER WILL learn what dielectricity , magnetism etc etc is with this SHIT between your EARS.

Tesla didnt fucking need it, nor did Maxwell, NOR did Heaviside,  NOR did Newton, nor did  Steinmetz.







Go find your teacher and pound his ass and then piss in his skull,  .....he destroyed you.




Added:  And I believe that you referred to even those scientists as "morons"..



and TESLA used the word ELECTRON too.............means NOTHING......


Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
     On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science.
     “To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble! Just to mention another improbability...” - Nikola Tesla
Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)

As I added to my last post, I believe you even referred to the scientists that developed that optical encoding method as "morons".

Ahem, let me PERFECT my statement formally:


“If one were to take Relativity and Quantum Mechanics at its word, then mother nature is an insane hooker addicted to crack who created the most absurd unbelievable and irrational nonsense that would make even the imaginary friend of your child giggle loud enough for you to actually hear it.” - Author

She might be.  Who knows?  That is why research continues. 

The quantum world does indeed seem insane.  Which hopefully means that it is just far from complete.  But, again, the math derived from QED has allowed for a lot of scientific and technological advances.

Even more disconcerting is the possibility that the world it describes may be correct. 

Think how crazy it would be to discover that the ether is the most dense solid ever known...

the denotation of SOLID eliminates the Ether under such a categorization.


No, the world is simplex, not simple.   But it is NOT complex at all, but to fools.


non-simple =  COMPOUNDED ,..........NOT "complex".


The "qauntum world" is as real a a Dr. Seuss book, its twaddle.