Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The simplest free energy system ever overlooked  (Read 20584 times)

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: The simplest free energy system ever overlooked
« Reply #45 on: July 25, 2007, 07:48:35 AM »
But at 1.65 lbs ave lift for 33 feet = 54.45 ftlbs in 33 seconds  = 1.65 ftXlbs/seconds X 20 buckets = 33ftXlbs/seconds=44.7watts X 33 seconds  = 1476watt seconds or 161084.75 watthours Using their equations  

Where did you get 33 seconds from? Does hydrogen rise at 33ft/sec?

What about:

1.65lbs of lift x distance from shaft X 20 buckets = total constant torque

Then just add water resistance for total output to shaft.
I can simulate this concept in WM2D I think...

~Dingus Mungus

d3adp00l

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
Re: The simplest free energy system ever overlooked
« Reply #46 on: July 27, 2007, 04:06:40 AM »
Air rises in water about 1 ft per second, thats also the fastest you want to ascend from a dive, else nitrogen bubbles (the bends) and other problems. if you extend the arm on the bucket it would only make a difference on a radius, the bucket would still go up in a single direction. wm2d would be cool, I don't know its abilities. The only way I can understand ftxlbs to watthours, is if they used a hp to torque during time equation. honestly I don't think it works out well so lefts try to approach it from a different angle.