Author Topic: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013 (Read 100840 times)

profitis · « **Reply #165 on:** August 14, 2013, 06:12:28 PM »

@sea monkey,,i agree with you that the ainslie episodes are a learning curve,that we can proceed from this point forward with greater clarity regarding improved tapping of collapsing magnetic fields energy.these episodes show us the absolute importance of knowing what you are looking for before you look for it.ainslie,s zeropoint theories,while not necessarily erronius,were too vague to nail down to deadly certainty.when we want deadly certaintly we want to go direct to the crux of the matter at hand and that matter can only be the thermodynamics of collapsing magnetic fields in inductance circuits.what we want to do and accomplish is none other than create an sinkhole for ambient heat in any circuitry purporting to deliver an overunity.we must force ourselves to take it from that angle in order to chop losses out the equasion.if we ignore or are unaware of this fundamental we are unlikely to progress.

Tseak · « **Reply #166 on:** August 14, 2013, 06:33:55 PM »

TK,
You're incorrigible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s9z620SFbA

TinselKoala · « **Reply #167 on:** August 14, 2013, 06:57:16 PM »

Yes, deeply and permanently so.

My mother loved me, though.
At least I'm pretty sure she did.

SeaMonkey · « **Reply #168 on:** August 14, 2013, 07:24:39 PM »

Gyulasun,

Your analysis provided here is comprehensive
and good.

The final paragraph addresses a potential
problem with the concept. Can you come
up with a solution to overcome this problem?

TK's commentary here raises good points too.
The total power dissipation should include
the entire circuit. With good switching techniques
we are able to apply nearly all of the input to
the load, but some heat will be dissipated in
the active devices and possibly other components.

SeaMonkey · « **Reply #169 on:** August 14, 2013, 07:30:26 PM »

Profitis,

You raise some very interesting
possibilities.

SeaMonkey · « **Reply #170 on:** August 14, 2013, 07:33:39 PM »

Quote from: Tseak on August 14, 2013, 06:33:55 PM

TK,
You're incorrigible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s9z620SFbA

And, it must necessarily be added,
The King of Hyperbole!

That is a dominant characteristic of
those who come from Our Home Planet.

(The video was good!)

conradelektro · « **Reply #171 on:** August 14, 2013, 07:42:36 PM »

I can hardly believe it, Ainslie admitted an error?

The many tests, contraptions and measurements (scope shots) done by TinselKoala finally helped to find the truth behind these wild claims.

The truth was know almost from the beginning, but only TinselKoala had the will and determination to educate enough people to stop a deluded person from proliferating this nonsense.

But now, no more time wasted on Ainslie!

I think that TinselKoala has the knowledge (because he built spectacular Tesla coils) to deflate Ernst, the self proclaimed Wardencliff resurrector and Tesla theory preacher.

Look how Ernst wallows in his self injected fame, without giving any proof, just by waffling and alleging:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11952-wardenclyffe-teslas-true-intention-19.html

Greetings, Conrad

TinselKoala · « **Reply #172 on:** August 14, 2013, 08:11:24 PM »

Let Ernst play, he's another UFOPolitics, thrives on his following and his drama. He can parrot big words and calculations all he likes, but he apparently still can't show a real measurement or a coil that outperforms any of mine. Wake me up when he shows some significant power transfer, without making every metal bit in his environment spray corona.

And really, I can't seem to claim much credit for Ainslie's rather insincere capitulation. I don't think she has actually watched any of my videos! Not since years ago. I did, indirectly, start the chain of events that brought Steve Weir to the scene, and it is poynt99 and Steve Weir who really deserve the credit for bringing Ainslie to this point. Perhaps my continual harping on the Figure 3 shot brought her around to the decision to have a public demo, in an arrogant effort to put me down.... but like all megalomaniacs she could not even conceive that she could have been wrong, so for more than TWO YEARS she never bothered to check or ask someone she trusted, she just insulted and claimed and insulted and threatened, until finally her ego couldn't take it any more and she had to try to put me down publicly, without even checking to see if she could do it, first.

Anyhow, Steve Weir deserves major credit even though he is a total newcomer and isn't fully aware of Ainslie's depths of duplicity, along with Poynt99 who also has a special relationship with Ainslie, so that she at least tries to understand his explanations. I just rattle cages, at this point.

gyulasun · « **Reply #173 on:** August 14, 2013, 08:38:54 PM »

Quote from: SeaMonkey on August 14, 2013, 07:24:39 PM

...
The final paragraph addresses a potential
problem with the concept. Can you come
up with a solution to overcome this problem?
...

Hi SeaMonkey,

Well, if you mean the divison of the supply voltage between the heating element and the series inductance as a potential problem with the concept, then I do not think it could be solved. If you meant something else as a concept problem, please tell.

It is obvious that the total power dissipation should include the entire circuit. The selection of the MOSFET type (with the 2 Ohm ON resistance) by the RA team back then did confine efficiency for the lower ranges, well below 80% (if the heating element had a 10 Ohm resistance).

Here is a device from Linear Tech which has 98% efficiency (i.e. COP=0.98) at certain output power levels and uses sophisticated switching and circuit technique: http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/3780ff.pdf (I have no any connections with Linear Technology.) Here is another device of 98% efficiency, using syncronous rectification: http://www.linear.com/product/LT8705

rgds, Gyula

profitis · « **Reply #174 on:** August 14, 2013, 08:45:48 PM »

@sea monkey..aye, tis the crux of the matter sir,the inductor itself.i propose radical new efficient methods for testing of inductors,inductors alone with their kickbacks.it will cut out the necessity to build an entire circuit,only to find out that theres losses later.some sort of meter with variable oscillance,variable diodance,plotting power out/kickback in,all-in-one.in other words all you will need to attatch to the machine is your inductor..something along these lines.. standardization of some parameters instead of chaos of all parameters

SeaMonkey · « **Reply #175 on:** August 14, 2013, 10:45:50 PM »

Gyulasun,

Yes, excellent! Your links are most informative
and do discuss the techniques of "continuous"
and "discontinuous" pulsing.

Synchronous Buck Converters have become
very, very efficient at what they do.
(DC transformers)

Profitis,

I agree, inductors (like the lead-acid battery)
are not yet fully understood within the realm
of "coil bangers."

poynt99 · « **Reply #176 on:** August 15, 2013, 02:56:54 AM »

Quote from: SeaMonkey on August 14, 2013, 06:46:53 AM

Perhaps you'd tell me what it is precisely that
you are seeking?

It's quite simple really; you made a claim (yeah you did), so I am asking you to show proof.

Talk is cheap my friend, and I think I speak for many when I say that I am tired of folks that drop useless hints posing as though they know something others don't, rather than just coming right and out and posting something with some real content.

So again I ask, what do you base your assertions on? Show us some test results or anything that proves your assertions. Where is your working Ainslie device? What have you measured? Show us your schematic?

poynt99 · « **Reply #177 on:** August 15, 2013, 02:59:46 AM »

Quote from: SeaMonkey on August 14, 2013, 10:45:50 PM

I agree, inductors (like the lead-acid battery)
are not yet fully understood within the realm
of "coil bangers."

Your opinion is noted.

Now, how about showing us some test results of your "coil banging", and describe what you believe you've discovered?

TinselKoala · « **Reply #178 on:** August 15, 2013, 03:31:19 AM »

I just want to jump in here and make a note: It is now early Thursday morning in Cape Town, 15 August 2013.

Although Ainslie has posted her statement, in the thread titled "Debunking Troll "Spin" as it Applies to Science".... the papers are still up, the statement cannot be found "prefacing" anything. The only place I see it is under her rock, in that thread, and of course in my quoting of it here and in my video announcement.

Anyone who finds a link to her papers and clicks on it is STILL NOT GOING TO SEE anything from Ainslie at all, indicating that the papers are completely bogus fabrications.

OK, carry on. I too am interested in seeing if Brine Shrimp can come up with anything interesting of his own. Or her own, as the case may be.

SeaMonkey · « **Reply #179 on:** August 15, 2013, 05:09:25 AM »

Quote from: 0.99

Talk is cheap my friend, and I think I speak for many when I say that I am tired of folks that drop useless hints posing as though they know something others don't, rather than just coming right and out and posting something with some real content.

Poynt, I'm rather disappointed in this response
because it sounds like you're actually requesting
to be "spoon fed!" What I'm suggesting, in
conjunction with the competent inquiries of Gyulasun
and the technical literature that he has so kindly provided
links to, is that the techniques of Synchronous Buck
Conversion offer many clues to solving the puzzle at
hand.

The circuits and their variations are now well established
so that all that is needed is a little creative "tinkering" to
get things optimized. That is the essence of what I've
done, albeit without the convenience of the modern
controller chips which make things so much easier.

Certainly, I could provide the details and data of my
own research but where would be the fun in that?

I've never been an advocate of Exact Replication.
I would much rather strive to stimulate creative
thought and innovation. This to you may seem
like a "cop out" but it is the way that I was trained.

Swim or sink. The guys with the poles are standing
by alongside the pool to assist the sinkers.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013 (Read 100840 times)

profitis

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

Tseak

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

TinselKoala

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

SeaMonkey

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

SeaMonkey

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

SeaMonkey

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

conradelektro

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

TinselKoala

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

gyulasun

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

profitis

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

SeaMonkey

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

poynt99

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

poynt99

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

TinselKoala

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

SeaMonkey

Re: New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013