Author Topic: Building a UFO (Read 27127 times)

TinselKoala · « **Reply #30 on:** February 03, 2009, 07:56:40 PM »

Quote from: plato on February 03, 2009, 06:46:14 PM

TinselKoala, do you care to elaborate on what may be missing?

The basic idea behind its power generator is Helium3 fuel production(See Arata Cold fusion). There is a waveguide in the variable magnetron which guides the microwaves to a fixed point at the center. In this space is a solution of mainly sulfur, nickel, and deuterium (Same elements in the liquid-plasma sun model). Here is the process in a nutshell:

1. Microwaves excite and heats sulfur under pressure. (Raising deuterium's boiling point is under work)
2. Sulfur heats and bonds with nickel metal
3. Nickel absorbs deuterium and transmutates it into He3 under proper heat and pressure
4. He3 is ionized thereby forming a miniature "sun".
5. Resulting ionized gasses are used to power magnetrons, electrogravitic shell and instrumentation.
6. Waste is expelled and distributed through small round channels in the hull.

Note: waste exhaust is toxic. I believe Stephen Michalak in the Falcon Lake UFO case was exposed and suffered its effects.

I intend to make a small experimental reactor model about the size of 2 cups when funding goes through. As for creating an entire craft, that would take a multi-million dollar budget. Deuterium and saphire crystals don't come cheap.

I was kidding you a bit. Sorry...but...
I obviously (or maybe not so obviously) believe, with some experimental support, that extremely high potential electric fields are key to UFO propulsion, and that is the direction of my researches. A propulsion and control system that consumes mass and ejects waste products will not, IMHO, be able to sustain itself in the inertialess flight regime that is necessary for radical maneuvering or trans-luminal velocities. Only by stressing space itself with EHV fields will we be able to manipulate the craft as needed. Like squeezing a pumpkin seed. Your electrogravitic shell will do the trick if it incorporates field shapers and polarizers. I made a little "joke" video for the LTLOT thread, but in it I show the functioning of such a polarization shaper.
It is possible that the mercury vortex engine of the Viimaanika Shastra may be a better choice of primary power plant, as it does not require ejection of waste products, as far as I can tell. But your "nano-fusion" plant is intriguing nevertheless...

(Here's the video showing the operation of the field polarizer. You may safely ignore the annotations and video description.)
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=f-aP7sk48jw

jadaro2600 · « **Reply #31 on:** February 14, 2009, 07:11:51 AM »

Kudos on your radiation spewing monstrosity. Anything involving deuterium and sulphur is out of the question for me to try and replicate.

Electrostatic propulsion is just as interesting.

@ Tinsel, will that ball still rotate when a lid is placed on the jar and there is negative pressure?

Halifax · « **Reply #32 on:** April 23, 2009, 01:45:20 AM »

I said in my first post that I would be unable to pursue the actual lab work without a place to do the work and that I hoped that I would be able to find space in which to do it when I got fully settled. It has come to the point in time where I begin settling.

It is time to open my UFO file again.

In three days I'll know whether I can truly pursue this in the capacity I initially planned. I will attempt at all times to utilize the scientific method. I will admit that I have not been trained in this. I will be keeping the Wikipedia page open as a reference while I do my work and analyse the outcomes.

My work will consist of the following:

1. Capacitors - symmetrical, assymetrical,
2. Gyroscopic/flywheel - counter rotating discs, spinning magnets (SEG/Roschin)
3.

I put up a website to chronical this effort in detail. It is http://001179.com

I will be posting here and there. More detail will be posted there as well as patents, related links, etc.

-Hal

PS - It's good to be back.

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #33 on:** April 23, 2009, 01:53:16 AM »

Quote from: jadaro2600 on February 14, 2009, 07:11:51 AM

Kudos on your radiation spewing monstrosity. Anything involving deuterium and sulphur is out of the question for me to try and replicate.

Electrostatic propulsion is just as interesting.

@ Tinsel, will that ball still rotate when a lid is placed on the jar and there is negative pressure?

Can someone please tell me how Deuterium and Sulfur can spew out radiation.

Hans von Lieven

plato · « **Reply #34 on:** May 07, 2009, 05:20:35 AM »

Quote from: hansvonlieven on April 23, 2009, 01:53:16 AM

Can someone please tell me how Deuterium and Sulfur can spew out radiation.

Hans von Lieven

The microwaves would quickly be absorbed by the water. There is no radiation concern.

FYI; I have eliminated the magnetron + clear vessel and moved on to a simpler design which is basically a thermite (mainly nickel + iron + sulfur mixture) reaction in a barrel of D2/water. The resulting gas will be measured for any helium through spectral analysis.

Success (presence of helium) mainly depends on the molten metal's ability to absorb and compact D2 atoms in its interstitial lattice. I suspect our sun (liquid-plasma sun model) works the same way and intend to validate with experimentation.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Building a UFO (Read 27127 times)

TinselKoala

Re: Building

jadaro2600

Re: Building a UFO

Halifax

Re: Building a UFO

hansvonlieven

Re: Building a UFO

plato

Re: Building a UFO