Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]   Go Down

Author Topic: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.  (Read 51371 times)

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #90 on: July 15, 2010, 01:47:43 PM »
Hello all,

@fritz

in the "end" is the heatsink muuuuuch hotter then the MOSFET.

If the MOSFET would have the same temperature as the heatsink, the MOSFET would melt.


Otto
Logged

nickc44

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #91 on: July 15, 2010, 02:53:19 PM »
Otto

How are you its been a long time hows the progress
I know your having a ball

Drop me a line when you get a chance

Nick
Logged

Jack Noskills

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #92 on: March 14, 2012, 01:54:43 PM »
I recently watched a video where De Palma was explaining his N-machine, homopolar generator. Magnets attached in copper disk and when disk is rotated you get electricity from the copper. Axle is one terminal and outer rim of disk is the other, this is the basic Faraday thingie. Then he said that it is not necessary to have the copper disk, it is enough to rotate the magnets and you can get electricity straight from the magnets. This implies that field of a magnet does not rotate with the magnet.
 
Some facts I have learned about SM TPU. It has a rotating magnetic field, so it is taken from Teslas trafo patent. In the video SM says that TPU needs a magnet to operate, does not work otherwise. SM also says that you need primary in different phase, to me this sounds that you need only one frequency to operate.
 
Now combine what De Palma has said with what SM has said, do you see the picture now ? Instead of rotating the magnet, magnet is stationary and you rotate magnetic field around the magnet instead. Magnet poles become your terminals. In order to get voltage, two magnets are combined together maybe using iron wire that is the core at the same time.
 
I think this is worthwhile to test. First of all, can you take electricity out from a magnet ? If true, how does this correlate to speed of field rotation ? Does core need to be aircore, iron or would higher permeability core make any difference ? How can you increase voltage if core is for example nanoperm or metglass ?
 
Tesla used iron, so maybe better to start with that. Also 1/4 L rule could be used, core is of length L and quadrants are of length L/4. Then sweep with signal generator for a sweet spot if any.
 
I am unable to test this, but I wanted to put the idea here since I haven't seen this approach mentioned anywhere. If someone has tried this then please post some links for results.
Logged

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #93 on: March 14, 2012, 06:52:17 PM »
Jack Noskills,  I think your points are good and I've also come across info recently that said there was success with just using one frequency rather than 3 frequencies but that one frequency needed to be 3 different phases. 
Logged

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #94 on: March 15, 2012, 02:40:28 AM »
Hey guys, the TPU does not need a magnet to operate.  It was smoke and mirrors for the investors.  Closed a reed switch to start the oscillations.  Also used to protect the controllerfrom the IM products messing the freqs.  It also had a small battery.


Cheers,

Bruce
Logged

gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #95 on: March 15, 2012, 05:07:45 AM »
Quote from: e2matrix on March 14, 2012, 06:52:17 PM
Jack Noskills,  I think your points are good and I've also come across info recently that said there was success with just using one frequency rather than 3 frequencies but that one frequency needed to be 3 different phases.


Well, 1 frequency and 3 phases is exactly what Bob Boyce's Hex Controller we reprogrammed to do in order to achieve the self-charging characteristics demonstrated in wacky1's 5 YouTube videos.  It's also what I've provided in the form of a non-micro-based, programmable digital controller to accomplish the same task ... almost ready to test.


More NEWS at 11:00.  Later,


Greg
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]   Go Up
« previous next »