Mechanical resonance (Projects unlike forums hacks Tinman and Magluvin)

[Magluvin]

OK.

I have two 12 oz. beers here and one 24 oz beer also.  I just drank all of them.

What was the question again?

Bill

lol   yeah.  I can only have 1 maybe 2 beers these days.  Just stopped altogether some years ago. But I have an occasional here n there. 2 beers seems like 5 or 6 for me now.  Im 50yrs old. 

Read the post before the one you replied to.

Mags

[DR.WHO]

You have to use the logarithm of the number 9 in numerological terms to create a free energy set up in mechanical resonance ! Plug that tuning fork into a lap top audacity program and set up the harmonics in the 9 ... 

The more harmonics you set up the louder the sound gets with no increase in current after the 9th harmonic .. On my lap top I can have 5000 tracks in audacity how much free energy was you thinking off

Avoid limited physics ! you need fractal harmonics but you need them in the numerological codes of the 9 ... !!! Its that simple !!! 
   

[Magluvin]

Was that American beer, Bill?

"Also Brad did a 1 coil input vs 2 coils driving his resonance pendulum and was able to reduce his input with 2 coils to get the same output. So other than the speakers, he has confirmed the phenomenon in a different way where the output was electrical, not sound waves.
Thats my 2 silver dollars." Define 'output' units and measurement protocol.

He had a pickup coil driven by the vibrating magnet with a 5ohm resistor as the load measured with a scope. The numbers dont really matter if they were the same in both tests. It was either the  'Joule Thief 101'  thread or 'Mechanical Resonance(projects)' thread.  Not the Mechanical Resonance (Projects unlike forum hacks Tinman and Magluvin) as in, this thread.   

Mags

[Magluvin]

You have to use the logarithm of the number 9 in numerological terms to create a free energy set up in mechanical resonance ! Plug that tuning fork into a lap top audacity program and set up the harmonics in the 9 ... 

The more harmonics you set up the louder the sound gets with no increase in current after the 9th harmonic .. On my lap top I can have 5000 tracks in audacity how much free energy was you thinking off

Avoid limited physics ! you need fractal harmonics but you need them in the numerological codes of the 9 ... !!! Its that simple !!! 
 

Used to use Audacity a lot. probably is better these days. Can you upload a file to put in audacity to show what you are talking about?  What version of Audacity do you use?


Mags

[ARMCORTEX]

Haha, such spewing of bullshit.

Pendulum motion with speakers is a pure novelty brought to you by Magluvin and Tinman.

As are these wanna be claims by Dr. Who, clearly you are all unreachable, psychotic almost in your subbornness, not at all scientific approach.

See the image posted on the first page, that guy clearly introduced you to phenomenon of damping, you should go and study that.

The pendulum concept idea with speakers is a non-starter, show me to the huge builds that came before you?

Where exactly did you get this idea, or did you just pop it out of your ass?

Show me the youtube videos, that leads you to believe this is a valid approach.

[Pirate88179]

lol   yeah.  I can only have 1 maybe 2 beers these days.  Just stopped altogether some years ago. But I have an occasional here n there. 2 beers seems like 5 or 6 for me now.  Im 50yrs old. 

Read the post before the one you replied to.

Mags

It was indeed American beer and I am 58!  But I feel like 35...well...maybe some days...ha ha.

Bill

[Magluvin]

Haha, such spewing of bullshit.

Pendulum motion with speakers is a pure novelty brought to you by Magluvin and Tinman.

As are these wanna be claims by Dr. Who, clearly you are all unreachable, psychotic almost in your subbornness, not at all scientific approach.

See the image posted on the first page, that guy clearly introduced you to phenomenon of damping, you should go and study that.

The pendulum concept idea with speakers is a non-starter, show me to the huge builds that came before you?

Where exactly did you get this idea, or did you just pop it out of your ass?

Show me the youtube videos, that leads you to believe this is a valid approach.

Dude, show me your YT vids that show anything of value to anyone here.  You demand that we show you something, yet you make claims of having ideas that we dont know about. Sooo, your rules are for us to show you but you wont show us? What, are you here to push people to show ideas so you can steal them?? Get a grip dude.


Mags

[ARMCORTEX]

Alot of those are based on Bobby Premarajan, look it up dude.

Anyways. just so you know, Bobby did not get OU also.

This did not come out of my ass, some stuff I modify and itirate from.

I am here calculating my odds like everyone else, tyring to get ideas from other people...

You call this stealing? Boy, you dont know much about law dont you.

Google image it, youtube it.

Now your turn, show me the huge build video that came before you.

[Pirate88179]

Dude, show me your YT vids that show anything of value to anyone here.  You demand that we show you something, yet you make claims of having ideas that we dont know about. Sooo, your rules are for us to show you but you wont show us? What, are you here to push people to show ideas so you can steal them?? Get a grip dude.


Mags

Mags:

If he had a grip, he would not have started this topic.  No sane person would have.

Bill

[ARMCORTEX]

Mags:

If he had a grip, he would not have started this topic.  No sane person would have.

Bill

This, this forum must be cleansed and purified, by sanity.

And this thread achieves this.

My idea is based on the theory by Nasa, that if you slingshot a shuttle around a planet, and break at the best moment, the shuttle will gain overunity energy.

I am trying to get the essence of that box, via my own method, I have a theory for that box, I also read a few theories about flywheels.

My idea is a mix of all of these things wrapped in an idea, wich is why I am not sharing it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr67j71NSsQ

[Pirate88179]

This, this forum must be cleansed and purified, by sanity.

And this thread achieves this.

My idea is based on the theory by Nasa, that if you slingshot a shuttle around a planet, and break at the best moment, the shuttle will gain overunity energy.

I am trying to get the essence of that box, via my own method, I have a theory for that box, I also read a few theories about flywheels.

My idea is a mix of all of these things wrapped in an idea, wich is why I am not sharing it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr67j71NSsQ

If you are talking about what they did with the Voyager probe, and some others, then when they used the "slingshot" method, this preserved energy already input into the spacecraft by rocket boosters and helped the ship continue on its way around the solar system without needing any additional energy input.  The key work here is additional.  This was just an efficient way to maintain the flight of the spacecraft without loosing much energy.  It was NOT an Overunity ploy to gain energy.  Don't forget, voyager was already traveling over 25,000 mph when it left earth's orbit.  A lot of energy there.


Bill

[tinman]

 author=ARMCORTEX link=topic=16550.msg482470#msg482470 date=1461983294]

This, this forum must be cleansed and purified, by sanity.

Well that leaves you out

And this thread achieves this.

This thread is no longer your's--ma and Mags are taking over lol.

My idea is based on the theory by Nasa, that if you slingshot a shuttle around a planet, and break at the best moment, the shuttle will gain overunity energy.

And there you have a classic example of -!brain dead!
No idea at all of how things work.

I am trying to get the essence of that box, via my own method, I have a theory for that box, I also read a few theories about flywheels.

And bla bla bla.

My idea is a mix of all of these things wrapped in an idea, wich is why I am not sharing it.

Yes-please spare us the laughter.

Thought you were leaving?--hurry on then.


Brad

[ARMCORTEX]

Dont change the subject, show me the dam video that leads you to believe the speaker approach is a valid one.

As for me, to break or to pulse, goes with what I saw, it doesnt matter, its not 100% that, its just a stating point for something else.

[Pirate88179]

Bill
If a magnetic field can bend light,would this be considered a displacement force?

And yes,a magnet holding a piece of paper to your fridge is not doing work.


Brad

Can a magnetic field bend light?  We know that gravity does.  Hmmm....light is electro-magnetic radiation so, I would not be surprised if this is possible.  Would that be considered a displacement?  I would think so.

Bill

[Pirate88179]

Ummm,,

The slingshot does indeed add energy into the spacecraft,, that energy comes form the planet that is providing the assist,, the spacecraft speeds up and there is a very, very,, very very very,,, small deceleration of the doner planet.  This is I believe Conservation of Momentum.

What will be found with the flywheel "box", I am reasonably sure, will be a net zero exchange.

OK, well we agree that it is not overunity energy as claimed, which was my point.  Your explanation is probably correct...just like when an Astronaut pushes off from the side of the space shuttle...he moves away but, the shuttle also moves in the opposite direction a very, very, very tiny bit as per Newton.

Bill