Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013  (Read 100848 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #270 on: August 24, 2013, 06:14:37 PM »
@ TK

You're on a hiding to nothing mate!  :(


Sorry, I don't understand this post.

Mate.  >:(

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #271 on: August 24, 2013, 06:22:56 PM »
I have been emailed by her again, I must admit you were right I thought she would go away gracefully
Time to dust of the gloves
Mark

I've posted her "open letter" to you in the new Quantum-17 thread. As anyone can clearly see for themselves, the Quantum article and the claims made around it are just as bogus as the two "withdrawn" papers (which can still be seen, including the fabricated Figure 3 scopeshot, at every link they have ever used, even if they do now contain the "preface" withdrawing them.)

She has claimed and published 3 different schematics for this same set of experiments, and neither of the claimed circuits that show the 555 timer can produce the duty cycle/frequency combination claimed in the original Quantum article.

As I told you before, Mark, the woman is a menace; she cannot even keep her own story straight and she engages in the vilest campaign of insults and outright lies that can be imagined. The "revised" schematic in the papers poynt99 posted appeared AFTER I and others at EF had pointed out the problem with the original circuit that she published. It is a fabrication, NEVER USED TO MAKE THE CLAIMED DATA, just like the schematics that appeared (again after analysis of the original showed its bogosity) in the two withdrawn papers.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #272 on: August 24, 2013, 06:37:38 PM »
Sorry, I don't understand this post.

Mate.  >:(

Meaning: To be faced with a situation which is pointless, as a successful outcome is impossible.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #273 on: August 24, 2013, 07:07:40 PM »
Meaning: To be faced with a situation which is pointless, as a successful outcome is impossible.

It would rather depend on your definition of "success", wouldn't it?

We have already achieved a major successful outcome: Ainslie has posted a statement of retraction, even though she does it insincerely and still believes in her bogus "thesis". And we have made enough lasting "noise" about it that she will never again be able to foist off those bogus claims and fake experiments onto legitimate researchers and journal reviewers again.

I consider every small refutation of her smallest claim, every proof that I offer you of Ainslie's lies and insults, to be a success. Every prediction that I make that comes true is a success. Every mention of "Ickle Pickle" or Bryan Little, by Rosemary Ainslie, is another success for me, because it is another illustration, from the horse's mouth, of her trollness, her mendacity and her utter disregard for the truth.

Now... since she brought it up herself... she will have to face up to the glaring discrepancies around the Quantum 17 circuit, whichever one of the three claimed ones she might have actually used. She may also even realize once again why they decided to modify THAT CIRCUIT (whatever it really was) into the 5-mosfet design in the first place!

Simply getting her to admit that the original apparatus wasn't lost after all is a big success. Getting her to show the circuit she ACTUALLY USED, or that is on the board when she now, finally photographs it... will also be a big success.  Successes for her critics, of course. Will what they show be big FAILS for Ainslie? Stay tuned.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #274 on: August 25, 2013, 09:38:31 PM »
I can see that the struggle is fully on:

<<< What's important is this.  WHATEVER the cause it serves its purpose to PROVE that the UNITY BARRIERS ARE MEASURED TO HAVE BEEN BREACHED.  And further tests - required by BP - PROVE that those measurements are CORRECT.  That REALLY matters. >>>

So here we are again, possibly at the beginning of another year long drama where the end result will be Rosemary apologizing and stating that she was wrong again.

Nothing has been breached, it's all complete and utter nonsense.

Now to move onto the real reason that I am posting.

Rosemary has challenged many people to reveal their identities.  Yet she made a point about not revealing the identities of the people that looked at her 2002 circuit.  Yet we have an implicit and mutually agreed on covenant that says that we respect other people's right to protect their identities and its their choice if they want to reveal them or not.  This is a covenant that has existed throughout the history of the Internet, and goes back further than that to the BBS days, and it goes back even further than that to the CB radio days.

We all know that Aaron Murakami has been embroiled in a controversy for several weeks now.  I am no fan of Aaron at all but that's it, it doesn't go any further than that.  Aaron often refers to "disinformation agents," implying that there is active interference in free energy research by the feds, the dreaded "Men in Black."  Aaron wants to say this nonsense because it creates buzz and it's good for business.  He is lying just like any sleazy peddler of magic elixirs will tell you that his $75 bottle of sugar water with food colouring will cure all of your ailments and boost your s** life.  Many people literally believe him and some of them could be mentally imbalanced.

If you have read the free energy forums long enough, you will have seen posts by people that seem to indicate that they are mentally imbalanced.  I have read several postings by people that in all seriousness claim that they will barricade themselves in their house and fight it out to the death with federal agents if they were going to do a raid to confiscate their spinny pulse motor.  For all we know based on news stories, some of these people could have dozens or hundreds of guns and tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition.

So going back to the Aaron controversy, here is a noteworthy link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_638781379&feature=iv&src_vid=UL7yMKVtNE4&v=ly21X6JQTkk

Here is the text copy and paste and I am attaching a screen capture also.

Quote
john lala 1 week ago

Any trained snipers want to take Aaron out?? would love to see his head explode

The person "John Lala" should be tracked down from his IP address with a court order and he should be charged with uttering death threats and prosecuted by his local District Attorney (if in the USA).  Six months in jail sounds about right to me.

Is your brain able to process this Rosemary?

MileHigh

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #275 on: August 25, 2013, 10:23:57 PM »
That is outrageous all right. I too have my own disagreements with Aaron, but I hope he pursues this through legal channels and sees that the person making the threat is brought to justice. The fear that a threat like that engenders makes it a serious matter, even if the poster wasn't entirely "fuck them all dead" serious.


On the Ainslie matter: we of course recall that she made the same claims of "benefit" and vetting by BP for the experiment described in the retracted manuscripts. The Heat power dissipation at the Load Element Resistor was far less than the wattage supplied by the battery, when the Vbatt was measured correctly. Ainslie, Martin, and everybody else agrees with that. Right?

So how can the earlier, single mosfet circuit possibly make _more_ heat than supplied by the battery? Removing the "Q-array", miswired or not, turns the NERD circuit into the Quantum-17 circuit! If the FG is used for the input, that is. The Vbatt and Vcsr measurements were in error, severely so, for the NERD experiment. How does simply removing the "Q-array" suddenly remove these errors, since they are measured in the same manner in both experiments? Of course it cannot. The heat power vs. battery power results claimed by Ainslie _have already been shown_ to be wrong, and removing 4 miswired transistors isn't going to change that! She thought that the device with the 5 transistors, miswired, was _better_ than the Quantum-17 circuit!
Think about what this means, already. Disproving the claims of the NERD circuit, which was supposed to perform _better_ than the Quantum-17 circuit,  has also already disproven the battery power vs. thermal power claims made for the Quantum-17 circuit. Just as in that circuit, most of the mosfet heating was coming from the Q1 turning on when the Vgs went over +4 volts, the same thing is happening here, just without the complications of the Q2 oscillations.

The "oscillations" that are shown in the present set of scopeshots from FTC, in the other thread.... aren't the same kind of oscillations as the Q2 oscillations at all, and they produce a mosfet ON time that is much longer than the actual ON signal from the FG or 555 timer source, because of the high frequency of the signal! The IRFPG50 is an outrageously SLOW mosfet and requires a large gate charge to operate! Check the data sheet!



Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #276 on: August 26, 2013, 02:49:23 AM »
it doesnt have to be a closed system @farmhand.if we go over 100% its a nail in the coffin for the thermo laws.just gota prove it.

No it won't, an open system that is gaining energy from the environment and producing more output than "we input" breaks no laws
and is common.

Any system that radiates heat, sound or vibration ect. out of the system is not a closed system.

A closed system such as the Universe itself does tend towards equilibrium. Most of the time !!!!!

However that is not always the case or the Universe would not exist as it does today.

Things get relative to the point of view but the only way to see it is on a Universal level/scale, the " Universe" meaning everything that exists, period.

None of us will ever hope to understand  the true workings of the Universe as a whole, period.

The 2nd L.of.T. simply exlains what people have observed in certain "pseudo" closed systems.

The only real closed system is the Universe itself, nothing is ever added and nothing is ever taken away, period.

The fact that energy is conserved is a good thing and works for us in many ways, learn to use it and get over the Laws thing.

Forget the laws, then use logic and common sense and you will see the same "laws" are evident.

The wording is convoluted and is not meant for the average person.

The universe is a constant in the fact that nothing is ever added, because there is nowhere for things to be added from,
and nothing is ever taken away, because there is nowhere to take anything  to.

Nothing does not exist. By definition Nothing means No thing and something that is "No thing" is non existent. [ oxymoron ]

If anybody can show me a truly closed system (other than the Universe), I would be surprised to say the least.

So come on, no fancy play on words.

Can anyone show a truly closed system "on the bench" ? Or not ?

And I mean an "actual" closed system not an "effectively" closed system, or to put it another way a "true fully closed system".

Cheers

P.S. If Rosemary or anybody else for that matter showed a setup that output more energy than was dissipated as input to it by it's operator,
Or a system showed more out than we put in then the "extra" energy can only be coming from outside the system or from the "materials" the
device is made from, which is fuel. Therefore no Laws would be broken or could be broken, Some thing cannot "come from" no thing. That is impossible.
The term "Coefficient of Performance" allows greater work output than work input by "us" the "operator" in some systems like refrigeration, no laws are broken.

There is No "O.U." or Over Unity, that involves something from nothing, there is only the utilization of energy more efficiently, over 100% efficiency is possible
and already happens commonly.

It's time these things were accepted and understood, I think.

..

Even if rosemary did show over 100% efficiency she would still not be showing anything that would break any laws,
that is because any extra energy would have to come from the break down of the device itself via (transmutation or molecular dissociation) 
or from the environment or surroundings. So no Over Unity that breaks any laws.


...

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #277 on: August 26, 2013, 03:37:16 AM »
"Even if rosemary did show over 100% efficiency she would still not be showing anything that would break any laws,
that is because any extra energy would have to come from the break down of the device itself via (transmutation or molecular dissociation) 
or from the environment or surroundings. So no Over Unity that breaks any laws."

Actually, if you read her retracted manuscripts and can suspend disbelief long enough to swim through her ridiculous jargon and false data, you can find her statement of just this same idea. She claimed, without the slightest shred of evidence, that mass in the circuit elements was being converted to energy, and she even mentioned Einstein. Of course her entire data set was bogus, error and mendacity, and she would have no clue whatsoever as to how to go about actually testing her absurd proposal of mass-to-energy conversion. Actually.

But we are so far beyond that pile of garbage now... we have an _entirely different_ pile of garbage -- quite literally -- to deal with now!! Stay tuned.... or rather, tune over to the new Quantum-17 thread,  for the next thrilling chapter. The Adventures of Little Miss Mosfet, Episode Zero.


Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #278 on: August 26, 2013, 04:30:29 AM »
"Adventures of Little Miss Mosfet"  (Or mosfet, depending on Rose's spelling)

That is a very good one TK.  Thanks to you, I now have to clean some spilled beer from my keyboard but, it was worth it. I needed the laugh, thanks.

Bill

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #279 on: August 26, 2013, 04:41:20 AM »
"Adventures of Little Miss Mosfet"  (Or mosfet, depending on Rose's spelling)

That is a very good one TK.  Thanks to you, I now have to clean some spilled beer from my keyboard but, it was worth it. I needed the laugh, thanks.

Bill

Heh... save some laughter for later, you will be needing it, I guarantee it.

 ;D

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #280 on: August 26, 2013, 05:40:08 AM »
Okay, I had to take a crack at this.....

Little Miss MOSFET
She is a boss yet
Heating resistors like toast.
Along came a zipon
Who said she's a boson
And yet she continues to post.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #281 on: August 29, 2013, 04:27:23 AM »
@farmhand,where did you learn such crap ey? Sure a perfectly closed system is impossible but what if i got 6joules out when my open system only did 3joules in?exactly,it sucks it in from the environment,uphill against a temperature gradient and against the 2lot.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #282 on: August 29, 2013, 04:38:54 AM »
@tk,yes but rosemary is making progress.she is now aware of the importance of a backspike.look how poynt is telling her otherwise(i dont know why).its the only mechanism that has a chance of a 2lot breach in her circuit.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #283 on: August 29, 2013, 12:54:55 PM »
@tk,yes but rosemary is making progress.she is now aware of the importance of a backspike.look how poynt is telling her otherwise(i dont know why).its the only mechanism that has a chance of a 2lot breach in her circuit.

You are so silly. Ainslie is _regressing_, not making progress.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDcC7bCI8EM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8TCOS7VYlw

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #284 on: August 29, 2013, 02:52:16 PM »
truly a hit and miss enterprise @tk,the horror of such circuits is that not only must the circuit synchronize with the core,s thermodynamic window but the core,s window must synchronize with the circuit too.