Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!  (Read 39279 times)

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #45 on: July 30, 2012, 02:34:41 PM »
My uneducated theory's are my own  :)
I will follow my own path  ;D
have a great day

blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #46 on: July 30, 2012, 02:38:41 PM »
Sorry. I am talking about the field-line cutting method.
I am not talking about your explanation shown in your video.



My uneducated theory's are my own  :)
I will follow my own path  ;D
have a great day

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #47 on: July 30, 2012, 03:57:11 PM »
     Neutron type A cw spin   Neutron type b ccw spin.  Super imposed.  Proton type 1.   Smash proton type 1.   Neutron type A  Neutron type b  wobble around a bit  then settle down into being Proton type 1 which you just cant ever ever ever demolish because of it's negentrophic properties.   Blackholes at the center of at least our galaxy are dipoles.  Recent observations of a large gamma ray cloud above and below the galactic plane at the poles of the galactic proton have been used by various idots to cause panic that Earth is going to be bombarded with huge amounts of gamma rays.  I am so tired of the bullshit these people put out.  How do they know how long that cloud of gamma rays has been there.  Could it be that the galaxy is alive.  That it is making a consious effort to be creative.  The Universe needs blackholes or magnetic monopoles to pickup space debris in order that it be recyled.  The Universe is a combination of Negentrophic influences and radiative influences.  If there was only one force all would have radiated away or condensed away.  Give the Universe a little credit where credit is due.  Hold it in awe because it is truly awesome.

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #48 on: July 30, 2012, 08:10:59 PM »



Quote
"Could it be that the galaxy is alive.  That it is making a consious effort to be creative."   "Hold it in awe because it is truly awesome."


Interesting ideas, Sparks. Fraught with so very many implications.  Implications, which, when reduced to practice, reveal The Awesome Creative Intelligence Who sits at the Center of it all.  The One Who revealed long ago, and in Great detail, just who would be in temporary power over the earth at this moment in time.  What their technical capabilities would be. What their 'mark' would be, What would be happening on the earth Chronologically, Geologically, Atmospherically, socially, economically, Politically, Culturally, and Spiritually. I'm sure I'm leaving out alot in that short list.


The Grandest of Engineers sure has lot's of 'Allys', doesn't He....




Blessings in Christ Yeshua

gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #49 on: August 02, 2012, 07:04:52 AM »
In Fig. 3 & Fig. 4 below, taken from a publication titled "Successful Brushless A.C. Power Extraction From The Faraday Acyclic Generator", by Jerry E. Bayles, two identical small magnets mounted on a rotor free to move on a low friction point of balance is brought to the sides of the magnet disks and if placed on the near side (fig. 3), the balanced magnet indicator lines up parallel to the axis of the disks. If however the balanced indicator magnets are placed on the far opposite side (fig. 4), the balance magnets line up towards the axis and between the disks! Since the disks are uniformly magnetized and uniform radially from the axis, this is most unexpected. If the disks are slowly moved in rotation, the same results are obtained. Is there a standing wave fixed around the magnets?  Here's a video of the above test.  Please note the difference in how the magnet indicator lines up at the starting position and at 1800 from the starting position.  Also, the video shows a macroscopic version of a quantum effect where the electron must revolve twice to turn itself around once. Hence the so-called spin 1/2.

A resonance at 2pi Hz and 8.00 Hz occurs during testing. At the 2pi Hz resonance, the entire test bed vibrates and at 8.00 Hz, the balance magnets in figures 3 and 4 swing back and forth violently. The meter also vibrates and seems to follow the action of the balance magnets. Further, the static alignment of the balance magnets remain relatively still as shown if the disks are rotated slowly by hand. Due to the alignments being 90 degrees out from one side of the disks to the other, it is postulated that there is some sort of active standing quarter wave across the disks even when they are not being rotated. Further, it is locked into an geographical North-South alignment for this setup. The North-South alignment may not be more than coincidence but the standing wave is locked into the above alignment. When the magnet disks are spun, the standing wave is force to degenerate and radiate (this is proof that the rotation of the magnet is relevant). This radiated field power has been measured and the results are encouraging. This means that no contacts are needed on the Faraday disk to extract power under the above setup conditions.  Further tests reveal that free from any contacts, the near side balance test oscillates the test magnet balance the most at 8.3 Hz and the far side position oscillates at 6.28 Hz. Also, at 6.28 Hz, the entire support for the magnet disk rotors and drill motor is observed to shake vigorously with a sharp resonance point at 6.28 Hz.

Gravock
« Last Edit: August 02, 2012, 08:08:09 AM by gravityblock »

gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #50 on: August 02, 2012, 07:20:44 AM »
Proof Of Concept Test Report -  Abstract: A simple test is performed on a brushless a. c. pickup Faraday generator wherein it is shown that power extraction does not slow down the prime mover. Then it is shown that a conventional generator loaded at the same power does slow down the prime mover significantly. The result indicates a vast improvement over conventional power generation methods.  Video demonstration showing power extraction doesn't slow down the prime mover (no back torque).  In this video, it is proven that shorting the brushless Faraday Free Energy Generator coils not only causes an increase in rotation speed but also causes a decrease of drive current to the prime mover a.c. motor. This is opposite to conventional generator/motor action.

Gravock

gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #51 on: August 02, 2012, 10:24:29 AM »
@Broli,

Open Circuit!

The text in the image below, as found on page 7 of Jerry Bayles publication on a successful brushless Faraday generator, sounds very similar to the open circuit we have been looking for.  When the magnet discs are spun, the standing wave around the discs will degenerate and an electromagnetic field will be radiated which is proportional to the rotational velocity.  In the conclusions of that paper, Bayles says the dimensions of the magnets used develop a standing wave that yield the properties of being related to the golden ratio.  For those who may be interested in duplicating the simple test arrangement, the magnets can be purchased from: http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=RY046.  I'll be ordering two magnets before next week.

Gravock

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #52 on: August 02, 2012, 05:11:03 PM »
I'm a bit critical concerning that specific experiment. Permanent magnets are inherently not perfect, these slight imperfections may be the cause of the induced voltage in the behemoth coil he's using at the rim to pick up the changing field. It would be interesting to see whether a single magnet has the same effect, what two magnets in attraction would do, and if the same voltage is generated using EM's instead of PM's
« Last Edit: August 02, 2012, 07:47:53 PM by broli »

gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #53 on: August 03, 2012, 05:36:00 AM »
I'm a bit critical concerning that specific experiment. Permanent magnets are inherently not perfect, these slight imperfections may be the cause of the induced voltage in the behemoth coil he's using at the rim to pick up the changing field. It would be interesting to see whether a single magnet has the same effect, what two magnets in attraction would do, and if the same voltage is generated using EM's instead of PM's.

Here's a video showing a magnetic balance resonance tests using four strong magnetic disks instead of the previous two tests, with first two, and then one disk.  Due to the number of magnetic disks, slight irregularities of the field due to flaws in the magnetic fields can be ruled out as the cause of this unbalance and energy flow as these would tend to cancel out.  Here's a video showing a magnetic one-disk resonance tests utilizing a two-magnet balance system.  For further information, please read the description of the videos.  Also, here's the link to the website of Jerry Bayles.  I really find the electron 1/2 spin test, where the balanced magnets must revolve twice around the disc magnet in order to return to it's original starting position very intriguing.

Gravock

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #54 on: August 03, 2012, 08:55:40 PM »
  I really find the electron 1/2 spin test, where the balanced magnets must revolve twice around the disc magnet in order to return to it's original starting position very intriguing.

Gravock

 It is intriguing indeed!
However, 1/2 spin is just because he encircles the magnets counter-clockwise. The spin would have been different, probably 2, for clockwise case. Agree? (I’m sorry but I’m too tired and lazy to prepare a setup and check it exactly with a compass).
 
Best regards,
Tinu
 

gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!
« Reply #55 on: August 04, 2012, 11:02:10 PM »
It is intriguing indeed!
However, 1/2 spin is just because he encircles the magnets counter-clockwise. The spin would have been different, probably 2, for clockwise case. Agree? (I’m sorry but I’m too tired and lazy to prepare a setup and check it exactly with a compass).
 
Best regards,
Tinu

I don't think the spin is different for the clockwise case.  Both a positron and an electron have a 1/2 spin regardless of their opposite spin directions (assuming of course they have opposite spin directions).  I guess we could say going CCW around the magnet discs would be a macroscopic display of an electron 1/2 spin and going CW around the magnet discs would be a macroscopic display of a positron 1/2 spin.  I ordered my magnets a few minutes prior to making this post and when they arrive I will try and duplicate this simple experiment for both the CW and CCW case.  Thanks for joining this discussion, and it's good to see someone else is intrigued by this experiment.  I do think this experiment shows an imbalance in energy around the magnet discs which can't be explained in having slight imperfections in the permanent magnets. 

In one of the tests by Bayles demonstrating the chiral nature of the left and right sides of the magnets, the magnetic balance rotates 360o when the magnet discs are being rotated.  Slight imperfections in the axially magnetized PM's rotating on their axis could never show such a huge imbalance in energy on the different sides of the magnets.  In addition to this, the resonance occurs at the Schumann frequency of 7.83 Hz on the right side and at a frequency on the left side such that the difference frequency multiplied by the circumference of the disk magnets yield a calculated least quantum velocity equal to the square root of the fine structure constant in meter per second units. Since there is uniformity in the disk magnets strength and dimensions, and another pair of identical magnets demonstrate the same chiral energy difference between the left and right sides, it is herein postulated that the gravitational field of the Earth is creating the chiral standing wave around the disk magnets. Hence the 5 Hz resonance in test 5 as demonstrated in the movie. (5 Hz is 1/2 of the 10 Hz predicted in Bayles's unified field theory) located online at http://www.electrogravity.com

Also, the Magnetic Potential Vector (A-Vector) is proven to penetrate iron pipes with no measured loss in this A-Vector test by Bayles.  The A-Vector's ability to penetrate iron pipes with no measured loss is a good explanation in why an increase in current and voltage in the behemoth pickup coil(s) are close to equal regardless of whether the core is iron or air.  This phenomenon is due to the A-Potential, and not because there may be slight imperfections in the permanent magnets.

Gravock