Lol. This from the 'know it all'.  Ever think to look in the description of the video on YT?

The article provided no sources for the images.  If someone put them somewhere else that still doesn't put them in the article.  It also doesn't make up for how poorly researched the article was when it implies that the CDC denies these pictures exist.

Of course, no reply from you on the CDC link post.

The post with a list of ingredients?   What did you want to say about that?

You ever seen the teen pregnancy rates in the US in the last couple years?  Down in all 50 states. What, you think teens are just not that interested in having  these days? In all 50 states???

Actually live births per 1000 show rapid decline from 1991to 2005 followed by a slow decline.  So I'm not sure what your particular idiot idea is but if you're saying that HPV vaccination is somehow sterilizing teens then clearly it's not nearly as good as whatever was being used before the introduction of HPV.  So if depopulation is their game they aren't very good at it.

From now on, maybe you had better put up 'your' links to sources for what you say

As ever if you want a SPECIFIC reference I'm more than happy to oblige.  Just say: "You said X. Can I see a reference for X".  As long as X is a specific thing it works like magic.

The answer - in case you missed it:

See, you're wrong. The question I'm asking is clear and highly relevant to the topic at hand.  It only can be answered in one of three ways, so until you choose one of those - you have not answered it.
So please answer if your discernment is useless at finding a relationship between two (or more) variables.  Just a yes, no or I don't know will do. 

Your Desperate Proposal is merely an effort to
engage in Desperate Games in a purely Desperate
Attempt to bolster your Desperately Bruised Ego.

Desperately Useless.  You're struggling Desperately
to create an image of knowledgeable intellect and
are failing Miserably.

Could you use the word "desperate" a few more times in your next post?  LOL.

...
So please answer if your discernment is useless at finding a relationship between two (or more) variables.  Just a yes, no or I don't know will do. 
...

Discernment, as you already know, develops
its powers of 'vision' through life experiences.
Wisdom grows as discernment becomes refined
in its ability to detect the Lie which obscures Truth.
To uncover the gems of Truth which those deceived
by the Lie are not able to comprehend.

Thinking that Discernment can be evaluated by
means of a competitive game is a prime example
of the Folly of the Wisdom of Man as it is taught in
numerous Institutions of The Establishment.

True Discernment, which is not attached to the Lie,
comes from a Source which is not the Same Source
as the Lie itself.  Good vs. Evil.

Your sense of Desperation originates from the same
Source as the Source of the Lie.  You cannot rest
until you've proven to yourself that you are in some
way Superior to others; that your Cleverness is better
than theirs; that your Beliefs are the only right beliefs;
that your Idol of Worship is more powerful than any
other.

Aye, it is very sad indeed to see how Desperation leads
one to pursue the Comfort in the Lie.

The day will come, perhaps soon, where you will realize
that not all is well within the Matrix which presently feeds
your desires.  Then you'll have to make a very difficult
choice;  whether to continue on the present path or to
wander off in the direction of Truth.

A Deceived Mind is a terrible thing to behold.

Discernment, as you already know, develops its powers of 'vision' through life experiences. Wisdom grows as discernment becomes refined in its ability to detect the Lie which obscures Truth.

Seems like you say you can differentiate.  If someone gives you a bunch of datasets and labels them related, non-related.   Then either the label is correct or it's a lie.

...but I'm sure you have some excuse ready.  So let's hear what makes your discernment so useless.

Your sense of Desperation

Aye, it is very sad indeed to see how Desperation

Only a 2 on the "SeaMonkey is desperate scale".  Disappointing.

But you see you said...

Mind of Mush is not able to distinguish the Truth from the Lie

I think it's well within the critical thinking that you used to champion (until I cornered you into to going all dimes-store mystic) that you examine your abilities.  So now that you've confirmed that your discernment works in these cases.  It will be simple to set up the test...

Shall I post the datasets tomorrow?

...
Shall I post the datasets tomorrow?

As is always the case, you may do as you please.

Whether or not anyone takes note of what you
do is an entirely different matter.

Games intended to create an air of Superiority
for the advocate who exhibits symptoms of
Inferiority are generally not well received by
Adult audiences.

Let your Desperation be your Guide.

...and the affectation drops even more.

From the article, south east Asia malaria is on the verge to mutate

Let's see if I can phrase some of your text better: The article does not say "verge to mutate" anywhere.  Please say "from the article" when you are using a text from the article . Malaria is an infection by a protozoa.  There is already a variant which is resistant to artemisinin which is not a vaccine - it's a very specific anti-microbial and should only be used in conjunction with other therapies.  This resistance is not in Africa it's primarily in Cambodia.  However it has been detected in Myanmar - which is very close to India which is of high concern because of it's population density (421/sqkm).    Normally the medical conversation about artemisinin resistance centers around Africa because when drugs like chlorquinine became less useful - lots of people died in Africa.  This paper contends that India is a bigger risk than Africa because of a human allele which confers disease resistance.  However that is at the cost of being more likely to get sick later and that current attempts to contain resistant protozoa are not sufficient.  Artemisinin isn't the only drug but it is the more effective and most well-tolerated.

So this is not "human body is doing better than drugs in Africa".  African people are still being treated with artemisinin (and hopefully in concert with other drugs).  It's about being able to maintain a population density.  If you stop people taking artemisinin people will die at a higher rate lowering the overall population.  Eventually this will cause people to have less contact the r0 of the disease drops.  In concert with this will be anything nature can do to confer resistance - that is select for people who are more likely to be immune but that's by killing people who are not likely.   

All I have being saying

Dude you go off topic more than anyone I've ever met.  Hence you lose the right to say "all I have been saying".

is that prevention is the ONLY KEY/CURE!

Having spent some time in Africa in malaria affect I can tell you that people do use preventive methods - in fact for non-natives the most common preventative action is to take drugs.  For natives it's neither feasible to take the same medication that visitors do neither can they spend the whole day in a spacesuit.  The current infection rate is the result of prevention being insufficient to maintain the population

You kind of believe that ignoring the prevention is NOTHING and vaccinations is the EVERYTHING.

Something I've never said.  Even though you have stupidly claimed it many times. 

The only purpose of vaccinations exist is as a last resort.

Again as we learned in the recent ebola outbreak preventative measures are insufficient even when people are well equipped, highly-educated and have a lot to lose.  Most vaccines reduce the r0 by more than half.  Hence most vaccines are superior to preventative measures. 

The 100% cure to the known virus is prevention!

...and earlier you said that no preventative measure is 100% so you have contradicted yourself.  Congratulations.

You are stuck that vaccines ere the 100% cure! When it is 100% wrong.

They're not the cure, they are prevention and they harm almost nobody.  All evidence suggests that your way would create more corpses.  If that's what you want.  That's your business.

Viruses that get in to the body will never leave.

Not true.  A virus that can not replicate eventually discorporates.

The carrier, even thought immune, will always carry the virus and will spread it around to others that their immune system have not fought the virus successfully.

Nope.  Serology of someone who has been infected tends only to show antigens.  If viruses exist they eventually die and you don't shed them because they can't replicate.   

a virus will mutate and the vaccine will become useless once the virus mutates in the future.

Primary method of mutation is replication error.  People who use Joel methods will likely replicate more viruses and therefore Joel methods create more mutations.

Prevention is the key not drugs.

Vaccines and other drugs are prevention. Let me know when you figure this out.