I'm beginning to like the sound of this "Travis Effect", Red. Where's the best place to read about it.

Grimer,
Wayne Travis has a topic running on his invention, here at overunity.com, 200+ pages, address below
http://www.overunity.com/10596/hydro-differential-pressure-exchange-over-unity-system/#.Ut_j8_vfrUI
Red_Sunset

Red_Sunset, would you kindly be more specific about where HER has stated what they claim the  "Travis Effect" is than just somewhere in a thread with thousands of posts?  Surely if HER spelled out what they claim that all important principle is you copied down their statement or know about when they stated it, or where the post is where they stated it.

..............................
Archimedes vs Displacement Replacement.
...................................................
................................................... 

Thanks Webby !!

He tried to provide a progressive detailed flow that was partly thwarted by certain member with a brash disposition.(the reason for the high post count).

The truth is quite the contrary. Travis resisted over and over providing any real data. He continually claimed to have working prototypes that were self-running and producing excess power. In a pdf presentation designed to attract new investors he promised to put a 50 kW generating plant at his church in six months if he got funding. None of the investors who saw the full presentation, in person, along with whatever Travis actually had built at the time... none of them chose to invest. Years later.... there is still no working prototype that does what Travis claims. He has recently "gone private", removing from the public view most of the overt claims that he was making those years ago.

Travis paid Webby a fair chunk of change for demonstrating what we all were calling the "travis effect" in a nested set of transparent tubes. Yet.... here Webby is now, posting on gravity motor threads, instead of getting paid big bucks working directly with Travis in Oklahoma to bring his marvellous free energy machine to market. Flat packable like Ikea furniture! 20 kW in the footprint of a garden shed! No input, no exhaust, just power out for free. But where is the working prototype that he claimed to have? Why is Travis's home and workshop still connected to the grid? I know why, and so do you, Red. He has devices that almost work. They leak, they run down, they require lots of weird acronyms to keep the investors hopeful and out of the lawyer's offices. ZED, TAZ, rotary ZED, and more. Travis _asked_ for his thread to be closed, so that he would not have to field the hard questions. The questions... and the thread... remain, however.

Anyone who might be interested in Travis really ought to take a look at that old locked thread, to see the kind of things people were saying and what they did.

IMO

Archimedes vs Displacement Replacement.

Work with fluids is pressure and volume.

The Displacement Replacement item occupies 90 percent of the vessel.

Each vessel is limited to a 10 percent lift of the height of the vessel.

Both vessels have the same dimensions.

Archimedes requires the full volume of the vessel to be moved.

Displacement Replacement requires 10 percent of the volume moved.

Archimedes lifts with no further input.

Displacement Replacement requires another 10 percent volume added.

For the same lift the Displacement Replacement vessel requires 20 percent of the input work as the Archimedes vessel.

OU? maybe not, but a more efficient method, yes.

Now transfer the stored potential into a second unit at the starting depth to make another lift.  By using the stored potential the input costs become the difference in pressure created by the change in height within the water column.

Again, the Archimedes requires the full volume and the Displacement Replacement requires 20 percent of the volume.

This is what the videos were trying to demonstrate.

There is a non-intuitive component to the multiple riser system that no video or demonstration was made for.  This is a strange phenomenon that I myself do not understand the "how" or "why" of, but it is present in the system.

The system response to lift and the force transfers to outside weight are not the same as the descent.  It is as if the weight left on the risers gets focused into the inner most riser\pod chamber and holds a higher pressure value on the ejected fluid from the pod chamber for a longer duration than it should, and it is this recovery condition that is an important part to the function of the system.

In the testbed I built, the motion of the pod\risers was not the same going up as they were going down.  If I used a solid single top riser kind of setup where I had all the risers locked together the system responded differently, if I locked some and not others, again the system response was different.

In short, it took less weight to maintain pressure on the way down than the system lifted with the same pressure.


Edit to Add:  IMO

What a lot of plausible sounding BS, $2000 is the only thing that you really believed in, after claiming you have achieved OU, you never had it independently verified or were capable of demonstrating a self-runner, and let's face it if you really had discovered OU why would you waste your time working on anything else ?, One over-unity device not enough for you ? 


Some people join this website to learn how to make (claims) of OU sound convincing without ever having to show proper evidence, there have been so many,(in fact all the threads so far have never had a real working OU device)
Luckily some of the threads are from genuine people, doing research in the hope that one day they will achieve OU, but we really could do with less idiots and conman who claimed they have done it and know how it works, but can never have it verified or demonstrate a working device under laboratory conditions,


For anyone that miss it Wayne Travis is a liar and conman.

Warning in all markets they are conman trying to convince you they have great products and that they know what they're talking about, but don't worry they never stay too long,  people in time can see through there broken words and inability to deliver what they preach .

HER were supposed to have a system set-up for Mark Dansie to observe operating for 48 hours as an initial test over two years ago.  That never happened.  The "instrumented" machine was built and supposedly run two years ago this spring.  Again, nothing came of it.

HER is about five years in.  The lawsuit suggests that the early investors are getting restless.