Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Open Source Vs. Patenting  (Read 2812 times)

ballz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Open Source Vs. Patenting
« on: March 20, 2010, 02:32:16 PM »
What you can do is:
Invent a f.e device. Patent it. BUT be fully transparant in the patent. Discribe everything. So people can fully and without hidden stuff replicate it completely.Problem is when you have a f.e machine and you do not patent it. Sombody will come around and claim the idea as theirs and do patent it and stop all progress on the thing. You can't do a thing because they have the patent, and are sitting on it. In that way a patent can become a worldwide available and free instuction manual for all.

__________________________
car accident lawyer
insurance
Logged

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Open Source Vs. Patenting
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2010, 07:07:52 PM »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »