The primary signal generator unit the Lietunov patent is talking about -I guess- is the high voltage generator (producing ozone), the secondary signal generator unit then is the 50Hz inverter. Since I can't spot any high voltage generator in the Stepanov transformer setup, I would say, there are basically two different principles to run such devices, one principle works with an electrostatic field the other works with an electromagnetic field in order to influence the electrons.

Therefore time for some (weird) theories about moving electrons.

The primary coil of a transformer is connected to mains. The primary coil generates a magnetic field in the core of that transformer, this magnetic field then generates a voltage in the secondary coil. That means the magnetic field moves the electrons in the wire of the secondary coil back and forth, therefore an AC voltage appears across the two endings of the secondary coil. So far so simple, but:

1) The lamp is lit when connected directly to the secondary coil.

2) The lamp is also lit when connected to the secondary coil via two (very) long wires. That means the electrons in these wires are moved back and forth (negative end is surplus of electrons, positive end is lack of electrons) although these wires are not directly influenced by the magnetic field of the transformer (even when the lamp is not connected).

3) One of the wires is connected to a (very) large massive copper ball (envision a diameter of a few meters). The lamp is lit when connected anywhere to the surface of this copper ball. That means the electrons in the transformer coil -moved back and forth by the magnetic field of the transformer's core- are able to move all the electrons in that huge copper ball without any effort, otherwise there would be no electric potential between any point of the surface of that copper ball and the second wire.

4) One of the wires is connected to Earth. The lamp is lit when connected anywhere to the surface of the Earth (although more depending on voltage and resistance). What does that mean? Does that mean (without a lamp connected, no current, only voltage) that this little transformer is able to influence (attract and repel) all the electrons located in the entire Earth like the electrons in the copper ball? Isn't that a very queer notion? Or shall we rather call it a paradox?

Could it be that something is wrong here?

One more weird thing (or paradox) about electrons: Two equal batteries are connected in series (without load). Hence, the positive pole of one battery (lack of electrons) is connected to the negative pole of the other battery (surplus of electrons). So what is the condition of the connected positive and negative poles? Is there now a lack or a surplus of electrons? If there is neither a lack nor a surplus (but rather an equilibrium) while the battery poles are connected to each other then how does this change occur? There is no compensation current flowing in the moment of contact, neither between nor within the two batteries. Curious, isn't it?

Now that we know that electricity can obviously act in a very paradoxical manner, we should look for that one paradox that can provide us with free electricity.

Apropos ozone: I think there was a Tesla patent called »Apparatus for producing ozone«. But maybe that's just a coincidence.

Another trafo anomaly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOhNtRhJ5Rw


Explanations welcome.

fabrice andre
final




00

hello to all !
I'm lost here in all schematic, as I know there is a few typ of construction an all we ''call'' capanadge, can you please someone of us tell me what is the best scheme for first kapange coil ?? I know there is The Donald L. Smith Device, original kapanadze device, SR 193, dally kapagen device....
I will tray to build it, anyone can help with best typ of device??

regards

Для начала думаю луще делать маленькую Пантюхова или Степанова установку. СР и Капанадзе так и не известно или дал схемы, поэтому больше путаницы от них может чем пользы. Можно делать и Смита установку. Если знания в электронике слабые, тогда надо выберать что-то попроще, Смита например или усилитель мощьности Степанова на 50 герц. А если крепкие тогда Далли установку можно. Но чтоб не потратить много денег, наверное, луще что-то маленькое делать.
Baisycly I think is best is Dally divice build, because it have almost all information how build. Kapanadze and SR we not have schematic, we not know or it is Kapanadze schematic one schematic...
Я всё хотел полегче зделать и не делал Далли установку, если бы её с начала начал делать, то может бы уже зделал, а то навсякие неофициальные безделушки отвлекался... Или Смита установку делать ,но там нужны большие конденсаторы, ёмкие, дорогие, от чего я и не стал её делать.
Вот такую можно попробовать, но тоже 100 киловольт диоды нужны http://i1108.photobucket.com/albums/h404/soundiceuk/Tesla/Don20Smith20True20Schematic-2b.jpg которые, наверное, очень дорогие. А так нет установки, которая рабочая у меня или у других многих, надо быть готовым, что очень большая вероятность, что не получишь свободной энергии.
Можно даже сказать, что я не знаю, какая самая лущая установка, тут от везения зависит или получиться тебе получить свободную энергию.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kO8aMm9uW8


Wesley

If I see this correctly, when the spark is intensified then there are more electrons jumping the spark gap. Therefore the diode somehow provides the high voltage circuit with additional electrons. The question is whether the energy for the intensified spark is coming from the power supply or from the environment, so we can call it free energy.

The real puzzling thing about moving electrons within a wire is this: A coil is connected to a load (or short-circuited). When a magnet is moved through that coil a current of electrons starts to flow in that wire. While the electrons are moving they must overcome a resistance within the atomic structure of the metal, so the wire gets hot (or the filament of a connected incandescent lamp). Now the load is removed from the coil. When a magnet is moved through that unconnected coil the electrons in that coil's wire are moved towards one end of the wire, so there is a surplus of electrons on one end and a lack of electrons on the other end, otherwise there would be no voltage across the two endings of that wire. But strangely in this case the electrons in the wire do not encounter any resistance in the wire while moving from one end to the other. How can that be?

Does this imply that pure voltage is free because we can move all electrons of the world around without any effort as long as the electric circuit is not closed (no circulating current)?

On the other hand how can it be that the closing of an electric circuit changes the movement of the electrons within the wire from frictionless to friction? Interesting mystery!

But maybe our conception of moving electrons in a wire is completely wrong.

I have a problem seeing your concept. First the main catch is that current never dies flowing through resistance according to Ohm law, which is kind of suprising effect. In reality resistance cause only a "voltage drop". I could agree about surplus of electrons in this old Aaron experiment but how they flow through the diode ?

Another trafo anomaly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOhNtRhJ5Rw


Explanations welcome.

Dear a.king21.

Just spent the last hour or so with this one. Now apart from possibly ruining several HV diodes?? I would say "Myth busted"!! Has anyone else tried?

I used an old 12V Motorcycle coil and tried with various capacitor values. "Weedy" spark, I saw no enhancement!! The latteral thought was to use a 12 to 240 V transformer and see what happened? Also nothing. So back to the drawing board??

Cheers Grum.

Evening Grum,

If your spark plug has an integral resistor, this may be the problem.

Evening Hoppy.

Spark plug? We HV men play with bare wires!!

Seriously though, If I must!!?? I just created a gap between HT lead and the coil's metal core frame. I don't know if the coils turns ratio is different, they are after all a little smaller but I thought the effect would be seen? Perhaps, as it is such an easy experiment to create maybe another member might like to see?

Regards, Grum.