Response from Wesley:
Skip all of the videos below , or watch it with caution. "
"""""""""And the Vasant Corporation is back. aerospace electronics engineer, George J. Bugh who is selling his book.. on spinwaves on ESR . link below… I have bought his book on amazon..
http://vasantcorporation.com/
George J. Bugh videos on spinwaves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkOuGRU8akA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjsL1zfmKvA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=craHcstJJZ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izlcZPUMkdA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDEtPGB13NM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEMFqOvViDg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge4Ni3ke2I8
[/font]
I went through that set of videos:
Unfortunately George J. Bugh is in science not recognized and has possibly reputation of renegade.
I have also another opinion, of very brilliant and very much traditional scientist I value so much.
He is skeptic, and good in what he is talking about.
He find these to be Pseudo-Scientific treatises .
Field of Physics 30 years ago, is not what is to be compared to of today times.
He has his “Eureka! Moment “ but his scientific jargon to make his day dreams only sound BRILLIANT , however is not real in minds of official science/
So the question would be who is wrong.
That might be very finely tuned “bull-shit” you risk falling down one, of these sad men’s “rabbit hole .And he might not even know about it.
He might be just a believer of what he says,
or he might be just on the verge of something, but there is no way for myself to make any sense of his lectures.
Personally I wish that he is right, but he did not deliver strong foundation to support it.
There is strong point of my friend scientist that: most new exciting theories that succeed are postulated by guys in their twenties, not their 70’s Planck Einstein, Bohr, Schrödinger,
Something of exceptional value for him and for me as well , is String Theory, Super Symmetry, Stephen Hawking’s work on Black Holes. Not guys that can’t grasp any idea from the last 100 years and re-discover discredited theories from the 19th century.
That is quote of my scientific colleague :
Electrons cannot be accurately defined in classical mechanics notions of Physics and are Quantum Mechanical objects which behave unlike classical physical objects (planets, etc.).
This "Person in question" doesn't seem to understand how electrons fill orbitals.
Iron's valence electrons exist in their 3d orbitals.
d orbitals contain 5 sub orbitals which progressively fill with unpaired electrons until the sixth electron occupies one of the half-filled 3d orbitals leaving 4 3d sub orbitals half-filled containing unbalanced non zero net spins (the four electrons do NOT pair up and balance their spin states even in their ground state).
His explanation of why crystallized iron is ferromagnetic is erroneous. (By the way, iron exists in many different allotropic states, depending on the surrounding temperature and pressure.
In some allotropic states Iron is Ferromagnetic (below its Curie point), BUT in other allotropic states (gamma iron=Austenite, or delta iron) Iron is not magnetic.
In fact due to the stabilizing coupling effect (which I've written about before) very small individual crystalline grains which are pressed together in an amorphous structure we recognize as metallic iron, if formed below their Curie point are already aligned magnetically.
The problem is each grain is oriented in a random direction and the collection of metallic grain's magnetic moment cancels out on a statistical basis unless they are aligned by an external magnetic field.
I do not deny any theory at all but As of today I might just not fully understand many things around me.
Any theory is just a model.
Based on that model we make science.
The more comfortable is the model the more chance it has to be applied to fundamental physic.
Model changes periodically but that takes another model to be able to replace the first one.
At the end we all must hold to any model that work for us.
The science might be wrong in many areas due to misunderstanding the phenomena or political agenda of some of entities .
and that is to be find out yet.
Wesley
