Guys

We have just completed a 'dry run' required by Steve Weir in advance of the demo for tomorrow.  We followed stringent protocols that are outlined in a file that has now, apparently, been put on the internet.  If not I'll see what I can do to get the file link posted here. 

The claim was made by Poynty that inductance on the battery was skewing our results and I refuted this.  SADLY he is RIGHT.  Far from being able to generate the required measurements - the advantage ENTIRELY falls away.  I am satisfied with the logic that Steve proposed for this proof.  And with the protocols required to prove this.  And again - WE HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS - NOTWITHSTANDING our earlier measurements.  This saddens me - on one level - the more so as I now feel that I must start this quest from scratch.  But on another level I'm strangely relieved.  It's complex.  And over time I may be able to understand it better - myself.  One liberating aspect is that I will not need to devote any time trying to persuade our academics to take this research on board.  Which I anticipated would take up way more time than I'd be willing to forfeit. And which I felt was an obligation on my part - as I was somehow compelled to protect the evidence against the onslaught to which it was subjected.  I can now, perhaps - proceed with ONLY those tests that really do interest me.

I have never made this fact public - but I am blind as a bat - and TERRIFIED of all things electrical.  I am simply NOT equipped to be an experimentalist.  And my devotion to this over the years has been out of a somewhat tortured sense of obligation to protect - what appeared to me to be a truth.  Whether or not the thesis is correct is irrelevant.  The fact is that this test most certainly DOES NOT PROVE IT.  And it is courtesy the input of our Poynty Point that I was obliged to bring the evidence to close scrutiny.

To cut a long story short - here's the thing.  We'll be doing the demonstration tomorrow - simply to put it on record that there is NO aspect of that oscillation that ACTUALLY delivers a gain.  This to prevent ANYONE wasting their time in trying to find it here.   It is ENTIRELY due to the inductance on the circuit that this is measured.  There is some evidence that inductance ADDS to the heat measured over the resistor element - which is possibly counter intuitive.  But the amount added - certainly on our circuit - is NOT significant.  We MAY - in due course - run the battery drawn down tests to evaluate various benefits in a switching circuit.  But we will NOT be boring you all with updates - basically because I do NOT think that open source is the way to go.  Unless, of course, we can first prove those values with the same standard of stringent testing protocols that Steve Weir imposed.

So guys - sadly - this is INDEED my swansong - as it relates to this circuit.  We will now have to retract our claims and our papers - and admit that there are errors in measurement that have accounted for that apparent gain.  I admit defeat.  Notwithstanding which, I'm rather proud of the fight that I managed in the face of my many detractors.  While it's kept me from gainful employment it has compensated by offering an intense level of intellectual engagement which I relish.  And it's all added to my love of science which I regret that I discovered rather late in life.

Thank you to all my supporters - and, in a rather circuitous way - to my detractors.  I will be continuing my work on this blog.  But as it will be confined mostly to the thesis - and to work to prove that thesis - it is unlikely that I'll be engaging as many of you as before.  For those who want to watch it - the demo will be aired tomorrow.  But it is only going to prove what I've written here.  Not good news.  But very relevant.  And most importantly - that those who read here - don't waste their time on this circuit.  Sadly.

Kindest regards
Rosie

This is of course copied from Rose's forum 2013-08-10.
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2313.msg4846.html#msg4846

[size=78%]She is actually PROUD of the fact that she "managed" to insult and disparage and lie about and ignore the solid factual information that her "detractors" have been telling her for, what, thirteen years now?  She is PROUD of this arrogant and willfully ignorant approach of hers, this utter beggaring of the Scientific Method, this amazing illustration of psychopathology on her part, she is rather PROUD of all this? The mind boggles.[/size]

The mind should not boggle:


The book on Ainslie, crying for attention anywhere that she could find it, was always about nothing more than a sick, diseased, clinically insane, pathologically deluded woman, with an infested mind totally out of touch with reality ..and everyone knew it. That will continue to be the case, and will never change without professional help.


Along with her inexcusably deceitful, vicious, hateful personality,
may this piece of shit continue to rot in her own hell.

On a positive note I would like to thank Poynt, TK, PicoWatt, the "new guy" Steve Weir, and I am sure there are many others unnamed, for the considerable efforts that they put into analyzing the various switching circuits put forth by Rosemary.  I learned a lot in the process and I respect their dedication in following up on this all the way to it's proper and truthful conclusion.  We are literally talking about years of work adding up to thousands and thousands of hours.  The mind boggles if you were to calculate the equivalent dollar sum in consulting fees.

It was all done for free by good people that have altruistic motivations and they are to be congratulated.

MileHigh

I would like to reflect MH and Bills thank you to everyone. My intention has always been in everyone's best interest to bring this to some sort of conclusion in some rational way. Hopefully we can at least bring it to some sort of conclusion.
Kind Regards
Mark

Here Here!  I agree 100%.   Nice job fellows.

I can't wait to see what cool devices TK now comes up with since he no longer has to waste his time on this bogus "science".

Bill

Yes congratulations to all, what a long road it's been, but finally the truth has got through 

Oh, it is not over, not by a long shot. It won't be over until Ainslie and Martin perform the following acts.

1. Rosemary Ainslie MUST remove all versions, all links, to the two papers IMMEDIATELY. She MUST contact Rossi's JNP and retract those posts of those papers there right away and issue statements of retraction with explanations to be posted there, as soon as possible.

2. Donovan Martin MUST assure that Ainslie complies. He surely does not want or need to have his name associated with these papers that contain FABRICATED DATA, misrepresentations of experimental procedures, outright lies, and totally false claims of excess power and energy. Donovan Martin should, by all rights, issue HIS OWN statement of retraction/repudiation, as he has been used, mercilessly, by the dishonest Ainslie to further her own goals, without regard for accuracy or fact.

3. The Quantum Magazine article, which includes a schematic that produces the exact inverse of her claimed duty cycle, MUST be retracted as well, since it contains the same bogus measurement technique and makes the same unfounded claims, in addition to having the impossible schematic.

4. Ainslie MUST issue a full and comprehensive ERROR REPORT that describes her errors, how to correct them and what the conclusions are when correct data is collected and proper analysis and interpretations are performed.

5. Ainslie MUST write retractions and explanations for the "open letters" and failed demonstration announcements that she has recently made on PESN and Mark Dansie's Revolution-Green websites and discussion forums. This should be done as soon as possible.

Anything short of full and honest and direct performance of the above will indicate that the team of Rosemary Ainslie and Donovan Martin are not interested in science at all -- for those things are WHAT SCIENTISTS DO when their data, or data they are associated with, is proven wrong.

Further:

6. Ainslie MUST issue INDIVIDUAL PERSONAL apologies, sincere, complete and public apologies, to those she has insulted, lied to and slighted with disrespect over all these years. Here is just a partial list:

-The Boss, one of her longest-term critics, who has been following her case for 13 years or more
-The Naked Scientists Forum and their moderators
-The Energetic Forum, and Aaron and Ashtweth in particular
-FuzzyTomCat (Glen Lettermeier) -- she has especially slighted Glen and he deserves a totally abject and complete apology from Ainslie.
-Harvey -- ditto.
-Tektronix (for misrepresenting their involvement when she had a loaner scope from them)
-Coast-to-Coast Radio, George Noory and Art Bell
-Professor Kahn
-this forum, Stefan Hartmann in particular
-PicoWatt, MileHigh, poynt99 and other individuals on this forum

Anything short of full and honest and direct performance of the above will indicate that Rosemary Ainslie is bereft of conscience, incapable of shame, doesn't take responsibility for her actions,  and is a troll queen of the first magnitude.

(She has even admitted that she doesn't really believe that my name is Bryan Little.... she has just been deliberately trying to "push my buttons" whenever she uses that name in reference to me!!! In short, the very definition of an internet troll.)

I announced it on my site yesterday and the link as soon as I got it. I did not realize I was the announcer
mark