I dont really follow the LENR equation, but Ill look it up. As I have reviewed a document thus far it deal with cold fusion which is not what Im doing.

Sorry, That makes sense.
Yes, Aero-gel has been a favorite of mine for years. A lattice matrix of silica made from nano crushed sand, and isoprophyl alcohol. 99% air, but with the tensile strength of steel per volume, all the while being lighter than polystyrene foam. It in fact floats on nitrogen. It can be made into just about anything, a battery, a capacitor, a conductor, an insulator, a foam that can be made with an insulating factor of R85. You can even eat it. But its best point is a piece the thickness of a piece of paper can rest on your hand, with a butane torch blowing on it, and you wont feel any heat transfer.

So despite its expense, it could be something very useful if married with the brown gas torch, or flame element for heating applications, as you could really keep the hot section hot, and not lose any heat applied. While keeping the rest of the equipment safe in a heater or other application. But at 70+ dollars for a little piece the size of a marble, its not in my pocket book. Another down side is its very fragile, like glass.

My flame tips arrived, a 3, 2, and 1 size from a jewelry torch. No I have to find a way to adapt them for use.

If I can get the flame size small enough, to get past the reactive flame, to just its heat output, I can dial it up or down as necessary.

I picked up some fittings to make some YouTube flame arrestors, and a bubbler diffuser, only to find the resistance to airflow through the line was ridiculous, So I may toss em, and take the parts back. My welding flame arrestor requires fairly high pressure to operate, so I may have to toss it as well.

My test bench is coming along nicely though. I have a generation side, and a testing side. The generation side is where all the liquid items are, and the dry side which is where all my testing and the gas is sent (separated by a wooden partition). The High powered A/C electronics are protected, and mounted above everything, and the lowered powered DC items, like gauges are mounted opposite of the generation side, yes still protected from any liquids, or mishaps.
Next Ill be working out a splash cage and fans for the generation side. The bench fully illuminated, and has enough room for me to take notes while its running. I'm using 10 gauge wire as the mains to the hydrogen generator, with a 30amp fuse placed in line to protect the electronics.
My reservoir is very small maybe a quart in liquid volume, and the cell is a 7 plate gap design. I made it like this as partially its what I had, but I should be able to get the cell up to operating temps faster with the smaller volume of electrolyte, and get to my testing ranges faster. The trick will be control of the cell.

Its a parallel cell, using highly reactive (electrically) elements researched from my chemistry experience in my last class, and trial and error.
My concern is even a a 40 amp dc to dc power module may end up just continuing to climb till it pops the fuse. So I will have to take things slowly to find the sweet spot. This would be where I have a sustained temperature, and a sustained flame via a torch tip.
Given each cell is different, I cannot use anything but estimates on starting points from other peoples experience.

Measurement: I bought an vertical ball gauge oxygen meter that measures in LPM. Now this is calibrated for oxygen which is a different density than a hydrogen and oxygen mixture, so I know it will be off a bit. So I also have the ghetto bottle filling station as well. Having two meters to measure gas should back each other up when it comes to real results.

I only wish i could find a gas sensor setup that would measure the content of the gases being produced. Nothing currently out there is made to detect gas content values in an air stream, for the gases we are making with these cells. If there was and it wasn't super expensive, then we would have the real tangible answers we need to refine the process further. After all its not just about the LPM, it about what is being produced in LPM. Some electrolyte, and metal mixtures produce deadly gases that would not be wise to exploit.

One thought for home heating though. We all know carbon monoxide is dangerous being released into a home via a heater, so is CO2. I had thought of using one of those Carbon monoxide detectors to check for CO content in the gas stream. I mean we wouldn't want a byproduct of the generator to be producing CO in the air while we sleep right? Perhaps just pointing the tube toward the sensor would reveal whether CO is being produced or not. Or it might false alarm by detecting what it thinks is CO as well.

I use K2CO3 for testing the bench, and KOH for actual recorded testing. Since Potassium Carbonate is less apt to burn me in the mixture rates Im using. Then once all the leaks are ironed out, I can rinse out the system and run it with KOH knowing Im not going to destroy my new bench.

Another thought of concern is hydrogen is lighter than even helium, it took scientists years to figure out how to store helium successfully. Now we are not storing it I know, however how much gas is making it past our gaskets? Could this lead to a fire if not properly ventilated?

under 22-PSI and/or OVER a 3/16 lead from the event horizon (flame rear) to the source,
your comfortable from incessive recursion into the flow path of standard HHO, despite arresters..

My inflator was a Bendix, standard basketball model,
didn't measure, I've moved, no additional data, sorry.

Previous = tested factors / post equals noted exceptions

This is going to seem counter intuitive,
but the closer you get the flame to the orifice the better.

Let me try to be clearer, when we diddle with regular gasses,
we tend to be cognisant of the burn rate by example/experience.

We are "Obeservant" of effect and change because we can see them...

But, those that have tested a 50' piece of 1/16" fish-tank hose know repeatadly,
that the flash at the other end into the ballon (at send end) appears instantanious.

So, seeing a lead frame before re-combination is an order more stable and predictable,
than with traditional gasses that we can "see" burn rate reaction because the flame propagation is within our visible observance and cognitive range of perception !

Don't underestimate how much error/horror has occurred due to this.

We are accustomed to "Being Able" to envision change with all we work with,
we ARE NOT accustomed to reactions outside of our perception range for sure.

To say "We saw that" implies we ONLY "saw that" in this case, as you can see...

I'll leave you with this question,
I'm from new England (Boston),
our granite emits heat very well,
moved to Pennsylvania next, sad,
but Houston Texas is MUCH WORSE.

What I mean is that if you heat our (NE) stone,
it emits better far IR than penn., and TX., by far.

why?

analisis shows only slightly higher sodium content...

There has to be so much more we just don't know.

There is a soap-stone I was given a sample of in Mildand, TX,
It would not secumb to sublimation at any range at all,
but sadly, it could not emit a snig of heat either it seemed...
"If it can change, it can / If it can change, it will"

Doesn't seem to apply here
what frequency is that soapstone re-emiting at,
that we most clearly cannot see ?

Sorry, spell like crap, type worse...

Funny,
I was conversing with CAL-TECH professors about "water cracking" 17 years ago. Before the HHO explosion, hell before youtube. lol

Just because someone claims ownership of something doesn't mean it can be stopped. Ideas, cannot be contained once they are shared. That's the difference between people trying to make the world a better place for everyone, or make a buck for themselves.
Too bad people place greed before generosity most of the time.

Well the new test bench is up and running.
The first night i fought leak after leak in my lines. First in the reservoir lid, all the way down the lines.
Then my cell was surging, on its gas release, telling me a gasket has gone awry inside. This pulsing of the gasses made my O2 ball flow gauge bounce horribly. Once my temps were up to 115 degrees, I ran the 500ml bottle test and came up with only a 1.06mmw.
So somethings isn't right with the cell Ill have to look more into it, by cracking it back open and verifying everything.
    So this isnt inspring results, I know. But i would have thought a much better flow rate, but too many variables were left out, like the strength of the electrolyte wasnt known, leaks, and the cell misbehaving. The internally manifolded system utilizes gaskets to channel the flow of fluid and gos, while keeping the plates perfectly separated at 1/8". Its probably my fault, as I was in a hurry to get the thing together, rather than nit pick every detail.
I wont make the same mistake next time.
The 96 cavalier surge tank had its own problems... Namely the filler cap has flat spots on two sides, I imagine it was designed to release gas, not contain it. So I may have to modify it, or buy a new one.

Once my temps were up to 115 degrees

What bulk of liquid are you using and how long did it take to get to that temperature?

It looks like too much of your electricity ends up as heat and the voltage across each cell is not good.

Oh and by the way, the volt/amp meter wasnt right. I wasnt producing bubbles at .2 amps. After the video I connected it through the meter and found I was running about 8amps. Once the leaks are fixed, I should be on my way to a decent generator for my home heater.