Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013  (Read 100855 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #195 on: August 16, 2013, 05:44:05 PM »
Waaait a minute.... The Quantum schematic was actually VERY DIFFERENT from the one she posted above and that I copied over to here. The Quantum schematic did not include the Diode across the load, and the Quantum schematic used the problematic 555 timer circuit, not the FG.

Below I attach the actual schematic published in the Quantum article, and my "re-draw" of it, clarifying the relationship to the discredited 5-mosfet circuit and the Unclamped Inductive Test circuit in the back of every power mosfet data sheet.


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #196 on: August 16, 2013, 05:53:06 PM »
So .... we are now in the position of waiting for Ainslie to show how the basic Inductive Clamp Test circuit, which she tried to patent with a 555 timer, is going to produce overunity performance that somehow has not been noticed by power supply designers and high-end audio amplifier designers.....

They are as children, playing with toys they do not understand, and who are either unwilling or simply incapable of doing the necessary homework in order to avoid making the silly errors they keep committing. And Ainslie is so arrogant that, instead of being ashamed of herself for attempting to patent a simple circuit from the Public Domain, in use for decades before she ever heard of MOSFETs..... she is bragging about it and believes she can demonstrate some "benefit" from the circuit.

Well, bring it on, Ainslie. Let's see your RAW DATA. We already know that some, if not all, of your Raw Data is fabricated, not collected under the stated conditions as you claim. Clearly your interpretations and crunched data cannot be trusted at all.

Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #197 on: August 16, 2013, 06:09:26 PM »
Its a small world!
Viv Cronje is lecturing at Wits university. John Wilson was MD of Spescom Measuregraph, the instrumentation division. I'm not sure where he is now, probably in the same place. I don't know the others.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #198 on: August 16, 2013, 06:15:36 PM »
Quote
The fact that there may or may not be a mix up in the design of the 555 switching circuit is IMMATERIAL.  I have questioned our academics on this...

Have you heard anything more absurd than this statement of Ainslie's?

A magazine article was actually Published -- her only real publication concerning these circuits -- and it contained claims about duty cycles used.
BUT--- the schematic diagram provided in the article and represented as the circuit tested CANNOT POSSIBLY PRODUCE the duty cycle claimed.

So one or both of two conditions exist: either the experiment was performed USING A DIFFERENT CIRCUIT than that which was presented..
And/Or the claims wrt the duty cycle used and performance of the apparatus are FALSE.

This is "immaterial"? A publication bearing the names of Rosemary Ainslie and BC Buckley... a real publication , not some posting on a vanity blog ... contains false information presented as factual. IT IS A LIE. That's not "immaterial" !! I'd love to see a statement from some "academics" that would say that including false information in a publication is "immaterial".

No matter how you slice it. If the experiment was performed using the duty cycle claimed, it COULD NOT HAVE BEEN DONE with the schematic posted. If the schematic posted was used, THE EXPERIMENT COULD NOT HAVE USED the duty cycle claimed.

The "error" in the 555 timer duty cycle as published has been confirmed over and over by Ainslie's cooperators and her detractors... she waffles back and forth about apologizing... but she has NEVER corrected the schematic nor posted any proof that a correct timer duty cycle was in fact used.
THE QUANTUM PAPER IS BOGUS for this reason alone and must be retracted !!! The paper is wrong! This has already been proven, by every one from Gmeast back to .... guess who in 2009.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #199 on: August 16, 2013, 06:33:43 PM »
Its a small world!
Viv Cronje is lecturing at Wits university. John Wilson was MD of Spescom Measuregraph, the instrumentation division. I'm not sure where he is now, probably in the same place. I don't know the others.

Hah.
Now.... watch Ainslie begin to freak out.

 :o

I realize "John" is, or used to be, a pretty common given name.... but out of eight males Ainslie names, three of them are named "John". I don't know whether this is more, or less, improbable than the "Tarnow" and the "Tarnowski" , an entire world apart ... but there it is.
 

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #200 on: August 16, 2013, 07:12:53 PM »
As if my own video proofs aren't enough...

Our friend Mark Euthanasius has supplied us with a comprehensive exploration of the 555 timer circuit published by Ainslie and Buckley in the Quantum article. In addition he has examined circuit variants including those tested by the Energetic Forum members when Ainslie was promoting her nonsense there... before she got banned.

I apologize for attaching such a large file. There is a lot of information on this page though, and I wasn't able to chop it up or shrink it any more without loss of resolution, and I can't upload the original because it is too large in pixel dimensions. If anyone wants to see the original, which is 7000 pixels wide at 288 pixels per inch resolution.... let me know and I'll send it to you.

The full range of duty cycle and frequency adjustments were determined for the circuit claimed by Ainslie in the Quantum article, and several possible "errors" were examined for their effects.

SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #201 on: August 16, 2013, 09:10:48 PM »
Gyulasun,

Ample clues have been provided which will enable
the sufficiently curious and capable experimenter
to discover how to make the concept work.

Well almost.  Is inductor saturation desirable for
some length of time?

As the old saw goes:  You can lead a horse to water
but you can't make it drink.

No more whining!

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #202 on: August 17, 2013, 02:04:18 AM »
Ample clues have been provided which will enable
the sufficiently curious and capable experimenter
to discover how to make the concept work.
Kindly define "work".

markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #203 on: August 17, 2013, 02:36:02 AM »
@ SeaMonkey
your great with global statements that have little substance.
Please define work?
Mark

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #204 on: August 17, 2013, 06:15:28 AM »
Here is a fun one for Rosemary.  I love this guy's clips.

Towards the end of this clip he explains the Hall effect.  The analysis proves that current is the flow of electrons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfqRv7dau2A

Atoms consist of little microscopic rocks of positively charged mass surrounded by a humongous fluffy shimmering cloud of electrons.  The "inside" of any material is mostly empty space.   Some electrons can escape the fluffy cloud like leaves being blown off of trees on a windy fall day.  The electric field is like the wind pushing the electrons along on their journey.  The electric field snakes its way through a conductor and sets up a "wind tunnel" to push electrons though the conductor.  Inside doped semiconductors electrons jump around in the electric field wind and can even be made to emulate "positive electrons" that move in the opposite direction to the wind.  It's all so profound!

SeaMonkey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1292
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #205 on: August 17, 2013, 06:35:38 AM »
Work?  In this case that may be a little hard
to nail down.

The degree to which the circuitry can be made
to accomplish what the experimenter hopes to
make manifest is directly proportional to the
abilities of the experimenter.

Most noobies would have difficulty getting it to
work. ???

Those who have some experience with switching
supplies and MOSFET drivers will have a much
better chance of seeing it work. ;)

And those who have the knowledge/experience
level of gents such as MileHigh, TK or 0.99 should
have little difficulty figuring out what to look for
and how to make the work happen. :o

Work = Hot Stuff! 8)


Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #206 on: August 17, 2013, 07:03:09 AM »
If I may surmise gent's and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a small misunderstanding may be occurring.
I don't think SeaMonkey has stated he thinks Rosemary has shown Over Unity. Rather I think SeaMonkey
has eluded to the possibility of approaching 100% efficiency and 'possibly' a small amount more from energy release
or integration if such a "principal" is applied at it's best efficiency and with careful thought given to where
any extra energy may come from in such an "inductive heater arrangement". I know I have but I am not in
a position as yet to even begin an attempt.

But if I do try I will reveal my results to all, but as ambiguous results at best, unless I see a significant enough
amount of energy to be able to convince myself it's worth the effort. I won't make any over 100% in - out claims either.
And without that claim there is nothing much to argue about.

I'm not after a watt or two I want lots for cheap. I can light leds as much as I like already, What I can't do is run the house
without the grid input when there is no sun. Lighting a light bulb or two for free with even 50 Watts is a bit less than I would be
considering much use anyway. Though every bit would help, our time experimenting is valuable.

Cheers

Edited to add 'possibly' to first paragraph. I can't speak for him, I can only give my opinion.

..

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #207 on: August 17, 2013, 07:15:52 AM »
I have a question I would very much appreciate a frank and honest answer to.

What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?

Remember a Qualified EE is watching you watching the experimenter so no one hides anything which I'm sure is the intention
you guys had anyway i just mentioned it so no one new could bring up checking the checkers at a later date. It's already considered
that way.  ;)

Remember I respect you trained folks a great deal. And hope to do some formal training myself if I can manage it. I'm all for it.

It's just a curiosity question.

Cheers.

P.S. SeaMonkey, I have a bucket full of carbon rods some bars, copper coated but it peels off.  ;) They were free too.

.....

Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #208 on: August 17, 2013, 08:16:55 AM »
Farmhand,
This is essentially the concept of peer review. Generally it is not as simple and in practice goes through a number of iterations.

Quote
What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?
I am sure that I would initially be very skeptical. If it proved to be true it would be exciting. This would require very detailed checking. Even with the best of intentions errors can make it through a number of review processes. In this particular instance I would be doubly skeptical because every man and his dog and his dog's cat has claimed overunity due to the flyback spike. This process is well understood and leaves no room for the additional energy. Having said that, one must always keep an open mind to the possibility that our theory is not complete.  A breakthrough such as you describe would be revolutionary.

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013
« Reply #209 on: August 17, 2013, 10:31:36 AM »

What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?

Remember I respect you trained folks a great deal. And hope to do some formal training myself if I can manage it. I'm all for it.

Cheers.
For me it is evident that science (or in a broader view, humankind) does not know everything. But one has to study and research a lot and has to go out far along known paths to go beyond present day knowledge. It needs a lot more than some experiments at home to see and test the limits of todays technology. People claiming OU very obviously lack the most basic science knowledge.

Where are the limits of todays knowledge:

- May be there is a third atomic reaction besides fission and fusion, the famous "cold fusion" or "LENR". Unfortunately this area of research is infested by strange people, which give it a bad reputation. Research at home is probably not possible because one needs expensive tools (measuring heat output is tricky and chemical reactions can be dangerous if not done properly).

- May be there are longitudinal waves in electro-magnetism. This could open the way to a more efficient energy transmission between a radio transmitter and receiver. Nowadays induction charging has an efficiency of about 70%, this could be made better. This could be a field for home experimenters. One looks for a "Tesla miracle" but finds a very good antenna and antenna circuit.

- Electric motors and generators could be brought closer to an efficiency of 100%. This might be a field for home experimenters. One might search for OU and finds a more efficient motor or generator (Lenz-effect).

- Generating hydrogen from water or air could be made more efficient or practical. Home experiments could be dangerous and measurements are difficult, therefore better suited for a good research lab.

- Wind and water turbines (wheels, propellers) could be made more efficient. Could be possible at home. Measuring efficiency can be tricky.

- My favorites are neutrinos (exotic particles flying around in space at high speeds), dark matter (may be also exotic particles) and dark energy. May be one can convert this energies into useful energy like heat, mechanical energy (like a sail) or electricity. Probably not possible at home because it could need a very big machine. In general this is the search for a yet unknown natural energy source.

- My second favorite are solar energy, wind energy and heat from the core of the earth. Many inventions are necessary to make the exploitation of these energies more practical. Try to come up with a good way to make a roof out of solar panels. Nowadays one has to build a conventional roof and then one puts the solar panels on top. This is like partially destroying the roof because many bolts have to go through the roof to fix the solar panels, opening leaks. How could one integrate wind turbines and buildings? How to get the heat out of the earth? Lots of room for home experimenters.

 
My opinion about OU: the only OU mechanisms detected are super novae, black holes and possibly the big bang. You would not want that in the hands of anybody.

Greetings, Conrad