Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE (Read 2369308 times)

ignacio · « **Reply #1920 on:** December 03, 2014, 05:21:30 AM »

Quote from: Doug1 on December 02, 2014, 11:18:57 PM

Yes but the 6 diodes in an automotive alternator waste a lot to heat thats why the diodes are mounted to heat sinks and the alternator has a fan on the front. Even with that if the regulator over powers the field winding the diodes will cook and fail.

I like your drawing to.

Ese problema lo resolvieron Tesla, Clemente F., etc. Hace más de 100 años, sin transistores, triac, diac ni diodos,
Mucho material quemado en mi casa, je je. Soy torpe y chapuzas

This problem it did resolved Tesla, F. Clemente, etc. Does over 100 years without transistors, triac, diac or diodes,
Much material burnt in my house je je, I'm very clumsy and Tinker
Hasta pronto, certeza certeza certeza fe alegria y paz

Doug1 · « **Reply #1921 on:** December 03, 2014, 12:13:49 PM »

Ignacio
Look at how Tesla converts ac to dc without diodes, he has used motors but he also uses some designs that use a battery and an electromagnet and one of them is pair of transformers. The need for balance in the current is absolute from the ac input in order for the method to work.

ignacio · « **Reply #1922 on:** December 03, 2014, 08:05:41 PM »

And so it remains loaded the other wire, taking into account the ohm of electromagnets game, for it be feed. if the N = 4 ohm, R = 32 ohm, = for S

ignacio · « **Reply #1923 on:** December 07, 2014, 02:27:43 PM »

sigo con preguntas tontas, ¿tiene algo que ver el rozamiento electromagnético?
I'm with stupid questions, do you have anything to do with the electromagnetic friction?

hanon · « **Reply #1924 on:** December 08, 2014, 11:01:50 PM »

Have anyone read the patent US3879622 by John W. Ecklin?

Doug1 · « **Reply #1925 on:** December 09, 2014, 12:02:12 PM »

Hanon

No I cant say I have seen that one. The date on the patent was for 1974. That wasn't that long ago. The only problem I would see right off the bat is joule heating of the shields as they spin past between the perm magnets. Maybe that is lower in his configuration of NN facing poles, not sure. Permanent magnets might become demagnetized after a while using them that way also but it is interesting non the less. If you search Eklin on google and switch to images there are a lot of images so it has been tried a number of times. I dont have time this morning but I would be interested to see the patents he cited in the list of citations on his patent. Sometimes that method of researching yields more then the patent in question.
Are you still trying to find other situations of people using NN SS in other devices?

Cadman · « **Reply #1926 on:** December 09, 2014, 07:14:00 PM »

Ran across this from 1842. It looks like Hanon may be onto something with NN or SS after all.

Cadman · « **Reply #1927 on:** December 09, 2014, 10:28:39 PM »

Back on 11-25 Bajac made a post about about a patent dispute between Gaulard, Gibbs, and Ferranti. http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg424526/#msg424526

I did a lot of google searching that day for the transformer of Gaulard and Gibbs and found a photo of the device http://catalogue.museogalileo.it/object/GaulardGibbsSecondaryGenerator.html
I also found and bookmarked a patent that described the construction of this transformer or secondary generator. It was basically a stack of copper rings with a split from the center hole to the outside edge, separated by insulation.

Later, I read an article on the worlds most powerful electromagnet and noticed it was built exactly like the Gaulard and Gibbs device (with the addition of cooling slots and silver plating). They call it a Bitter electromagnet now.
Today I went to look up the Gaulard and Gibbs patent bookmark and it is gone. I checked my history for the google searches that led me to the patent and they are all gone too, no trace of them.

shadow119g · « **Reply #1928 on:** December 11, 2014, 07:57:57 PM »

Cadman,

Try this,
I can't figure out how to get a hyperlink?

Oh well

http://www.google.com/patents/US316354

Doug1 · « **Reply #1929 on:** December 12, 2014, 12:05:14 PM »

Cadman

Florida state university hosts one of the biggest platter magnets 45 T. I do not remember exactly what TV program it was that aired a segment on it "How it's made" or Discovery. It is worth watching just to watch the guy who assembles the plates. Takes about 6 months to do just one layer. The really big one is made of 5 layers of magnets with the last outer one around 4 or 5 ft diameter. No recording devices can survive being in the building when the largest one is fired up,lots of restrictions for safety reasons. Uses as much power as the entire town around it uses.I think they ended up building their own power plant to run the 45T. The cooling system is the bulk of the space taken up in the building to run it. The smaller versions where used to float frogs and other objects you may have seen pictures or videos of one time or another. I dont think your aiming for one of these monsters but they do give up a few construction details in the documentary. If you want to see it or use it you have to get on a list just to make an appointment and it's expensive.

ignacio · « **Reply #1930 on:** December 12, 2014, 08:43:37 PM »

Hace algún tiempo alguien menciono que querría decir CF, con la (y), y ahora con el rozamiento electromagnético, se me ocurre que con dos (doble T) una bobinada en un sentido y la otra en el otro, se podría aumentar o disminuir el rozamiento, y el N y S seria más efectivo. Solo es una idea.
Creo que con las medidas que di en su día, añadí que se consultara a alguien que trabajara en motores o bobinados.
Perenquen me dice que los estoy liando demasiado, que son demasiados datos sueltos. Disculpen.

Some time someone mentioned that would mean CF, with the (y), and now with the electromagnetic friction occurs to me that two (double T) a coiled in one direction and the other in the other, could increase or decrease ago friction, and the N and S would be more effective. It's just an idea.
I believe that the measures I gave at the time, added that consult someone working on motors or windings.
Canary Island wall gecko tells me that I'm messing too, that are too loose data. Sorry.

AVENGERS · « **Reply #1931 on:** December 13, 2014, 08:38:10 PM »

I need all of your help Please. The volts are not moving back and forth across the resister. I noted on the paper what the readings where, hope its not to blurry. Thank You for your help in the past. I didn't burn them & I have the BDX53C transistors hooked up correctly this time. The 555 area has 7 volts and the two 4017BCP's have near 12 volts as well as the 4081B. I didn't install the 10,000uf, 25V Capacitor as Anonymous didn't have it installed on his circuit.
Thanks Again, Hope you all do well.
AVENGERS

hanon · « **Reply #1932 on:** December 14, 2014, 07:23:29 PM »

A very important read

GUIDE TO BUCKING COILS, in hyiq.org.

I think that Figuera also used this principle.

Direct link to pdf file: http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

Link to webpage: http://www.hyiq.org/Updates/Update?Name=Update%2030-11-14

I attach here the current version of this document. Please have a look to this info!!

I have looked for synonyms of "buck": to oppose, resist, combat, go against, withstand, dispute, fight

AVENGERS · « **Reply #1933 on:** December 14, 2014, 09:52:24 PM »

hanon

Thank You. This is good stuff.

hanon · « **Reply #1934 on:** December 14, 2014, 11:46:29 PM »

Avengers,

I think you are referring in one of your previous post to the circuit included in Patrick Kelly book. I can only recommend you to check step by step each part with an oscilloscope. If not you can not detect if your circuit is fine or if it has a problem in any part (555, CD4017,...). Apart from that, it is imposible to guess which your problem is. I don´t have an oscilloscope and I feel really limited to test any kind of electronic circuit.

From your pictures I have seen you are testing a kind of configuration as the one included in Patrick Kelly book. I recommed you to test a different setup with all coils aligned: ---- ---- ----

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE (Read 2369308 times)

ignacio

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Doug1

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

ignacio

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

ignacio

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

hanon

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Doug1

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Cadman

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Cadman

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

shadow119g

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Doug1

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

ignacio

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

AVENGERS

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

hanon

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

AVENGERS

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

hanon

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE