@Profitis
you should contact her and see if she will send you a full set of papers that supports her conclusions. Might be a worthwhile exercise.
I get hung up on why it only does what it claims it can do with batteries and not caps.
I will not even attempt to comment of measuring techniques and electronics...I do not have the knowledge.
Kind Regards
Mark

Mark:

I respect you a lot for your mentioning that you don't have the electronics knowledge to do the testing of the RA circuit.  On the forums you see a lot of bluffing about that.

On SmartScarecrow's last YouTube clip just for fun I am engaging what I call "HHO Outlaws" and they are making big claims about modern cars needing much bigger alternators and stuff like that.  I can read between the lines and see the bluff and bluster.

The most notable in recent memory was debating with John Rohner on PESN several months ago and it became quickly apparent that he was nearly clueless about many things including electronics, how a car ignition works, and how to test his own "PAPP engine."  Big claims about his engine that can allegedly output hundreds of horsepower from nowhere and the man could not even propose a single test.  Then of course in his shop Mark E. pointed out how he had no kind of engine testbed with a prony brake or or a generator connected up to a big resistive load to act as a load on his "engine."

The discussion with Rohner was a kind of "Great Turkey Shoot."

Again, your honesty is very much appreciated.

MileHigh

thanks TK

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the kind comments.  To be honest they are "too kind."  I have the full engineering foundation and a lot of bench experience but it's nothing compared to some of the other people that are around here and on PESN.  I was more of a digital guy and here the discussion is mostly related to analog stuff.  For example I have never in all the years heard mention of De Morgan's theorem on the forums.

On the analog side, I could never design a 4th order Chebyshev bandpass filter unless I poured over the material and relearned a bunch of stuff.  Nor do I have the analog bench experience that others around here have, but I can understand the issues and can appreciate the words of wisdom that we sometimes get from the analog gurus.

But, I do understand energy and I am very good at visualization and it's very hard to fool me!

Also, I may contribute to your web site but I can't guarantee it.  Thanks for the offer.  My "bandwidth" is aligned with my interest level and it's normally fair to moderate unless a biggie comes along.

MileHigh

Instead of working to repeat the Figure 3 scopeshot, Ainslie is continuing to engage in delaying tactics. Poynt99 has asked her for clear photos of both sides of her current board.... something that I or any of us could provide within the half-hour........ but she promises to have a friend do it on Sunday. Will she provide the scopeshot before then? What do you think? Will she actually provide the photos on Sunday? What do you think?

It shouldn't matter though because as she says, "It's exactly the same as always".

But if it's exactly the same as always (except for the new "noninductive shunts" and the mystery LED and the extra Black and Red wires snaking off to some hidden power supply or charger thing behind the oscilloscope) then it's also "exactly the same" as Tar Baby. Remember TB? It uses the same circuit she claims to use. It uses the same mosfets, the same resistor values, the same input voltages, and makes _exactly the same_ waveforms including the Negative Mean Power that Ainslie claims indicates her COP INFINITY overunity. I've offered this device for side-by-side comparison testing with Ainslie's circuit (by a qualified third party) many times and I offer it yet again, to confirm that it is indeed a replication of Ainslie's circuit and that it performs the same under the same conditions. The schematic I used is EXACTLY the schematic that she claims to be using.

In fact it is such a good and exact replication that, when I posted a screenshot from a Tek DSO showing traces from Tar Baby, she actually thought I had rifled her computer and stolen one of HER screenshots of her circuit in operation!!

So one has to ask why she lies the way she does, in the post I've attached below. And why she's continuing to delay, when it would be a matter of a few minutes to produce the data requested. (I know why.)

@tinselkoala..calculations calcushmations,if she does my suggested experiment and if anybody can replicate it it removes ALL (not some) doubts about an overunity effect.in fact its the best way to publicly demo this thing of hers,an ordinary joe clearly undastands'this battery heat cup up but this battery heat cup up more,hosau kimjongsun'.its same things with rossi except here anybody can replicate.lets see if she,l do this tk.

Go see her then, she needs all the help she can get. You've got her email and forum links, right?

But remember that she uses six automotive or marine style batteries in series, each with 50 Amp-Hour capacity and around 400-600 amps of cold-cranking current output capability. Be sure to have someone video the event when you crowbar that battery stack and drop it in a cup of oil.

@Profitis
I can nominate you as my special envoy for the purposes of validation....that solves the problem.
You can use the forum here as your technical support.
Go read the papers first and get her to explain why caps may not be used only batteries.
Mark