Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Big try at gravity wheel  (Read 720714 times)

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #555 on: January 25, 2014, 04:13:46 AM »
This sounds very interesting.  But (of course) I have some questions.  If you can indulge me, you imply that sub luminous speeds are a limiting factor, which I would have to agree with.

So how are the circuit manufactures surmounting the "light speed" barrier?  Have they found a way to have electric currents travel FTL or are they just shortening the circuit path, or what?

FYI, I am not trying to trip you up or anything.  This is extremely interesting to me and I would like to know more about it.

M.
As much as FTL would be nice, it doesn't exist in any form that anyone knows about.  The circuit manufacturers just deal with the problems and they are getting exponentially more difficult as bit rates climb.  At 25Gbs, inside a circuit board, a pulse only goes about 1/4" in one bit time.  It is sort of good for the capital test equipment makers.  In order to play in the current space, one needs a lab with at least half a million minimum in test equipment.

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #556 on: January 25, 2014, 01:54:37 PM »
Hi,
   Neither RAR nor HER could be described as elegant machines. One can imagine the problems
with inertia with RAR and HER if anything of a useful operating speed were to be achieved.
   Has anyone heard anything of these machines recently. Sterling said of HER that he was to
wait 'till end of Feb. for any news-but didn't say which year!
                   John.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #557 on: January 25, 2014, 02:13:15 PM »
I think that 48 hour rundown observations of HER's ZED by Mark Dansie were first supposed to happen in 2011.  Just as in the John Worrell Keely fan dance script, the schedule for any critical observations moves out, and out, and out.

I could be wrong, but I am not aware that RAR has ever promised any demonstrations of their machines operating as they claim.

Marsing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #558 on: January 25, 2014, 02:27:36 PM »
so.

what the answer you got when you asked them in 2012 MArkE,
did they promise you something?

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #559 on: January 25, 2014, 04:29:05 PM »
so.

what the answer you got when you asked them in 2012 MArkE,
did they promise you something?
I got the run around. 

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #560 on: January 25, 2014, 09:29:59 PM »
Did anyone ever get anything else but the run around from Travis (except Webby of course)?

The "Travis Effect" is a Red Herring. But the best Red Herrings are real fish, after all.

Ol' Wayne never liked me much, even though I was the only one (in public at least) who rose to his challenge to make a table-top selfrunning water pump incorporating the ZED effect.  Personally, I find this demonstration fairly dramatic, and I'm puzzled as to why it didn't cause more of a stir at the time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlLYD4CSJLU

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #561 on: January 25, 2014, 09:57:28 PM »



  Koala,
         trouble is the Tinselzed stops. Travis had the same problem, his thing stopped
after four hours. He originally said that that was not a problem, but I think it was.
If it would have kept going for forty eight hours he would have been able to show it
off to Mark, wouldn't he?
                             John.

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #562 on: January 25, 2014, 10:32:11 PM »
This looks like a folding and respawning operation:

http://www.hydroenergyrevolution.com/
http://www.zydroenergy.com/

Surprise!

Quote
Zydro Energy is a Team of over 200 Men and Women from around this World - Connected in heart and conscious by Our common goal:

I don't believe it for a second!

mondrasek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1301
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #563 on: January 25, 2014, 10:37:38 PM »
Personally, I find this demonstration fairly dramatic...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlLYD4CSJLU

So did (and do) I!  Why didn't you point out, investigate, and/or explain more about what you demonstrated at that time?  I was hoping you would and was also disappointed that no one else asked.

Would you now?

M.

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #564 on: January 25, 2014, 10:45:21 PM »
Ol' Wayne never liked me much, even though I was the only one (in public at least) who rose to his challenge to make a table-top selfrunning water pump incorporating the ZED effect.  Personally, I find this demonstration fairly dramatic, and I'm puzzled as to why it didn't cause more of a stir at the time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlLYD4CSJLU

People do not like the truth because they want to believe in miracles. Debunking is not popular because it destroys illusions. Facts are boring because they prove a reality one wants to escape from.

Nice and clear measurements which demonstrate grave errors in wondrous machines are quickly forgotten. Facts which could easily be verified by everybody are constantly overlooked. Apparent false claims are believed instead of the overwhelming arguments against them.

But people just love to be bamboozled. They love sweet talk specially when god is brought into the equation. How nice it is if someone lies to support a long awaited miracle. How we all love tall tales and hints at things to come tomorrow, just not today, just a little more effort, and we get salvation from all worries.

Why are we lingering in this forum? Do we want to hear the big thing? Are we expecting the final OU proof?

I am just a little better than the deluded ones, just one step away from believing in the impossible. You may accuse me of false hope. I hope that one day the impossible will be done. I am just not far gone enough to believe in clumsy prophets with a badly designed machine and who contradict themselfs every fifth sentence.

But if the master deceiver appears I might as well fall for his spiel.

Greetings, Conrad

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #565 on: January 25, 2014, 11:04:20 PM »


  Koala,
         trouble is the Tinselzed stops.
Yep, that's a problem all right.  But some might see it as "just an engineering issue" since the basic principle has been demonstrated. Hasn't it?    ;)

Quote
Travis had the same problem, his thing stopped
after four hours. He originally said that that was not a problem, but I think it was.
If it would have kept going for forty eight hours he would have been able to show it
off to Mark, wouldn't he?
                             John.

Well, I think a well-balanced, heavy teeter-totter can keep rocking back and forth for a long time with very little input. The Travis ZED thing was "precharged" with a fair amount of air pressure and elevated water, as I recall, and it kept stopping because it usually "sprung a leak" somewhere... meaning all its precharge was gone. Go figure. You'd think the boys never heard of Teflon tape.

So yeah, run it for 48 hours, but be sure to measure the _precharge levels_ before and after the run.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #566 on: January 25, 2014, 11:05:45 PM »

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #567 on: January 25, 2014, 11:12:31 PM »
So did (and do) I!  Why didn't you point out, investigate, and/or explain more about what you demonstrated at that time?  I was hoping you would and was also disappointed that no one else asked.

Would you now?

M.

The Heron's Fountain with active TinselZED produced a greater flow rate with higher head pressure than the same fountain with the TZED removed... but for a shorter time. As far as I could tell, the TZED operates like a "pressure lever" system that amplifies force at the expense of distance, or in this case volume.

fletcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #568 on: January 25, 2014, 11:29:38 PM »
Conrad .. FWIW - these types of forums serve a purpose - they are a place where people can congregate & share ideas & opinions - we don't always agree & that diversity makes it interesting at times - some are quick to believe claims without iron-clad proof whilst others will remain skeptics until the bitter end - that is, unless a working model is produced & independently verified by qualified & trustworthy individuals, they will not look for a possibility in the known physics & math that could provide a pathway to OU & PM in the vernacular - both positions are polarizing & neither of particular merit - an open mind to possibilities is more an advantage to exploring new potential paradigms than to become a science bigot constantly falling back on what we have learned.

That said, this forum & others teach you more about human nature than science & the scientific method - if you can keep it in perspective & recognize these undercurrents of human nature, ego's & emotionally charged arguments you will find it an altogether more enjoyable experience [as I'm sure you do].

The benefit from this experience is that exposure to sometimes volatile & emotionally charged individuals & their arguments desensitizes you & then you begin to see the same patterns of communication everywhere around you in daily life & work environments - it is the human condition & it pays to understand it - soon you realize that entire markets are driven by the same precepts & even philosophy & economics etc are not immune to its covert influence.

An old adage I often keep in mind when reading this forum "trouble can't be where trouble can't go" - for me this simply means that if I understand the drivers for different personalities then I am less likely to respond out of character.

ETA: I also hope one day to be greatly surprised by something not easily explained, & that keeps me interested.

mondrasek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1301
Re: Big try at gravity wheel
« Reply #569 on: January 26, 2014, 12:06:31 AM »
The Heron's Fountain with active TinselZED produced a greater flow rate with higher head pressure than the same fountain with the TZED removed... but for a shorter time.

Now that explanation is what is predicted (expected) in accordance with the rules that science has developed from previous observations.  Not that those are wrong...

You tested an extraordinary claim and dismiss it without comparing it to a control experiment.  Or at least you never showed the control experiments and corresponding measurements.  Instead, you explain the higher head pressure away (understandably) using currently understood science.  Instead of testing.

Just how do you know the higher pressure manifested "for a shorter time?"

Please don't think I'm trying to goad you into performing more tests.  It is only that I am used to you proving your points by presenting excellent experiments and data.  Even when they are redundant to the point of being moribund.  I am just curious how you draw your conclusion.

M.