Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1270716 times)

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3000 on: April 19, 2015, 08:48:22 PM »
No, sarkeizen. My position is unchanged.
"Perhaps you can, when you feel a bit better correct your position and be a bit more reasonable in the future?" My more important matter is dealing with the imminent loss of my last remaining brother.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3001 on: April 19, 2015, 09:35:09 PM »
No, sarkeizen. My position is unchanged.
Why?

Do you...

i) Not acknowledge that there are other senses of the same term? You sure seemed to imply that you acknowledge their existence when you said "you did not say that it 'may refer to' but 'is'"  or were you in error for bringing that up?
ii) Acknowledge there exist other senses but my use is not one of them?
iii) Acknowledge that my use is legitimate but demand I supply phrasing like "may refer to" or some other secret password to make it acceptable to you?
iv) Acknowledge that my use is legitimate and valid on it's own but is sufficiently ambiguous to have caused you enough confusion to be unable to understand what I was saying?

...or what exactly?

Notice how your claim that this was all about 'crystal clarity' sounds pretty hollow when you're unwilling to explain your objection in any useful way. :)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3002 on: April 19, 2015, 09:52:13 PM »
Sarkeizen'So it's constantly getting slower then the more bits you add'

A large quenco or a small quenco takes the same time to compute:instantaneous.two quencos or more quencos can begin to form a brain yes,if we shove them in certain arrangements on an electronics board

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3003 on: April 19, 2015, 10:03:42 PM »
A large quenco or a small quenco takes the same time to compute:instantaneous.two quencos or more quencos can begin to form a brain yes,if we shove them in certain arrangements on an electronics board
But that would mean that the sorting time doesn't change regardless of your input size.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3004 on: April 19, 2015, 10:15:41 PM »
Sarkeizen:'But that would mean that the sorting time doesn't change regardless of your input size.'

What do you mean

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3005 on: April 19, 2015, 10:31:52 PM »
Sarkeizen:'But that would mean that the sorting time doesn't change regardless of your input size.'

What do you mean
That no matter how many things you want to sort. It never takes more time.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3006 on: April 19, 2015, 11:11:06 PM »
Sarkeizen:'That no matter how many things you want to sort. It never takes more time.'

Wellll...you can sort a billion molecules/particles instantaneously or you can sort forty-five molecules/particles instantaneously yes.takes the same time yes,aslong they're each contained in one demon

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3007 on: April 19, 2015, 11:31:54 PM »
No, sarkeizen. My position is unchanged.
"Perhaps you can, when you feel a bit better correct your position and be a bit more reasonable in the future?" My more important matter is dealing with the imminent loss of my last remaining brother.
I am sorry to hear that. 

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3008 on: April 20, 2015, 12:21:48 AM »
Mark E'I am sorry to hear that.'

Ditto yes

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3009 on: April 20, 2015, 01:48:21 AM »
Wellll...you can sort a billion molecules/particles instantaneously or you can sort forty-five molecules/particles instantaneously yes.takes the same time yes
What you describe is O(1) complexity.  BBBV proves that you can't - with any quantum effect do better than O(N^1/2).  So Philip's device doesn't work. :)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3010 on: April 20, 2015, 08:17:43 AM »
Sarkeizen:'What you describe is O(1) complexity.'

Are you sure it is.an edward scissorhands.a scissor-switch > forward react>two ways sort> backward react> two ways sort.both ways spontaneous,downhill.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3011 on: April 20, 2015, 08:36:38 AM »
 demon-on > particles jump down a level the quantum/particles move to the right in the non-quantum.switchoff>particles jumpup a level in the quantum>particles move to the left in the non-quantum

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3012 on: April 20, 2015, 08:54:34 AM »
The above applies to epicatalysis let me just think about quenco for a second..

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3013 on: April 20, 2015, 11:11:24 AM »
Quantumdown/particles random.quantumup/particles ordered same thing for quenco.we can simplify: on/quantumdown.off/quantumup.the quantum drive to entropy is stronger than the kinetic drive to entropy but the sun undrives it each time due to loss of further disproportional heat into space,due to heavy leverage.no heat no heat-demon.the toilet thingy must fillup before you can flush it

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #3014 on: April 20, 2015, 11:31:06 AM »
I might add: one reason why a quenco is able to work is because of an electron's kinetic particle/wave duality.if it was a strictly a wave then quenco could not work.