Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 ... 88   Go Down

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 830332 times)

sebosfato

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1170 on: April 02, 2009, 01:57:13 AM »
Quote from: dankie on April 02, 2009, 01:55:39 AM
Resonance is what anyways ? Efficiency ?

Dam right a low Q ...

Sorry i don't get it. I didn't understand what you mean.
Logged

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1171 on: April 02, 2009, 02:18:45 AM »
What happens when you have a transformer with great power transfer and 23k+ ohms on the secondary side ?
Logged

sebosfato

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1172 on: April 02, 2009, 02:22:08 AM »
Quote from: dankie on April 02, 2009, 02:18:45 AM
What happens when you have a transformer with great power transfer and 23k+ ohms on the secondary side ?


I'm not sure You have a very high impedance.? ???
You have low Q and high bandwidth lower voltage magnification. On the other hand you could have maybe an phase angle shift? is that correct?
What happens?
« Last Edit: April 02, 2009, 04:37:22 AM by sebosfato »
Logged

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1173 on: April 02, 2009, 07:57:29 PM »
We were talking about efficiency , there is nothing more to what I said ... You seem a bit "too fast" lol , I tought you had it all figured out with your 50k "catalyst" ??

If you look @ the wire AWG called for you realize where the voltage comes from ,but also it is a fast coil , can operate past the 200 Khz mark . The coil is also very strong and possibly dangerous for your health  , must be worked at @ a distance or put in somekind of box .
Logged

eddecomm

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1174 on: April 04, 2009, 05:40:35 AM »
To those who is still skeptical on this technology, keep it up. Hope it will lead u to end of the road.
And those who still working effortlessly on this project pls continue. See u at the top.
I've got mine working already.
Cheers to Mr.Ravi and all those contributed.
Thank you very much from the bottom of my heart. :o
Logged

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1175 on: April 04, 2009, 04:46:11 PM »
Quote from: eddecomm on April 04, 2009, 05:40:35 AM
To those who is still skeptical on this technology, keep it up. Hope it will lead u to end of the road.
And those who still working effortlessly on this project pls continue. See u at the top.
I've got mine working already.
Cheers to Mr.Ravi and all those contributed.
Thank you very much from the bottom of my heart. :o

You got the unworkable ravi disinfo design to work ?

I'm surprised that you did since its impossible to make it work ... Also , the Dave Lawton's circuit is a piece of disinfo trash by the CIA .

You can say that neither Dave Lawton's or Ravi has contributed anything , more harm than good .

Its we the people are making a contribution.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2009, 03:24:24 AM by dankie »
Logged

sebosfato

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1176 on: April 05, 2009, 03:05:16 PM »
About what happens i tried to find about, ad impedance can be used for lowering the damping factor is  it right ? this way it should become undamped?
how about the stray capacitance increase?

Do you know induction heating?  Is an rlc circuit. Someone can maybe post a easy diagram with part list ? 8)

Logged

TheCell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1177 on: April 05, 2009, 05:43:30 PM »
@dankie

you have been payed for saying that.
Logged

kinesisfilms

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1178 on: April 05, 2009, 10:26:44 PM »
i will agree that the ravi method is a dead end destruction of your steel tubes.....that "coating" is the depletion of your stainless steel tubes.....you will eventually destroy them and have to by new ones...sa for lawton's circuit being disinfo.....that is DISINFO.....lawtons circuit is not creaed by the cia lawtons circuit can work and be used but you will first need a frequency generator with sweeping.....and once a resonant frequency is found then you can use a lawton circuit at the exact frequency.....lawton circuits work but are a HUGE pain in the ass.

ravi's coating is A DEAD END.

it is not disinfo that was created by the governemt it's just simple wrong information....dynodon has seen stan's cell and has stated that there was no coating on it whatsoever.
Logged

CrazyEwok

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1179 on: April 06, 2009, 06:48:06 AM »
unfortunately a lot of people are willing to sacrifice $150 every 12 months to replace their tubes... Its just maintenance... i can't see you finding something that won't break down at all that is still reasonably priced... Dead is not the word i would use... More an aspect of a working system that has room for improvement. I don't know about you guys but if i can re-capture some of the power used after the electron chamber (re-coup some "waste" power) that would be nice... If your biggest gripe with the ravzzi method is that you need to replace the tubes because they breakdown, even if it happens every 6 months thats still cheaper, cleaner and all round better than petrol!!!
Logged

kinesisfilms

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1180 on: April 06, 2009, 06:59:58 AM »
it may be cheaper and cleaner....that is a good point.....but will we throw away the old tubes into landfills.....or will they be recycled?.....still another tiresome bubble-gum and bandade solution to a real problem......stanley meyer's method of potnetial difference would destroy the ss tubes after 10,000 years......now that is A SOLUTION.....compare that to ravi and you have the real answer.

just get ready.....this may be the year we have all been waiting for.
Logged

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1181 on: April 06, 2009, 07:43:54 PM »
Quote from: CrazyEwok on April 06, 2009, 06:48:06 AM
unfortunately a lot of people are willing to sacrifice $150 every 12 months to replace their tubes... Its just maintenance... i can't see you finding something that won't break down at all that is still reasonably priced... Dead is not the word i would use... More an aspect of a working system that has room for improvement. I don't know about you guys but if i can re-capture some of the power used after the electron chamber (re-coup some "waste" power) that would be nice... If your biggest gripe with the ravzzi method is that you need to replace the tubes because they breakdown, even if it happens every 6 months thats still cheaper, cleaner and all round better than petrol!!!

It was done with bare tubes , end of story , ravi is a fraud and a failure , nobody ever did a decent job @ replicating Meyers ( maybe a few forgotten peole ) , everybody who cheered on and went on with this silly project , you should be a shame of yourself , you shameful little idiot for brains , panacea should be ASHAMED !!!!

You got rick-rolled , you got social-engineered , your brain was dazzled by a youtube video , just like you always do... This message goes to almost every member on this site , 95%

These people are sheeple hearder , they control you by "personality" and "youtube videos" since your research is based on "opinions" and "youtube videos" .

So now we must move on to better things , and screw this site .

Logged

CrazyEwok

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1182 on: April 07, 2009, 07:05:56 AM »
So Dankie... finally given up on selling your wire on this forum and trying to go out with a bang huh??? Or burning as many bridges as you can huh... Well good luck to you and your "team" on your injectors... bye bye now... And to everyone else HI AND WELCOME BACK!!! as we were saying disposable tubes wouldn't be a bad thing depending on lifetime... any thoughts as to this?
Logged

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1183 on: April 07, 2009, 02:22:19 PM »
His wire is a golden opportunity, that he tried to sell it is because it costed a shitload of $$.
Too bad nobody sees this.
Logged

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #1184 on: April 08, 2009, 01:37:00 AM »
My wire ? What about my wire ? If Stan calls for a coil made with cow intestins than I'll do just that . And yeah ... I was right about the VIC , it was like I said It was , you mofo's and sisinfo's will only get crushed by me , I operate on this shit like a fuckin detective , nobody ever impressed me , nobody . I'm no fuckin "believer" . Now gfto , I am taking this thread for a ride . Ravi who ?? I killed Ravi .



Btw , the owner of Stan's buggy has decided to sell Stan's wire , I cant compete vs the original sorry , I am no longer a wire seller .

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1281
« Last Edit: April 08, 2009, 02:29:22 AM by dankie »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 ... 88   Go Up
« previous next »