Oh Randy..

That drip sits right before your nose in the form of Air..Lot of electricity is present in air..If it were not for the air that you are able to inhale and the electricity that goes in the form of negative charges in the air to our lungs, none of us can remainn alive.

Since I started from zero I learnt what are the methods of Generation of Electricity..

a. Electrostatic Induction machines - Not used
b. Electromagnetic induction machines (used mostly everywhere) (hydro, Thermal and Nuclear - all use only a turbine that rotates to generate electricity and is subject to Lenz Law)
c. Nuclear Battery ( Not even known - used only in Satellites) - Banned under statutes
d. Chemical Batteries (lead-acid and our normal 9 volt batteries Lithium ion batteries used in cell phones etc)
e. Thermoelectricity using thermocouples - Not used due to inefficient production
f. Photovoltics - Solar Cells
g. Electricity from Sparks -- When different metals constitute the spark plug a type of plasma condition is generated and excess ions are released but capturing it is not that easy and it is not taught in text books. This is not well understood yet.
h. Electricity from water - No one talks about this - Not much of knowledge is there about the subject
i- Electricity from Ground - Earth batteries - Forgotten technology.
j. Diesel and Oil based Generators -- You get it every where
k. Transformers - using rotating magnetic fields but the core itself remains stationary and the electricity is generated by flux linking which is again subject to Lenz law. Used every where. Not considered to be a method of Generation but only as method of transmission. More electricity is given to the transformers in the Primary than taken out at the secondary because current is lost by Eddy currents due to heat generated in the core and so current is lost though transformers remain the most efficient electrical machines. Efficiencies of 99.6% are reported and accepted using very expensive materials.
l. Capacitors - Not considered to be capable of generation but only as resistors placed in series for transmission.

Probably there are other methods but the above the methods of Generation of electricity the main forms investigated over the years.

Most of them use the Electromagnetic Induction which is subject to Lenz law by using a rotating magnetic core which is surrounded by coils. While easy to construct this is subject to Lenz law and requires more input than output. When the magnetic core rotates electricity is generated in the coils and this tends to block the rotation of magnet and so more input energy is needed to get lesser output. This is what is taught in textbooks. This is the root cause of the energy crisis..

Figuera method as Hanon pointed out avoids the Lenz law effect by using the method of flux cutting the lines between the opposite poles. 
It provides less input and claims to take out more output. The Patent itself has gone in to archives to be forgotten but has been brought out by Hanon..So is this really possible? Is this true? If so how can it be done?

If you go through the Ramaswami Power Transformer book and the above the drip will be there before you..I hope you can open your eyes and mind and open the windows and let fresh air and light come in and then you can see the drip immediately right before you..I suggest that you follow the nature rather than putting up artificial constraints.. If you watch catch big fish go to Oceans and don't go to a pond and then say I will wait here till the whale or the big shark comes to this pond and keep fishing in the pond..If you want to catch the big fish, you need to go where the big fish is and that is where the drip is present..



 

You can create a simple motor effect with a magnet, piece of iron and a battery. Take a strong magnet and place the iron on one of the poles. For this you can use a 16 penny nail. Connect the iron(nail) to the (-) side of a AA battery. Take a small wire from the (+) side of the battery and touch the bottom end of the magnet. You will see that the magnet rotates.

In this case two magnetic fields are created in one object. That object is the magnet. The current from the battery slightly distorts the magnetic field from the battery. Prevent the magnet from rotating and quickly introduce and remove the current from the battery the magnetic field distorts and springs back. In this experiment you end up moving a magnetic field with a current.

This effect can be amplified with electromagnets. Build a coil with iron, tire irons work well. Spin a coil on it, start light say 12 vdc. Connect wires to the iron core and pulse the iron core with 12 vdc. Secure the iron core from wanting to rotate, when this is done again you are creating a Locked Rotor effect as seen in a stalled electric motor.

Find a way to get the distorted magnetic field to do work, shouldn't be that hard. Give credit where credit is do.

- Fernandez

Fernandez, Sorry but I do not get to understand your post. Are you suggesting to connect the electromagnets core to a battery? What kind of effect are you looking for?


Thanks

Fernandez, Sorry but I do not get to understand your post. Are you suggesting to connect the electromagnets core to a battery? What kind of effect are you looking for?


Thanks

I will have to take a pic or make a video to funny understand.
In essence you are building a motor less all the internal parts. There is only one magnetic part the other magnetic element comes from the current that traverses the iron core.

The effect I described above used a permanent magnet to view the effect. So you only have 1 robust low cost magnetic field. The second magnetic field comes from the current passing through the core material (at 90 degrees) this flash of current distorts the larger magnetic field. When the current is removed the larger field springs back.

If you hold the current steady your magnet or electromagnet will try to rotate. This is because it has been disturbed off its natural position and tries to find equilibrium.

I will post a pic next weekend as I am busy this week.

-Fernndez

btw...Did you know that Patrick Kelly took down most of what was on the " Figuera " in His eBook.

Randy,


I will tell the story of Figuera description into Patrick´s ebook: In october 2012 Bajac published his descrption of the Figuera generator (the one in post #1 in this thread). Later this interpretation was copied by Patrick´s into his ebook. Therefore the description included into the ebook is just the description delivered by Bajac


After studying in deep the text of the Figuera´s patent I can not agree with the interpretation of Bajac, based on transformer-type cores and air-gaps, both concept not mentioned in any place of the original Figuera patent text. For me this is a genuine design , but not related to the original Figuera intentions. This is my guess, I am not sure because I don´t have a crystal ball nor I have succeded with my other prototypes. If you have not read the original patent text I will encourage you to do it with open mind and not trying to fit it into the split primary transformer. If this is not the right configuration then it is doing more bad that good because now everyone read it and try to fit into that model (except for NRamaswami that has gone into using straight solenoids, which for myself is more similar to Figuera´s ideas)


In my case I always quote the text from the original patents. I just quote the Figuera/Buforn text and I try to give and interpretation of what I read or what I see that is lacking. It is up to you to read the original patent text or just the interpretation included in the ebook

Nobody has say a a word about my previous post, copied below.


How can you use both poles of each electromagnet if you pile the coil as :N--y--S--y--N--y--S--N--y--S   as the 1914 suggest?


Any other option apart from using straight bars cores in all "N/S" electromagnets and "y" coils?




   (====N====) (===y===) (====S====)

  ^                       ^                   ^                        ^ 
  |                         |                   |                         |
  |                         |                   |                         |
  |                         |                   |                         |
pole                  pole              pole                    pole

hanon,


The patent shows the electromagnets in what is assumed to be plan view as just rectangles, and I've yet to see any explanation or drawing that makes sense to interpret that to mean he used "C" or "I" or bars. Very common back then is the horseshoe shape and it fits with the illustration and description, so the "rectangles" would be the ends. Just an observation ....

In all cases the essence is what he understood with his first rotating machine.

That is my point... I think Woopy captured that basically in his first video on the Figuera...Had Woopy used thicker wire or used all of the transformers we would have seen this whole picture clearer...

I think its just a matter of time before Bajac posts His results and adds another piece of the puzzle...

Cheers

PS could I have all the patents location so I can basically read them ( I thought I did awhile back ).

I don't understand...

We went from the " Figuera " being the next best thing since sliced bread back to wrapping a coil around a nail...

Never stated "wrapping a coil around a nail" I understand your frustration because your hard work and ideas have gone nowhere.
I simply disclosed how to move a field with little to no moving parts.

Maybe it helps people here like Hannons translations of the patent. Jerking around with LED's goes nowhere ..... A simple fact.

Figurea studies the interaction of magnetic fields in a dynamo. Why aren't you?

Good luck.