That makes 2 Idiot Dummies!!!

MileHigh quite obviously did not read my posts and true to your nature, Mouth and Brain are not working together! You Idiot!

No room for Dummies in the new world, how bout you both leave My Thread!

Go discuss who will be your next engineered Enemy! A Hint, try not to make it, each other!

You TOTAL Idiots!

Your thread my ass.  This entire thread is a continuation of a discussion that I initiated with you on YouTube.  Therefore this is my thread.  But it is completely infantile to argue about who "owns" a thread, isn't it?

You should STFU and let Tinman and the other contributors do their thing.  Put a hold on your nonsensical "partnered coils" bullshit and then feel free to resume churning after the Tinman discussion is over and resolved.

Your thread my ass.  This entire thread is a continuation of a discussion that I initiated with you on YouTube.  Therefore this is my thread.  But it is completely infantile to argue about who "owns" a thread, isn't it?

You should STFU and let Tinman and the other contributors do their thing.  Put a hold on your nonsensical "partnered coils" bullshit and then feel free to resume churning after the Tinman discussion is over and resolved.

WHOH WHOH WHOOHH.   It is my understanding that the person that starts a thread, then it is their thread. To say it is yours is absolute baloney.

And whoh number 2, this thread is about partnered coils. Not to belittle Tin in any way, but he is not using partnered coils.

So who are you to be delegating who can talk about what here?

Mags

Hahaha - Keep trying you IDIOT!!!!

MileHigh is obviously not an idiot so now we have yet another False Claim.

I have lost track...is this like 200 or 250 False Claims you have made now?  I will have to go back and count...but by then, you will have made more of them.  Geeze, this never ends.

Bill

PS:  We have all noted that you have not answered the question of how old you are so...now I am thinking 12 years old.
Does your Mom know that you post over here?

MileHigh is obviously not an idiot so now we have yet another False Claim.

I have lost track...is this like 200 or 250 False Claims you have made now?  I will have to go back and count...but by then, you will have made more of them.  Geeze, this never ends.

Bill

PS:  We have all noted that you have not answered the question of how old you are so...now I am thinking 12 years old.
Does your Mom know that you post over here?

Ah Yep, you both are!

Between you both, what have we got, Thought Experiments and Joule Thief Circuits...

Nothing new there Dofusses!

Even the Box Troll's did more that you two!

Hahaha - Keep trying you IDIOT!!!!

Well, you bragged a lot about your electronics prowess and knowledge about coils.  (10 years+ worth, wasn't it?)  I gave you a circuit that consisted of a voltage source and a single coil and you fell flat on your face and had a mini freakout when you could not answer a question about it.

I can't control you.  But the simple fact is that there was nothing going on on this thread for a while, and then Tinman got a lively and interesting discussion going on this very thread.  It's something that happens all the time.  Apparently, your screwed up ego can't handle that and you came back today to spam the discussion just like you spammed the discussion with the simple circuit that I showed a few weeks ago.  I assume that you wouldn't stand a chance with that circuit either.

Perhaps Tinman can simply create a new thread and you can indulge yourself in your nonsensical electronics fantasies and spam the same information over and over.  Hold your breath for Bill Alek, the magic scooter is just around the corner.

So, are you now Claiming that you did NOT have your scope set to AC Coupling when you did your tests?  If so, are you now also Claiming that you did not post that to test AC circuits, you Always have the AC Coupling on?  (I can easily go back and quote where you have said this at least once)

The video clearly shows that both channels were set to AC coupling.  It would be silly for him to claim that the scope was not set in the way that it indicated it was.

So, now, who is making the pathetic excuses?  I believe it is you Chris.

More False Claims and more excuses.

Tinman has done more here to show real experimental testing in just one of his videos than you have on this entire topic.

What does that say Chris?

Bill

PS  The really ironic part of this is, Tinman is getting suggestions and direction from the "Trolls" helping him with his tests.  You know, those trolls like MarkE, TK, .99, etc.  They actually appear to be working together to figure out what is happening over there on Tinman's bench.  All I can say is...Thank God for the Trolls.

The video clearly shows that both channels were set to AC coupling.  It would be silly for him to claim that the scope was not set in the way that it indicated it was.

Which is, as I have already proven many times, perfectly fine to use, if one eliminates the possible small measurement defects encountered!

your continued argument here is TOTAL RUBBISH MarkE!!!

you're full of crap and as helpful as a bag of bricks!

if only you understood the absolute basics of "Power Generation"