@poynt99
No problem. It will take me a little while though to figure out all this web-cam software garbage. I have been needing to learn to do it anyway though, as the knowledge will come in handy later.
I will try to make as simple of setup as possible for demonstration and for simplicity of replication.
Concerning your question: the answer is simple. The problem is that you cannot ask the question if you do not want the answer.
The answer = $
No, I am not a conspiracy dude, but I also know the power of greed, both on an individual scale, as well as larger scales.
If $20 in your pocket can get you killed in the wrong neighborhood, of what surprise is the protection of billions of dollars of revenue per year........... It is stupid, senseless, sad, but unfortunately also true.
Who makes it to the top echelon of corporations? Is it not generally the most desirous of the position, whom was willing to do whatever it took to get there? (dog eat dog and all that rot) These are also the people whom are "protecting" their companies.
It is a common and well known occurrence in EE, but it is never stated as OU. Nothing ever is, or probably ever will be. OU is a bad term leaving a bad taste in too many mouths to ever be seriously accepted professionally.
In academia, professional reputations and many times research grant moneys dependent upon certain principles being true, are at stake.
In the business sector entire fortunes and even the necessity of existence for various corporations, let alone the fortunes of investors in these corporations, are at stake.
In the governmental sector, some volatile nations have a sole export being energy, and things like treaties come into play. Not to mention the fact that many of the politicians themselves may be heavily invested in energy corporations. So national security, vested interest, and economies are at stake.
Now consider again the fact that individuals can and do kill others every day for a lousy $20, and I ask why you are surprised that suppression (generally legal and NOT lethal) of technology happens on all fronts.
Why? Put a TPU or other OU device in every home in the world. Now what is affected? Simply stated, every person in the world can now live with free energy, and never pay heating, cooling, or energy bills ever again. Guess what, vehicles follow suit. As with all techs, over time comes miniaturization and improvement in technology. Coal, Gas, Oil, Commercial Electricity, and batteries, all become a glorious thing of the past.
You cannot charge for what is freely available, so the only ones making money off of energy are those making and selling TPU's.... Every other dime is gone.
MULTIPLE TRILLIONS of dollars are not spent on these items worldwide every year.... These trillions are making how many people money per year? How many people are now out of work, and even worse, who's job skills are completely obsolete? You do the math. Entire wars have been caused over Oil disputes.......
These level headed types have been known to throw themselves out of windows at 20 stories, because they lost their money. (Consider the stock crash leading to the great depression.)
Now, consider where the money comes from for research grants, school funding, etc, etc, etc, and consider how many areas of research now have no need for existence beyond , therefore no funding. ...... Consider how specialized training generally is now days. How many doctorates have just become either fools proven wrong, outdated, or outmoded. You already know the answer here.
No "conspiracy" need be involved, it is a simple matter of economics and history, not conspiracy.
It has always been the creed of detectives to "follow the money", as a first rule of thumb. It is true here. Most people just simply never think about it any deeper than "man I would love something like that", without considering any of the ramifications of quite literally anything other than the obvious.
I have one simple question for you concerning this level headed academia (which includes the colleges, professors, as well as all else connected). Why is it that the term "pseudoscience" applies to BRANCHES of chosen study, and not to experimental techniques used? What happens to scientists whom venture into the realms of pseudoscience? (Do you want a list....? I can think of many just off hand.)
So. You have this sinking feeling in your stomach. What I have said is obvious, and whats worse, simple and historically accurate. Worse, you can now probably think of many obvious things even beyond what I have stated, for this is anything but comprehensive, just a simple overview.
You asked, there it is. That is why the world, academia, and everyone is not screaming for this tech, and why it is discouraged, as well as any and every tech or physical principle like it.
@everyone else
No, I am not a government operative.
This is just a common sense evaluation of the problem.
Paul Andrulis
