Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow  (Read 12026 times)

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« on: September 23, 2011, 12:18:48 AM »
Yes they have done it in the collider,who says the laws of physics can't be beaten  ;D :D :) ;)
faster than the speed of light
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
Quote
The team measured the travel times of neutrino bunches some 15,000 times, and have reached a level of statistical significance that in scientific circles would count as a formal discovery.

Wow

blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2011, 12:46:21 AM »
Einstein was wrong.


Justsomeguy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2011, 03:01:11 AM »
Remember - time is relative. How can you use time to prove or disprove a constant? If it ever was a constant.

NerzhDishual

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
    • FreeNRG.info
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2011, 04:02:54 AM »
Hi OU dot com guys,

Eric Dollard demonstrated, a lot of years ago, that, actually, faster than light is possible.
Einstein was wrong. You bet he was.

The Justsomeguy's opinions are also relatives.
IMHO, they are relative to his stupidity

Very Best.

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2011, 04:25:38 AM »
sorry, it is not a 'fact' yet, don't jump the gun so early unless you want to become the fool and just don't care.

NerzhDishual

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
    • FreeNRG.info
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2011, 05:11:46 AM »
It is not a fact?  It Is.
You could replicate this documented experiment.

I jumped the gun? I did.

I am the fool? Perhaps.
You? Just do not care? Let it be!

Et bien le bonjour chez vous monsieur je sais tout.

Liberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
    • DynamaticMotors
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2011, 05:24:19 AM »
Hi OU dot com guys,

Eric Dollard demonstrated, a lot of years ago, that, actually, faster than light is possible.
Einstein was wrong. You bet he was.  ...





Does anyone know what was used to accelerate the particle 45.4 miles?  Was it a series of  magnetic fields or an attractive charge force?  If so, I think I can imagine why it may have been clocked going faster than the speed of light.

Justsomeguy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2011, 06:59:45 AM »
Hi OU dot com guys,

Eric Dollard demonstrated, a lot of years ago, that, actually, faster than light is possible.
Einstein was wrong. You bet he was.

The Justsomeguy's opinions are also relatives.
IMHO, they are relative to his stupidity

Very Best.


Maybe you are ignorant of the fact that time is not constant. When measuring speed based on time and distance, shouldn't both be examined? Isn't the very result of this experiment supposed to prove the possibility of time travel or a warped dimension? Gee, imagine that. The distance travelled could be shorter. Time could be distorted. Or it could just be going faster. 

NerzhDishual

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
    • FreeNRG.info
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2011, 07:01:32 AM »

Please just Google vid question "Eric Dollard"
You could stumble upon:
Eric Dollard Peter Lindemann Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4m82cvThd8

You also could google ask:  Konstantin Meyl faster than light

Konstantin Meyl is a 'real' scientist.
JustSome... is just a real, what?.
Very Best


Justsomeguy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2011, 07:25:37 AM »
Joe Lykken of Fermilab said, “Special relativity only holds in flat space, so if there is a warped fifth dimension, it is possible that on other slices of it, the speed of light is different.”
John Learned, a neutrino astronomer at the University of Hawaii, said that if the results of the Opera researchers turned out to be true, it could be the first hint that neutrinos can take a shortcut through space, through extra dimensions.

National Institute of Technology researcher Chen-Wen Chou, who recently developed the world’s most precise clock.
...Chou’s latest development now allows scientists to study the effects of time dilation at much shorter, and more manageable, distances. In fact, Chou was able to study a second effect of time dilation – time relative to an object’s movement.

Justsomeguy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2011, 07:33:04 AM »
@NerzhDishual

 Why the need for a cheap shot? Did you not understand my original post. I have posted a few things to clarify it for you.

nul-points

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 995
    • Doc Ringwood's Free Energy blog
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2011, 05:35:12 PM »

Remember - time is relative. How can you use time to prove or disprove a constant? If it ever was a constant.

Einstein was confused - time is linear; it's the speed of light which is relative



@NerzhDishual

 Why the need for a cheap shot?

maybe ND was impressed by your recent request for suggestions how to "become disgustingly wealthy" from an OU discovery  ;)

Justsomeguy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2011, 07:36:53 PM »
You sir, Have a valid point.

albert

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2011, 09:08:44 PM »
How. Do you synchronize two clocks 700 kms apart with sufficient precision to measure 60 billionth of a second? They did it by gps which means they encountered relativistic effects on the satellites. I think here is the rub on this experiment.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Faster than the speed of light, in Hadron collider, Wow
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2011, 10:28:01 PM »
Here is a quote from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-particles-neutrinos?newsfeed=true

"It is a concept that forms a cornerstone of our understanding of the universe and the concept of time – nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

But now it seems that researchers working in one of the world's largest physics laboratories, under a mountain in central Italy, have recorded particles travelling at a speed that is supposedly forbidden by Einstein's theory of special relativity.

Scientists at the Gran Sasso facility will unveil evidence on Friday that raises the troubling possibility of a way to send information back in time, blurring the line between past and present and wreaking havoc with the fundamental principle of cause and effect.

They will announce the result at a special seminar at Cern – the European particle physics laboratory – timed to coincide with the publication of a research paper (pdf) describing the experiment.

Researchers on the Opera (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus) experiment recorded the arrival times of ghostly subatomic particles called neutrinos sent from Cern on a 730km journey through the Earth to the Gran Sasso lab.

The trip would take a beam of light 2.4 milliseconds to complete, but after running the experiment for three years and timing the arrival of 15,000 neutrinos, the scientists discovered that the particles arrived at Gran Sasso sixty billionths of a second earlier, with an error margin of plus or minus 10 billionths of a second.

The measurement amounts to the neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light by a fraction of 20 parts per million. Since the speed of light is 299,792,458 metres per second, the neutrinos were evidently travelling at 299,798,454 metres per second.

The result is so unlikely that even the research team is being cautious with its interpretation. Physicists said they would be sceptical of the finding until other laboratories confirmed the result.

Antonio Ereditato, coordinator of the Opera collaboration, told the Guardian: "We are very much astonished by this result, but a result is never a discovery until other people confirm it.

"When you get such a result you want to make sure you made no mistakes, that there are no nasty things going on you didn't think of. We spent months and months doing checks and we have not been able to find any errors.

"If there is a problem, it must be a tough, nasty effect, because trivial things we are clever enough to rule out."

The Opera group said it hoped the physics community would scrutinise the result and help uncover any flaws in the measurement, or verify it with their own experiments.

Subir Sarkar, head of particle theory at Oxford University, said: "If this is proved to be true it would be a massive, massive event. It is something nobody was expecting.

"The constancy of the speed of light essentially underpins our understanding of space and time and causality, which is the fact that cause comes before effect."

The key point underlying causality is that the laws of physics as we know them dictate that information cannot be communicated faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, added Sarkar.

"Cause cannot come after effect and that is absolutely fundamental to our construction of the physical universe. If we do not have causality, we are buggered."

The Opera experiment detects neutrinos as they strike 150,000 "bricks" of photographic emulsion films interleaved with lead plates. The detector weighs a total of 1300 tonnes.

Despite the marginal increase on the speed of light observed by Ereditato's team, the result is intriguing because its statistical significance, the measure by which particle physics discoveries stand and fall, is so strong.

Physicists can claim a discovery if the chances of their result being a fluke of statistics are greater than five standard deviations, or less than one in a few million. The Gran Sasso team's result is six standard deviations.

Ereditato said the team would not claim a discovery because the result was so radical. "Whenever you touch something so fundamental, you have to be much more prudent," he said.

Alan Kostelecky, an expert in the possibility of faster-than-light processes at Indiana University, said that while physicists would await confirmation of the result, it was none the less exciting.

"It's such a dramatic result it would be difficult to accept without others replicating it, but there will be enormous interest in this," he told the Guardian.

One theory Kostelecky and his colleagues put forward in 1985 predicted that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light by interacting with an unknown field that lurks in the vacuum.

"With this kind of background, it is not necessarily the case that the limiting speed in nature is the speed of light," he said. "It might actually be the speed of neutrinos and light goes more slowly."

Neutrinos are mysterious particles. They have a minuscule mass, no electric charge, and pass through almost any material as though it was not there.

Kostelecky said that if the result was verified – a big if – it might pave the way to a grand theory that marries gravity with quantum mechanics, a puzzle that has defied physicists for nearly a century.

"If this is confirmed, this is the first evidence for a crack in the structure of physics as we know it that could provide a clue to constructing such a unified theory," Kostelecky said.

Heinrich Paes, a physicist at Dortmund University, has developed another theory that could explain the result. The neutrinos may be taking a shortcut through space-time, by travelling from Cern to Gran Sasso through extra dimensions. "That can make it look like a particle has gone faster than the speed of light when it hasn't," he said.

But Susan Cartwright, senior lecturer in particle astrophysics at Sheffield University, said: "Neutrino experimental results are not historically all that reliable, so the words 'don't hold your breath' do spring to mind when you hear very counter-intuitive results like this."

Teams at two experiments known as T2K in Japan and MINOS near Chicago in the US will now attempt to replicate the finding. The MINOS experiment saw hints of neutrinos moving at faster than the speed of light in 2007 but has yet to confirm them.

• This article was amended on 23 September 2011 to clarify the relevance of the speed of light to causality."